RECENT ADVANCES IN ALLERGY (ASTHMA, HAY-FEVER, ECZEMA, MIGRAINE, ETC.) BY GEORGE W. BRAY M.B., CH.M. (SYDNEY) A.STH!fA RESEARCH SCHOLAR, THE HOSPITAL FOn. SIC I{ CHILDREN, GREAT OR)[QND STREET, LONDON WITH FOREWORD BY ARTHUR F. HURST M.A., l\f.D.(OXON), F.R.C.P. SENIOR PHYRICIAS", GUY'S HOSPITAL: CIIAIRUAN MR1HCAL ADVISORY COM~fITTEE, ASTHlIA RESEAROH COUNCIL 01" onE.!T BRITAIN 98 Illustrations including 4 Coloured Plates LONDON J. & A. CHURCHILL 40 GLOUCESTER PLACE PORTMAN SQUARE 1931 B. L. No 64. Jmpnrial Institute of Veterinary Research 615 '31 e, R Laboratory. Library. ~. Class. Rpgister No. 16'.J " Room No. , Inward No. 16',; ,1 -, ' Shelf No. Rrceived . ..<' .1 Book No. - *' _.... ... _..-, RECENT ADVANCES IN ALLERGY THE RECENT ADVANCES SERIES -128. 6d. each except "Surgery,'· "Children " and "Chemotherapy," 15s. each. MICROSCOPY: Biological Applications Edited by A. PINEY, M.D. RADIOLOGY By PETER KERLEY, M.B., B.Ch. PSYCHONEUROSES By MILLAIS CULPIN, III.D., F.R.C.S. DISEASES OF CHILDREN By W. J. PEARSON, D.s.O., D.M., F.R.C.P., and W. G. WYLLIE, M.D. Second Edition. SURGERY By W. H. OGILVIE, M.D., F.R.C.S. Second Edition. MEDICINE . By G. E. BEAUMONT, D.M., F.R.C.P., D.P.H., and E. C. DODDS, M.V.D., M.D., B.S., Ph.D. Sixth Edition. OBSTETRICS AND GYNlECOLOGY PH:II~t~~~. BOURNE, F.R.C.S. Second Edition. ByC. LOVATT EVANS, D.Sc., F.R.C.P., F.R.S. Fourth Edition. BIOCHEMISTRY HlE~-1rJi.OGyB.Sc., M.Sc. Third Edition. By A. PINEY, M.D. Third Edition. OPHTHALMOLOGY ByW. STEWART DUKE-ELDER, M.D., F.R.C.S. Second Edition. ANATOMY . By H. WOOLLARD, M.D. TROPICAL MEDICINE By SIR LEONARD ROGERS, C.I.E., F.R.S., M.D., F.R.C.P., F.R.C.S. Second Edition. BACTERIOLOGY By J. HENRY DIBLE, M.B., Ch.B. NEUROLOGY • ByW. RUSSELL BRAIN, D.M., and E. B.STRAUSS, 8.1\1., B.Ch. Second Edition. PSYCHIATRY By H. DEVINE, O.B.E., M.D., F.R.C.P. CARDIOLOGY By TERENCE EAST, M.D., F.R.C.P., and C. W. C. BArN, M.B. Second Edition. PULMONARY TUBERCULOSIS By L. S. T. BURRELL, M.A., M.D., F.R.C.P. Second Edition. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE By J. F. C. HASLAM, M.C., M.D. CHEMOTHERAPY RH:~A~i~:;DLAY, D.B.E., M.D., D.Se. By F. J. POYNTON, M.D., F.R.C.P., and BERNARD SCHLESINGER, M.D., M.R.C.P. FORENSIC MEDICINE By SYDNEY SMITH, M.D., and JOHN GLAISTER, Jnr., M.D. ALLERGY By G. W. BRAV, M.B., Ch.M. J. & A. CHURCHILL Printea in Great Britain FOREWORD Two distinct periods can be recognised in the history of our knowledge of asthma. The first, beginning with' Sir John Floyer's treatise published in 1698, culminating with the pub lication of Hyde Salter's monograph in 1860, and ending with the Great War, was the period of clinical observation. The second, beginning about 1920, is the period in which intensive laboratory investigations have been combined with the older clinical methods. This has led fo a remarkable development in our knowledge of the subject and to the appearance of numerous books and innumerable papers in many languages. It has become impossible for the ordinary man to keep abreast with the literature, so that a successful summary of the results of recent research on asthma is assured of a warm welcome. Such a summary will be found in Dr. Bray's book, which has the additional advantage of containing a first-hand account of his own work on asthma and allied conditions in children, in whom allergic manifestations appear in their simplest forms. Having devoted himself for two years almost exclusively to the investigation of this subject, he is in an exceptionally favourable position to review the whole question. His success is the result of his flair for research combined with hard work and clear thinking. But some credit is due to the lay members of the Asthma Research Council, who as sufferers from asthma them selves conceived the idea of endowing asthma research. This prompted the Halley Stewart Trustees to found the Fellowship which Dr. Bray has held during the last two years at the Hospital for Sick Children. All who read this book will agree that the Committee of the Hospital for Sick Children has been fortunate in its choice of a research fellow. ARTHUR F. HURST. v PREFACE ., Dcr Geimpfte verhlilt sich gegeniiber der Lymphe, der Luetische gegeniiber dem Syphilisvirus, der Tubereulose gegeniiber dem 'l'uberkulin, der mit Serum Injizicrte gegeniiber dem Serum anders als ein Individuum, welches mit dem betreffenden Agens noeh nicht in Bcriihrung gekommen ist; er ist deswegen noeh weit entfernt, unempfindlich zu sein. Alles, was wir von ihm sagen konnen, ist, dass seine Reaktionsfahigkcit geandert is~. Fur diesen ullgemeinen Begriff der veranderten Reaktionsflihigkeit schlage ieh den Ausdruck Allergic vor. Allos bezeichnet die Abwei chung wm der urspriinglichen Verfassung, von dem Verhalten des Normalen, wie in Allorhythmie, Allotropie." (v. PIRQUET, " Allergie," ]906.) This, in von Pirquet's own words, is how the term" Allergy" originated, and, in the quarter of a century that has elapsed since its inception, this idea of an "altered reactivity" has been extended to include a multitude of conditions other than those to which von Pirquet originally referred. So, whilst the whole study of the subject of Allergy is a comparatively reccnt innovation, and still regarded by many as a term in which to cloak our ignorance of the complex mechanisms concerned, the minute clinical recognition of such an allergic disease as asthma dates back even to the pre-Christian era. With Allergy, as with all other new theses; there has been an immediate profusion and confusion of ideas. Impetuous youth finds that the theory explains most-of.DUl' bodily ailments, whilst staid old age regards it as a passing fad that will soon expire as many such have done before. For this reason, with the task before me of conducting research into the nature of these peculiar altered reactions, it has been necessary to endea vour to correlate, if possible, these ancient and modern views, and so establish the basis of our present knowledge of the subject so that further advancements can take place. In the vii viii PREFACE majority of particulars conflicting views have been expresseq which it has been necessary either to confirm or to refute; so, where antithetic statements have appeared, I have endeavoured to support one or other from the intensive study of some thousand allergic children that I have investigated in the last few years. It may be of interest to English readers and sufferers that a great deal of the pioneer work in allergic conditions originated in England. Sir John Floyer, of London, in his" Treatise of the Asthma" (1698), gave a minute description of the symptoms and treatment to that date, and assigned the" immediate cause of the asthma to a straitness, compression, or constriction of the bronchia," and added some " reflections on the dissection of a broken-winded mare." Ramadge, of London, differentiated (1835) the nervous and symptomatic types of asthma. Salter's " On Asthma, its Pathology and Treatment" (1860, 1868) has remained a classic to this day. It was he who first noted the association of asthma with the presence of animals, and who emphasised the importance of the hereditary factor. It was Bostock, of Liverpool, who was the first (1819) to describe hay-fever as "summer catarrh," a disease with a definite symp tomatology and a seasonal occurrence. From 1859-1873 Blackley, of Manchester, by a series of most thorough and systematic experiments, proved conclusiv:ely that the pollen of grass was a causative agent. Noon and Freeman, of London, applied the conjunctival test in diagnosis, and in 1911 were the first to use pollen solutions for therapeutic purposes. Histamine was isolated by Barger and Dale, of London, in 1910, in the same year as Hurst, also of London, first drew attention to the analogy between asthma and muco-membranous colic. Within recent years priority in tliis field has been ousted from us largely by the prevalence and importance of its applica tion in America; but with the formal- constitution of the Asthma Research Council in October, \927, and the subsidisa tion of various research centres throughout the British Isles by voluntary subscription, a great impetus has been given to the further study and elucidation of allergic conditions in this PREFACE ix country, and many sufferers have offered, not only funds, but themselves, as subjects for detailed investigations. My aim in writing this book has been to provide in a handy and inexpensive form a ,resume of our present state of knowledge and the trend of modern !esearch in Allergy in general and its individual manifestations in particular. In addition, a tentative endeavour has been made to reproduce the possible common, hay-fever producing flora of the British Isles, which, as far as I am aware, has been unattempted hitherto. For the excellent opportunities that have been conferred upon me I desire to convey my thanks to the Asthma Research Council and the Halley St~wart Trust for a grant of funds; to the Honorary Medical Staff of the Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London, for referring their' cases unre servedly to the Clinic for investigation; and to the individual sufferers, both parents and children, who have' patiently submitted themselves to tedious questionings and procedures. Nor should I fail to express my indebtedness to Dr. W. Payne for constant advice and assistance in biochemical matters, and to Dr. A. Signy in the hrematologic and bacteriologic aspects. In the actual production of the book it is a pleasure to acknowledge the help of Dr. Arthur F. Hurst, who lias written the Foreword and devoted much time to the tedious task of reading through the whole manuscript !lnd tempcring it with his wisdom and criticism based on years of experience, and, ' might I add, suffering. His numerous contributions to the study of asthma are referred to in the text, as well as those of Professor R. J. S. McDowall, who has rendered great assistance in the experimental aspects and their diagrammatic representa tion (Figs. 1 to 6). To Mr. Charles Keogh I would like to express my thanks for his colour work (Figs. 14, 23 and 24) and sketching (Fig. 8, 25 and 26); to S. F. Armstrong and the Cambridge University Press for permission to reproduce most of the British grasses portrayed; to A. R. Horwood for permission to reproclucc the trees and weeds; to Dr. F. Knott for Figs. 45 to 48, illustrating the bacteriology of the sputum; to Mr. B. Shires for his opinions on the radiograms of the chest (Figs. 49
Description: