PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW PSYCHOLOGY, CRIME AND LAW SERIES Series Editor: David Canter Forthcoming titles in the Series Principles of Geographical Offender Profiling David Canter and Donna Youngs Applications of Geographical Offender Profiling David Canter and Donna Youngs Profiling Violent Crime David Canter and Donna Youngs The Investigative Psychology of Serial Killings David Canter and Donna Youngs Profiling Homicide C. Gabrielle Salfati Safer Sex in the City David Canter, Maria Ioannou and Donna Youngs Behavioural Analysis of Crime: New Directions in Offender Profiling Donna Youngs Psychology in Court Joel D. Lieberman and Daniel A. Krauss David Canter is Professor of Psychology at The University of Liverpool, where he directs The Centre for Investigative Psychology, which he established there in 1994. He is a Fellow of the British Psychology Society and the American Psychological Association and an Academician of the Academy of Social Sciences. He is a Chartered Forensic Psychologist and member of the Forensic Science Society, and a Fellow of The Royal Society of Medicine and the RSA. He has edited over 30 academic books, bringing together the work of others as well as publishing five major books that he authored directly. He has published at least 200 papers in academic and professional journals. He is the founding editor of the Journal of Environmental Psychology, and has recently established the new Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. David is regularly invited to give keynote addresses at international conferences all over the world. His book, Criminal Shadows not only won the Golden Dagger award for True- Crime but also the US equivalent, an Anthony award. He frequently contributes to television and radio documentaries and news programmes, having written, presented and co-produced a six-part documentary series on ‘Mapping Murder’. From time to time he also writes for various newspapers including The Times and The News of the World. David is internationally known for his cross-disciplinary research and consultancy as well as providing evidence in a number of high profile court cases and government enquiries. Psychology and Law Bridging the Gap Edited by DAVID CANTER Centre for Investigative Psychology, University of Liverpool, UK RITA ŽUKAUSKIENĖ Mykolas Romeris University, Lithuania © David Canter and Rita Žukauskienė 2008 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. David Canter and Rita Žukauskienė have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the editors of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Gower House Suite 420 Croft Road 101 Cherry Street Aldershot Burlington, VT 05401-4405 Hampshire GU11 3HR USA England Ashgate website: http://www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Psychology and law : bridging the gap. - (Psychology, crime and law) 1. Law - Psychological aspects 2. Forensic psychology I. Canter, David V. II. Žukauskienė, Rita 340.1'9 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Psychology and law : bridging the gap / edited by David Canter and Rita Žukauskienė. p. cm. -- (Psychology, crime and law) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-7546-2656-5 ISBN-10: 0-7546-2656-3 (hbk.) ISBN-10: 0-7546-2660-1 (pbk.) 1. Law--Psychological aspects. I. Canter, David V. II. Žukauskienė, Rita. K346.P798 2007 340'19--dc22 2007011096 ISBN 13: 978 0 7546 2656 5 (hardback) ISBN 13: 978 0 7546 2660 2 (paperback) Printed and bound in Great Britain by MPG Books Ltd, Bodmin, Cornwall. Contents Series Preface vii Foreword ix List of Contributors xi 1 In the Kingdom of the Blind 1 David Canter 2 Contemporary Challenges in Investigative Psychology: Revisiting the Canter Offender Profiling Equations 23 Donna Youngs 3 Lie Detectors and the Law: The Use of the Polygraph in Europe 31 Ewout H. Meijer and Peter J. van Koppen 4 Eyewitness Research: Theory and Practice 51 Amina Memon 5 Identification in Court 65 Andrew Roberts and D avid Ormerod 6 Profiling Evidence in the Courts 79 Ian Freckelton 7 Implications of Heterogeneity among Individuals with Antisocial Behaviour 103 Henrik Andershed and Anna-Karin Andershed 8 From Crime to Tort: Criminal Acts, Civil Liability and the Behavioral Science 119 Daniel B. Kennedy and Jason R. Sakis, J.D. 9 The Consequences of Prison Life: Notes on the New Psychology of Prison Effects 143 Craig Haney vi Psychology and Law 10 Psychopathy as an Important Forensic Construct: Past, Present and Future 167 David J. Cooke 11 Key Considerations and Problems in Assessing Risk for Violence 191 Michael R. Davis and James R. P. Ogloff 12 Computer-assisted Violence Risk Assessment among People with Mental Disorder 211 John Monahan 13 Does the Law Use Even a Small Proportion of What Legal Psychology has to Offer? 223 Viktoras Justickis 14 ‘They’re an Illusion to Me Now’: Forensic Ethics, Sanism and Pretextuality 239 Michael L. Perlin Index 255 Series Preface Over recent years many aspects of law enforcement and related legal and judicial processes have been influenced by psychological theories and research. In turn concerns that derive from investigation, prosecution and defence of criminals are influencing the topics and methodologies of psychology and neighbouring social sciences. Everything, for example, from the detection of deception to the treatment of sex offenders, by way of offender profiling and prison management, has become part of the domain of a growing army of academic and other professional psychologists. This is generating a growing discipline that crosses many boundaries and international frontiers. What was once the poor relation of applied psychology, populated by people whose pursuits were regarded as weak and arcane, is now becoming a major area of interest for many students and practitioners from high school through to postgraduate study and beyond. The interest spreads far beyond the limits of conventional psychology to disciplines such as Criminology, Socio-Legal Studies and the Sociology of Crime as well as many aspects of the law itself including a growing number of courses for police officers, and those associated with the police such as crime analysts or forensic scientists. There is therefore a need for wide-ranging publications that deal with all aspects of these interdisciplinary pursuits. Such publications must be cross-national and interdisciplinary if they are t o reflect the many strands of this burgeoning field of teaching, research and professional practice. The Psychology, Crime and Law series has been established to meet this need for up to date accounts of the work within this area, presented in a way that will be accessible to the many different disciplines involved. In editing this series I am alert to the fact that this is a lively new domain in which very little has been determined with any certainty. The books therefore capture the debates inherent in any intellectually animated pursuit. They reveal areas of agreement as well as approaches and topics on which experts currently differ. Throughout the series the many gaps in our knowledge and present-day understanding are revealed. The series is thus of interest to anyone who wishes to gain an up-to-date understanding of the interplays between psychology, crime and the law. Professor David Canter This page intentionally left blank Foreword Psychology is spreading through many aspects of the legal process across the world. The enlargement of the EU is further increasing the speed with which the application of psychological expertise, currently prevalent in the US and Western Europe, is being taken up in forensic practice and the courts throughout the newly emergent democracies. The rather different social contexts in which this interaction between psychology and law is now taking place is set to influence our understanding of criminals and the influence of the law. It is therefore timely to produce a book that captures many of these developments. The occasion of the fifteenth European Conference on Psychology and the Law in Vilnius in July 2005, organised by the European Association of Psychology and Law (http://www.law.kuleuven.be/eapl/) provided a suitable starting point for identifying leading contributors from both sides of this dialogue, across many different countries, in order to put together a book that would capture contemporary attempts to build bridges between these two very different disciplines. The book is thus unusual both in including lawyers as well psychologists, sociologists and criminologists as authors, as well as in the very diverse range of jurisdictions from which they come, including the USA, across Europe and Australia. It thus sets out to bridge the inherent gap between the practice of law and the profession of psychology at an international level. The book shows that bri dges are needed for the many different contexts in which the law interacts with psychology. Chapters have therefore been included to throw some light on how psychology connects with, inter alia,the courts, prisons, community care, clinics, long-stay hospitals, police investigations and legislative bodies. This allows coverage of well-established areas, such as the study of and challenges to, for example, eyewitness testimony, and the nature of Psychopathy. Much more recent areas of social science contribution to legal proceedings are also covered, such as the liability that arises from not preventing crimes happening or the systematic prediction of likely violence by an offender. What emerges from all these accounts is that psychological involvement in legal processes has rapidly evolved over the past decade from limited clinical concerns with the diagnosis of defendants’ mental states, and academic studies of the memory processes involved in providing testimony through to a full-blooded range of studies and professional contributions. These arise at every stage of the legal process, from the police officer attending the scene of a crime, through how evidence may be presented in court, on to the implications of aspects of prison life and then decisions
Description: