Ravine Concrete Arch Footbridge at Milwaukee Lake Park A Cultural Heritage Assessment Study and Report Historic Preservation Office City of Milwaukee 200 E. Wells Street, Milwaukee, WI 53202 Phone 4142865712, fax 4142863004 [email protected] Carlen Hatala Emma Rudd Leila Saboori Nader Sayadi July 2016 Introduction: This report has been prepared to accompany the current study of the Lake Park Ravine Bridge taking place 20152016. The evaluation from Milwaukee County and its consultants consists of an assessment of the bridge’s structural condition and alternatives for its repair or replacement. This report concentrates on the significance of the bridge, its context as part of a National Register district, the contribution of its architects and how innovative technology helped to produce the distinctive design of the bridge that we have in Lake Park today. Many questions are raised when determining the future of this bridge. How significant is significant? Does significance matter? Is or should cost always be the determining factor in preservation? Why haven’t we been able to save more bridges in Wisconsin? Is there a bias when evaluating bridges; why aren’t bridges looked at the same way as a historic house or site? Does a utilitarian structure have less value than something “attractive”? This report will hopefully open the door to a productive dialogue on the future of this unique structure. Many thanks to the UWMilwaukee students who enthusiastically poured over the hundreds of documents and photos to arrive at the report in the following pages, Emma Rudd, Leila Saboori, and Nader Sayadi. They were interns with the City of Milwaukee Historic Preservation office in 2016. 2 Lake Park as a context for the Ravine Concrete Arch Footbridge The origins of the establishment of Lake Park on Milwaukee’s East Side go back to the earliest attempts of the city toward providing recreational spaces within the growing city in the midnineteenth century. Considered “gardens of the poor,” a series of parks were imagined to bring over natural elements to the public who could not afford to have private gardens and yards like the wealthy. With the establishment Milwaukee’s first Park Commission by the City of Milwaukee in 1889, the city began acquiring land under the presidency of Christian Wahl. Lake Park was designed by the wellknown landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted, as a part of larger planning project including River Park, now Riverside Park, at the Milwaukee River and Newberry Boulevard connecting these two parks and therefore the river and the lake. Olmsted also laid the foundations of a third park in Milwaukee, West Park, now Washington Park.1 The work on Lake Park began in 1892, when the city made agreements with Olmsted and his firm, Olmsted, Olmsted & Eliot, of Brookline, Massachusetts, to develop ideas and plans for the park. Olmsted’s main spatial idea for the park was based on English Romantic style as a reaction to the fast industrialization and urbanization of societies. There were at least two main factors that shaped Olmsted’s design perspective: first, he was greatly influenced by the English Romantic movement and the precedents he saw in his trip to England in 1850. Second, he collaborated with with Calvin Vaux who was an assistant of Andrew Jackson Downing, a wellknown advocate of the naturalistic movement. In their design for Milwaukee’s Lake Park, Olmsted applied some of the features that were already developed in his works, such as New York City’s Central Park. Thier features provided a contrast to the surrounding urban area: 1 . Dolores Knopfelmacher, “History of Lake Park,” http://lakeparkfriends.org/history/ (accessed July 06, 2016). 3 winding pathways through the park instead of the city grid, everchanging views, refreshment from the sights and sounds of urban life, and natural scenery.2 Lake Park in Milwaukee is locally and nationally recognized as a significant historic place. One of the first parks in Milwaukee, Lake Park is credited with the emergence of the City of Milwaukee Park Commission and later parks system.3 Prior to 1880, Milwaukee had no legal means or overall plan to fundraise for the establishment and maintenance of the urban public parks. As a result, the city’s green public spaces were limited to small squares, triangles or plots of land donated to the city and often maintained by residents who lived nearby. The establishment of Lake Park, the parks system, and the Board of Park Commissioners was a milestone in the history of Milwaukee’s built environment and social history.4 “Lake Park is also significant because it is one of the original park locations selected by the first park commissioners when the city became aware of the need to establish cityowned public parks.”5 The historical significance of Lake Park extends primarily to its designer, the nationally renowned landscape architect Frederick Law Olmsted. Olmsted’s belief that public parks are crucial natural segments of urban areas for the public drastically changed cities across the United States in the late nineteenth century and the dawn of the twentieth century, and laid the 2 . Lake Park, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, National Register of Historic Places, Continuation Sheet (United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1992), Section 7, Page 2. 3 . https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiI0ofJgNPNAhXK3YM KHYTPA2kQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcounty.milwaukee.gov%2FImageLibrary%2FGroups%2FcntyPark s%2Fparkwriteups%2FLake_Park.doc&usg=AFQjCNEyMrt8hyK2uKbXUBg7JtUhJbW7pQ&sig2=FSqGcSk_fkA p_m9q8PDg9A&bvm=bv.126130881,d.amc&cad=rja 4 . “Historic Designation Study Report, North Point North Historic District,” City of Milwaukee, Designated Reports, p. 67 (January 01, 2001): http://www.city.milwaukee.gov/ImageLibrary/Groups/cityHPC/DesignatedReports/vticnf/HDNoPointNorth.pdf (accessed July 01, 2016). 5 . Lake Park, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, National Register of Historic Places, Continuation Sheet (United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1992), Section 8, Page 11. 4 foundations of the cities we live in today. Olmsted’s significant influence on the generations of planners, social and environmental activists, and legislators was the result of his design and construction of a series of parks that applied his ideas in practice. The most wellknown of these parks is Central Park in New York City, built between 1857 and 1873. When Olmsted won the competition for the Central Park project, he was not yet a wellknown designer. At the time he was hired by the Milwaukee Park Commission in 1982, however, he already had done a considerable number of landscape projects in California, Montreal, Boston, and Chicago. With the extensive professional knowledge and experience he had by the 1890s, Milwaukee’s Lake Park can be considered an excellent example of his mature works. Two years after the Lake Park project at Milwaukee, Olmsted retired from active practice in 1895. He passed away in 1903.6 As previously mentioned, Lake Park was one of the three main projects that Olmsted executed in Milwaukee; however, it is the only one that today most closely retains the original form and intent of its designer. This is a main requirement when seeking designation from the National Register of Historic Places status: “The significance of Lake Park as a Designed Historic Landscape is based on the fact that the plan of the park is essentially that which was supplied by Frederick Law Olmsted and his firm of Olmsted, Olmsted, & Eliot. The original curving carriage drives through the park have now become walkways. However, what remains are (I) the provision of views of Lake Michigan and (2) the contrast between the expanses of meadow and the rugged scenery in the natural ravines.”7 6 . Lake Park, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, National Register of Historic Places, Continuation Sheet (United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1992), Section 8, Page 7. 7 . Lake Park, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, National Register of Historic Places, Continuation Sheet (United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1992), Section 8, Page 11. 5 The completeness, wholeness, and authenticity of the park as one single historic entity and cultural property are not only substantial characteristics of the park, but also fulfil major criteria for being a National Historic Place. In other words, the significance of the park is not attributed to a few of its particular features but the combination of all existing historic features as a whole regardless of their materiality and form. Lake Park consists of various features and vegetations. The National Register for Historic Places recognizes ten contributing structures, two contributing buildings, two contributing objects, and two contributing sites within the boundaries of the park. It also considers four sites in the park as noncontributing sites.8 Most of the main architectural features of the park were built between 18931936, also described as “The Period of Significance of Lake Park.”9 The architectural features of the park include but are not limited to buildings, bridges, memorials, golf courses, playgrounds, tennis courts, and pathways. A considerable amount of work, including gardening, planting, and walkways, was accomplished in the 1890’s and early 1900’s. A majority of these elements still exist today, though a few of them has been altered and three have been eliminated. A list of major features are given in the table below:10 8 . Lake Park, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, National Register of Historic Places, Continuation Sheet (United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1992), Section 8, Page 1. 9 . Lake Park, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, National Register of Historic Places, Continuation Sheet (United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1992), Section 8, Page 12. 10 . “Lake Park,” County of Milwaukee, Park Writeups, p. 1: http://county.milwaukee.gov/ImageLibrary/Groups/cntyParks/parkwriteups/Lake_Park.doc (accessed July 06, 2016). 6 INVENTORY OF MAJOR FEATURES Name Date NHP report code North Point Lighthouse/Dwelling (originally built before the 1879 A11 park development) Park development begins in 1892 Steel Arch Bridge 1893 A2 Brick Arch Bridge 1893 A3 Formal Entrance at Newberry Blvd. 1893 B1 Streetcar station and shelter [demolished later] 1903 Lion Bridges (2) 1896 97 A6 South Concourse 1898 A8 Pavilion 1903 B3 Bandstand [demolished later] 1903 6Hole Golf Course (expanded in 1930) 1903 C8 Concrete Footbridge 1905 B7 Children’s building and playground [demolished/eliminated 1906 later] Grand Stairway 1908 B8 Indian Mound Plaque 1910 B10 Tennis Court 1911 B11 North Point Lighthouse/Dwelling (relocation & alteration) 1912 A11 Tool Shed/Workshop/Storage Building 1918 B12 E. B. Wolcott Monument 1920 C1 American War Mothers Plaque 1920 C2 Lincoln Memorial Drive 1929 C4 7 Rustic Bridge 1930s B2 18Hole Golf Course 1930 C8 American War Mothers Plaque 1931 C6 Bowling on the Green 1946 C7 Golf Starter's Building 1961 D7 Lawn Bowling Clubhouse 1962 D2 Ice Skating Warming House 1965 D3 County Bicycle Path 1967 D4 Milwaukee Landmarks Commission Plaque 1973 D5 1915 Harp Luminaires (Moved to Park in 1977) 1977 DS Exercise/Jogging Trail 1978 D6 Among Olmsted’s various ideas embodied in Lake Park, the circulation system of the park and its continuity are the main two elements that make up the structure of the park. Unlike many locations that Olmsted had previously designed, Lake Park is located along a 100 feet high bluff overlooking Lake Michigan. Olmsted designed the park based on a series of pathways so that diverse spaces could be experienced and various sceneries could be seen. In his original plan, he envisioned a main pathway along the park’s western edge that followed the city grid, and a second pathway below the bluff along the lakeshore and the park’s eastern edge which later merged into Lincoln Memorial Drive. A third pathway which winds above the bluff in between the other two main pathways, however, was designed as the spatial spine of the park. The latter not only provides amazing views towards the lake along the crest of bluff, but also ties 8 the main spaces and structures of the park such as the pavilion, the lighthouse, the meadows, and the golf course together, as illustrated by the following:11 Parks designed by the Olmsted firm all embody elements which reflect their beginning in the naturalistic movement admired by Olmsted. One of the noticeable features is ‘a continuing sequence of spaces ranged on a structure of serially connected sightlines.’ Olmsted designed his landscapes to be planned sequential experiences. Following a curving drive through Lake Park leads one to view a scene of Lake Michigan at the foot of a bluff, rugged sloping sides of a ravine, or the ordered plantings in a formal garden. The curving carriage drives in the park as designed by Olmsted provide a strong contrast to the grid pattern of surrounding city streets. Views of the sweep of Lake Michigan or broad lawns created vistas which were usually ended by a building or plantings creating the illusion of limitless vision. The first concern of Frederick Law Olmsted was to achieve visual unity. He thought in terms of the organization of space, perspective, and vistas. He placed darker forms of foliage in the foreground and lighter, simpler forms farther away and generally planted densely, but was careful to maintain open views.12 This continuing sequence of spaces along the pathways, therefore, is a crucial aspect of the original design of the park. In Lake Park, the paths and other elements of the park have remained similar to Olmsted’s original 1895 drawings, paying homage to the significant of Olmsted’s design. This authenticity of historic parks, however, has not been maintained in the two other Milwaukee parks designed by Olmsted. Both Washington Park’s and Riverside Park’s spaces and features have been altered in ways that make them unlikely candidates for nomination to the 11 . https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwiI0ofJgNPNAhXK3YM KHYTPA2kQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fcounty.milwaukee.gov%2FImageLibrary%2FGroups%2FcntyPark s%2Fparkwriteups%2FLake_Park.doc&usg=AFQjCNEyMrt8hyK2uKbXUBg7JtUhJbW7pQ&sig2=FSqGcSk_fkA p_m9q8PDg9A&bvm=bv.126130881,d.amc&cad=rja 12 . Lake Park, Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, National Register of Historic Places, Continuation Sheet (United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1992), Section 7, Page 3. 9 Register for National Historic Places, making Lake Park the only remaining example of historical accuracy and authenticity of original design.13 Lake Park’s Structure and Ravines: As previously mentioned, Lake Park is located along a bluff overlooking Lake Michigan on Milwaukee’s East Side. This lot, however, is not one solid piece of land: there are several ravines cutting through the park down towards the lakeshore at the bottom of the bluff. These ravines are perpendicular to the lakeshore, running through the length of the park from east to west. They were shaped naturally by years of erosion and glacial melting, which subsequently shaped the entire landscape of the Lake Michigan region. In order to provide the flow of northsouth pathway as the main circulation structure of the park, Olmsted considered two strategies: the majority of the ravines were to be crossed on bridges and in one instance, the ravine was filled in entirely. At the time of the development of Lake Park, there were originally six natural ravines on the lot. From south to north today, there are two ravines (A and B) which meet on the edge of the bluff at east, where they make a forkshape. They are located between East Belleview St. (formerly Gilman St.) and East Park Pl. Olmsted planned a double bridges (with approximately 100 feet distance in between) close to the junction of the Ravine A and B. These two bridges are now known as the Lion Bridges. The Ravine C, also known as Trinity Ravine, used to be almost in line with East Locust St. running through the park all the way to the lakeshore. Olmsted 13 . Walking Tour Guide (Amy J. Smith and Milwaukee County Department of Parks, Recreation and Culture, 1992), 15. 10
Description: