Relationships among Span, Time Allocation, and Leadership of First-Line Managers and Nurse and Team Outcomes by Raquel Marie Meyer A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Nursing Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Raquel Marie Meyer 2010 ii Relationships among Span, Time Allocation, and Leadership of First- Line Managers and Nurse and Team Outcomes Raquel Marie Meyer Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Nursing Science University of Toronto 2010 Abstract Comparisons of raw span (i.e., number of staff who report directly to a manager) within and across organizations can misrepresent managerial capacity to support staff because managers may not allocate the same amount of time to staff contact. The purpose was to examine the influence of alternative measures of managerial span on nurse satisfaction with manager’s supervision and on multidisciplinary teamwork. The alternative measures were (a) raw span as a measure of reporting structure and (b) time in staff contact as a measure of closeness of contact by the manager. The main effects of the alternative measures, leadership, hours of operation, and other covariates on outcomes were examined. The interaction effects of the alternative measures with leadership and hours of operation were investigated. The study framework was based on Open System Theory and the boundary spanning functions of managers. A descriptive, correlational design was used to collect survey and administrative data from employees, managers, and organizations. Managerial time allocation data were collected through self- logging and validated through observation. Acute care hospitals were selected through purposive sampling. For supervision satisfaction, the final sample size was 31 first-line managers and 558 nurses. For teamwork, the final sample size was 30 first-line managers and 754 staff. The Leadership Practices Inventory, the Satisfaction with my Supervisor Scale, and the Relational ii iii Coordination Scale were used. Hierarchical linear modeling was the main type of analysis conducted. Raw span interacted with leadership and hours of operation to explain supervision satisfaction. Teamwork was explained by leadership, clinical support roles, hours of operation, total areas, and non-direct reports, but not by raw span or time in staff contact. Large acute care hospitals can improve satisfaction with supervision and teamwork by modifying first-line management positions. iii iv Acknowledgements Success as a doctoral student depends on the efforts of many people. I am deeply grateful to the many individuals and organizations that enabled this journey and extend my sincerest thanks. To my thesis supervisor and mentor Dr. Linda O’Brien-Pallas, for sharing your vast expertise and experience, for believing in me, and for fostering my success. I will always hold you in high and fond regard. To my committee members Dr. Diane Doran, Dr. David Streiner, Dr. Mary Ferguson-Paré, and Dr. Christine Duffield, for sharing your expert knowledge and humour to skillfully guide this thesis. To my thesis reviewers Dr. Linda McGillis Hall and Dr. Carol Brewer, for your constructive feedback. To the staff at the Nursing Health Services Research Unit, for facilitating this thesis. To the nurse managers, who graciously allowed me into their busy worlds, thank you so much for your insights and for the vital contributions you make every day to our healthcare system. You made this dissertation possible and I will always be grateful. To the front-line nurses and health care providers, administrative staff, senior nurse leaders, and hospitals who also very generously participated, I am extremely appreciative. To the following, thank you for financial support: the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, the Nursing Health Services Research Unit, the Canadian Health Services Research Foundation/Canadian Institutes for Health Research Chair in Nursing/Health Human Resources, the Ontario Training Program in Health Services and Policy Research, the Ontario Nursing Leadership Network, the Registered Nurses Foundation of Ontario, the Nursing Research Interest Group, and the Ontario Nursing Informatics Group as well as awards through the Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing and University of Toronto. To my father Ken Meyer and stepmother Lynn Brown, for your steadfast encouragement and for supporting me in a myriad of ways. To my mother Cam Duhaime and stepfather Don Kishibe, for instilling me with a strong work ethic and for cheering me on. To Amy, Louise, and Bob, for believing in me and for the on-line support. To Barb Mildon, Christine Covell, Kim Sears, Joan Almost, Jessica Peterson, and Doris Leung for friendship and laughter during the doctoral program adventure. Finally and ever so importantly, to my husband Paul Barber, for unwavering love, support, and humour and for weathering this journey alongside me – you are the wind beneath my wings. iv v Table of Contents Abstract..........................................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................iv Chapter 1: The Problem...............................................................................................................1 Background of the Problem.............................................................................................1 Problem Statement............................................................................................................2 Purpose of the Study.........................................................................................................3 Literature Review.............................................................................................................3 Managerial Span...............................................................................................................4 Measurement and Analytical Issues.......................................................................11 Studies of Span as Reporting Structure and Staff Outcomes..............................13 Studies of Span as Closeness of Contact and Staff Outcomes..............................14 Managerial Time Allocation..........................................................................................16 Measurement Issues.................................................................................................16 Leadership.......................................................................................................................22 Studies of Managerial Span, Leadership, and Staff Outcomes...........................25 Gaps in the Literature and Study Rationale................................................................26 Chapter 2: Theory and Study Framework...............................................................................28 Theory..............................................................................................................................28 Assumptions..............................................................................................................28 Open System Theory Applied to Large Scale Organizations...............................29 Boundary Spanning.................................................................................................32 Outcomes...................................................................................................................33 Study Framework...........................................................................................................38 First-Order Relationships.......................................................................................42 Manager Level Covariates......................................................................................46 v vi Staff Level Covariates..............................................................................................51 Chapter 3: Method......................................................................................................................53 Design...............................................................................................................................53 Design and Data Collection Overview....................................................................53 Power.........................................................................................................................54 Setting and Sample...................................................................................................55 Data Collection Procedures.....................................................................................57 Risk and Benefits......................................................................................................59 Administrative Data........................................................................................................60 Managerial Work Logs...................................................................................................62 Instrumentation...............................................................................................................64 Leadership Practices Inventory..............................................................................64 Nurse Satisfaction with Manager’s Supervision...................................................65 Relational Coordination Scale................................................................................68 Data Analyses..................................................................................................................68 Data Entry and Cleaning.........................................................................................68 Levels of Analysis.....................................................................................................69 Study Objectives.......................................................................................................70 Knowledge Translation Plan..........................................................................................71 Chapter 4: Results.......................................................................................................................73 Instruments......................................................................................................................73 Leadership Practices Inventory..............................................................................73 Satisfaction with my Supervisor Scale...................................................................74 Relational Coordination Scale................................................................................74 Sample Description.........................................................................................................74 Descriptive Statistics of the Study Variables................................................................77 Satisfaction Findings.......................................................................................................84 vi vii Objective 1: Main Effects for Satisfaction.............................................................84 Objective 2: Interaction Effects for Satisfaction...................................................87 Objective 3: Model Explaining Most Variation in Satisfaction...........................92 Teamwork Findings........................................................................................................93 Objective 1: Main Effects for Teamwork..............................................................93 Objective 2: Interaction Effects for Teamwork....................................................96 Objective 3: Model Explaining Most Variation in Teamwork............................98 Chapter 5: Discussion of Findings...........................................................................................100 Descriptive Findings.....................................................................................................100 Manager Sample.....................................................................................................100 Outcomes.................................................................................................................102 Raw Span and Outcomes.............................................................................................102 Time in Staff Contact and Outcomes..........................................................................103 Leadership and Outcomes............................................................................................103 Hours of Operation and Outcomes.............................................................................104 Three-Way Interaction Effects....................................................................................105 Covariates and Outcomes.............................................................................................107 Implications for Boundary Spanning..........................................................................109 Study Limitations and Strengths.................................................................................110 Future Knowledge Translation Plan...........................................................................112 Chapter 6: Summary, Recommendations, and Conclusions................................................113 Summary........................................................................................................................113 Recommendations for Research..................................................................................114 Recommendations for Theory Development..............................................................116 Recommendations for Organizational Policy and Managerial Practice.................116 vii viii Conclusions....................................................................................................................120 References..................................................................................................................................121 viii ix List of Tables Table 1. Span at the Manager Level...............................................................................................6 Table 2. Operational Definitions of Span.....................................................................................12 Table 3. Components of the Literature Used to Derive the Study Framework............................41 Table 4. Data Collection Flow Chart............................................................................................54 Table 5. Managers’ Average Raw Span, Total Areas Assigned, and Surveys Analyzed.............75 Table 6. Managers’ Age, Tenure, Years of Experience, and Education.......................................76 Table 7. Nurses’ Designation, Age, Years of Experience, and Education...................................76 Table 8. Team Surveys by Occupation.........................................................................................77 Table 9. Team Surveys by Highest Education..............................................................................77 Table 10. Descriptive Statistics of Study Variables......................................................................78 Table 11. One-Way Analysis of Variance Model for Satisfaction...............................................84 Table 12. Fixed-Coefficient Regression Model Level-1 for Satisfaction.....................................85 Table 13. Fixed-coefficient Regression Model Level-1 for Satisfaction: Reduced Model..........85 Table 14. Raw Span. Intercepts-as-Outcomes Model for Satisfaction.........................................86 Table 15. Time in Staff Contact. Intercepts-as-Outcomes Model for Satisfaction.......................86 Table 16. Raw Span with Two-Way Interactions for Extended Hours of Operation. Intercepts-as- Outcomes Model for Satisfaction.................................................................................87 Table 17. Raw Span with Two-Way Interactions for Compressed and Mixed Hours of Operation. Intercepts-as-Outcomes Model for Satisfaction...........................................................88 Table 18. Time in Staff Contact Two-Way Interactions for Extended Hours of Operation. Intercepts-as-Outcomes Model for Satisfaction...........................................................88 Table 19. Time in Staff Contact with Two-Way Interactions for Compressed and Mixed Hours of Operation. Intercepts-as-Outcomes Model for Satisfaction.........................................89 Table 20. Raw Span with Three-Way Interaction for Extended Hours of Operation. Intercepts-as- Outcomes Model for Satisfaction.................................................................................89 Table 21. Holm Procedure for Three-Way Interaction for Two Alternative Measures for Satisfaction....................................................................................................................90 Table 22. Raw Span with Three-Way Interaction for Compressed and Mixed Hours of Operation. Intercepts-as-Outcomes Model for Satisfaction...........................................................91 ix x Table 23. Summary of Between-Manager Variance Explained in Satisfaction Models with Alternative Span Measures...........................................................................................93 Table 24. One-Way Analysis of Variance Model for Teamwork.................................................93 Table 25. Fixed-coefficient Regression Model Level-1 for Teamwork.......................................94 Table 26. 95% Confidence Intervals of Pairwise Differences in Mean Teamwork Scores..........95 Table 27. Raw Span. Level-2 Covariate Model Parameter Estimates for Teamwork..................96 Table 28. Time in Staff Contact. Level-2 Covariate Model Parameter Estimates for Teamwork96 Table 29. Time in Staff Contact with Two-Way Interactions for Extended Hours of Operation. Level-2 Covariate Model Parameter Estimates for Teamwork....................................97 Table 30. Time in Staff Contact with Two-Way Interactions for Compressed and Mixed Hours of Operation. Level-2 Covariate Model Parameter Estimates for Teamwork..................98 Table 31. Summary of Between-Manager Variance Explained in Teamwork Models with Alternative Measures....................................................................................................98 Table 32. Level-2 Covariate Model Parameter Estimates for Teamwork....................................99 Table 33. Characteristics of Study Managers Compared to Other Studies................................101 x
Description: