Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration

635 Pages·2015·4.273 MB·English

by  coll

KluwerArbitration
Document information
Preface
Publication Blackaby Nigel
Redfern and Hunter on It is difficult to believe that over a decade has passed since we first sat down over dinner
International Arbitration in Paris with our friends and mentors, Alan Redfern and Martin Hunter, to begin a
(Sixth Edition) generational transfer of their seminal work on international arbitration. Our excitement at
holding the reins of parts of the work from which we learned our trade was soon
accompanied by author's block. How could we honour the tradition of a work known for its
Bibliographic reference style and synthesis without extending its length in a world where arbitration was in a
process of normalisation and relevant sources, jurisdictions, and laws were multiplying by
Blackaby Nigel, 'Preface', in the day. That challenge was all the greater as we were tasked with making the work even
Blackaby Nigel , Constantine more international. But as students of the book ourselves, we understood that the genius of
Partasides , et al., Redfern Redfern and Hunter was its status as an elegantly written, easily comprehensible synthesis
and Hunter on International of arbitration law and practice. It was not intended to be an exhaustive encyclopaedia of
Arbitration (Sixth Edition), arbitral sources or precedents. And the heart of the arbitral process, despite many attacks,
6th edition (© Kluwer Law remains as true today as it was in 1986 when the first edition was published: an
International; Oxford independent dispute resolution process to assist international business (and states) in
University Press 2015) pp. v - which private individuals selected by the parties would hear their disputes and render a
xviii binding decision enforceable throughout the world. So whilst we take care to address the
proliferating novelties in the arbitration world—whether the ever stronger influence of
investment arbitration, the arrival of the emergency arbitrator, the development of soft
law on conflicts, ethics, and evidence, or the growing jurisprudence on arbitrator
challenges, we have sought to ensure that these novelties do not overshadow the essence
of the arbitral process. This in turn has allowed us to keep our promise of a single volume
work.
The product of our approach will be immediately recognisable to those of you familiar with
earlier editions. Our structure remains untouched. It follows an international arbitration
chronologically through its life with a brief parenthesis to look at the influence of
arbitration pursuant to investment treaties. As befits a work whose authors learned their
trade as advocates and arbitrators, it has a strong practical focus. For this, it draws on the
authors' cumulative century of experience in international arbitration.
This edition embraces the many changes that have taken place since the publication of the
fifth edition in October 2009. Indeed, we delayed publication by a year to ensure we had
fully integrated all of the major new rules and guidelines that have been refreshed in
P v
recent years. It therefore addresses the changes of the 2010 UNCITRAL Rules, the 2011
P vi
French Arbitration Law, the 2012 ICC Rules, and the changes to the ICDR and LCIA Rules in
2014. We also analyse the evolution of soft law such as the revised IBA Guidelines on
Conflict of Interest and Party Representation. It expands references to international
sources and the many developments in investment arbitration. It draws more deeply from
key jurisprudence emanating from the United States, as well as arbitration's new venues:
from China to Brazil, from Russia to Venezuela, and from the Middle East to Sub-Saharan
Africa.
Finding the time for a work of this scope is a challenging task for busy practitioners. We
have been delighted that Alan and Martin have continued to play an extremely active role,
maintaining the lead pen on two key chapters and reviewing our work with an eagle eye for
inconsistencies and inelegance of expression. Indeed, one of the greatest pleasures of this
exercise is the excuse to retain frequent contact with two of the modern founders of
international arbitration who combine insight and experience with humour and humility in
equal doses. We hope that this generational collaboration will continue because we are
the richer for it.
Of course, we thank our families for their unfailing support. This book is not written in place
of our professional demands but in hours stolen from other parts of our lives. Without the
support of Maria and Patricia, we wouldn't have advanced beyond our first edition and yet
we are now proud to have completed our third edition as a team.
Our ability to ensure we were fully briefed on developments before putting pen to paper is
due to the assistance of many talented international arbitration practitioners we have
come to know and respect throughout the world in addition to a pool of young and
talented lawyers who gave us a great deal of their free time to participate with enthusiasm
for this project. There are too many names to mention but they include Chido Dunn and
Caroline Richard (who led the research efforts from London and Washington respectively)
and Pat Allan (who has provided indefatigable assistance to Alan). We also thank Luiz
Aboim, Alipak Banerjee, Abinash Barik, Georges Chalfoun, Ricardo Chirinos, Jeffery
Commission, Simon Consedine, Ella Davies, Yann Dehaudt-Delville, Francisco Franco,
Lauren Friedman, Monika Hlavkova, Maanas Jain, Ashley Jones, Sofia Klot, Oliver Marsden,
Penny Martin, Jenny Merrick, Claire Pauly, Sam Prevatt, Evgeniya Rubinina, Gustavo
Topalian, and Tomas Vail.
Internationally, we would like to mention the following for their insights into developments
in their home jurisdictions: Francisco González de Cossío, Maxim Kulkov, Gisela Mation,
P vi
P vi
Javier Robalino, Diego Romero, Pedro Saghy, Sebastián Yanine, and Vladislav Zaitsev.
P vii
And finally we are grateful to the institutions who have kindly given us permission to
publish their rules and guidelines, including the IBA, the ICC, the ICDR, ICSID, and the LCIA.
A traditional book format relies on a production process that is less immediate than we
have come to expect in an internet world. As a consequence, we had to put pens down by a
certain date. The date in this instance is May 2015.
Nigel Blackaby and Constantine Partasides
P vii
August 2015

© 2019 Kluwer Law International, a Wolters Kluwer Company. All rights reserved.
Kluwer Arbitration is made available for personal use only. All content is protected by copyright and other intellectual property
laws. No part of this service or the information contained herein may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, or
used for advertising or promotional purposes, general distribution, creating new collective works, or for resale, without prior
written permission of the publisher.
If you would like to know more about this service, visit www.kluwerarbitration.com or contact our Sales staff at lrs-
[email protected] or call [phone].
KluwerArbitration
KluwerArbitration
Document information
Table of Cases
Publication
A v B and X [2011] EWHC 2345 (Comm) 4.103
Redfern and Hunter on A Rahman Golshani v Iran Revue de l'arbitrage (2005) 993; Global Arbitration Review (2008)
International Arbitration 42 10.30
(Sixth Edition)
AAY and others v AAZ (AAY) [2011] 1 SLR 1093 2.169
ABB AG v Hochtief Airport GmbH [2006] EWHC 388 (Comm); [2006] ArbLR 33 5.74
Bibliographic reference
Abnaa Al-Khalaf Co e al v Sayed Aghajaved Raza, Qatari Court of Cassation, Challenge No.
'Table of Cases', in Blackaby 64 (2012) 10.82
Nigel , Constantine
Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Co Ltd v Eastern Bechtel Corp [1982] 2 Lloyd's Rep 425, CA 2.219,
Partasides , et al., Redfern
2.220, 2.221, 2.236, 2.240
and Hunter on International
Arbitration (Sixth Edition), ACD Tridon Inc v Tridon Australia Pty Ltd [2002] NSWSC 896 2.207
6th edition (© Kluwer Law
Adesa Corp v Bob Dickenson Auction Service Ltd, 73 OR (3d) 787 (2 December 2004) 2.172
International; Oxford
University Press 2015) pp. xxi Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd [1909] AC 488 9.45
- xxxvi
Aegis v European Re [2003] 1 WLR 1041 2.236
AEK v National Basket Association [2002] 1 All ER (Comm) 70 10.75
AI Trade Finance Inc v Bulgarian Foreign Trade Bank Ltd, Supreme Court of Sweden, 27
October 2000 2.176
AIG Capital Partners Inc v Kazakhstan [2005] App LR 10/20 11.154
Airbus SAS v Aviation Partners Inc, United States District Court, Western District of
Washington, No C12-1228JLR (25 October 2012) 2.210
Aita v Ojjeh (1986) Revue de l'Arbitrage 583 2.182
Albon v Naza Motor Trading Sdn Bhd [2007] EWHC 665 (Ch) 2.202
Alcom Ltd v Republic of Colombia [1984] AC 580 11.152
Ali Shipping Corporation v ‘Shipyard Trogir’ [1998] 1 Lloyd's Rep 643 2.166
Alliance Healthcare Servs, Inc v Argonaut Private Equity, LLC, 804 F Supp 2d 808, 811 (ND Ill
2011) 7.35
Allianz SpA, and another, v West Tankers Inc Case C-185/07 10 February 2009 5.132, 5.133,
5.134, 5.135, 5.136
Almare Prima, The [1989] 2 Lloyd's Rep 376 2.70
Aloe Vera of America, Inc (US) v Asianic Food (S) Pte Ltd (Singapore) and Another, (2007)
XXXII Ybk Comm Arb 489 11.80, 11.104
Ambassade de la Féderation de Russie en France v Compagnie NOGA d'Importation et
d'Exportation SA, Cour d'Appel de Paris (1 Ch A) 10 August 2000, (2001) 1 Revue de
l'Arbitrage 114 11.155
American Bureau of Shipping v Société Jet Flint SA, 170 F 3d 349 (2nd Cir 1999) 2.53
American Bureau of Shipping v Tencara SpA, Italian Corte di Cassazione, Plenary Session,
26 June 2001, No 8744; (2002) XXVII Ybk Comm Arb 509 2.27
American Central Eastern Texas Gas Co v Union Pacific Resources Group, 2004 US App LEXIS
1216 2.138
American Express Co v Italian Colors Restaurant, Supreme Court of the United States, No
12-133 (20 June 2013) 2.234, 3.32
American Safety Equipment Corp v JP Maguire Co, 391 F 2d 821(2nd Cir 1968) 2.135
Amparo Directo 465/2005, Tercer Tribunal Colegiado en Materia Civil del Primer Circuito,
Servicios Administrativos de Emergencia (2 September 2005) 2.203
Amparo Directo en Revisión No. 8/2011 (Mexican Supreme Court) 10.25
P xxi
Angelic Grace, The [1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 87 (CA) 2.68, 2.69
P xxii
Antilles Cement Corporation (Puerto Rico) v Transficem (Spain) (2006) XXXI Ybk Comm Arb,
846 11.87
Apelação 0177130-22.2010.8.26.0100, 3 December 2012 10.10
Applied Industrial Materials Corp v Ovalar Makine Ticaret Ve Sanayi, AS, 492 F 3d 132, 139
(2d Cir. 2007) 4.75
Application of Caratube Int'l Oil Co., LLP, In re 730 F Supp 2d 101 (DDC 2010) 7.44
Application of Chevron Corp. (Berlinger), In re 709 F Supp 2d 283 (SDNY 2010) 6.131, 7.43
Application of Mesa Power Grp, In re LLC, No 2:11–mc–270–ES, 2013 WL 1890222 (DNJ Apr. 19,
2013) 7.43
Application of the Republic of Ecuador, In re 2011 WL 4434816 (ND Cal, 2011) 7.43
Arab African Energy Corp Ltd v Olieprodukten Nederland BV [1983] 2 Lloyd's Rep 419 1.49,
2.18
Arab National Bank v El Sharif Saoud Bin Masoud Bin Haza'a El-Abdali [2004] EWHC 2381
10.44
Arab Republic of Egypt v Southern Pacific Properties, Cour d'Appel de Paris, 12 July 1984,
(1984) 23 ILM 1048 11.78
Arbitration between International Bechtel Company Limited v Department of Civil Aviation
of the Government of Dubai, In re 300 F Supp 2d 112 (2005) 5.21
Arenson v Arenson [1977] AC 405; [1976] 1 Lloyd's Rep 179, HL 5.48
Arret du 17 Fevrier 2015, no 77 (13/13278) (Cour d'Appel de Paris) 1.25
Asghar v Legal Services Commission [2004] EWHC 1803; [2004] Arb LR 43 2.93
Assicurazioni Generali SpA v Tassinari, Corte di Cassazione, Judgment No 2384 of 18 March
1997 2.53
Associated Electric and Gas Insurance Services Ltd v European Reinsurance Co of Zurich
UKPC 11, [2003] 1 WLR 1041 2.181, 9.180
Astengo v Comune di Genova, Corte di Cassazione, Judgment No 2096 of 22 October 1970
2.96
Astra Oil Co, Inc v Rover Navigation, Ltd, 344 F 3d 276 (2nd Cir 2003) 2.53
Asturcom Telecomunicaciones SL v Cristina Rodriguez Nogueira, Case C-40/80, [2009] ECR I-
9579 10.86
AT&S Transportation LLC v Odyssey Logistics & Technology Corp 803 NYS 2d 118 (24 October
2005) 2.58
AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion, Supreme Court of the United States, (27 April 2011) 2.234
AT&T Mobility LLC v Concepcion, 131 S. Ct. 1740, 1753, (2011) 3.31
Attorney-General v Mobil Oil NZ Ltd, High Court, Wellington (1 July 1987) 2.138
Avila Group Inc v Norma J of California, 426 F Supp 537 (DCNY 1977) 2.53
Baiti Real Estate Development v Dynasty Zarooni Inc, Dubai Court of Cassation, Petition No
14 of 2012 11.114
Baker Marine (Nig) Ltd v Chevron (Nig) Ltd 191 F 3d 194 (2nd Cir 1999) 11.97
Bank Mellat v GAA Development Construction Co [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep 44 9.132
Bank Mellat v Helliniki Techniki SA [1984] QB 291; [1983] 3 All ER 428 (CA) 3.84
Banque de Paris v Amoco Oil, 573 F Supp 1465 at 1472 (SDNY 1983) 2.55
Banque du Proche-Orient v Société Fougerolle, Cass Civ 2e, 9 December 1981 (2nd decision);
Cass Civ 1ère, 22 October 1991 (Austrian Supreme Court, 18 November 1982); (1984) IX Ybk
Comm Arb 161 3.176
Banque populaire Loire et Iyonnais v Société Sangar, Cour de cassation (1re Ch civ), 11 July
2006 2.53
Bautista v Star Cruises 396 F 3d 1289 (11th Cir 2005) 11.50
Baxter Int'l Inc v Abbott Labs, 315 F 3d 829 (7th Cir, 2003) 10.74, 11.122
Baxter Int v Abbott Laboratories, 315 F 3d 163 (2nd Cir 2004) 2.136
Bay Hotel and Resort Ltd, The v Cavalier Construction Co Ltd (Turks and Caicos Islands)
P xxii
[2001] UKPC 34 2.59
P xxiii
Beijing Jianlong Heavy Industry Group v Golden Ocean Group Limited [2013] EWHC 1063
(Comm) 2.112
Beximco Pharmaceuticals Ltd and others v Shamil Bank of Bahrain EC [2004] EWCA Civ 19
3.187
BG Group PLC v Republic of Argentina, No 12-138, 572 US (March 5, 2014) 5.127, 10.47
Bharat Aluminium Co v Kaiser Aluminum Technical Service, Inc (Civil Appeal No 7019 of
2005. Decision of 6 September 2012, given at New Delhi) 11.99
Bharat Aluminium Co v Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc 2012 (9) SCC 552 9.59
Bharat Aluminium Co (BALCO) v Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Civil Appeal No. 7019
of 2005 (Sept 6, 2012) 10.26
Bhatia International v Bulk Trading 2002 (4) SCC 105 9.59, 10.26
Bilta (UK) Ltd (In Liquidation) v Nazir [2010] EWHC 1086 (Ch) 2.206
Birmingham Associates Ltd v Abbott Labatories 547 F Supp 2d 295; 2008 US Dist LEXIS 30321
2.53
BJ Export & Chemical Processing Co v Kaduna Refining and Petrochemical Co (2003) 24 WRN
74 (31 October 2002) 2.154
BKMI and Siemens v Dutco French Cass Civ 1ere, 7 January 1992 Bull Civ 1 1.111, 2.214
Black Clawson International Ltd v Papierwerke Waldhof-Aschaffenburg AG [1982] 2 Lloyd's
Rep 446 3.22
Boraks v AAA 517 NW2d 771 (Mich App 1994) 5.64
Borst v Allstate Insurance Company 717 NW 2d 42, 48 (Wis, 2006) 4.75
Bothell Bothell v Hitachi Zosen Corp 97 F Supp 2d 1048 (2000) 2.23
Bowen v Amoco Pipeline Co, 254 F 3d 925 (10th Cir 2001) 10.80
Braes of Doune Wind Farm v Alfred McAlpine [2008] EWHC 426 (TCC) 2.198, 3.63
Brandon v MedPartners Inc 203 FRD 677 at 686 (SD Fla 2001) 9.52
Braspetro Oil Services Co v The Management and Implementation Authority of the Great
Man-Made River Project, Paris Cour d'Appel (1 July 1999); (1999) 14 Mealey's Intl Arb Rep 8;
(1999) XXIVa Ybk Comm Arb, 297 9.10, 9.11
Bratex Dominicana, C por A v Vanity Fair Inc, Supreme Court of Justice of the Dominican
Republic (31 May 2005) 2.108
Bremen, The v Zapata Off-Shore Co, 407 US 1 (1972) 11.110
Bridas SAPIC, Bridas Energy International Ltd et al v Government of Turkmenistan and
Turkmennneft, 345 F 3d 347 (5th Circuit 2006) 2.52
British Airways Board v Laker Airways Ltd [1985] AC 58 (HL) 9.45
Buckeye Check Cashing Inc v John Cardegna et al, 126 S Ct 1204 (2006) 2.107
Bulgarian Foreign Trade Bank Ltd v Al Trade Finance Inc (2001) XXVI Ybk Comm Arb 291,
Swedish Supreme Court, 27 October 2000, Case No T1881–99 3.25
Bundesgerichtshof, 22 February 2001, XXIX Yearbook Commercial Arbitration (2004) 724
11.97
Bundesgerichtshof 53 NJW 2346 (2000) 2.55
Bundesgerichtshof decision (1978) 71 BGHZ 162 2.55
Bundesgerichtshof (Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 1992), 3096 et seq 9.49
Bunge Agribuss v Guangdong Fengyuan [2006] Min Si Ta Zi No. 41 11.86
Buques Centroamericanos SA v Refinadora Costarricense de Petroleos SA, 1989 US Dist
LEXIS 5429 (SDNY 1989) 2.39
Burkinabe des Ciments et Matérieux (CIMAT) v Société des Ciments d'Abidjan (SCA) (2001)
Revue de l'Arbitrage 165 10.55
BVerfG, Beschluß vom 24.01.2007 - 2 BvR 1133/04 9.49
BVerfG, Beschluß vom 14.06.2007 - 2 BvR 2247/06 9.49
C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282; [2008] 1 All ER (Comm) 1001 3.23
Cable & Wireless v IBM United Kingdom [2002] EWHC 2059 (Comm) 2.90, 2.91
Cambodia v Thailand [1962] ICJ Rep 6 9.54
Capital Trust Investments Ltd v Radio Design TJ AB [2002] EWCA Civ 135 2.207
P xxiii
Cargill Int'l SA v M/T Pavel Dybenko, 991 F 2d 1012 (2nd Cir 1993) 2.53
P xxiv
Case No 4A_376/2008 of 5 December 2008 (Swiss Federal Tribunal) 2.198
Case No. I CSK 312/11 9 March 2012 (Polish Supreme Court) 10.63
Cass Civ 1, 10 October 2012 Tecso, no 11-20.299 4.125
CE Int'l Res. Holdings, LLC v SA Minerals Ltd. P'ship, et al, No 12–CV–08087 (CM)(SN), 2013 WL
2661037 (SDNY Jun 12, 2013) 7.44
Central Meat Products Ltd v JV McDaniel Ltd [1952] 1 Lloyd's Rep 562 2.198
Cetelem SA v Roust Holdings Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 618 7.38
Champ v Siegel Trading Co, 55 F 3d 269 (7th Cir 1995) 2.212
Channel Tunnel Group Ltd v Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd [1993] AC 334 3.22, 7.25, 7.46,
7.47, 7.58, 7.49
Channel Tunnel Group Ltd v Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd [1992] 1 QB 656 3.150, 3.152,
3.176
Chantiers de l'Atlantique SA v Gaztransport & Technigaz SAS [2011] EWHC 3383 10.62
Chaval v Liebherr, Recurso Especial No 653.733, Superior Court of Justice (3 August 2006)
2.49
Chevron USA, Inc, In re No. 08-08-00082-CV, 2010 Tex App LEXIS 459 9.24
Chevron Corp v Berlinger, 629 F 3d 297 (2d Cir 2011) 6.131
Chevron Corp v Republic of Ecuador 2013 WL 2449172 (DDC 2013) 11.145
China Agribusiness Development Corp v Balli Trading [1998] 2 Lloyd's Rep 76 11.59
China Nanhai Oil Joint Service Cpn v Gee Tai Holdings Co Ltd (1995) XX Ybk Comm Arb 671
11.83, 11.84, 11.85
Chloe Z Fishing Co Inc v Odyssey Re (London) Ltd 109 F Supp 2d 1048 (2000) 2.23
Chloro Controls (I) P Ltd v Severn Trent Water Purification Inc and others, Supreme Court of
India (28 September 2012) 2.49
Chromalloy Aeroservices v Arab Republic of Egypt, 939 F Supp 907 (DDC 1996) 3.89, 10.06,
11.59, 11.95, 11.97
Chun Wo Building Construction v China Merchants Tower Co [2000] 2 HKC 255 2.239
Citibank NA v Stok & Associates PA, No 09-13556 (11th Cir July 20, 2010) 2.210
Citigroup Global Mkts v Bacon, 562 F 3d 349 (5th Cir, 2009) 10.74
City of London v Sancheti [2008] EWCA Civ 1283 2.45
City of Moscow v International Industrial Bank [2004] 2 Lloyd's Rep 179 2.178
Cogecot Cotton Company c/ Marlan's Cotton Industries MCI, Gazette du Palais (2005) 118
10.30
Collective Fishing Farm Krasnoye Znamya v White Arctic Marine Resources Ltd., Case No.
Ð​05-4274/2007 11.99
Commercial Caribbean Niquel v Societe Overseas Mining Investments Limited, Paris Court
of Appeal, No. 08/23901 (Mar 25, 2010) 10.85
Commonwealth Coatings Corp v Continental Casualty Co, 393 US 145 (1968) 4.104
Commonwealth of Australia v Cockatoo Dockyard Pty Ltd [1995] 36 NSWLR 662 2.172, 2.183
Compagnie Tunisienne de Navigation SA v Compagnie d'Armament Maritime SA [1971] AC
572 3.38, 3.63, 3.93
Companhia Estadual de Energia Eléctrica (‘CEEE’) v AES, Recurso Especial No. 612.439-RS,
Superior Court of Justice (14 September 2006) 2.37
Companhia do Metropolitano de São Paolo 10.10
Companhia Paranaense de Gas (‘Compagás’) v Carioca Passarelli Consortium (‘Consortium’),
Appeal No 247.646-0, Paraná Court of Appeals (11 February 2004) 2.37
COMSAT Corp v NSF, 190 F 3d 269, 276 (4th Cir 1999) 7.36
Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomuniciaciones SA, In re v JAS Forwarding, Inc, 685 F 3d 987
(11th Cir 2012) 7.43
Copel v Energetica Rio Pedrinho SA, Agravo de Instrumento No 174.874-9, Paraná Court of
Appeals (11 May 2005) 2.37
Coppée Levalin NV v Ken-Ren Fertilisers and Chemicals [1994] 2 Lloyd's Rep 109 (HL) 7.01
P xxiv
Corcoran v Ardra Insurance Company Ltd 842 F 2d 31 (2nd Cir 1988) 2.202
P xxv
Corey v New York Stock Exchange 691 F 2d 1205 (6th Cir 1982) at 1209 5.54, 5.55
Corporación Mexicana de Mantenimiento Integral, S de RL de CV v PEMEX-Exploración y
Producción, No 10 Civ 206 (AKH) 2013 WL 4517225 (SDNY, August 27, 2013) 3.89, 10.06, 11.96,
11.97
Cort v AAA, 795 F Supp 970 (NDCa 1992) 5.56, 5.57
County of Nassau v Chase, 402 Fed Appx 540 (2d Cir 2010) 3.32
Creighton Ltd (Cayman Islands) v Minister of Finance and Minister of Internal Affairs and
Agriculture of the Government of the State of Qatar (2000) XXV Ybk Comm Arb 458 11.148,
11.149, 11.150
Cubic Defence Systems v Chambre de Commerce International (1999) Revue de l'Arbitrage
103 10.58
Czech Republic v CME Czech Republic BV, Svea Court of Appeal, Case No T 8735–01, IIC 63
(2003) 9.107
Dadourian Group International Inc v Simms and others 13 May 2004 9.185
Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Co v the Ministry of Religious Affairs, Government
of Pakistan [2010] UKSC 46, [2011] 1 A11 ER 485 3.35, 3.77, 5.111, 10.44, 11.68, 11.69, 11.80
Dallal v Bank Mellat [1986] QB 441 11.19
Decision of 28 April 1992 of the Tribunal Fédéral, [1992] A SA Bull 368 2.134
Decision of February 17, 1995, of the District Court of Rotterdam NIPR 1996 9.49
Decision of 18 September 1997 of the regional court of Hamburg, (2000) XXV Ybk Comm Arb
710 11.79
Decision of 11 December 1997 of the Cour de Justice of Geneva, (1998) XXIII Ybk Comm Arb
764 11.105
Decision of 30 July 1998 of the Court of Appeal of Hamburg, (2000) XXV Ybk Comm Arb 714
11.79
Decision of 16 August 1999 (Halogaland Court of Appeal (Norway)), (2002) XXVII Ybk Comm
Arb 519 2.23
Decision of 30 September 1999 of Bremen Court of Appeal, [2001] 4 Intl ALR N-26 11.76
Decision of February 1, 2001, (2001) No1 R.P.S (German Federal Supreme Court) 10.85
Decision of 7 January 2004, 4P196/2003, ASA Bull 3/2004 (Swiss Federal Tribunal) 10.53
Decision of 1 July 2004, 4P 93/2004, ASA Bull, 1/2005 (Swiss Federal Tribunal) 10.53
Decision of 18 October 2004, District Court of The Hague, civil law section; provisional
measures judge, challenge no 13/2004, Petition No HA/RK2004/667 4.134, 4.135
Decision No 4A_294/2008 (28 October 2000) (Swiss Federal Supreme Court) 6.33
Decision No 506/2010 (10 February 2010) (Greek Supreme Court) 2.27
Decision No 4A_103/2011 (20 September 2011) (Swiss Federal Tribunal) 2.66
Decision No 4A_50/2012 (16 October 2012) (Swiss Federal Tribunal) 2.144
Decision No 4 Ob 80/08f (26 August 2008) (Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof)) No 4 Ob
80/08f (26 August 2008) 2.64
Del Monte Corp v Sunkist Growers 10 F 3d 753, 760 (11th Cir, 1993) 4.75
Desputeaux v Éditions Chouette (1987) Inc [2003] 1 SCR 178 2.132
Deutsche Schachtbau und Tiefbohrgesellschaft GmbH (F/Germ) v R'as Al Khaimah National
Oil Co (R'as Al Khaimah, UAE) Shell International Petroleum Co Ltd (UK) [1987] 3 WLR 1023
3.176
DiMercurio v Sphere Drake Insurance plc, 202 F 3d 71 (1st Cir 2000) 2.96
Discover Bank v Superior Court, 36 Cal 4th 148 (2005) 2.229
Discovery Geo Corporation v STP Energy Pte Ltd, High Court of New Zealand, 19 December
2013 7.50
Dolling-Baker v Merrett [1991] 2 All ER 890 2.165
Downing v Al Tameer Establishment [2002] EWCA Civ 721 2.202
Dubai Court of Cassation, Petition No 156/2009 9.148
Dubey, In re 2013 US Dist LEXIS 83972, at *7-15 (CD Cal June 7, 2013) 7.43
P xxv
Dynegy Midstream Servs v Trammochem, 451 F 3d 89, 96 (2d Cir 2006) 7.35
P xxvi
Eagle Star Insurance Co v Yuval Insurance Co [1978] 1 Lloyd's Rep 357 2.206
Ecuador, et al v Stratus Consulting, Inc, No 13–cv–01112–REB–KLM, 2013 WL 2352425 (D Colo
May 29, 2013) 7.43
Eco Swiss China Time Ltd v Benetton International NV Case C–126/97 (1999) XXIV Ybk Comm
Arb 629 2.137, 2.138, 3.105, 3.131, 11.120
EDF Internacional SA v Endesa Internacional SA and YPF SA, 8 September 2011, 5(3)
Arbitraje: Revista de Arbitraje Comercial y de Inversiones (2012) 915 11.97
Edman Controls, Inc, 712 F 3d 1021 10.77
Eisenwerk Hensel Bayreuth GmbH v Australian Granites Ltd [2001] 1 QDR 461 2.208
EJR Lovelock Ltd v Exportles [1968] 1 Lloyd's Rep 163 2.198
El Nasharty v J Sainsbury plc [2007] EWHC 2618 (Comm) 2.203
El Paso Corp v La Comision Ejecutiva Hidroelectrica Del Rio Lempa, 341 Fed.Appx. 31 (5th
Cir 2009) 7.43
Elektrim SA v Vivendi [2007] EWHC 11 (Comm) 1.238
Emirates Trading Agency LLC v Prime Mineral Exports Private Ltd [2014] EWHC 2104 2.91
Emmott v Michael Wilson & Partners Ltd [2008] EWCA CW 184 9.199
Encyclopaedia Universalis SA (Luxembourg) v Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc (US) (2005) XXX
Ybk Comm Arb, 1136 11.86
ENRC Marketing AG and others v OJSC ‘Magnitogorsk Metallurgical Kombinat’, Federal Court
of Australia, Case No. NSD 2110 of 2011, 25 November 2011 7.50
Esso Australia Resources Ltd and others v The Honourable Sidney James Plowman and
others (1995) 193 CLR 10 2.170, 2.171
Estado Nacional—Procuración del Tesoro de la Nación c/ Cámara de Comercio
Internacional, 3 July 2007 and 17 July 2008 (not published) 4.110
ET Plus SA v Jean Paul Welter & The Channel Tunnel Group [2005] EWHC 2115 (Comm) 2.134
Etat Libanais v Societe FTML (Cellis) SAL, Conseil D'etat Libanais, 17 July 2001 2.37
Exodis c/ Ricoh France, Revue de l'arbitrage (2004) 683 10.30
F Ltd v M Ltd [2009] EWHC 275 10.55
F & G Sykes (Wessex) Ltd v Fine Fare Ltd [1967] 1 Lloyd's Rep 53 2.68, 9.65
Fairchild & Co, Inc v Richmond F & PR Co, 516 F Supp 1305, 1313 (DDC 1981) 4.140
Ferguson v Corinthian Colleges, Inc, 733 F 3d 928, 936 (9th Cir 2013) 3.31
Fédération de Russie v BNP Paribas (Suisse) SA Compagnie NOGA d'Importation et
d'Exportation SA 5A_618/2007 (10 January 2008) (Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland)
11.155
Fédération de Russie v BNP Paribas (Suisse) SA Compagnie NOGA d'Importation et
d'Exportation SA 4A_403/2008 (9 December 2008) (Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland)
11.155
Figueiredo Ferraz E Engenharia de Projeto Ltda v Republic of Peru 663 F 4d 384 (2nd Cir
2011) 11.124
Fiona Trust and Holding Corp v Privalov [2007] UKHL 40; [2007] EWCA Civ 20 2.28, 2.66, 2.69,
2.112, 2.151, 5.102
Fisher v General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC, slip copy, No. 10-cv-0109-WYD-BNB, 2011 WL
524362 (D. Colo. Oct. 31, 2011) 10.23
Fisichella Motor Sport International SpA v Héctor, Audencia Provincial, Barcelona, 4 March
2010 7.50
Fletamentos Maritimos SA v Effjohn International BV [1996] 2 Lloyd's Rep 304 2.69
Fontaine Pajot Cour de cassation, l re chambre civile, 1 December 2010, Bulletin 2010, I, no
248 10.84
Fortress Value Recovery Fund I LLC v Blue Skye Special Opportunities Fund LP [2013] EWCA
Civ 367 2.52
P xxvi
Fougerolle v Procofrance (1992) JDI 974) 10.20
P xxvii
Fougerolle SA (France) v Ministry of Defence of the Syrian Arab Republic (1990) XV Ybk
Comm Arb, 515 11.67
Francelino da Silva Matuzalem v Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA),
Decision of the Swiss Supreme Court 4A_558/2011 of 27 March 2012 10.83
Fulham Football Club (1987) Ltd v Sir David Richards [2011] EWCA Civ 855 2.159
Fyrnetics Ltd v Quantum Group Inc 293 F 3d 1023 (7th Cir 2002) 2.58
Ganz v Nationale des Chemins de Fer Tunisiens (SNCFT) (1991) Revue de l'Arbitrage 478 10.51
Garrity v Lyle Stuart Inc, 40 NY 2d 354; 353 NE 2d 793 (1976) 9.47
Gateway Tech Inc v MCI Telecomms Corp, 64 F 3d 993 (5th Cir 1995) 10.80
Gatoil Int'l Inc v Nat'l Iranian Oil Co, High Court of Justice, Queen's Bench Division (1988)
XVII Ybk Comm Arb 587 2.39
Ghirardosi v Minister of Highways (BC) (1996) 56 DLR (2d) 469 4.146
Giacobassi Grandi Vini SpA v Renfield Corp (1987) US Dist, LEXIS 1783 2.173
Glaser v Legg, No. 12-cv-00805, 2013 WL 870382 (DDC Mar 11, 2013) 10.10
Glencore Ltd v Degussa Engineered Carbons LP 848 F Supp. 2d 410 (2012) 2.23
Glencore Ltd v Schnitzer Steel Products, 189 F 3d 264, 265–266 (2nd Cir 1999) 2.212
GMAC Commer Credit LLC v Springs Indus 171 F Supp 2d 209; 2001 US Dist LEXIS 5152; 44 UCC
Rep Serv 2d 2.55
Gold Coast Ltd v Naval Gijon SA [2006] EWHC 1044 (Comm); [2006] Arb LR 381 9.188
Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing v Off'l Unsecured Creditors Committee of Bayou
Group, 491 Fed Appx. 201, 2012 US App LEXIS 13531, 3-4 (2012) 10.74
Gosset Cass Civ Lere, 7 May 1963 2.106
Gouvernement de la République arage d'Egypte c/ société Malicorp Ltd, Cour de cassation,
lère chamber civile, 23 June 2010, Rev Arb 2011, 446 10.55
Gouvernement du Pakistan v Société Dallah Real Estate and Tourism Holding Co, Cour
d'Appel de Paris, 17 February 2011, (2012) Revue de l'Arbitrage 369 11.69
Grand Pacific Holdings Ltd v Pacific China Holdings Ltd, CACV 136/2011, 19 February 2013
10.54
Great Offshore Ltd v Iranian Offshore Engineering and Construction Co (2008) 14 SCC 240