Protohistoric Archaeology and Settlement in Central Maluku, Eastern Indonesia David Kyle Latinis National University of Singapore 2002 Protohistoric Archaeology and Settlement in Central Maluku, Eastern Indonesia David Kyle Latinis (B.A.-Anthropology) (M.A.-Anthropology) (Ph.D.-Anthropology) A Thesis Submitted For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Southeast Asian Studies Programme National University of Singapore 2004 Protohistoric Archaeology and Settlement David Kyle Latinis 2004 in Central Maluku, Eastern Indonesia i Name: David Kyle Latinis Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Department: Southeast Asian Studies Programme Thesis Title: “Protohistoric Archaeology and Settlement in Central Maluku, Eastern Indonesia” Abstract Maluku played a major role in history for at least 2000 years as the sole source region of the highly demanded spices, clove, nutmeg, and mace. However, historic documents from visitors and indigenes emerge only in the 16th century or later. Few archaeological projects have been conducted in Maluku to shed light on the protohistoric period. The purpose of this thesis is designed to explore the late protohistoric period through archaeological data, especially the artifactual assemblages from a few relatively large walled settlements possibly dating to the 8th-15th centuries. Factors relating to the emergence, location and distribution of these sites are explored as well as factors possibly relating to sites’ possible abandonment towards the end of the 15th century. Compositional studies coupled with identification of foreign ceramics to known time periods indicate several local and extra-local exchange spheres existed. New settlements appear to have emerged in the subsequent colonial period. Continuities, changes and possible influential factors in the transition from protohistoric to historic periods are also discussed. Keywords: Maluku (Moluccas), Archaeology, Ceramics, Compositional Analysis, Protohistory, Settlement. ii Summary The following thesis highlights the results of field and laboratory research conducted on late protohistoric period (ca. 8th-15th centuries) archaeological sites and archaeological assemblages from Central Maluku, Eastern Indonesia. Chapter 1 introduces the study area and some of the problems and hypotheses. Chapter 2 is intended to provide an extensive overview of past and present Maluku and Malukan culture. It is a synthesis of much historical, archaeological, and ethnographic data. Chapter 3 summarize previous archaeology, important archaeological topics related to the thesis and a brief prehistory of Maluku. Chapter 4 recounts survey and describes the fieldwork. Chapter 5 is devoted to the ceramic assemblage description. Chapter 6 recounts the results of compositional studies conducted on earthenware samples. Chapter 7 concludes with an overall assessment and brief discussion of some transitional trends from the protohistoric to early historic period. Perhaps more questions are provided than answers throughout the discussion. However, the protohistoric period and protohistoric archaeology in Central Maluku remains in a state of infancy and additional work is sorely needed, especially because Maluku played such a prominent role in world history. Nevertheless, the results of the research helps shed light on an otherwise completely unknown era and place. This research coupled with current investigations in places like Banda should be viewed as a launching pad for future studies in the area rather than a definitive conclusion of the time period and settlement patterns during the protohistoric period. Large, stacked stone walled settlements with dense earthenware assemblages and sparse foreign ceramics provide the bulk of the data. These sites seem to have lost their importance and were likely mostly abandoned by the dawn of the historic period. The factors related to their emergence and decline remain obscure, but at least they yield clues about Malukan protohistory and Maluku’s connection to the larger world during arguably one of the most exciting periods in history. iii Acknowledgements Firstly, I must give thanks to both my wife, Swee Chiang, and my daughter, Mina Marie. Without their support and inspiration, none of this would be possible. I also wish to thank my friends, Mike Dega, Mike Carson, Stan Tan, Shah Alam Mohammed Zaini, Roeland Stuelmeir, Pollie Bith, Yunus Metiari, Yonki Tupamahu, Widya Nayati, Win Than Tun, Omar Chen, Dan Crosswell, Martin Bazylewich the entire Arts Faculty Softball Team (perhaps the only sanity valve within a hundred mile radius) and countless others that I cannot possibly list here for their continued support, comments, insights, editorial suggestions, motivational techniques and interest. One could not ask for a more capable and nicer group of friends. I am forever grateful and unquestionably the most fortunate person around to know these people. I would also like to thank the eight most inspirational anthropologists that I know in order of meeting them or being inspired by their writings: David Frayer (University of Kansas), Alan Hanson (University of Kansas), Bion Griffin (University of Hawaii), Douglas Yen (University of Hawaii), Peter Bellwood (Australian National University), Matthew Spriggs (Australian National University), Roy Ellen (University of Kent), and John Miksic (National University of Singapore). The combined genius of these people is indescribable. If I am half of what any of these individuals are, I will have exceeded ten times my expectations. To these individuals I am eternally thankful for inspiration, insight, and direction. Any of my successes should certainly be attributed to them. Any of my failures are entirely of my own making. I must also thank my friends in Maluku and all the people of Maluku. Without you and your knowledge I would be nothing. In many ways, all my successes have only been translations of your cultural genius. These are troubled times and my heart goes out to those who are affected. I hope that these troubled times will quickly dissipate. I have never felt more at home outside of my home than I have in Maluku. I hope that I can soon experience such hospitality, relaxation, fun and security again. I cannot thank you enough. Lastly, I wish to thank the Henry Luce Foundation, National Science Foundation and the National University of Singapore for their direct and indirect research support. Particularly, Prof Frank Watt and Mr. Ng Tong Hoe (EDXRF lab) and Mr. Eugene He (Materials Science, SEM and XRD) deserve great recognition and thanks for their help and support with compositional analyses conducted on the ceramic assemblages. iv Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: A Diachronic Background to the Environment, People and Relevant History of Maluku 20 The Physical Environment and Human Factors Affecting the Physical Environment 23 The People 38 Subsistence/Food Production and Settlement Implications 54 Other Issues Related to Current and Past Settlement 66 Settlement Types 70 Religion and Beliefs, Past and Present 80 Linguistics 83 Summary 85 Chapter 3: Introduction to Prehistory, Protohistory and Archaeology in Maluku 88 Brief Prehistory of Maluku 88 History of Archaeological Research in Central Maluku and Neighboring Areas 91 Further Considerations Regarding Archaeological and Ceramic Studies in Central Maluku 97 Chapter 4: Survey, Site Description and Sampling 109 Luhu and the Hoamoal Peninsula 109 Piru 113 Lumoli and Hinterland 113 Lohiatala and Hinterland 113 Rambatu, Rumberu, Manusa and Hinterland 114 Sawai, Masihulan and Hinterland 118 Masohi 121 Gorom and Geser 121 Mamala, Morela and Hinterland 125 Kapahaha 126 Liang 128 Rahban 130 v Amaheru 130 Hila 131 Kaitetu 132 Haruku 132 Saparua 133 Buru 134 Hitu 136 Hitumessing and Hitulama 136 Tomu/Amatomu 136 Some Comments on Relevant Oral History and Further History Surrounding the Tomu Site 149 Hatusua 152 The Hatusua Site 152 Further Survey and Sampling of the Hatusua Site 166 Hatusua Lama 170 Further Comments on Oral History and History Surrounding the Hatusua Site 171 Summary 174 Chapter 5: Ceramic Assemblages 178 The Assemblages 178 The Clay 182 Production Techniques 183 Vessel Forms, Vessel Part Forms and Decoration Represented in Surface and Excavated Assemblages 187 Discussion of Vessel Form and Decoration 203 The Excavated Hatusua Assemblage and the Tomu Samples 206 Further Discussion 214 Chapter 6: Compositional Studies 224 Amaheru, Kapahaha, Rahban, Buru, Dulak, Giru Gajah, Kataloka, Ondor and Sri Kshetra 229 Tomu and Hatusua 235 Chapter 7: Conclusion 246 vi References 256 Appendix A: Radiocarbon analyses reports CD Appendix B: Reconstructed profiles from the Hatusua excavation CD Appendix C: Video clips CD Appendix D: Images of assemblages CD vii List of Figures Figure 1a: Map of Southeast Asia 2 Figure 1b: Map of Central Maluku 2 Figure 2a: Bowen 1714 Map of Wallacea and New Guinea. 24 Figure 2b: Study Area in Central Maluku. 25 Figure 3: Sunda, Sahul, Wallacea, Central Lyddeker Region and Near Oceania. 27 Figure 4: Wallace’s Sketch of Dobbo. 34 Figure 5: Smith and Sharp map of site distribution. 58 Figure 6: Possible Evolutionary Trajectories of a Variety of Subsistence Systems in the Region. 61 Figure 7a: Model 1-dusun/umur panjang systems with ‘active fallow’ phase. 62 Figure 7b: Model 2-kebun and umur pendek swidden systems with ‘passive fallow’ phase. 62 Figure 8: Tomu Field Plan of Northwest Section. 146 Figure 9: Plan View of Hatusua Excavation. 155-156 Figure 10a: Incised/Impressed Designs and Motifs from Sites in Ambon and Seram Discussed in Text. 179 Figure 10b: Similar Forms of Earthenware Bases (Possible Lids) with Similar Incised/ Impressed Designs from Both the Hatusua and Tomu Sites. 180 Figure 10c: Unique Incised/Impressed Designs on Bases (Possible Lids) from the AMQ 12 (Ambon), Tomu (Ambon) and Hatusua Sites. 181 Figure 11: Surface Images of Sherds from Select Sites in Central Maluku. 184 Figure 12: Unique Rim, Ring Foot and Sago Mold Designs/Forms from Various Sites. 189 Figure 13: Anglo Examples. 198 Figure 14: Unique Handles and Knobs from the Central Malukan Assemblages. 200 Figure 15: Possible Oil Lamp Fragments from the Hatusua Site, Seram. 201 Figure 16: A Few Unique Pieces from the Assemblages. 202 Figure 17: Rim Profiles from Sites Discussed in Text. 212 Figure 18: SEM Readout for Select Elements. 225
Description: