Public Opinion Quarterly 1996: Vol 60 Index

7 Pages·1996·1.7 MB·English

INDEX TO VOLUME 60,
Abramson, Paul R., review of Arian, Asher, Subversive Words: Public Opinion in
Security Threatened: Surveying Israeli Eighteenth-Century France, 660-62
Opinion on Peace and War, 464-65 Benson, John M., see Young, John T., Da-
Abramson, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart, vid Hemenway, Robert J. Blendon, and
Value Change in Global Perspective, re- John M. Benson
viewed, 322-31; Formative Security, Bias. Catania, Joseph A., Jesse Canchola,
Education, and Postmaterialism: A Re- and Lance Pollack, Response to ‘“They
sponse to Davis, 450-55 Said It Couldn’t Be Done: The National
ADVERTISING. Murry, John P., Antonie Health and Social Life Survey,’ 620-27
Stam, and John L. Lastovicka, Paid- ver- Binson, Diane, see Catania, Joseph A., Di-
sus Donated-Media Strategies for Public ane Binson, Jesse Canchola, Lance M.
Service Announcement Campaigns, |- Pollack, Walter Hauck, and Thomas Jj.
29 Coates
AIDS. Catania, Joseph A., Jesse Canchola, Bischoping, Katherine, review of Marcus,
and Lance Pollack, Response to ‘‘They George E., John L. Sullivan, Elizabeth
Said It Couldn’t Be Done: The National Theiss-Morse, and Sandra L. Wood, With
Health and Social Life Survey,’’ 620-27; Malice toward Some: How People Make
Miller, Peter V., Reply to Catania, Can- Civil Liberties Judgments, 653-55
chola, and Pollack, 628-33 Black, Joan S., review of Weimann, Ga-
AMERICAN ASS®CIATION FOR PUBLIC OPIN- briel, The Influentials: People Who In-
ION RESEARCH. Award, 476; Conference fluence Peopie, 468-70
Report, 471-75; Conference Program, Blendon, Robert, J. see Young, John T., Da-
491-508; Membership Meeting, 509-— vid Hemenway, Robert J. Blendon, and
13; Presidential Address, 477-490 John M. Benson
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto ly-
engar, Going Negative: How Political Campanelli, Pamela, review of Fowler,
Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Floyd J., Jr., Improving Survey Ques-
Electorate, reviewed, 456-61 tions: Design and Evaluation, 341-43
ANTI-SEMITISM. Wilson, Thomas C., Co- Canache, Damarys, review of Dominguez,
hort and Prejudice: Whites’ Attitudes Jorge I., and James A. McCann, Democ-
toward Blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and ratizing Mexico: Public Opinion and
Asians, 253-74 Electoral Choices, 657-60
Aquilino, William S., and Debra L. Wright, Canchola, Jesse, see Catania, Joseph A., Di-
Substance Use Estimates from RDD and ane Binson, Jesse Canchola, Lance M.
Area Probability Samples: Impact of Dif- Pollack, Walter Hauck, and Thomas J.
ferential Screening Methods and Unit Coates; see Catania, Joseph A., Jesse
Nonresponse, 563-73 Canchola, aad Lance Pollack
Arian, Asher, Security Threatened: Survey- Cantor, David, review of Schwarz, Norbert,
ing Israeli Opinion on Peace and War, and Seymour Sudman, eds., Autobio-
reviewed, 464-65 graphical Memory and the Validity of
Attitupes. Steeh, Charlotte, and Maria Retrospective Reports, 165-67
Krysan, Poll Trends: Affirmative Action Catania, Joseph A., Diane Binson, Jesse
and the Public, 1970-1995, 128-58 Canchola, Lance M. Pollack, Walter
Hauck, and Thomas J. Coates, Effects of
Bartels, Larry M., review of Ansolabehere, Interviewer Gender, Interviewer Choice,
Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar, Going and Item Wording on Responses to Ques-
Negative: How Political Advertisements tions concerning Sexual Behavior, 345-
Shrink and Polarize the Electorate, 456- 75; Catania, Joseph A., Jesse Canchola,
61 and Lance Pollack, Response to ‘“They
Bassili, John N., and Stacey Scott, Re- Said It Couldn’t Be Done: The National
sponse Latency as a Signal to Question Health and Social Life Survey,’’ 620-27
Problems in Survey Research, 390-99 Census. Dillman, Don A., Eleanor Singer,
Beniger, James R., review of Arlette Farge, Jon R. Clark, and James B. Treat, Effects
664 Public Opinion Quarterly
of Benefits Appeals, Mandatory Appeals, A. Krosnick, Jesse Marquette, and Mi-
and Variations in Statements of Confi- chael Curtin
dentiality on Completion Rates for Cen-
sus Questionnaires, 376-89 Dalton, Russell J., ed., The New Germany
Clark, Jon R., see Dillman, Don A., Eleanor Votes: Unification and the Creation of a
Singer, Jon R. Clark, and James B. Treat New German Party System, reviewed,
Coates, Thomas J. see Catania, Joseph A.., 167-71
Diane Binson, Jesse Canchola, Lance M. Davis, James A., review essay on Abram-
Pollack, Walter Hauck, and Thomas J. son, Paul R., and Ronald Inglehart, Value
Coates Change in Global Perspective, 322-31
CoGniTIoNn. Bassili, John N., and Stacey Diamond, Shari Seidman, Reference Guide
Scott, Response Latency as a Signal to on Survey Research, reviewed, 159-65
Question Problems in Survey Research, Dillman, Don A., Eleanor Singer, Jon R.
390-99 Clark, and James B. Treat, Effects of
Conort ANALysis. Wilson, Thomas C., Benefits Appeals, Mandatory Appeals,
Cohort and Prejudice: Whites’ Attitudes and Variations in Statements of Confi-
toward Blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and dentiality on Completion Rates for Cen-
Asians, 253-74 sus Questionnaires, 376-89
Collet, Christian, Poll Trends: Third Parties Dominguez, Jorge 1, and James A.
and the Two-Party System, 431-49 McCann, Democratizing Mexico: Public
COMMUNICATION. Murry, John P., Antonie Opinion and Electoral Choices, re-
Stam, and John L. Lastovicka, Paid- ver- viewed, 657-60
sus Donated-Media Strategies for Public DruGs AND DruG Use. Aquilino, William
Service Announcement Campaigns, |- S., and Debra L. Wright, Substance Use
29 Estimates from RDD and Area Proba-
Computers. Couper, Mick P., and Benja- bility Samples: Impact of Differential
min Rowe, Evaluation of a Computer- Screening Methods and Unit Nonre-
Assisted Self-Interview Component in a sponse, 563-73
Computer-Assisted Personal Interview
Survey, 89-105 EpucatTion. Narayan, Sowmya, and Jon A.
CONFIDENTIALITY. Dillman, Don A., Elea- Krosnick, Education Moderates Some
nor Singer, Jon R. Clark, and James B. Response Effects in Attitude Measure-
Treat, Effects of Benefits Appeals, Man- ment, 58-88
datory Appeals, and Variations in State- ELECTIONS. Visser, Penny S., Jon A. Kros-
ments of Confidentiality on Completion nick, Jesse Marquette, and Michael Cur-
Rates for Census Questionnaires, 376-89 tin, Mail Surveys for Election Forecast-
CONTENT ANALYSIS. OTHER MEpia. Gil- ing? An Evaluation of the Columbus
ens, Martin, Race and Poverty in Dispatch Poll, 181-227
America: Public Misperceptions and the ELECTIONS. STATE AND LOCAL. Plutzer,
American News Media, 515-41 Eric, and John F. Zipp, Identity Politics,
ConTEXT Errects. Narayan, Sowmya, and Partisanship, and Voting for Women
Jon A. Krosnick, Education Moderates Candidates, 30-57
Some Response Effects in Attitude Mea- Ericksen, Eugene P., review of Gawiser,
surement, 58-88; Tourangeau, Roger, Sheldon R., and G. Evans Witt, A Jour-
and Tom W. Smith, Asking Sensitive nalist’s Guide to Public Opinion Polls,
Questions: The Impact of Data Collec- 159-65; review of Diamond, Shari Seid-
tion Mode, Question Format, and Ques- man, Reference Guide on Survey Re-
tion Context, 275-304 search, 159-65
Couper, Mick P., and Benjamin Rowe,
Evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Self- Farge, Arlette, Subversive Words: Public
Interview Component in a Computer-As- Opinion in Eighteenth-Century France,
sisted Personal Interview Survey, 89- reviewed, 660-62
105 FIELD EXPERIMENTS. Warriner, Keith, John
CRIME AND PUNISHMENT. Lynch, James P., Goyder, Heidi Gjertsen, Paula Hohner,
Poll Review: Clarifying Divergent Esti- and Kathleen McSpurren, Charities, No;
mates of Rape from Two National Sur- Lotteries, No; Cash, Yes: Main Effects
veys, 410-30 and Interactions in a Canadian Incentives
Curtin, Michael, see Visser, Penny S., Jon Experiment, 542-62
Index to Volume 60 665
Finkel, Steven E., review of Semetko, Holli Heywood, Paul, see Miller, William L., Ste-
A., and Klaus Schoenbach, Germany’s phen White, and Paul Heywood
“Unity Election’’: Voters and the Media, Hochschild, Jennifer, Facing Up to the
461-63 American Dream: Race, Class, and the
Fowler, Floyd J., Jr., Improving Survey Soul of the Nation, reviewed, 332-34
Questions: Design and Evaluation, re- Hohner, Paula, see Warriner, Keith, John
viewed, 341-43 Goyder, Heidi Gjertsen, Paula Hohner,
Freedman, Paul, and Ken Goldstein, Build- and Kathleen McSpurren
ing a Probable Electorate from Preelec- Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague, Citi-
tion Polls: A Two-Stage Approach, 574— zens, Politics, and Social Communica-
87 tion: Information and Influence in an
Election Campaign, reviewed, 650-52
Gawiser, Sheldon R., and G. Evans Witt,
A Journalist’s Guide to Public Opinion Inglehart, Ronald, see Abramson, Paul R..,
Polis, reviewed, 159-64 and Ronald Inglehart
Gibson, James L., review of Kluegel, James INTERVIEWER. Bias. Catania, Joseph A.,
R., David S. Mason, and Bernd Wege- Diane Binson, Jesse Canchola, Lance M.
ner, eds., Social Justice and Political Pollack, Walter Hauck, and Thomas J.
Change: Public Opinion in Capitalist Coates, Effects of Interviewer Gender,
and Post-Communist States, 655-57 Interviewer Choice, and Item Wording
Gilens, Martin, Race and Poverty in on Responses to Questions concerning
America: Public Misperceptions and the Sexual Behavior, 345-75
American News Media, 515-41 INTERVIEWER. EFFECTS. Catania, Joseph
Gjertsen, Heidi, see Warriner, Keith, John A., Diane Binson, Jesse Canchola, Lance
Goyder, Heidi Gjertsen, Paula Hohner, M. Pollack, Walter Hauck, and Thomas
and Kathleen McSpurren J. Coates, Effects of Interviewer Gender,
Goldstein, Ken, see Freedman, Paul, and Interviewer Choice, and Item Wording
Ken Goldstein on Responses to Questions concerning
Goyder, John, see Warriner, Keith, John Sexual Behavior, 345-75
Goyder, Heidi Gjertsen, Paula Hohner, INTERVIEWER. SELECTION. Catania, Joseph
and Kathleen McSpurren A., Diane Binson, Jesse Canchola, Lance
Graber, Doris, review of Mondak, Jeffery M. Pollack, Walter Hauck, and Thomas
J., Nothing to Read: Newspapers and J. Coates, Effects of interviewer Gender,
Elections in a Social Experiment, 338- Interviewer Choice, and Item Wording
41 on Responses to Questions concerning
Green, Donald P., review of Kuran, Timur, Sexual Behavior, 345-75
Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social INTERVIEWING. Couper, Mick P., and Ben-
Consequences of Preference Falsifica- jamin Rowe, Evaluation of a Computer-
tion, 335-38 Assisted Self-Interview Component in a
Groves, Robert M., Presidential Address: Computer-Assisted Personal Interview
The Educational Infrastructure of the Survey, 89-105
Survey Research Profession, 477—90 Iyengar, Shanto, see Ansolabehere, Ste-
Gun ConTROL. Young, John T., David Hem- phen, and Shanto Iyengar
enway, Robert J. Blendon, and John M.
Benson, Poll Trends: Guns, 634-49
Jelen, Ted G., and Clyde Wilcox, Public At-
Hauck, Walter, see Catania, Joseph A., Di- titudes toward Church and State, tre-
ane Binson, Jesse Canchola, Lance M. viewed, 466-68
Pollack, Walter Hauck, and Thomas J. Jennings, M. Kent, Political Knowledge
Coates over Time and across Generations, 228-
HEALTH. Miller, Peter V., Reply to Catania, 52
Canchola, and Pollack, 628-33 Johnson, Thomas J., The Rehabilitation of
Hemenway, David, see Young, John T., Da- Richard Nixon: The Media’s Effect on
vid Hemenway, Robert J. Blendon, and Collective Memory, reviewed, 173-75
John M. Benson
Hesli, Vicki L., review of Popov, Nikolai, Kluegel, James R., David S. Mason, and
The Russian People Speak: Democracy Bernd Wegener, eds., Social Justice and
at a Crossroads, 171-73 Political Change: Public Opinion in
666 Public Opinion Quarterly
Capitalist and Post-Communist States, Russian Election Campaign, 106-27;
reviewed, 655-57 Reply to Catania, Joseph A., Jesse Can-
Krosnick, Jon A., see Narayan, Sowmya, chola, and Lance Pollack, 628-33
and Jon A. Krosnick; see Visser, Penny Mondak, Jeffery J., Nothing to Read: News-
S., Jon A. Krosnick, Jesse Marquette, and papers and Elections in a Social Experi-
Michael Curtin ment, reviewed, 338-41
Krysan, Maria, see Steeh, Charlotte, and Murry, John P., Antonie Stam, and John L.
Maria Krysan Lastovicka, Paid- versus Donated-Media
Kuran, Timur, Private Truths, Public Lies: Strategies for Public Service Announce-
The Social Consequences of Preference ment Campaigns, 1-29
Falsification, reviewed, 335-38
Narayan, Sowmya, and Jon A. Krosnick,
Lastovicka, John L., see Murry, John P., Education Moderates Some Response
Antonie Stam, and John L. Lastovicka Effects in Attitude Measurement, 58-88
Losh, Susan, review of Jelen, Ted G., and
Clyde Wilcox, Public Attitudes toward Opinions. Merkle, Danie! M., Poll Review:
Church and State, 466-68 The National Issues Convention Deliber-
Lynch, James P., Poll Review: Clarifying ative Poll, 588-619
Divergent Estimates of Rape from Two OrpDeER EFrFects. Narayan, Sowmya, and
Nationai Surveys, 410-30 Jon A. Krosnick, Education Moderates
Some Response Effects in Attitude Mea-
Marcus, George E., John L. Sullivan, Eliza- surement, 58-88; Wanke, Michaela,
beth Theiss-Morse, and Sandra L. Wood, Comparative Judgments as a Function of
With Malice toward Some: How People the Direction of Comparison versus
Make Civil Liberties Judgments, re- Word Order, 400-409
viewed, 653-55
Marquette, Jesse, see Visser, Penny S., Jon PANEL AND OTHER LONGITUDINAL STUD-
A. Krosnick, Jesse Marquette, and Mi- 1ES. Jennings, M. Kent, Political Knowl-
chael Curtin edge over Time and across Generations,
Marsden, Peter V., review of Huckfeldt, 228-52
Robert, and John Sprague, Citizens, Poli- Plutzer, Eric, and John F. Zipp, Identity
tics, and Social Communication: Infor- Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for
mation and Influence in an Election Women Candidates, 30-57
Campaign, 650-52 PoLiticaL Attitupbes. Miller, William L.,
Mason, David S., see Kluegel, James R., Stephen White, and Paul Heywood, Poll
David S. Mason, and Bernd Wegener Review: 25 Days to Go: Measuring and
Mass Mepia Errects. Gilens, Martin, Interpreting the Trends in Public Opinion
Race and Poverty in America: Public during the 1993 Russian Election Cam-
Misperceptions and the American News paign, 106-27
Media, 515-41; Murry, John P., Antonie POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE. Jennings, M.
Stam, and John L. Lastovicka, Paid- ver- Kent, Political Knowledge over Time
sus Donated-Media Strategies for Public and across Generations, 228-52
Service Announcement Campaigns, |— POLITICAL Parties. Piutzer, Eric, and John
29 F. Zipp, Identity Politics, Partisanship,
McCann, James A., see Dominguez, Jorge and Voting for Women Candidates, 30-
L., and James A. McCann 57
McSpurren, Kathleen, see Warriner, Keith, POLITICAL SOCIALIZATION. Jennings, M.
John Goyder, Heidi Gjertsen, Paula Kent, Political Knowledge over Time
Hohner, and Kathleen McSpurren and across Generations, 228-52
Merkle, Daniel M., Poll Review: The Na- Pollack, Lance M., see Catania, Joseph A.,
tional Issues Convention Deliberative Diane Binson, Jesse Canchola, Lance M.
Poll, 588-619 Pollack, Walter Hauck, and Thomas J.
Miller, Peter V., Reply to Catania, Can- Coates; see Catania, Joseph A., Jesse
chola, and Pollack, 628-33 Canchola, and Lance Pollack
Miller, William L., Stephen White, and Potts. Merkle, Daniel M., Poll Review:
Paul Heywood, Poll Review: 25 Days to The National Issues Convention Deliber-
Go: Measuring and Interpreting the ative Poll, 588-619
Trends in Public Opinion during the 1993 PoLLs. ELECTIONS. Freedman, Paul, and
Index to Volume 60 667
Ken Goldstein, Building a Probable PuBLic Po.icy. Murry, John P., Antonie
Electorate from Preelection Polls: A Stam, and John L. Lastovicka, Paid- ver-
Two-Stage Approach, 574-87; Miller, sus Donated-Media Strategies for Public
William L., Stephen White, and Paul Service Announcement Campaigns, 1-
Heywood, Poll Review: 25 Days to Go: 29; Steeh, Charlotte, and Maria Krysan,
Measuring and Interpreting the Trends in Poll Trends: Affirmative Action and the
Public Opinion during the 1993 Russian Public, 1970-1995, 128-58; Young,
Election Campaign, 106-27; Visser, John T., David Hemenway, Robert J.
Penny S., Jon A. Krosnick, Jesse Mar- Blendon, and John M. Benson, Poll
quette, and Michael Curtin, Mail Surveys Trends: Guns, 634—49
for Election Forecasting? An Evaluation PsyCHOLOGY. Narayan, Sowmya, and Jon
of the Columbus Dispatch Poll, 181-227 A. Krosnick, Education Moderates Some
PoLLs. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY. Col- Response Effects in Attitude Measure-
let, Christian, Poll Trends: Third Parties ment, 58-88
and the Two-Party System, 431-49;
Lynch, James P., Poll Review: Clarifying QUESTION SCREENING. Bassili, John N.,
Divergent Estimates of Rape from Two and Stacey Scott, Response Latency as a
National Surveys, 410-30; Merkle, Dan- Signal to Question Problems in Survey
iel M., Poll Review: The National Issues Research, 390-99
Convention Deliberative Poll, 588-619;
Miller, William L., Stephen White, and Race RELATIONS. Gilens, Martin, Race and
Paul Heywood, Poll Review: 25 Days to Poverty in America: Public Mispercep-
Go: Measuring and Interpreting the tions and the American News Media,
Trends in Public Opinion during the 1993 515-41; Steeh, Charlotte, and Maria
Russian Election Campaign, 106-27; Krysan, Poll Trends: Affirmative Action
Richman, Alvin, Poll Trends: American and the Public, 1970-1995, 128-58;
Support for International Involvement: Wilson, Thomas C., Cohort and Preju-
General and Specific Components of dice: Whites’ Attitudes Toward Blacks,
Post—Cold War Changes, 305-21; Steeh, Hispanics, Jews, and Asians, 253-74
Charlotte, and Maria Krysan, Poll RECALL. Lynch, James P., Polls Review:
Trends: Affirmative Action and the Pub- Clarifying Divergent Estimates of Rape
lic, 1970-1995, 128-58; Young, John T., from Two National Surveys, 410-30
David Hemenway, Robert J. Blendon, RESEARCH METHODS. Wanke, Michaela,
and John M. Benson, Poll Trends: Guns, Comparative Judgments as a Function of
634-49 the Direction of Comparison versus
Popov, Nikolai, The Russian People Speak: Word Order, 400-409
Democracy at a Crossroads, reviewed, RESPONDENTS. Catania, Joseph A., Diane
171-73 Binson, Jesse Canchola, Lance M. Pol-
PREDICTION. Freedman, Paul, and Ken lack, Walter Hauck, and Thomas J.
Goldstein, Building a Probable Elector- Coates, Effects of Interviewer Gender,
ate from Preelection Polls: A Two-Stage Interviewer Choice, and Item Wording
Approach, 574-87; Miller, William L., on Responses to Questions concerning
Stephen White, and Paul Heywood, Poll Sexual Behavior, 345-75; Couper, Mick
Review: 25 Days to Go: Measuring and P., and Benjamin Rowe, Evaluation of a
Interpreting the Trends in Public Opinion Computer-Assisted Self-Interview Com-
during the 1993 Russian Election Cam- ponent in a Computer-Assisted Personal
paign, 106-27; Visser, Penny S., Jon A. Interview Survey, 89-105
Krosnick, Jesse Marquette, and Michael RESPONSE EFFECTS. Wanke, Michaela,
Curtin, Mail Surveys for Election Fore- Comparative Judgments as a Function of
casting? An Evaluation of the Columbus the Direction of Comparison versus
Dispatch Poll, 181-227 Word Order, 400-409; Lynch, James P.,
PREJUDICE. Wilson, Thomas C., Cohort and Poll Review: Clarifying Divergent Esti-
Prejudice: Whites’ Attitudes toward mates of Rape from Two National Sur-
Blacks, Hispanics, Jews, and Asians, veys, 410-30
253-74 RESPONSE RaTE. Aquilino, William S., and
PuBLic Opinion. Merkle, Daniel M., Poll Debra L. Wright, Substance Use Esti-
Review: The National Issues Convention mates from RDD and Area Probability
Deliberative Poll, 588-619 Samples: Impact of Differential Screen-
Public Opinion Quarterly
ing Methods and Unit Nonresponse, nor Singer, Jon R. Clark, and James B.
563-73; Dillman, Don A., Eleanor Treat
Singer, Jon R. Clark, and James B. Treat, Smith, Tom W., see Tourangeau, Roger,
Effects of Benefits Appeals, Mandatory and Tom W. Smith
Appeals, and Variations in Statements of SociaL CHANGE. Steeh, Charlotte, and Ma-
Confidentiality on Completion Rates for ria Krysan, Poll Trends: Affirmative Ac-
Census Questionnaires, 376-89; Tour- tion and the Public, 1970-1995, 128-58
angeau, Roger, and Tom W. Smith, Ask- SociAL PsyCHOLOGY. Bassili, John N., and
ing Sensitive Questions: The Impact of Stacey Scott, Response Latency as a Sig-
Data Collection Mode, Question For- nal to Question Problems in Survey Re-
mat, and Question Context, 275-304; search, 390-99
Warriner, Keith, John Goyder, Heidi Sprague, John, see Huckfeldt, Robert, and
Gjertsen, Paula Hohner, and Kathleen John Sprague
McSpurren, Charities, No; Lotteries, No; Stam, Antonie, see Murry, John P., Antonie
Cash, Yes: Main Effects and Interactions Stam, and John L. Lastovicka
in a Canadian Incentives Experiment, Steeh, Charlotte, and Maria Krysan, Poll
542-62 Trends: Affirmative Action and the Pub-
Richman, Alvin, Poll Trends: American lic, 1970-1995, 128-58
Support for International Involvement: STUDENTS. Jennings, M. Kent, Political
General and Specific Components of Knowledge over Time and across Gener-
Post—Cold War Changes, 305-21 ations, 228-52
Rieger, Cheryl, review of Johnson, Thomas Sudman, Seymour, see Schwarz, Norbert,
J., The Rehabilitation of Richard Nixon: and Seymour Sudman
The Media’s Effect on Collective Mem- Sullivan, John L., see Marcus, George E.,
ory, 173-75 John L. Sullivan, Elizabeth Theiss-
Rowe, Benjamin, see Couper, Mick P., and Morse, and Sandra L. Wood
Benjamin Rowe SuRVEY RESEARCH. Catania, Joseph A., Di-
Russia. Miller, William L., Stephen White, ane Binson, Jesse Canchola, Lance M.
and Paul Heywood, Poll Review: 25 Pollack, Walter Hauck, and Thomas J.
Days to Go: Measuring and Interpreting Coates, Effects of Interviewer Gender,
the Trends in Public Opinion during the Interviewer Choice, and Item Wording
1993 Russian Election Campaign, 106- on Responses to Questions concerning
27 Sexual Behavior, 345-75; Catania, Jo-
seph A., Jesse Canchola, and Lance Pol-
lack, Response to ‘“They Said It Couldn’t
Schoenbach, Klaus, see Semetko, Holli A.., Be Done: The National Health and Social
and Klaus Schoenbach Life Survey,’ 620-27; Miller, Peter V.,
Schwarz, Norbert, and Seymour Sudman, Reply to Catania, Canchola, and Pollack,
eds., Autobiographical Memory and the 628-33; Visser, Penny S., Jon A. Kros-
Validity of Retrospective Reports, re- nick, Jesse Marquette, and Michael Cur-
viewed, 165-67 tin, Mail Surveys for Election Forecast-
Scott, Stacey, see Bassili, John N., and Sta- ing? An Evaluation of the Columbus
cey Scott Dispatch Poll, 181-227; Wanke, Mi-
Semetko, Holli A., and Klaus Schoenbach, chaela, Comparative Judgments as a
Germany's ‘‘Unity Election’’: Voters Function of the Direction of Comparison
and the Media, reviewed, 461-63 versus Word Order, 400-409; Warriner,
SEXUAL BEHAVIOR. Catania, Joseph A.., Keith,“ John Goyder, Heidi Gjertsen,
Jesse Canchola, and Lance Pollack, Re- Paula Hohner, and Kathleen McSpurren,
sponse to ““They Said It Couldn't Be Charities, No; Lotteries, No; Cash, Yes:
Done: The National Health and Social Main Effects and Interactions in a Cana-
Life Survey,’’ 620-27; Miller, Peter V., dian Incentives Experiment, 542-62
Reply to Catania, Canchola, and Pollack, SuRVEY RESEARCH. COMPUTER. Couper,
628-33; Tourangeau, Roger, and Tom Mick P., and Benjamin Rowe, Evaluation
W. Smith, Asking Sensitive Questions: of a Computer-Assisted Self-Interview
The Impact of Data Collection Mode, Component in a Computer-Assisted Per-
Question Format, and Question Context, sonal Interview Survey, 89-105; Tour-
275-304 angeau, Roger, and Tom W. Smith, Ask-
Singer, Eleanor, see Dillman, Don A., Elea- ing Sensitive Questions: The Impact of
Index to Volume 60 669
Data Collection Mode, Question Format, VoTING. Plutzer, Eric, and John F. Zipp,
and Question Context, 275-304 Identity Politics, Partisanship and Voting
SuRVEY RESEARCH. FACE-TO-FACE. Aqui- for Women Candidates, 30-57
lino, William S., and Debra L. Wright,
Substance Use Estimates from RDD and Wanke, Michaela, Comparative Judgments
Area Probability Samples: Impact of Dif- as a Function of the Direction of Compar-
ferential Screening Methods and Unit ison versus Word Order, 400-409
Nonresponse, 563-73 Warriner, Keith, John Goyder, Heidi
SurvEY RESEARCH. MAIL. Dillman, Don Gjertsen, Paula Hohner, and Kathleen
A., Eleanor Singer, Jon R. Clark, and McSpurren, Charities, No; Lotteries, No;
James B. Treat, Effects of Benefits Ap- Cash, Yes: Main Effects and Interactions
peals, Mandatory Appeals, and Varia- in a Canadian Incentives Experiment,
tions in Statements of Confidentiality on 542-62
Completion Rates for Census Question- Wegener, Bernd, see Kluegel, James R.,
naires, 376-89; Miller, Peter V., Reply to David S. Mason, and Bernd Wegener
Catania, Canchola, and Pollack, 628-33 WEIGHTING. Freedman, Paul, and Ken
SuRVEY RESEARCH. TELEPHONE. Aquilino, Goldstein, Building a Probable Elector-
William S., and Debra L. Wright, Sub- ate from Preelection Polls: A Two-Stage
stance Use Estimates from RDD and Approach, 574-87
Area Probability Samples: Impact of Dif- Weil, Frederick D., review of Dalton, Rus-
ferential Screening Methods and Unit sell J., ed., The New Germany Votes:
Nonresponse, 563-73; Bassili, John N., Unification and the Creation of a New
and Stacey Scott, Response Latency as a German Party System, 167-71
Signal to Question Problems in Survey Weimann, Gabriel, The Influentials: People
Research, 390-99; Freedman, Paul, and Who Influence People, reviewed, 468-70
Ken Goldstein, Building a Probable Elec- WELFARE. SociAL. Gilens, Martin, Race
torate from Preelection Polls: A Two- and Poverty in America: Public Misper-
Stage Approach, 574-87 ceptions and the American News Media,
515-41
Tate, Katherine, review of Hochschild, Jen- White, Stephen, see Miller, William L., Ste-
nifer L., Facing Up to the American phen White, and Paul Heywood
Dream: Race, Class, and the Soul of the Wilcox, Clyde, see Jelen, Ted G., and Clyde
Nation, 332-34 Wilcox
Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, see Marcus, Wilson, Thomas C., Cohort and Prejudice:
George E., John L. Sullivan, Elizabeth Whites’ Attitudes toward Blacks, His-
Theiss-Morse, and Sandra L. Wood panics, Jews, and Asians, 253-74
Tourangeau, Roger, and Tom W. Smith, Witt, G. Evans, see Gawiser, Sheldon R.,
Asking Sensitive Questions: The Impact and G. Evans Witt
of Data Collection Mode, Question For- WomeNn. Plutzer, Eric, and John F. Zipp,
mat, and Question Context, 275-304 Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Vot-
Treat, James B., see Dillman, Don A., Elea- ing for Women Candidates, 30-57
nor Singer, Jon R. Clark, and James B. Wood, Sandra L., see Marcus, George E.,
Treat John L. Sullivan, Elizabeth Theiss-
Morse, and Sandra L. Wood
VIOLENCE AND AGGRESSION. Lynch, James Wright, Debra L., see Aquilino, William S.,
P., Poll Review: Clarifying Divergent Es- and Debra L. Wright
timates of Rape from Two National Sur-
veys, 410-30 Young, John T., David Hemenway, Robert
Visser, Penny S., Jon A. Krosnick, Jesse J. Blendon, and John M. Benson, Poll
Marquette, and Michael Curtin, Mail Trends: Guns, 634—49
Surveys for Election Forecasting? An
Evaluation of the Columbus Dispatch Zipp, John F., see Plutzer, Eric, and John
Poll, 181-227 F. Zipp