Psychological and educational interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents (Review) Merry SN, Hetrick SE, Cox GR, Brudevold-Iversen T, Bir JJ, McDowell H ThisisareprintofaCochranereview,preparedandmaintainedbyTheCochraneCollaborationandpublishedinTheCochraneLibrary 2011,Issue12 http://www.thecochranelibrary.com Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents(Review) Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 OBJECTIVES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Figure1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Figure2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Figure3. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Figure4. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Figure5. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 Figure6. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 Figure7. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Figure8. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Figure9. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Figure10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 CHARACTERISTICSOFSTUDIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 DATAANDANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 Analysis1.1.Comparison1Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare,Outcome1 Depressivedisorder(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 Analysis1.2.Comparison1Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare,Outcome2 Depressivedisorder(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 Analysis1.3.Comparison1Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare,Outcome3 Depressivedisorder(bysex). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209 Analysis1.4.Comparison1Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare,Outcome4 Depressivedisorders(byrisk). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 Analysis1.5.Comparison1Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare,Outcome5 Depressionscores(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 Analysis1.6.Comparison1Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare,Outcome6 Depressionscores(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 Analysis1.7.Comparison1Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare,Outcome7 Depressionscores(bysex). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217 Analysis1.8.Comparison1Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare,Outcome8 Depressionscores(byrisk). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 Analysis2.1.Comparison2Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherintervention,Outcome 1Depressivedisorder(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 Analysis2.2.Comparison2Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherintervention,Outcome 2Depressivedisorder(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 Analysis2.3.Comparison2Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherintervention,Outcome 3Depressionscores(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 Analysis2.4.Comparison2Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherintervention,Outcome 4Depressionscores(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 Analysis2.5.Comparison2Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherintervention,Outcome 5Depressionscores(bygender). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225 Analysis3.1.Comparison3Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcarethreetonine months,Outcome1Depressivedisorder(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents(Review) i Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd. Analysis3.2.Comparison3Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcarethreetonine months,Outcome2Depressivedisorder(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 Analysis3.3.Comparison3Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcarethreetonine months,Outcome3Depressivedisorder(bysex). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 Analysis3.4.Comparison3Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcarethreetonine months,Outcome4Depressivedisorder(byrisk). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230 Analysis3.5.Comparison3Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcarethreetonine months,Outcome5Depressionscores(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231 Analysis3.6.Comparison3Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcarethreetonine months,Outcome6Depressionscores(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 Analysis3.7.Comparison3Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcarethreetonine months,Outcome7Depressionscores(bysex). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 236 Analysis3.8.Comparison3Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcarethreetonine months,Outcome8Depressionscores(byrisk). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238 Analysis4.1.Comparison4Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherinterventionthreeto ninemonths,Outcome1Depressionscores(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240 Analysis4.2.Comparison4Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherinterventionthreeto ninemonths,Outcome2Depressionscores(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 Analysis5.1.Comparison5Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare12months, Outcome1Depressivedisorder(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 Analysis5.2.Comparison5Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare12months, Outcome2Depressivedisorder(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243 Analysis5.3.Comparison5Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare12months, Outcome3Depressivedisorder(bysex). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 Analysis5.4.Comparison5Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare12months, Outcome4Depressivedisorder(byrisk). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245 Analysis5.5.Comparison5Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare12months, Outcome5Depressionscores(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246 Analysis5.6.Comparison5Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare12months, Outcome6Depressionscores(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247 Analysis5.7.Comparison5Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare12months, Outcome7Depressionscores(bysex). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249 Analysis5.8.Comparison5Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare12months, Outcome8Depressionscores(byrisk). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 251 Analysis6.1.Comparison6Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherintervention12months, Outcome1Depressionscores(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 Analysis6.2.Comparison6Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherintervention12months, Outcome2Depressionscores(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 Analysis6.3.Comparison6Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherintervention12months, Outcome3Depressionscores(bysex). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 Analysis7.1.Comparison7Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare24months, Outcome1Depressivedisorder(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254 Analysis7.2.Comparison7Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare24months, Outcome2Depressivedisorder(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255 Analysis7.3.Comparison7Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare24months, Outcome3Depressivedisorder(bysex). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256 Analysis7.4.Comparison7Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare24months, Outcome4Depressivedisorder(byrisk). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257 Analysis7.5.Comparison7Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare24months, Outcome5Depressionscores(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 Analysis7.6.Comparison7Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare24months, Outcome6Depressionscores(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents(Review) ii Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd. Analysis7.7.Comparison7Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare24months, Outcome7Depressionscores(bysex). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 Analysis7.8.Comparison7Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare24months, Outcome8Depressionscores(byrisk). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 Analysis8.1.Comparison8Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherintervention24months, Outcome1Depressionscores(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 Analysis8.2.Comparison8Psychological/educationalinterventionversusplacebo/attention/otherintervention24months, Outcome2Depressionscores(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 Analysis9.1.Comparison9Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare36months, Outcome1Depressivedisorder(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 Analysis9.2.Comparison9Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare36months, Outcome2Depressivedisorder(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264 Analysis9.3.Comparison9Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare36months, Outcome3Depressionscores(bypopulation). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265 Analysis9.4.Comparison9Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare36months, Outcome4Depressionscores(byintervention). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266 Analysis9.5.Comparison9Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare36months, Outcome5Depressionscores(bysex). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267 Analysis9.6.Comparison9Psychological/educationalinterventionversusnointervention/wait-list/usualcare36months, Outcome6Depressionscores(byrisk). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 WHAT’SNEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271 HISTORY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 CONTRIBUTIONSOFAUTHORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 DECLARATIONSOFINTEREST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272 SOURCESOFSUPPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 DIFFERENCESBETWEENPROTOCOLANDREVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 NOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 INDEXTERMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273 Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents(Review) iii Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd. [InterventionReview] Psychological and educational interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents SallyNMerry1,SarahEHetrick2,GeorginaRCox2,TessaBrudevold-Iversen1,JullietJBir3,HeatherMcDowell4 1Departmentof Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland,Auckland, NewZealand.2Centreof Excellencein YouthMental Health,OrygenYouth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 3DepartmentofPsychiatry,UniversityofAuckland,Auckland,NewZealand.4ConsultLiaisonTeam,StarshipHospital,Auckland, NewZealand Contactaddress:SallyNMerry,DepartmentofPsychologicalMedicine,UniversityofAuckland,PrivateBag92019,Auckland,New [email protected]. Editorialgroup:CochraneDepression,AnxietyandNeurosisGroup. Publicationstatusanddate:Newsearchforstudiesandcontentupdated(conclusionschanged),publishedinIssue12,2011. Reviewcontentassessedasup-to-date: 22July2010. Citation: MerrySN,HetrickSE,CoxGR,Brudevold-IversenT,BirJJ,McDowellH.Psychologicalandeducationalinterventions forpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents.CochraneDatabaseofSystematicReviews2011,Issue12.Art.No.:CD003380. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub3. Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd. ABSTRACT Background Depressioniscommoninyoungpeople,hasamarkednegativeimpactandisassociatedwithself-harmandsuicide.Preventingitsonset wouldbeanimportantadvanceinpublichealth. Objectives Todeterminewhetherpsychologicaloreducationalinterventions,orboth,areeffectiveinpreventingtheonsetofdepressivedisorder inchildrenandadolescents. Searchmethods TheCochraneDepression,AnxietyandNeurosisReviewGroup’strialsregisters(CCDANCTR)weresearchedattheeditorialbase inJuly2010. UpdatesearchesofMEDLINE,EMBASE,PsycINFOandERICwereconductedbytheauthorsinSeptember2009. Conferenceabstracts,referencelistsofincludedstudiesandreviewsweresearchedandexpertsinthefieldcontacted. Selectioncriteria Randomisedcontrolledtrialsofpsychologicaloreducationalpreventionprogrammes,orboth,comparedwithplacebo,anycomparison intervention,ornointerventionforyoungpeopleaged5to19years-old,whodidnotcurrentlymeetdiagnosticcriteriafordepression orwhowerebelowtheclinicalrangeonstandardised,validated,andreliableratingscalesofdepression,orboth,wereincluded. Datacollectionandanalysis Twoauthorsindependentlyassessedstudiesforinclusionandratedtheirquality.Samplesizeswereadjustedtotakeaccountofcluster designsandmultiplecomparisons.Wecontactedstudyauthorsforadditionalinformationwhereneeded. Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents(Review) 1 Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd. Mainresults Fifty-three studies including 14,406 participants were included in the analysis. There were only six studies with clear allocation concealment,participantsandassessorsweremostlynotblindtotheinterventionorblindingwasunclearsothattheoverallriskof biaswasmoderatelyhigh.Sixteenstudiesincluding3240participantsreportedoutcomesondepressivediagnosis.Theriskofhaving adepressivedisorderpost-interventionwasreducedimmediatelycomparedwithnointervention(15studies;3115participantsrisk difference(RD)-0.09;95%confidenceinterval(CI)-0.14to-0.05;P<0.0003),atthreetoninemonths(14studies;1842participants; RD-0.11;95%CI-0.16to-0.06)andat12months(10studies;1750participants;RD-0.06;95%CI-0.11to-0.01).Therewasno evidenceforcontinuedefficacyat24months(eightstudies;2084participant;RD-0.01;95%CI-0.04to0.03)butlimitedevidence ofefficacyat36months(twostudies;464participants;RD-0.10;95%CI-0.19to-0.02).Therewassignificantheterogeneityinall thesefindings.Therewasnoevidenceofefficacyinthefewstudiesthatcomparedinterventionwithplaceboorattentioncontrols. Authors’conclusions Thereissomeevidencefromthisreviewthattargetedanduniversaldepressionpreventionprogrammesmaypreventtheonsetofdepres- sivedisorderscomparedwithnointervention.However,allocationconcealmentisunclearinmoststudies,andthereisheterogeneity inthefindings.Thepersistenceoffindingssuggeststhatthisisrealandnotaplaceboeffect. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents Depressivedisorderiscommonandhasamajorimpactonthefunctioningofyoungpeople.Theaimofthisreviewwastoassessthe effectivenessofprogrammesdesignedtopreventitsonset. Wefoundthat,comparedwithnointervention,psychologicaldepressionpreventionprogrammeswereeffectiveinpreventingdepression withanumberofstudiesshowingadecreaseinepisodesofdepressiveillnessoverayear.Thereweresomeproblemswiththewaythe studiesweredone butdespitethistheresultsareencouraging. Wefounddatatosupportbothtargetedanduniversal programmes, whichisimportantasuniversalprogrammesarelikelytobeeasiertoimplement.Werecommendthatfurtherresearchbeundertaken toidentifythemosteffectiveprogrammesandtotesttheseintherealworld. BACKGROUND therequestoftheWorldBankandsupportedbytheWorldHealth Organizationrankeddepressivedisorderfourthintheestimateof Descriptionofthecondition diseaseburden,aheadofischaemicheartdisease,cerebrovascular disease and tuberculosis (Murray 1997). The authors predicted Depressionisacommonprobleminyoungpeople.Overallpreva- depressionwouldbesecondinthecauseofdisabilitybytheyear lencerates,measuredfrompointprevalenceupto12monthpe- 2020(Ustun1999;Murray1997a)andin2002theirpredictions riodprevalence,fromalargemeta-analysiswereestimatedat2.8% provedtobecorrect,withdepressivedisordersrankedsecond in forchildrenundertheageof13and5.6%foryoungpeopleaged developedcountries, andfirst indevelopingcountrieswithlow 13to18years(Costello2006).Ratesrisesteeplyinadolescence mortality(Mathers2004).Becauseofthistherehasbeeninterest (Feehan1993;Feehan1994;Fergusson 1993;Fergusson 2001). inthedevelopmentofprogrammesaimedatpreventingtheonset By the age of 19, between a fifth and a quarter of young peo- ofdepression,withanumberofstudiesbeingpublishedinthelast ple have suffered from a depressive disorder (Lewinsohn 1993; twodecades. Lewinsohn1998).Depressioninyoungpeopleisassociatedwith pooracademicperformance,socialdysfunction,substanceabuse, andattemptedandcompletedsuicide(Birmaher1996;Birmaher 1996a;Brent1986;Brent2002;Fleming1993;Rao1995;Rhode Descriptionoftheintervention 1994).TheGlobalBurdenofDiseasestudy,initiatedin1992at Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents(Review) 2 Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd. Prevention can be universal, where the intervention is imple- ders,somepsychologicaltheoriesproposethatindividualfactors mentedforadesignatedpopulationregardlessofrisk,ortargeted createapredispositiontodevelopingdepressivedisorders,andal- toapopulation athighriskfor thedisorder. Targetedinterven- ternativelymayprovideamodelforpromotingresilienceinthe tions can be furtherclassifiedinto selectiveinterventions which faceofstress.Thesetheorieshaveledtothedevelopmentof ef- focus on populations with a risk factor for disorder e.g. family fectivetreatmentsfordepressivedisorderinyoungpeopleandare history,andindicatedinterventionswhichfocusonpopulations oftenusedtoprovide atheoreticalbasis forthedevelopmentof with symptoms or signs suggestive of incipient disorder. Some preventionprogrammes. selective interventions target risk factors for depression, such as Beckdevelopedcognitivebehaviouraltherapybasedonhiscogni- trauma, topreventlong-termsequelae.Theprimary targetmay tivemodelofdepression(Beck1976).Heproposedthatindividu- not be depression, although the effect on depression may have alspronetodepressionhavecognitivedistortionswhichresultina beenmeasuredalongwithotheroutcomes.Earlyinterventionmay negativeviewofthemselves,theworldandthefuture.Incognitive beconsideredpreventionortreatment.TheInstituteofMedicine behavioural therapy(CBT), peoplelearntomonitor andevalu- Report(Mrazek1994)andtheupdatedreport(O’Connell2009) atetheirthoughts,identifydifferentlevelsofmoodinthemselves, recommendsthatpreventionisdefinedasthoseinterventionsthat recognisethoughtsandbehavioursthathavecontributedtothis occurpriortotheonsetofaclinicallydiagnoseddisorder. mood, and learnhow to address these.Theassociated concepts There are many psychological treatments for depression, that of “attributional style”(Abramson 1978) and “learnedhelpless- include psychodynamic, humanistic and cognitive behavioural ness”(Petersen1993;Seligman1979)havealsocontributed to strategies.Themostrobustevidenceexistsfortwoparticularpsy- componentsofCBT.Thosewithapessimisticattributionalstyle chologicalinterventions:cognitivebehaviouraltherapyandinter- see negative events as a stable and enduring part of themselves, personaltherapy.Thereisevidencethatbothareeffectivetreat- while positive events are seen as transient occurrences in which mentsfordepressionandthattheymayreducerelapse,hencethe theyhaveplayednopart.Learnedhelplessnessisaphenomenonof potentialfordepressionprevention. withdrawalanddepressionthatfollowsafailuretocontrolaversive The depression prevention interventions are often delivered in events.Bothareassociatedwithasenseofhelplessnessandhope- a group setting, both to reduce cost and because a group may lessness,whichleadstopassivityinthefaceofchallengesandcon- reinforceeffectivenessbyprovidingpositivepeerexperiences.Both tributestolowmood(McCauley2001).Peoplewhoareproneto groupandindividualinterventionsusuallytakeplaceonaweekly depressionarethenlesslikelytotakeanactiveapproachtodealing basisandtypicallylastfor10to15sessions. with difficulties. Cognitive behavioural therapyusuallyincludes Family-based programmes are based on thepremise thatfamily acomponentofeffectiveproblem-solving.Cognitivebehavioural memberscaninfluenceoneanother’swell-beingandhaveasignif- therapycanalleviatesymptomsofdepressioninchildrenandado- icanteffectontheoutcomesofinterventions(Carr2006).Family- lescents(Harrington 1998;Reinecke 1998)and canpreventre- basedinterventionsoftenincludethecognitivestrategiesoutlined lapse(Paykel1999)althoughlong-termresultsinstudiesinchil- above.Implementationwithinthefamilysystemisthoughttore- drenandadolescentshavecontradictoryfindings(Fonagy2005). sultinamorerobustoutcomeasfamilydiscordisariskfactorfor Interpersonalconflict,difficultywithroletransitionsandexperi- depression. encesoflossareallwellknownasriskfactorsinthedevelopmentof Thereisevidencesupportingtheimportanceoftheschoolenvi- depressivedisorderinyoungpeople(Birmaher1996;Lewinsohn ronmentforyoungpeople’swell-being(Carr2006).Youngpeople 1994;McCauley2001;).Interpersonal therapy(IPT)addresses spendasignificantamountoftimeinschool,anddisseminating someofthesecomponentsandthereisevidenceofefficacyintreat- a programme within a school or classroom is likely to be cost- mentofteenagedepression(Bolton2003;Mufson1996;Mufson effectiveasmanyyoungpeoplecanbetaughtatthesametime. 2004). Inthisreviewwehaveincludedbothpsychologicalandeducational approachestopreventingdepression.Thekeydifferentiatingpoint isthateducationalinterventionssimplyprovideinformationabout Whyitisimportanttodothisreview depression,throughlecturesorfactsheets,whereaspsychological Since the last review was published in 2004 (Merry 2004b) a interventionsattempttochangehowpeoplethink,usingavariety largenumberofstudieshavebeenconducted,andothersareun- ofdifferentstrategies. derway. Because of the cost of depression to society, and its re- lationship to suicide attempts and completedsuicide, this is an importantpublichealthissue.Previousreviewshaveshownthat Howtheinterventionmightwork targeted programmes are potentially effective in preventing de- Theaetiologyofdepressivedisorderiscomplexandincludesbio- pressionforyoungpeople,withmoremixedresultsfromuniver- logical,psychologicalandsocialfactors(Davidson2002;Cicchetti salprogrammes(Brunwasser2009;Horowitz2006;Merry2007; 1998;Goodyer2000;McCauley2001;Lewinsohn1994).While Merry2007a).Governmentsarekeentotakeactiontoaddressthe itisclearthatasingleapproachwillnotreducealldepressivedisor- problem.However,thereisthepotentialforsuchprogrammesto Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents(Review) 3 Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd. beimplementedintheabsenceofevidenceofeffectiveness.Itis ofMedicineReport(Mrazek1994;O’Connell2009),prevention timelytore-evaluatetheevidencecurrentlyavailablefortheeffec- wasclassifiedasthoseinterventionsthatoccurredpriortotheini- tivenessofdepressionpreventionprogrammes. tialonsetofaclinicallydiagnosabledisorderandincludedinter- ventionsforindividualswhohadelevatedsymptomsofdisorder butwhodidnotcurrentlymeetthecriteriaforaclinicaldisorder. Studieswithparticipantswhohadpreviouslymetdiagnosticcrite- OBJECTIVES riafordepressivedisorder,butdidnotcurrentlymeetthosecriteria andhadhadnotreatmentfordisorderwereincluded.Although Todeterminewhetherpsychologicaloreducationalinterventions, thisisnotapuristdefinitionofprevention,infactthemajority orboth,areeffectiveinpreventingtheonsetofdepressivedisorders ofstudieshavenotrigorouslyassessedwhetherornotparticipants inchildrenandadolescentsincluding: had ahistory of depressive disorder, while some of the best de- signedstudiesweidentifieddiddothis.Itwasillogicaltoexclude 1. Universalinterventions;and thesestudies,giventhattheparticipantsintheotherstudiesare 2. Targetedinterventionsaimedatyoungpeopleatriskof likelyto have also included young people with past episodes of developingadepressivedisorder(identifiedthroughelevated depressivedisorderthathavebeenunrecognisedanduntreated. depressivesymptomsorpresenceofknownriskfactors). Weincludedstudiesthattargetedariskfactorfordepressivedis- order as long as outcomes includeddepressive symptoms or di- agnosisofdepressivedisorder,orboth,eveniftheywerenotthe METHODS primaryoutcomevariable(e.g.interventionstoreducetheeffect oftrauma,wherepost-traumatic stressdisorderwastheprimary outcomevariable). Secondary and tertiary interventions, including relapse preven- Criteriaforconsideringstudiesforthisreview tion, andpharmacological interventions fordepression wereex- cluded. Inthisreviewwehaveincludedbothpsychologicalandeducational Typesofstudies preventionprogrammes.Wehavedefinedpsychologicalinterven- Randomisedcontrolledtrials(RCTs),includingclusterRCTswere tionsbroadlyasthosethattargetpsychologicalprocessesthought included. tobeinvolvedinthedevelopmentofdepressionandeducational interventionsarethosethatprovideeducationaboutdepression, itscausesandwhatcouldbedoneaboutitinabroadsense,for Typesofparticipants example lifestyle interventions such as advice to take Omega-3 Studieswereincludedifthesubjectswerechildrenandadolescents oil.However,thetwocanoverlap,especiallywhenpsychological (aged5to19years)whodidnotcurrentlymeetthecriteriafor interventionsincludesomepsycho-education. Earlystudieshave aclinicaldiagnosisofdepressiveillness,althoughtheymayhave investigatedpurelyeducationalprogrammesbutthesewerelargely had sub-clinical symptoms of depression. Studies that included ineffectiveandtheemphasissincethelastreviewhasbeenonpsy- participantswithahistoryofdepressionwereincludedifthein- chologicalinterventions.Themainmodalityemployedbyinvesti- terventionwasaimedatpreventionofdepressioninanon-clin- gatorswasbasedoncognitivebehaviouraltherapy,butsomeused icalsetting,andwheretheparticipantswerenotbeingcurrently otherapproachessuchasplaytherapy. treatedfordepression. The way interventions are delivered varies. In this review most Studies were excluded if they lacked a clear definition of par- interventionsaredeliveredingroups,butinthisreviewwehave ticipants, were on children and adolescents who metDSM-IV- somestudiesinvestigating theuseofcomputerstodeliverinter- TR(AmericanPsychiatricAssociation2000)orICD-10(World ventions. HealthOrganization2007)criteriafordepressivedisorderorfell intotheclinicalrangeonstandardised,validated,andreliablerat- ingscalesofdepressionatthestartofthestudy,orboth,orthere Typesofoutcomemeasures wasnoadequateassessmentofparticipants. Dichotomousoutcomemeasuresincludedstructuredclinicalin- terviews,yieldingdiagnosisofdepressivedisorderusingmeasures Typesofinterventions such as the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders Scale (K- Studiesondepressionpreventionwereincludediftheycompared SADS)(Kaufman1997).Otheroutcomemeasuresusedapredes- theefficacyofeducationalorpsychologicalinterventionswiththe ignatedcut-offpointonacontinuousmeasurelikelytobecorre- efficacyofplacebo,anycomparisonintervention,ornointerven- latedwithpresenceofadepressivedisorder,suchastheReynolds tioninchildrenandadolescents.AsrecommendedintheInstitute Adolescent Depression Scale (Reynolds 1986) and rating scales Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents(Review) 4 Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd. providing continuous measures of depressive symptoms such as searchesofMEDLINE(1950-),EMBASE(1974-)andPsycINFO theChildren’sDepressionInventory(CDI)(Kovacs1992). (1967-); quarterly searchesof the Cochrane Central Register of ControlledTrials(CENTRAL)andreview-specificsearchesofad- ditional databases. Reportsof trialsare also sourcedfrominter- Primaryoutcomes nationaltrialsregistersc/otheWorldHealthOrganization’strials Ourprimaryoutcomeswere: portal (ICTRP) (http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/), drug compa- • prevalenceofdepressivedisorderintheinterventiongroup nies, thehandsearching of key journals, conference proceedings comparedwiththecontrolgrouppost-interventionandat andother(non-Cochrane)systematicreviewsandmeta-analyses. follow-up,measuredoneitheravalidatedmeasureofdepressive DetailsofCCDAN’sgenericsearchstrategiescanbefoundonthe disorder,oraboveacut-offonavalidated,reliable,continuous Group’swebsite. measureofdepressionindicating’caseness’;and • depressivesymptomsintheinterventiongroupcompared withthecontrolgrouppost-interventionandatfollow-up. Electronicsearches 1.TheCochraneDepression,AnxietyandNeurosisGrouptrials Themeasurementtoolsincluded: registersweresearched(toJuly2010)usingthefollowingupdated 1. ArecogniseddiagnosticsystemsuchasDSM-IV-TR searchstrategy: (AmericanPsychiatricAssociation2000)orICD-10(World CCDANCTR-StudiesRegister HealthOrganization2007); Diagnosis=(depress*ordysthymi*)and 2. Standardised,validated,andreliabledepressionratingscales AgeGroup=(child*oradolescen*orunclearor“notstated”)and suitableforchildrenandadolescents.Wheremorethanone Free-Text=(prevent*or“earlyintervention*”orriskorat-riskor outcomemeasurewasused,thehighestqualityoutcomemeasure vulnerab*or(healthandpromot*)or“healthliteracy”oreducat* wasenteredintotheanalyses.Forthisweusedahierarchybased or psychoeducat* or training or “life skill*”or school* or class- onpsychometricpropertiesandappropriatenessforusewith room*orinternet*ordivorce*ordeathorbereave*) childrenandadolescents,followingthemethoddescribedby Hazell2002,seeAppendix5. CCDANCTR-ReferencesRegister Outcomesareorganisedbyfollow-uptimepoints,includingpost Title/Abstract= (depression or depressive or dysthymi* or “de- intervention,shortertermfollow-up,whichwedefinedas3to9 pressedmood“or“mentalhealth”)and months,andlongertermfollow-upincluding12months,24and Free-text= (adolesc* or preadolesc* or pre-adolesc* or child* or 36months. boysorgirlsorjuvenil*orminorsorpre-schoolorpreschoolor paediatric* or pediatric* or pubescen* or puberty or school* or high-schoolorteen*oryoungoryouth*or(student*and(college Secondaryoutcomes oruniversit*))orundergraduate*)and Given the size of the review and variability of the data, other Free-text=(prevent*or”earlyintervention*“orriskorat-riskor secondaryoutcomes(suchasgeneral/socialadjustment,academic vulnerab*or(healthandpromot*)or”healthliteracy“oreducat* functioning, cognitive style, anxiety and suicidal ideation) were or psychoeducat* or training or ”life skill*“or school* or class- notincludedintheupdateofthereview. room*orinternet*ordivorce*ordeathorbereave*) 2.TheoriginalsearchofMEDLINE,EMBASE,PsycINFOand ERIC was in 2005. The original search terms for all databases Searchmethodsforidentificationofstudies havebeenupdated(September2009),(seeAppendix1;Appendix 2;Appendix3;Appendix4)andsearchesofthesedatabaseswere CCDAN’sSpecialisedRegister(CCDANCTR) updatedatthistime. TheCochraneDepression,AnxietyandNeurosisReviewGroup BecausetheCCDANregistersnowincluderegularsearchesofall (CCDAN)maintaintwoclinicaltrialsregistersattheireditorial thesedatabases,wedidnotundertakeanyfurthersearchesofthese baseinBristol,UK,areferencesregisterandastudies-basedregis- databasesinJuly2010. ter.TheCCDANCTR-ReferencesRegistercontainsover27,500 reportsoftrialsindepression,anxietyandneurosis.Approximately 60%ofthesereferenceshavebeentaggedtoindividual,codedtri- Searchingotherresources als.ThecodedtrialsareheldintheCCDANCTR-StudiesRegis- terandrecordsarelinkedbetweenthetworegistersthroughthe 1. Thereferencelistsofarticlesandotherreviewsretrievedin use of unique Study ID tags. Coding of trials is based on the thesearchweresearched; EU-Psicodingmanual.PleasecontacttheCCDANTrialsSearch 2. Conferenceabstracts,1994,1996,and1998-2001,forthe Co-ordinatorforfurtherdetails.Reportsoftrialsforinclusionin AmericanAcademyofChildandAdolescentPsychiatrywere theGroup’sregisters arecollatedfromroutine (weekly),generic searched; Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents(Review) 5 Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd. 3. Personalcommunication:inordertoensurethatasmanyas 3. Descriptionofintervention,includingtypee.g.CBT, possibleRCTswereidentified,theauthorsoftheincludedstudies educational;durationandintensity,whetheritwasmanualised wereconsultedtofindoutiftheyknewofanypublishedor andwhodeliveredtheintervention; unpublishedRCTsinthearea,whichhadnotyetbeenidentified. 4. Typeofplacebo/control/comparison,e.g.wait-list,no intervention,placebo. Datacollectionandanalysis Measures 1. Assessmentinstruments; Selectionofstudies 2. Assessmentintervals. Theselectionoftrialsforinclusionintheupdateofthereviewwas performedindependently by at leasttwo of the review authors. Whereatitleor abstractappearedtodescribeatrialeligiblefor Outcomes inclusion,weobtainedthefullarticleandinspectedittoassessrel- 1. Diagnosisofdepressivedisorder; evancetothisreviewbasedontheinclusioncriteria.Anydiscrep- 2. Depressivesymptoms. anciesbetweenthetworeviewerswereresolvedbyathirdreview Whenaspectsofmethodologywereunclear,orwhenthedatawere author. inaformunsuitableformeta-analysisandtrialsappearedtomeet theeligibilitycriteria,additionalinformationwassoughtfromthe principal author. We have indicated in the notes section of the Dataextractionandmanagement Characteristicsofincludedstudiesifanauthorsuppliedadditional Datawereindependentlyextractedbyfourofthereviewauthors data. (SM,JB,GCorTB)anddiscrepancieswereresolvedbySH.To ensureaccuratedataentry,thedataweredouble-checkedafteren- tryforanalysis.Thefollowingdetailswereextractedfromthein- Assessmentofriskofbiasinincludedstudies cludedtrialsandtheinformationispresentedintheCharacteristics Fortheoriginalversionofthisreview,weassessedmethodological ofincludedstudies: qualityusingthequalityratingscaledevisedbyMoncrieffandcol- leagues(Moncrieff2006).Allstudieswerescoredindependently bytwooftheauthorsandthosescoring30ormoreweredeemed ’high’quality,thosescoring23ormoreweredeemed’adequate’. Methods Asensitivityanalysiswasundertakenincludingonlythosestudies 1. StudyDesigni.e.RCTorclusterRCT; thatscoredinthe’high’or’adequate’qualityrange. 2. Whetherapowercalculationwasdone; Forthecurrentupdate(2011),weupdatedourmethodstocon- 3. Thesourceofsubjectse.g.school; formtothecurrentversionoftheCochraneHandbook(Higgins 4. Whethertherewasrepresentativesamplerecruitment; 2008a)andmorespecifically,the’RiskofBias’toolitrecommends 5. Whetherdiagnosticcriteriaorclearinclusioncriteriawere (Higgins 2008b). We examined each study for randomised se- used. quence generation method, allocation concealment, blinding of participantsandassessors,themethodsofaddressingincomplete outcomedata,potentialselectivereporting,andanyotherpossible biasthatmightaffecttheoutcomeofthestudy. Characteristicsofthestudyparticipants Allassessmentsof thequality of trialswereperformedindepen- 1. Ageandsexofparticipants; dentlybytworeviewauthors(SMandHM)forpreviousversions 2. Methodsusedtodefineanddiagnosestudyparticipants; of this review and by one of SM, JB, GC, TB, or HM for the 3. Otherinclusioncriteria,e.g.thosewithahighriskfactor; currentversionofthisreview.Anydiscrepancieswereresolvedby 4. Exclusioncriteria; SH. 5. Country. Adescription oftheassessmentofriskofbiasisinRiskofBias TablesintheCharacteristicsofincludedstudies. Interventionsused Measuresoftreatmenteffect 1. Locationofinterventionprogrammee.g.schoolor community; Depressivediagnosis 2. Focusofintervention,i.e.TargetedorUniversal; Psychologicalandeducationalinterventionsforpreventingdepressioninchildrenandadolescents(Review) 6 Copyright©2011TheCochraneCollaboration.PublishedbyJohnWiley&Sons,Ltd.
Description: