Table Of Content

Index to Volume 7 1 is the Winter 1996/97 issue 2 is the Spring 1997 issue 3 is the Summer 1997 issue 4 is the Autumn 1997 issue AUTHORS Bryda, Lisa K., and Morris, Peter E. Emerging Adams, Kortney, and Gibson, Kathleen C. Technologies for In-Situ Groundwater Brownfields—A Status Report on Recent Devel- Remediation, No. 3, 109-126 opments, No. 3, 131-140 Buchanan, Ronald J., Ellis, David E., Shoemaker, Azadpour, Azadeh, Powell, Patricia D., and Stephen H., and Quinton, Gary E. A Method To Matthews, John. Use of Lignin Degrading Fungi Compare Groundwater Cleanup Technologies, in Bioremediation, No. 4, 25-49 No. 4, 7-16 Booth, Steven R., and Cummings, Mark. Remediation Cameron, Kirk. RCRA Leapfrog: How Statistics of Uranium-Contaminated Soil Using the Seg- Shape and in Turn Are Shaped by Regulatory mented Gate System and Containerized Vat Mandates, No. 1, 15—26 Leaching Techniques: A Cost-Effectiveness Study, Conger, Robert Mark, and Portier, Ralph J. No. 1, 1-14 Phytoremediation Experimentation with the Bradford, Mike, and Sadhukhan, Pasupati. Thermal Herbicide Bentazon, No. 2, 19-38 Treatment and Decontamination of Mercury- Cosentini, Chris, Ronning, Tedd, Larsen, Mark, and Contaminated Waste: Recent Development and Stroo, Hans. Natural Biodegradation of Wood Comparative Evaluation, No. 4, 17-24 Preservatives, No. 4, 77-93 Brown, James R., Myers, Vernon B., Parker, Susan Cummings, Mark, and Booth, Steven R. Remediation G., and Stewart, Robert. Rehabilitation of the of Uranium-Contaminated Soil Using the Seg- Chernoistochinskii Drinking Water System, mented Gate System and Containerized Vat Nizhnii Tagil, Russia, No. 2, 83-106 Leaching Techniques: A Cost-Effectiveness Study, Bryant, Christopher R. EPA Releases Latest Agency No. 1, 1-14 Hazardous Waste Compliance, No. 4, 105-107 Davis, John W., West, Jobert J., and Klecka, Gary M. Bryant, Christopher R. EPA Strives for “Parity” Enhanced Land Treatment of Petroleum-Con- between RCRA and CERCLA Programs, No. 1, taminated Soils Using Solid Peroxygen Materi- 119-121 als, No. 2, 67-82 Bryant, Christopher R. New Alternatives and Guid- Davis, Michael J., Janke, Robert J., and Folga, ance for Management of Materials Contami- Stephen. Unit Costs for Decontamination and nated with Cesium-137, No. 3, 127—129 Dismantlement of Structures, No. 2, 1-19 Bryant, Christopher R. Significant Regulatory Duran, David, and Odencrantz, Joseph E. Integra- Developments in CERCLA, No. 2, 141-145 tion of RBCA Frameworks and Remediation Bryda, Anthony P., and Bryda, Lisa K. Status and Technologies, No. 3, 97-108 Potential Future of Risk-Based Corrective Action Durham, Lisa, Williams, Gustavious, Robbat, Albert, (RBCA) at Contaminated Sites, No. 2, 147-157 Jr., Johnson, Robert, and Quinn, John. Adaptive Bryda, Lisa K., and Bryda, Anthony P. Status and Sampling and Analysis Programs for Contami- Potential Future of Risk-Based Corrective Action nated Soils, No. 3, 81-96 (RBCA) at Contaminated Sites, No. 2, 147—157 Dutta, Subijoy, and Robinson, Bonnie B. Best REMEDIATION/ AUTUMN 1997 INDEX TO VOLUM Manager ne s To Prevent Cross-Media Janke, RobertJ .,F olga, Stephen, and Davis, MichaelJ . Transfers d Cleanup, No. 2, 39-66 Unit Costs for Decontamination and Dismantle- Ellis, David I r, SteH.p, Qhuinteon,n Ga ry ment of Structures, No. 2, 1-19 E., and B mald J. A Method To Johnson, Robert, Quinn, John, Durham, Lisa, Will- Compare r Cleanup Technologies, iams, Gustavious, and Robbat, Albert,J r.A daptive No. 4, 7-1 Sampling and Analysis Programs for Contami- Elmore, Andr ind Vandeberg, Mark A. nated Soils, No. 3, 81-96 Using Unc« ysis To Reduce Costs at a Jones-Lee, Anne, and Lee, G. Fred. Hazardous Pump-and No. 3, 5-22 Chemical Site Remediation Through Capping: Folga, Stepher :ael J., and Janke, RobertJ . Problems with Long-Term Protection, No. 4, 51- Unit Costs amination and Dismantle- 57 ment of Str 2, 1-19 Kelly, Brian A. New Regulatory Structure Being Fox, Catherin« iperfund National Remedy Considered for Devices Containing Radioactivity, Review B« 141-144 No. 4, 95-103 Fox, Catherins lous Substance Research Kimzey, Doug. Primer on GRITS/STAT 5.0, No. 1, 47— Centers: Ar f Collaborators and New 86 Research | 2, 159-162 Klecka, Gary M., Davis, John W., and West, Jobert J. Fox, Catherin« Private Partnerships for Enhanced Land Treatment of Petroleum-Con- More Efte of Contaminated Sites, taminated Soils Using Solid Peroxygen Materials, No. 1, 129 No. 2, 67-82 Gabel, Andrew !-John, Moos, Lawrence, Larsen, Mark, Stroo, Hans, Cosentini, Chris, and and Yu, ‘ logical Risks and Cleanup Ronning, Tedd. Natural Biodegradation of Wood Costs: A Re ase Study, No. 3, 23-38 Preservatives, No. 4, 77-93 Gampel, Mind es on RCRA Corrective Lee, G. Fred, and Jones-Lee, Anne. Hazardous Action ¢ leral Facilities, No. 1, 87- Chemical Site Remediation Through Capping: 104 Problems with Long-Term Protection, No. 4, 51—- Gibbons, Robert g the RCRA Leapfrog, No. 57 1, 27—30 Lee, O. Lawrence, Haugse, A. Leonard, and Gibson, Kat! ind Adams, Kortney. Soundararajan, R. The Impact of High Level Brownfield Report on Recent Devel- Gamma Radiation on Immobilized Waste Forms opments, ! in Polymeric Matrices, No. 4, 59-76 Haugse, A. Le lararajan, R., and Lee, O. McCutcheon, Steven C., and Medina, Victor F. Lawrence t of High Level Gamma Phytoremediation: Modeling Removal of TNT and Radiation red Waste Forms in Poly- Its Breakdown Products, No. 1, 31—46 meric Mats S—/0 Matthews, John, Azadpour, Azadeh, and Powell, Henriksen, An Decision Analysis Ap- Patricia D. Use of Lignin Degrading Fungi in proaches ‘ hemical Analysis Method, Bioremediation, No. 4, 25—49 No. 3, 39-6: Medina, Victor F., and McCutcheon, Steven C. Hirschorn, Joe p Levels for Dioxin-Con- Phytoremediation: Modeling Removal of TNT and taminated $ 63-80 Its Breakdown Products, No. 1, 31-46 Hirschorn, Joe mental Deficits, No. 4, Moos, Lawrence, Yu, Charley, Gabel, Andrew D., and 1-6 Hong, Kou-John. Radiological Risks and Cleanup Hogan, Brian r, Jennifer P. The Trade- Costs: A Remediation Case Study, No. 3, 23-38 Off betwee nt and Cleanup Phases of Morris, Peter E., and Bryda, Lisa K. Emerging Remediatior No. 1, 105-118 Technologies for In-Situ Groundwater Hong, Kou-Joh awrence, Yu, Charley, and Remediation, No. 3, 109-126 Gabel, Andre ological Risks and Cleanup Myers, Vernon B., Parker, Susan G., Stewart, Robert, Costs: A Ret Case Study, No. 3, 23-38 and Brown, James R._ Rehabilitation of the REMEDIATION/ AUTUMN 1997 INDEX TO VOLUME 7 Chernoistochinskii Drinking Water System, Nizhnii Compare Groundwater Cleanup Technologies, Tagil, Russia, No. 2, 83-106 No. 4, 7-16 Odencrantz, Joseph E., and Duran, David. Integration Simon, John A. Eliminating Environmental Liabilities of RBCA Frameworks and Remediation Tech- by Transferring Ownership of Contaminated Prop- nologies, No. 3, 97-108 erties, No. 1, 123-128 Painter, Jennifer P., and Hogan, Brian J. The Trade- Simon, John A. Technical Aspects Affecting the Future Off between Assessment and Cleanup Phases of of the Remediation Industry, No. 4, 109-115 Remediation Projects, No. 1, 105-118 Smith, Tracy G., and Portier, Ralph J. A Risk Assess- Parker, Susan G., Stewart, Robert, Brown, James R., ment of Chlorinated Aliphatics in Bioremediated and Myers, Vernon B. Rehabilitation of the Soils, No. 2, 107-132 Chernoistochinskii Drinking Water System, Nizhnii Soundararajan, R., Lee, O. Lawrence, and Haugse, A. Tagil, Russia, No. 2, 83-106 Leonard. The Impact of High Level Gamma Portier, Ralph J., and Conger, Robert Mark. Radiation on Immobilized Waste Forms in Poly- Phytoremediation Experimentation with the Her- meric Matrices, No. 4, 59-76 bicide Bentazon, No. 2, 19-38 Stewart, Robert, Brown, James R., Myers, Vernon B.., Portier, Ralph J., and Smith, Tracy G. A Risk Assess- and Parker, Susan G. Rehabilitation of the ment of Chlorinated Aliphatics in Bioremediated Chernoistochinskii Drinking Water System, Nizhnii Soils, No. 2, 107-132 Tagil, Russia, No. 2, 83-106 Powell, Patricia D., Matthews, John, and Azadpour, Stroo, Hans, Cosentini, Chris, Ronning, Tedd, and Azadeh. Use of Lignin Degrading Fungi in Larsen, Mark. Natural Biodegradation of Wood Bioremediation, No. 4, 25—49 Preservatives, No. 4, 77-93 Quinn, John, Durham, Lisa, Williams, Gustavious, Vandeberg, Mark A., and Elmore, Andrew Curtis. Robbat, Albert, Jr., and Johnson, Robert. Adaptive Using Uncertainty Analysis To Reduce Costs at a Sampling and Analysis Programs for Contami- Pump-and-Treat Site, No. 3, 5—22 nated Soils, No. 3, 81-96 West, Jobert J., Klecka, Gary M., and Davis, John W. Quinton, Gary E., Buchanan, Ronald /J., Ellis, David E., Enhanced Land Treatment of Petroleum-Con- and Shoemaker, Stephen H. A Method To taminated Soils Using Solid Peroxygen Materials, Compare Groundwater Cleanup Technologies, No. 2, 67-82 No. 4, 7-16 Williams, Gustavious, Robbat, Albert, Jr., Johnson, Robbat, Albert, Jr., Johnson, Robert, Quinn, John, Robert, Quinn, John, and Durham, Lisa. Adaptive Durham, Lisa, and Williams, Gustavious. Adap- Sampling and Analysis Programs for Contami- tive Sampling and Analysis Programs for Contami- nated Soils, No. 3, 81-96 nated Soils, No. 3, 81-96 Yu, Charley, Gabel, Andrew D., Hong, Kou-John, and Robinson, Bonnie B., and Dutta, Subijoy. Best Moos, Lawrence. Radiological Risks and Cleanup Management Practices To Prevent Cross-Media Costs: A Remediation Case Study, No. 3, 23-38 Transfers during Soil Cleanup, No. 2, 39-66 Ronning, Tedd, Larsen, Mark, Stroo, Hans, and ASSESSMENT Cosentini, Chris. Natural Biodegradation of Wood The Trade-Off between Assessment and Cleanup Preservatives, No. 4, 77-93 Phases of Remediation Projects, Jennifer P. Sadhukhan, Pasupati, and Bradford, Mike. Thermal Painter and Brian J. Hogan, No. 1, 105-118 Treatment and Decontamination of Mercury-Con- taminated Waste: Recent Development and Com- BIOREMEDIATION parative Evaluation, No. 4, 17-24 A Risk Assessment of Chlorinated Aliphatics in Schaaf, Lesley-Anne. Environmental Legislative Ac- Bioremediated Soils, Tracy G. Smith and Ralph complishments: The 104th Congress in Review J. Portier, No. 2, 107-132 and a Look at What’s Ahead, No. 2, 133-140 Use of Lignin Degrading Fungi in Bioremediation, Shoemaker, Stephen H., Quinton, Gary E., Buchanan, Azadeh Azadpour, Patricia D. Powell, and John Ronald J., and Ellis, David E. A Method To Matthews, No. 4, 25—49 REMEDIATION/ AUTUMN 1997 INDEX TO VOLU) CHEMICAL SIT! MEDIATION DECONTAMINATION Hazardous Che temediation Through Cap- Unit Costs for Decontamination and Dismantlement ping: Prol Long-Term Protection, G. of Structures, Stephen Folga, MichaelJ .D avis, and Fred Lee a 1es-Lee, No. 4, 51-57 RobertJ . Janke, No. 2, 1-19 CLEANUP DISMANTLEMENT OF STRUCTURES Cleanup Level ontaminated Soils, Joel S. Unit Costs for Decontamination and Dismantlement Hirschor of Structures, Stephen Folga, MichaelJ .D avis, and Radiological anup Costs: A Remediation RobertJ .J anke, No. 2, 1-19 Case Stu Hong, Lawrence Moos, Charley Y ew D. Gabel, No. 3, 23-38 DRINKING WATER The Trade- Assessment and Cleanup Rehabilitation of the Chernoistochinskii Drinking Water Phases Projects, Jennifer P. Painter System, Nizhnii Tagil, Russia, James R. Brown, and Bria: 1, 105-118 Vernon B. Myers, Susan G. Parker, and Robert Stewart, No. 2, 83-106 CORRECTIVE A N COSTS Influences rective Action Costs for GROUNDWATER Nonfed« Mindy Gampel, No. 1, Emerging Technologies for In-Situ Groundwater 87-104 Remediation, Lisa K. Bryda and Peter E. Morris, No. 3, 109-126 COST EFFECTT' A Method To Compare Groundwater Cleanup Tech- Remediatior ntaminated Soil Using the nologies, Gary E. Quinton, RonaldJ . Buchanan, segment m and Containerized Vat David E. Ellis, and Stephen H. Shoemaker, No. 4, Leaching \ Cost-Effectiveness Study, 7-16 Mark ¢ Steven R. Booth, No. 1, Primer on GRITS/STAT 5.0, Doug Kimzey, No. 1, 1-14 47-86 COSTS LEGISLATION Environment: | S. Hirschorn, No. 4, 1-6 Environmental Legislative Accomplishments: The 104th Radiologica! | nup Costs: A Remediation Congress in Review and a Look at What's Ahead, Case Stu Hong, Lawrence Moos, Lesley-Anne Schaaf, No. 2, 133-140 Charley * w D. Gabel, No. 3, 23-38 Unit Costs |! ution and Dismantlement MERCURY of Struct ga, MichaelJ .D avis, and Thermal Treatment and Decontamination of Mercury- Robert | 19 Contaminated Waste: Recent Development and Using Uncer lo Reduce Costs at a Comparative Evaluation, Pasupati Sadhukhan and Pump-a! Andrew Curtis Elmore and Mike Bradford, No. 4, 17—24 Mark A. ' 3, 5-22 NATURAL BIODEGRADATION CROSS-MEDIA NSFERS Natural Biodegradation of Wood Preservatives, Hans Best Managen s To Prevent Cross-Media Stroo, Chris Cosentini, Tedd Ronning, and Mark Transfers leanup, Subijoy Dutta and Larsen, No. 4, 77-93 Bonnie B ». 2, 39-66 PETROLEUM-CONTAMINATED SOILS DECISION ANA Enhanced Land Treatment of Petroleum-Contami- Two Decisio: Approaches: Choosing a nated Soils Using Solid Peroxygen Materials, John Chemical A thod, Anne D. Henriksen, W. Davis, Jobert J. West, and Gary M. Klecka, No. No. 4 2, 67-82 REMEDIATION/AUTUMN 1997 INDEX TO VOLUME 7 PHYTOREMEDIATION RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN LAWS AND Phytoremediation: Modeling Removal of TNT REGULATIONS and Its Breakdown Products, Victor F. Medina EPA Releases Latest Agency Hazardous Waste Com- and Steven C. McCutcheon, No. 1, 31—46 pliance, Christopher R. Bryant, No. 4, 105-107 Phytoremediation Experimentation with the Her- EPA Strives for “Parity” between RCRA and CERCLA bicide Bentazon, Robert Mark Conger and Programs, Christopher R. Bryant, No. 1, 119-121 Ralph J. Portier, No. 2, 19-38 New Alternatives and Guidance for Management of Materials Contaminated with Cesium-137, Chris- RADIOACTIVE WASTE topher R. Bryant, No. 3, 127-129 The Impact of High Level Gamma Radiation on Significant Regulatory Developments in CERCLA, Immobilized Waste Forms in Polymeric Ma- Christopher R. Bryant, No. 2, 141-145 trices, R. Soundararajan, O. Lawrence Lee, and A. Leonard Haugse, No. 4, 59-76 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN POLICY AND New Regulatory Structure Being Considered for SCIENCE Devices Containing Radioactivity, Brian A. EPA’s Superfund National Remedy Review Board, Kelly, No. 4, 95-103 Catherine A. Fox, No. 3, 141-144 Hazardous Substance Research Centers: An Overview RADIOLOGICAL RISKS of Collaborators and New Research Initiatives, Radiological Risks and Cleanup Costs: A Catherine A. Fox, No. 2, 159-162 Remediation Case Study, Kou-John Hong, Public/Private Partnerships for More Effective Cleanup Lawrence Moos, Charley Yu, and Andrew D. of Contaminated Sites, Catherine A. Fox, No. 1, Gabel, No. 3, 23—38 129-132 RCRA RISK ASSESSMENT Influences on RCRA Corrective Action Costs for A Risk Assessment of Chlorinated Aliphatics in Nonfederal Facilities, Mindy Gampel, No. 1, Bioremediated Soils, Tracy G. Smith and Ralph J. 87-104 Portier, No. 2, 107—132 RCRA Leapfrog: How Statistics Shape and in Turn Are Shaped by Regulatory Mandates, Kirk RISK REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY Cameron, No. 1, 15-26 Integration of RBCA Frameworks and Remediation Stalking the RCRA Leapfrog, Robert D. Gibbons, Technologies, Joseph E. Odencrantz and David No. 1, 27-30 Duran, No. 3, 97—108 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN CLEANUP SOIL CONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGIES Adaptive Sampling and Analysis Programs for Con- Brownfields—A Status Report on Recent Devel- taminated Soils, Robert Johnson, John Quinn, Lisa opments, Kathleen C. Gibson and Kortney Durham, Gustavious Williams, and Albert Robbat, Adams, No. 3, 131-140 Jr., No. 3, 81-96 Eliminating Environmental Liabilities by Trans- Best Management Practices To Prevent Cross-Media ferring Ownership of Contaminated Proper- Transfers during Soil Cleanup, Subijoy Dutta and ties, John A. Simon, No. 1, 123-128 Bonnie B. Robinson, No. 2, 39-66 Status and Potential Future of Risk-Based Correc- Cleanup Levels for Dioxin-Contaminated Soils, Joel S. tive Action (RBCA) at Contaminated Sites, Hirschorn, No. 3, 63-80 Lisa K. Bryda and Anthony P. Bryda, No. 2, Enhanced Land Treatment of Petroleum-Contami- 147-157 nated Soils Using Solid Peroxygen Materials, John Technical Aspects Affecting the Future of the W. Davis, Jobert J. West, and Gary M. Klecka, No. Remediation Industry, John A. Simon, No. 4, 2, 67-82 109-115 Remediation of Uranium-Contaminated Soil Using the REMEDIATION/ AUTUMN 1997 121 INDEX TO VOLU! Segmente tem and Containerized Vat TNT REMOVAL Leaching 1 A Cost-Effectiveness Study, Phytoremediation: Modeling Removal of TNT and Mark Cum Steven R. Booth, No. 1, 1-14 Its Breakdown Products, Victor F. Medina and Steven C. McCutcheon, No. 1, 31—46 THERMAL TRI [ENT Thermal Trea Decontamination of Mer- UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS cury-(x Waste: Recent Development Using Uncertainty Analysis To Reduce Costs at a and ¢ Evaluation, Pasupati Pump-and-Treat Site, Andrew Curtis Elmore Sadhukh Bradford, No. 4, 17-24 and Mark A. Vandeberg, No. 3, 5-22 REMEDIATION/AUTUMN 1997 ie ‘ aggueaete E 2 otb jese re fgeN, s