Preface I Professing in the Postmodern Academy Faculty and the Future of Church-Related Colleges Edited by Stephen R. Haynes Baylor University Press Waco, Texas Hayne-front matter 1 10/5/04, 8:57 AM II PREFACE Hayne-front matter 2 10/5/04, 8:57 AM Preface III CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................................................V PREFACE......................................................................................VII PART ONE: INTRODUCTION A Review of Research on Church-Related Higher Education STEPHEN R. HAYNES........................................................1 PART TWO: POSTMODERN OPPORTUNITY The Habit of Empathy: Postmodernity and the Future of the Church-Related College PAUL LAKELAND............................................................33 Prolegomena to Any Postmodern Hope for the Church-Related College MARGARET FALLS-CORBITT............................................49 A Sense of Place and the Place of Sense WILLIAM J. CAHOY........................................................73 PART THREE: ACADEMIC VOCATION Conversation and Authority: A Tension in the Inheritance of the Church-Related College RICHARD KYTE.............................................................115 Beyond the Faith-Knowledge Dichotomy: Teaching As Vocation ELIZABETH NEWMAN ...................................................131 The Erotic Imagination and the Catholic Academy JOHN NEARY................................................................149 Hayne-front matter 3 10/5/04, 8:57 AM IV CPORNETFEANCTES PART FOUR: PEDAGOGY AND PRAXIS “Academic” vs. “Confessional” Study of the Bible in the Postmodern Classroom: A Response to Philip Davies and David Clines JULIA M. O’BRIEN .......................................................169 Teaching the Conflicts, For the Bible Tells Me So TIMOTHY K. BEAL........................................................183 A Pedagogy of Eucharistic Accompaniment DOMINIC P. SCIBILIA ....................................................195 PART FIVE: MISSION AND CURRICULUM One-Armed Embrace of Postmodernity: International Education and Church-Related Colleges KEITH GRABER MILLER ................................................217 Religion and the Curriculum at Church-Related Colleges MARCIA BUNGE ...........................................................247 From the Ties that Bind to Way-Stations: The Dynamics of Religious Commitment among Students and Their Families D. JONATHAN GRIESER AND CORRIE E. NORMAN.........267 AFTERWORD A Typology of Church-Related Colleges and Universities STEPHEN R. HAYNES....................................................297 NOTES ....................................................................................303 BIBLIOGRAPHY...........................................................................341 CONTRIBUTORS..........................................................................357 Hayne-front matter 4 10/5/04, 8:57 AM Preface V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank all the persons and institutions who contributed to the completion of this book, especially Lilly Endowment Inc. By funding and cultivating the Rhodes Con- sultation on the Future of the Church-Related College since 1995, the Endowment has made a significant contribution to church-related higher education and to the lives and careers of Consultation participants. Craig Dykstra, Vice President of the Religion Division at Lilly, has been a strong advocate for this work and a mentor for many of the participants. Jeanne Knoerle, SP, former Program Officer at the Endowment, deserves much credit for the Rhodes Consultation’s success. Before her retirement in 1999, Jeanne fashioned and nurtured the Consultation in important ways. Her encouragement of younger scholars, her guidance and leadership, and her faith in the spirituality of conversation have left their mark on each of us. We dedicate this volume to her, in appreciation of her friendship and support. Hayne-front matter 5 10/5/04, 8:57 AM VI PREFACE Hayne-front matter 6 10/5/04, 8:57 AM Preface VII PREFACE Scholars have employed a number of images to describe the problems and possibilities associated with American church- related higher education. Charles McCoy (1972) speaks of an identity crisis, an image that foregrounds the struggles which accompany maturation and social change. Merrimon Cuninggim (1994) refers to “uneasy partners,” an image that captures the shifting relationship between church and college and the intellectual chafing that results from the unequal yok- ing of institutions. Studies by George Marsden (1994) and James Tunstead Burtchaell (1991; 1997)—along with other recent works on higher education that have its religious dimensions in view—traffic in images of declension. They plot the history of higher education in America as a fall from grace, a dimin- ishment of soul, an exile from pristine origins. “Professing in the postmodern academy” is the metaphor we have selected to guide our reflections on the identity and role of the church-related college. The image of professing in the postmodern academy commends itself to us for several reasons. First, it accentuates the faculty voice on an issue where it is often silent or silenced. Second, by foregrounding the au- thors’ institutional locations—which include colleges and uni- versities affiliated with a variety of Protestant (Presbyterian, Methodist, Baptist, Lutheran, Episcopal and Mennonite) and Roman Catholic traditions (Norbertine, Lasallian, Benedictine, Dominican, Jesuit, and Sisters of Holy Cross)—it emphasizes the faculty role in articulating and embodying religious iden- tity. Third, while the academic vocation calls us to be profes- sors, we are aware of professing in a world and an academy that are in the midst of change. The “postmodern” environ- ment emerging in the American academy may be one that is friendly to religious professions—as George M. Marsden and others have suggested. In any case, if claims of church- Hayne-front matter 7 10/5/04, 8:57 AM VIII PREFACE relatedness at our institutions are to be taken seriously amid the welter of competing methodologies and truth claims, an articulate and committed faculty voice is required. THE RHODES CONSULTATION Who are these junior scholars who dare to speak about the importance of church-relatedness at this juncture in the his- tory of American higher education? The twelve contributors to this volume are the original members of the Rhodes Con- sultation on the Future of the Church-Related College, a project funded since 1995 by Lilly Endowment Inc.1 The Rhodes Con- sultation began as an attempt to convene outstanding junior faculty at church-related colleges and universities to reflect to- gether on the future of our institutions and the role of faculty in shaping that future. The authors were selected from among 130 applicants to the first round of the Consultation. Because interest in the project was so great, a second round of conver- sations was initiated in 1997. Forty-two new participants were selected, again from well over one hundred applicants. A third round of the Consultation, which included thirty-six new fac- ulty members, was launched in 1999. To this point, ninety fac- ulty representatives from ninety institutions have participated in the Rhodes Consultation, and as the project has evolved a majority of participants in the first two rounds have remained involved in some capacity. When an institution becomes part of the Consultation, the first step is initiation of a series of formal campus discussions dealing with issues of church-relatedness. These faculty dis- cussions typically move from the general to the specific, and often utilize the college’s own history as a case study. Every attempt is made to represent the various attitudes toward church affiliation to be found on college faculties, with the goal of establishing the sort of open and respectful dialogue that is often lacking around this issue. The campus conversations sponsored by the Consultation yield further discussions, revi- sion of mission statements, strategic planning documents, and plans for new initiatives. These developments are institution- alized in the second step of the Consultation, which calls for Hayne-front matter 8 10/5/04, 8:57 AM Preface IX participants to develop “Institutional Renewal Grant” propos- als. The Consultation’s IRG program funds projects designed by faculty to reclaim creatively the institution’s religious tra- dition. Programs initiated under the IRG banner have included faculty orientation seminars, mentoring programs, institutional history projects, and curriculum development (e.g., courses in “Religion and Education” and Catholic Studies programs). The ultimate goal of both campus discussions and IRGs is long- term institutional change. Indeed, after a full year of formal discussion and two years of a project specifically designed to enhance the viability of the religious tradition on campus, the very character of the college can be affected. This volume represents another contribution of the Rhodes Consultation to the future of church-related higher education. Between 1996 and 1998, the twelve original members of the Consultation met regularly to discuss the situation on their campuses, their own identity and vocation as scholars, and the issues affecting church-related higher education about which they felt most strongly. After undertaking research projects and writing, revising, and editing together for two years, the group produced this manuscript. It represents the reflections of junior teacher-scholars who are religiously com- mitted and deeply concerned with the future of their institu- tions. It does not represent the official view of any college, church, or denomination, but it does capture the spirit of the Rhodes Consultation, whose aim has been to provoke genu- ine conversation about the issues we care about and the insti- tutions to which we are called. ORIGINS How did the Rhodes Consultation come to be? Its origins go back a decade to an episode that is symbolic of the tensions that animate many church-affiliated institutions. At Rhodes College, during the opening faculty meeting of the 1991–1992 academic year, a newly hired professor of Political Science was introduced. Following his official welcome by the Dean, he asked to address the faculty. The prestigious scholar, whom the college had lured away from a leading research university, Hayne-front matter 9 10/5/04, 8:57 AM
Description: