READINGS IN HILIPPINE CHURCH HISTOI JOHN N. SCHUMACHER, S.J. QUEZON CITY LOYOLA SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY ATENEO DE MANILA UNIVERSITY 1979 PCPM S.P. No. 669 Copyright 1979 by the Loyola School of Theology, Ateneo de Manila University, P.O, Box 4082, Manila, Philippines PREFACE Vll I. The Spanish Church in the Indies ........................... 1 The Age of Discovery The Papal Bulls Justice to the Indians. ^atfonato Real de las Indicts II. Christianity Comes to the Philippines.................... 12 Pre-Hispanic Filipino Religion beginnings of Evangelization jOrganization of the Church, 1579-1595 III. The Struggle for Justice................................................. 22 Augustinians vs. Conquistadores The Synod of Manila Defends the Filipinos Bishop Salazar is Champion of Filipino Rights ^Acceptance of Spanish Sovereignty IV. 39 Evangelization -Methods and Motives ‘‘Obstacles to Christianization - Adaptation to Filipino Culture .^Building the Christian Community Success of the First 50 Years 9B V. Obstacles and Setbacks Resistance in the South The Dutch Wars, 1600-1648 Disruption of the Christian Communities in Luzon The “Moro Wars” in the Visayas VI. .......................................... 114 Jurisdictional Struggles Church vs. State Bishops vs. Religious Orders Episcopal Visitation Enforced VII. 1620-1760 ........................ 141 The Established Church, Education Works of Charity The Church in Manila ^ The Church in the Provinces Missionaries and Vernacular Literature The Church and Material Development Missionary Outreach VIII. Development of a Filipino Clergy......................................... 193 Initial Obstacles Hesitant Beginnings, 1720-1767 Twisted Growth, 1767-1820 Political Suspicion, 1820-1872 The Nationalist Clergy, 1849-1872 IX. The Church and Filipino Nationalism............................... 231 4 Nineteenth-Century Religious Conditions The Antifriar Character of the Nationalist Movement Church Policy of the Revolutionary Government The Filipino Clergy and the Revolution X. .............................................. 292 The Church in Disarray A Church Without Leadership, 1899-1903 v The Coming of Protestantism The Aglipayan Schism XI. Adjusting to a New Order............................................................. 334 Reorganization of the Church, 1903-1910 The Church on the Defensive, 1910-1925 j Adaptation and Resurgence, 1925-1941 War and Destruction, 1941-1945 sources............................................................................................................................... 385 .............................................................................. 402 appendices ............................................................... 405 GLOSSARY ....................... 411 SUGGESTIONS for further reading 416 INDEX 429 MAPS AND FIGURES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to acknowledge gratefully permission to reprint the following materials: Dr. Daniel Doeppers and the Ateneo de Manila University Press, for materials taken from “Changing Patterns of Aglipayan Adherence, 1918-1970,” Philippine Studies 25 (1977): 270. Dr. Jose N. Endriga, for a passage from “The Friar Lands Settlement: Promise and Performance,” Philippine Journal of Public Administration 14 (1970): 412-13. The Program Agency of the United Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A. for a passage from James B. Rodgers, Forty Years in the Philippines. Fr. Frederick Scharpf, S.V.D., for a passage from “Why Did We Not Do This Much Sooner!,” Ilocos Studies 7-8 (1975-1976): 80-83. Fr. Pedro S. de Achutegui, S.J., for the diagram in Figure 1. Dr. Daniel Doeppers and the Academic Press Inc. (London) Ltd. for the maps in figures 2 and 3. Dr. Daniel Doeppers and The Geographical Review for the map in figure 4. PREFACE As I write this preface, the celebration of the fourth centenary of the erection of the diocese of Manila has already begun. Four cen turies after the Church was juridically organized in our country, it is ironic, and sad, to have to acknowledge that there is no adequate his tory of the Philippine church. Though this book has no pretensions to filling that lamentable deficiency, it aims to provide at least a sketch of such a history, which may satisfy some of the immediate needs for a knowledge of our Christian past. Whether one is a believ ing Catholic or not, the development of the Filipino nation cannot be understood without a knowledge of the major, often decisive, role that the Church has played, well or ill, in that process, and continues to play. This book is frankly modeled on the well-known and much- appreciated work of the late Fr. Horacio de la Costa, Readings in Philippine History. The format he employed — selections from primary historical sources accompanied by a running commentary weaving the whole into a continuous narrative — has seemed also to me effective for giving the reader who is not a professional histo rian something of the flavor of the original sources, while at the same time enabling him to synthesize these disparate pieces into some kind of a pattern of development. As De la Costa said of his book, it is an attempt at “a history of [the Church in] the Philippines by those who made it, or who saw it made.” In this way it may be hoped that it will serve the cause of both historical and theological understand ing. The book owes more than its inspiration to Father de la Costa. The nucleus from which I have developed it over' the past ten years was a short collection of readings which he had compiled for a series of lectures on the Church in the Spanish period, given to the students of San Jose Seminary in 1964, shortly before my arrival from grad uate studies to take up the post of professor of church history at that institution and at its academic successor, the Loyola School of viii PREFACE Theology of the Ateneo de Manila University. I produced my own collection for a regular two-unit course in 1968, which in turn devel oped into a three-unit course for which I assembled a larger mimeo graphed collection in 1970. With the intention of filling a growing need for a textbook in Philippine church history felt in other semi naries and universities, I subsequently accompanied the readings with commentary so that it might be used by others than myself. This was completed for the first half of the readings in the edition of 1976, and for the entire volume in this first printed edition. The long period of gestation which the work has undergone, has, I trust, been of benefit to it. The comments, as well as the difficulties, of my students in San Carlos Seminary, Manila; Divine Word Seminary, Tagaytay; Mindanao Regional Seminary, Davao; and especially at Loyola School of Theology, have done much to help me rewrite it. In the early stages of this work, I made considerable use of selections from the monumental compilation of Blair and Robert- .son._ But as I became increasingly aware how deficient many of the translations in that collection were, I have retranslated from the Span ish originals all but a very few texts whose originals were not avail able to me. All translations unless otherwise noted, therefore, are my own, except for a certain number earlier translated by Father de la Costa (marked H1C in the reference notes). While attempting to avoid the archaisms not easily intelligible to the ordinary student, I have generally tried to keep fairly close to the originals, especially in the sixteenth and seventeenth century documents, in the hope of conveying to the reader something of the feeling of the text. In the case of Tagalog selections, I have preserved the original, inasmuch as the book is written for Filipino readers, but have included an English translation in an appendix for those who need it. Trends in seminary education have made it unwise to continue the practice of Father de la Costa’s first compilation, in which most of the readings were pre sented in their original Latin and Spanish. It should be emphasized that this book cannot pretend to be a definitive history of the Philippine church, even within the limit ations imposed by a one-volume work. It has other limitations as well, and I am only too conscious of them. I would like to mention three. It is limited, first, to the Roman Catholic Church, at least directly. Though one could wish for an ecumenical history, my lack of thorough familiarity with the sources for other churches and denominations made me judge it better to limit myself to what I know better. Some may find the selections concerning Protestantism and Aglipayanism in the early part of this century rather harsh. They are not meant to be offensive; the facts of that period, at least as seen by the participants, were harsh, and the inclusion of such selec tions is not meant to pass any judgment on later developments, still less on the present. A fuller history of other denominations, would, PREFACE ix I am sure, make clear their later contributions to Filipino Christian ity, but that is outside the scope of the present work. The second limitation is what may seem to some an undue pro portion of Jesuit sources, particularly for the late nineteenth and the twentieth centuries. This is certainly so in some respects, and occurs for two reasons. One is the fact that due to the circumstances of the Revolution, the Jesuits came to occupy a unique position in the Church for some time, both because of their relative numbers, and because of the fact that, of the older and established religious orders, only they had emerged relatively unscathed from the anticlericalism which followed from the Revolution. The second, more subjective, reason is that Jesuit archives and other Jesuit sources have been more accessible to me for the modern period, and hence I have had to de pend on them more. The third limitation is the fact that this history ends with 1945. There is much that deserves to be written about in the post-inde pendence period if we are to understand today’s Church and its problems. But representative sources are not as easy to come by for recent events. Given more time, this lack could be remedied, at least to some extent, as could the other limitations mentioned above. But given the urgent need for a textbook in the present situation, it has seemed to me better to publish this basic text rather than wait to produce something more perfect in an as yet unforeseen future. If it comes to another edition, I hope to be able to lessen these limitations. If its deficiencies may stimulate someone else to improve on it, I will be more than happy too. Meanwhile, I hope that it may serve to give seminarians and university students in particular, an ap preciation of the mighty works of God in our land, as well as to give understanding of the human limitations of His servants which have placed obstacles to, or deflected the direction of, His work. For a sound theology today, as Vatican II emphasized, must be based not only on the written Word of God in the Scriptures, but also on the living experience of the Church down through the centu ries, including the signs of the times perceptible in the experience of the People of God today. In the light of that principle, the history of the Church is an important ingredient in any theology which is to escape being mere abstract speculation. By the same token, the incul- turation of theology which the post-Vatican II Church, especially in the Third World, sees as an imperative of any real evangelization, must needs root itself in the history of the local church. It was with this in mind that I have worked on this book, in the hope that it would serve especially, though not solely, Filipino students and professors of theology in their efforts to root their theological reflec tion in the lived experience of the Filipino People of God during these past four centuries. But I hope that fellow historians will also find it useful, as well as all those who are interested in the history of X PREFACE our people, in which the Catholic Church has played so significant a part. Non-English words in the text have generally been italicized only on their first use. In accordance with ordinary Philippine usage, accents have been omitted in Filipino proper names of Spanish origin. When the names are those of Spaniards or Spanish institu tions, however, the standard Spanish practice has been followed. I have retained certain terms which were sometimes used with a derogatory connotation, not only, of course, in the readings in which they occur, but also at times in the commentary. This is especially true of the term Indio, which often had such'a connotation in the late nineteenth century, because it is essential to make clear about just whom we are talking — indigenous Filipinos of Malay blood or Philippine-born Spaniards. The term “Filipino” as we now use it, can of course only have its full sense with the rise of national conscious ness in the latter half of the nineteenth century. Besides my debt to the curators and librarians of various institu tions here and abroad in which I first came on some of the materials used here while pursuing research on my other books, there are a number of persons to whom I owe a special debt of gratitude for this particular work. Fathers Ralph B. Gehring, S.J., librarian of Loyola School of Theology; Leo A. Cullum, S.J., archivist of the Philippine Province of the Society of Jesus; Robert J. Suchan, S.J., Director of Libraries of the Ateneo de Manila University; and Pablo Fernandez, O.P., curator of the Dominican archives of Santisimo Rosario Prov ince and of the University of Santo Tomas; all generously exerted themselves to help me locate materials in the collections under their care. Father Fernandez, in addition to extraordinary generosity with his time in locating and suggesting documents, read both one of the earlier mimeographed versions and the manuscript of the present edition. From his own wide and detailed knowledge of the Spanish period of our history, by his suggestions, corrections, and clarifica tions, he saved me from a number of errors, especially on technical matters of that unique ecclesiastical organization which was the Patronato Real de ias lndias. I have also been aided by the com ments and suggestions of Fathers Manfred Muller, S.V.D., and Frederick Scharpf, S.V.D., who made use of the earlier editions in their courses respectively at Divine Word Seminary, Tagaytay, and the Archdiocesan Major Seminary in Vigan. Finally, Fr. Pedro S. de Achutegui, S.J., painstakingly read the final manuscript for me, and gave invaluable assistance on the technical matters of publication, as well as making available to me materials from his own collection of documents and microfilms. All of these have contributed to whatever virtues this volume may contain, but of course I myself must take sole responsibility for whatever deficiencies there are in its final form.