THER EAL SOVIERTU SSIA BY DAVIJD.D ALLIN TRANSLATED BY JOSEPH SHAPLEN REVISED AND ENLARGEEDDI TION NEW HAVEN YALUEN IVERSPIRTEYS S 1947 CoPYRIGHT, 1944, 1947, BY YALE UNIVERSITY PRESS REVISED AND ENLARGED EDITION Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (except by reviewers for the public press), without written permission from the publishers. THE AMASA STONE MATHER MEMORIAL PUBLICATION FUND The present volume is the twenty-second work published by the Yale University Press on the Amasa Stone Mather Me morial Publication Fund. This Foundation was established August 25, 1922, by a gift to Yale University from Samuel Mather, Esq., of Cleveland, Ohio, in pursuance of a pledge made in June, 1922, on the fifteenth anniversary of the gradua tion of his son, Amasa Stone Mather, who was born in Cleveland on August 20, 1884, and was graduated from Yale College in the Class of 1907. Subsequently, after traveling abroad, he returned to Cleveland, where he soon won a recog nized position in the business life of the city and where he actively interested himself also in the work of many organiza tions devoted to the betterment of the community and to the welfare of the natiol). His death from pneumonia on February 9, was undoubtedly hastened by his characteristic unwill 1920, ingness ever to spare himself, even when ill, in the discharge of his duties or in his efforts to protect and further the interests committed to his care by his associates. PREAFC ET OT HEN EWE DITION A REAL and durable resolution of the increasing inter national tensions can come only from Russia, in the shape of an internal transformation. No other solu tion would be stable. Unless the political system in Russia undergoes fundamental changes, the ups and downs in the relationship of. the powers will continue and the trend to ward a new war will become stronger. Some conflicts will be resolved but new ones will arise. Some problems will be worked out, but new ones will take their place. The state of armed peace or, rather, armed armistice, with all its inherent dangers and the inevitable bloody ending, will continue. Either an internal transformation of Russia's political sys tem will prevent a war, or a war will lead to an upheaval in Russia. Another war would certainly mean a gigantic de feat for her; in the course of such a war much more would be buried than Sovietism and Stalinism. From such a war Russia would emerge divided into several states, surrounded by hating nations, pushed far back into the East, im poverished and drained of blood. It would be a terrible and tragic ending of a great and glorious revolution. This is the dilemma. To the world the solution of it means peace or war. To Russia it means peace or defeat and degradation. It is up to the people of Russia to choose the road-the people, but not the official leadership. The leader ship is committed to a political line which for decades has not varied essentially, despite zi ags and compromises. gz This leadership, with all its realism and cynicism, is walk ing blindfold toward a deep abyss, because it is committed to follow a prescribed course. It is unable to travel a road of peaceful evolution and it cannot change its nature. A fresh proof that it cannot and will not change was supplied during the last war years when hopes had risen high, in Russia as well as abroad, that the Moscow goverrt of ment had entered the road a gradual transmutation, that Vl THE REAL SovIET RussIA the old ideas had been discarded and that, with victory won, the rigid internal system would be liberalized. In Russia . the conviction was widespread that everythmg would change after the war, that there would be no going back to the old oppression, and that the .first days of peace would mean the dawn of a new freedom. This was only an illusion, a bitter self-delusion. The ideological retreat made by the Soviet regime during the war proved to be a well-calculated maneuver, and democ racy merely a convenient slogan. A new purge, or rather a combination of several purges, begun in the summer of 1946 is intended again to streamline everything and everyone into a new "Socialist offensive" to compensate for the tem porary wartime retreat. The mechanism is again being tightened. An icy wind blows anew from the East. It extinguishes the .first ray of hope that has been cherished by intellectuals and peasants, by workers and prisoners, and last but not least, by many a Soviet Army leader. "Socialist offensive" on the march inside Russia always means an irritation of Russian relationships with the world abroad. Soviet internal policies and foreign policies are insolubly tied together, as they were during the last period of prerevolutionary Russia. The cement that bound Russia with the West was called Adolf Hitler. With his disappearance and with his empire smashed, hatred above everything else animates the Soviet leadership's attitude today toward the democratic world. In order to understand and foresee the foreign policies of the Soviet Government one must understand Soviet domes tic policy. The two are opposite sides of the same medal. Only by studying the general concepts dominating Soviet activity at home, the established social relationships, and the direction of internal political development, is it possible to comprehend Soviet foreign policy and avoid the na'ive and dangerous mistakes which have occurred so frequently dur ing the last years. PREFACE TO THE NEW EDITION vu Appreciation is expressed to George Denicke and Vladimir Zenzinov, authorities in the field of international literature on Russia, for their substantial help in the preparation of this book. To Dr. N. M. Jasny I am indebted for advice and factual material on Russian economy; to Professor Alfred V agts for valuable help on the difficult problem of war casualties. Much labor was devoted by Mrs. Tillie Klorman and the late Joseph Shaplen in helping to shape the literary form of this book. The staff of the Slavonic Division of the New York Public Library gave me invaluable aid. The charts were prepared by Alexander Dallin and drawn by W. C. Kirkwood. D.J.D. CONTENTS I. "KL YUKVA" I II. THE So-CALLED EvoLUTION OF COMMUNISM 15 The Revolution Is Not Yet Ended 20 The State Does Not Die 31 Stalin and His Party in the War 37 Marxism-Leninism in the War 43 After the War 50 III. THE DEvrL's NAME Is TROTSKY 53 IV. THE NEW RELIGIOUS POLICY 68 V. THE SovrET CONCEPT OF FoREIGN Poucy 91 "Suspicion" and "Mistrust" 95 Wars Will Be Inevitable IOI Peaceful But Aggressive 104 VI. THE NEw SocIAL STRUCTURE 108 More Inequality! 109 "Socialism Is Inequality" Il5 The Melting Pot and the New Social Classes II8 Industrial Expansion on Communist Lines 123 The Population Problem 129 I. VII. THE NEw UPPER CLASSES, THEIR RrsE 137 Communism and the Intelligentsia 139 Fluctuations in Policy 142 A Strange Amalgam 148 Rapid Increase 154 The Leviathan 158 VIII. THE NEW UPPER CLASSES, II. THEIR FUTURE 163 Rigid Hierarchy 163 Vague Programs 166 The Communist Party and the Intelligentsia 170 THE REAL SOVIET RUSSIA X Standards of Living 17 3 Future Development and Differentiation 1 7 5 IX. THE WoRKING CLAss 179 Why No Labor Movement in Russia? 183 The Standard of Living 188 The Workers and the Communist Party 196 X. THE PEASANTRY 203 "Right" and "Left" Communism 203 The Kolkhoz 209 Old Wine in New Bottles 2 1 2 The "Millionaires" 2 1 6 The Communist Party in the Village 17 2 The War and After 19 2 XI. FORCED LABOR 7 2 2 Labor as an Instrument of Correction 3 t 2 The First Labor Camps 2 3 5 Successful Development 39 2 The Five-Year Plans 241 The Network of Labor Camps 249 XII. THE COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE SOVIET UNION 263 Lenin's Party 268 Molding the Party 70 2 Stalin and His Party 2 7 5 The Real Party 279 The Komsomol 283 XIII. THE ARMY AND THE SECRET POLICE 291 XIV. AFTER THE WAR 301 SOURCES 314 INDEX 321 THER EASLOV ITER USSAI I "KLYUKVA" FOREIGNERS have been discovering Russia in recent years with the same rapture with which Columbus dis covered America. Nearly every month some intrepid traveler, having exchanged the edict of the King of Spain for the credentials of an American newspaper, and the Santa Maria wooden for a winged Douglas, produces a weighty book, containing the results of his observations in Russia. This literary output has created a very sizable li brary. The authors are honest, decent folk who often do not know either the language or the country; who today are in India, tomorrow in Tierra del Fuego, and, in between, in Moscow; and who invariably try to be nice to the powers that-be in each country. For this reason, because of their energy, American speed, and desire to combine whatever objectivity they possess with "hot news," they produce books, some of them called scientific, some political, which would justify the Russian people in exclaiming in horror, as do the Indians in a certain operetta, when Columbus comes ashore, "Woe to us, we are discovered!" Such is the fate of Russia. A certain French traveler, upon visiting there a century ago, was intrigued by a plant which klyukva, the Russians called a cranberry plant used in the manufacture of a popular beverage. Klyukva grows on small, low bushes. But upon his return to France the noted explorer related how he drank tea with Russian grandees "sous l'o mbre d'un klukva majestueux"-under the shade of a majestic kly ukva. His report provoked laughter in Russia, and the word "klyukva" came to be used as signifying a certain kind of ri diculous misinformation. 2 THE REAL SovrET RussrA As an example we may cite a young journalist who tries to be objective, but who apparently never saw women working in either American or Russian industrial plants. He reports that in Russia "the women are neither entirely masculine nor entirely feminine . . . They look like a mixture of both sexes, they are different from any other women." Another writer, the editor of a New York newspaper, dis covers that "the Russians rarely say 'da'-yes; they say mostly 'da-da-da.' " One author of a widely circulated book reports seriously the alleged fact gleaned in Moscow that "only one per cent of the Russian people were literate before the Revolution." The fact is, as is well known, that the proportion was about 40 per cent of the population over nine years. But he wanted to be obliging to the government by showing the low level of literacy it had to contend with at the beginning of its rule. Another writer, for the same reason, reveals the state of ed ucation in Russia as the most extraordinary in the world: "nearly half of the people in Russia know German." In 5 6 reality, only about to per cent are familiar with that lan guage. One writer, having failed to grasp the Russian word for (kipyatok); boiled water, says it is "kippy tuck" a photog rapher, having snapped the picture of a woman from Tam bov, explains that the city of that name is located in Siberia, although Tambov is seven hundred miles distant from Siberia. Another author calls Stalin's father Illarion, although he could have learned. the correct name from almost any person in the street. In a book published in the United States by a serious and well-known organization devoted to the study of foreign policy we find the following bit of information concerning the agrarian question in Russia: "By 1914 only one-third of the peasants owned land . . . The rest were landless peas ants who worked as tenants or farm hands on the estates of big land owners.'; All of which is pure nonsense. The "KLYU KVA" 3 percentage of landless peasants before the Revolution was negligible, although the lot of the peasantry was not envi able. In the same book we learn that "there are about 3 oo million Slavs in Europe." The actual number is between 1 So and 1 90 million. A good many people are familiar with the "white nights" enjoyed by Leningrad, located in the sixtieth degree of north latitude. But a lady journalist, having visited only Moscow, and having heard something about "white nights," informs her readers in the United States in klyukva style: "The white nights of Moscow is a phrase that Muscovites have used for centuries, but with the war it has taken on another mean ing." In general, geography and history suffer most. Take the German town of Tilsit, for example. In October, 1943, a newspaper in Virginia published this: "In the course of the last centuries many a conference took place in Russia which decided the fate of Europe: the Tilsit conference of 1807 . . ." The system of limited free enterprise reintroduced in 1921 in Soviet Russia was abolished about five years after Lenin's death ( 1924). But a military publishing house de clares in a book that "when Lenin felt that the movement toward Socialism could proceed, he abandoned the NEP." The same book offers the following gem of historic lore bearing upon events of 1917: "When Lenin saw that the revolution might become a democratic or boµrgeois revolu tion he joined with Trotsky in violent action. Civil war ensued." It is strange that all such nonsense is written mainly with respect to Russia. No one writes that Manchester is in Ire land or Lyons in Belgium; th.at the Germans do not say "ja" but "ja-ja-ja," and that the Italians are all illiterate. Careful verification of facts is obligatory for all other coun tries. Why is the exception made for Russia?