ebook img

(Re)Articulating Writing Assessment for Teaching and Learning PDF

228 Pages·2002·0.7 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview (Re)Articulating Writing Assessment for Teaching and Learning

(RE)ARTICULATING WRITING ASSESSMENT FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING This Page Intentionally Left Blank (RE)ARTICULATING WRITING ASSESSMENT FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING BRIAN HUOT UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS Logan, Utah ISBN 0-87421-470-X (E-BOOK) Copyright © 2002 Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322–7800 All rights reserved. Manufactured in the United States of America. Cover design by Sans Serif Inc. A version of chapter three appeared in College EnglishVol 64, copyright © 2002 by the National Council of Teachers of English. Reprinted with permission. An early version of chapter four appeared in College Composition and Communication, Vol 47, copyright © 1996 by the National Council of Teachers of English. Reprinted with permission. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Huot, Brian A. (Re)articulating writing assessment for teaching and learning / Brian Huot. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. ISBN 0-87421-449-1 (alk. paper) 1. English language—Rhetoric—Study and teaching. 2. Grading and marking (Students) 3. Report writing—Evaluation. 4. College prose—Evaluation. I. Title. PE1404 .H86 2002 808'.042'071—dc21 2002010352 For Pam and Pat, without whom many of the good things in my life (like this book) would not be possible. This Page Intentionally Left Blank CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix 1 (Re)Articulating Writing Assessment 1 2 Writing Assessment as a Field of Study 21 3 Assessing, Grading, Testing and Teaching Writing 59 4 Toward a New Theory for Writing Assessment 81 5 Reading Like a Teacher 109 6 Writing Assessment as Technology and Research 137 7 Writing Assessment Practice 165 Notes 192 References 195 Index 213 About the Author 217 This Page Intentionally Left Blank ACKNOWLEDGMENTS When I was in graduate school in the mid 1980s, Michael M. Williamson told me and my graduate student colleagues that no one did research alone. Over the years, I have come to realize just how accurate he was. I am dependent upon so many people for many of the ideas, insights and expressions in this book, that there is no way I could acknowledge everyone’s contributions. I would like to start by thanking all of those people whose names do not appear in this acknowledgement. My omissions are due to the vast intellectual debts I owe for this book and my own inability to remember all of the help I have received. There is no way I could have done the work I have during my professional life and in this book had not many scholars paved the way in writing assessment. Among the many shoulders upon which I stand, I must men- tion Hunter Breland, Roberta Camp, Charles Cooper, Peter Elbow, Lester Faigley, Lee Odell and Stephen Witte. Of course, like anyone working in college writing assessment I am greatly indebted to Edward M. White for his trail blazing work over the last three or more decades. Although I have carefully docu- mented the published sources I’ve used, the published work of some people has shaped this volume and helped me to create a text that would not be possible without their contributions. In this category, I would like to thank Arnetha Ball, Pat Belanoff, Harold Berlak, Roberta Camp, Lee Cronbach, Peter Elbow, Lester Faigley, Richard Haswell, George Madhaus, Samuel Messick, Pamela Moss, Sandra Murphy, Louise Phelps, Lorrie Shephard, William L. Smith, Melanie Sperling, Richard Straub,

Description:
Brian Huot’s aim for this book is both ambitious and provocative. He wants to reorient composition studies’ view of writing assessment. To accomplish this, he not only has to inspire the field to perceive assessment—generally not the most appreciated area of study—as deeply significant to th
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.