Table Of Content

document Historic, archived Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. mtm-.'* An Economic Research service nepor United States Departmentof Proceedings of the to/Mm IPM Third National ...rscellaneous Publication Symposium/Workshop Number 1542 USDA =CSREESz Broadening Support for 21 st Century IPM Edited by Sarah Lynch, Catherine Greene, and Carol Kramer-LeBlanc fUmii C~//flC><gPtyb I Received by: QS) IndexingBraucH BBBHBBBB BBBiBBBB r.lBVBBBBB ,4k"JUBlBBB BBBB1BBB BBBBil^r^ IIIIILIil BBBBBBBB' February 27-March 996 1 , 1 DC Washington, ERRATA for Proceedings of the Third National IPM Symposium/Workshop USDA, ERS.MP-1542 Table 1 on page 75 contained an error. The correct table is reproduced below. Table 1. Causes ofdeath showing deficits and excesses among farmers Number withR/R* Number less Cause ofDeath ofStudies than 1.0 Total mortality 10 9 Ischemic heart disease 12 12 All cancer 20 18 Lung 24 23 Bladder 21 19 Colon 15 13 Esophagus 18 12 Pancreas 20 11 Rectum 13 6 Kidney 15 9 Skin, nonmelanotic 8 4 Non-Hodgkin's lymphtDma 14 5 Brain 18 5 Connective tissue 7 2 Prostate 22 6 Leukemia 23 9 Stomach 24 9 Multiple myeloma 12 2 Melanoma 11 2 Hodgkin's disease 12 2 Lip 8 *R/R = Relative risk Proceedings ofthe Third National IPM Symposium/Workshop: Broadening Support for 21st Century IPM. Sarah Lynch, Cathy Greene, and Carol Kramer-LeBlanc, editors. U.S. Department ofAgriculture, Economic Research Service, Natural Resources and Environment Division. Miscellaneous Publication Number 1542. Abstract The Third National IPM Symposium/Workshop took place in Washington, DC, from February 27 through March 1, 1996. More than 600 participants from around the country attended the symposium/workshop reflecting a wide spectrum ofprofessional interests including scientists (social, biological, and environmental), agricultural producers, and representatives of agribusiness and non-profit organizations. Two dominant themes provided a unifying focus. USDA "Putting Customers First" focused on reaching out to the diverse customer base of programs to identify IPM research and implementation needs. "Assessing IPM Program Impacts" addressed how to incorporate economic, environmental, and public health assessment in IPM research and extension activities. Other topics covered included analytical and data needs for pest-management programs, policies for promoting biological and reduced risk alternatives, and overcoming barriers to increased adoption ofIPM practices and technologies. Keywords: Integrated pest management (IPM), economic assessment, environmental impact evaluation, public health assessment, pesticide policy, biological and reduced risk alternatives. Note: Opinions expressed in this proceedings are those ofthe authors; they do not necessarily reflect policies or opinions ofthe U.S. Department ofAgriculture. Washington, DC 20005-4788 May 1997 Sponsored By: ESCOP Pest Management Strategies Subcommittee ECOP IPM Task Force USDA Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service USDA Economic Research Service Table ofContents I. Preface The Third National IPM Symposium/Workshop: Broadening Support for21st Century IPM 1 II. Putting Customers First Introduction 4 The USDA IPM Initiative 5 byRichardRominger, DeputySecretary, USDA What American Farmers Need from USDA and TheirLand-Grant Universities to Implement IPM on 75 Percent ofU.S. Crop Acres 9 by Ken Evans, Arizona Farm Bureau Reducing Pesticide Reliance and RiskThrough Adoption ofIPM: An Environmental and Agricultural Win-Win 12 byPollyHoppin, World Wildlife Fund IPM Needs ofPotato Producers 18 byLynn Olsen, NationalPotato Council IPM Needs ofApple Producers 22 byDavidBenner, PennsylvaniaApple Grower Implementing the IPM Goal: What Crop Consultants Need 24 by Don Jameson, NationalAlliance ofIndependent Crop Consultants III. Assessing IPM Impacts Introduction 28 Interdisciplinary Collaboration to Achieve IPM Goals 31 by KarlStauber, FormerDeputy Undersecretary, USDA Integrated Assessment ofIPM Impacts: An Overview 33 byJohnAntle andSusan Capalbo, Montana State University Environmental-Impact Assessment: The Quest fora Holistic Picture 40 bySusan Riha, Lois Levitan, andJohn Hutson, Cornell University Occupational Exposures to Pesticides and TheirEffects on Human Health 59 byAaron Blair, National CancerInstitute; Marcie Francis, TechnicalAssessmentSystems, Inc.; and Sarah Lynch, EconomicResearch Service, USDA A Primer on Economic Assessment ofIntegrated Pest Management 76 by George Norton andJeffreyMullen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute andState University; Edwin Rajotte, The Pennsylvania State University Practical Considerations in Assessing Barriers to IPM Adoption 93 by Pete Nowak, University ofWisconsin; Steve Padgett, Iowa State University; Thomas Hoban, North Carolina State University Assessing IPM Impacts: Summaries ofSelected Papers 115 AssessingIPM Impacts: Summaries ofSelected Papers 115 Session 1: IPMAdoption: Obstacles, IncentivesandMeasurement Session 2: Health andEnvironmentalImpacts ofIPM: Measurementand Valuation Session 3: Pesticide Use, Productivity, andAlternatives Session 4: InterdisciplinaryModeling: IssuesandExamples Session 5: Economic Impacts ofIPMAdoption: CaseStudies IV. Analytical and Data Needs forPest-Management Programs: Panel-DiscussionSummaries Introduction 123 MeetingDataNeeds forIPM Assessment 125 Cathy Greene, EconomicResearch Service, USDA; Moderator Tools forAssessingEnvironmentalImpacts: Emerging Approaches forDifferent Objectives 130 Lois Levitan, Cornell University; Moderator EstimatingBiological Benefits ofPesticides forRegulatoryDecision Making 132 Ron Stinner, North Carolina State University; Moderator NAPIAP: Issues in EstimatingBenefits ofPesticides 134 Craig Osteen, NationalAgriculturalPesticideImpactAssessmentProgram, USDA; RobEsworthy, U.S. EnvironmentalProtectionAgency; Moderators IR-4 Minor-UseRegistrations 136 Dick Guest, Rutgers University; Moderator Pest-Management Alternatives Decision Support System 143 DennisD. Kopp, Cooperative StateResearch, Education, andExtension Service, USDA; Moderator V. Policiesfor Promoting Biological and Reduced-RiskAlternatives: Panel-Discussion Summaries Introduction 145 ReducingEnvironmental and Health Risks fromAgricultural Chemicals: Policy Considerations 147 Katherine Smith, HenryA. Wallace Institute; Moderator Respondingto ConsumerConcerns About Agricultural Chemicals 151 Carol Kramer, EconomicResearch Service, USDA; Moderator AreawideIPM as aTool fortheFuture 154 CO. Calkins, AgriculturalResearch Service, USDA; Moderator Exotic Pest Plants, Biological Control, andIPM: ATrio with aDate fortheFuture 159 GaryR. Buckingham, AgriculturalResearch Service, USDA; Moderator Limitations to Implementation ofBiological Control forIPM 162 MichaelBenson, North Carolina State University; Moderator EPA's PesticideEnvironmental Stewardship Program: Making aDifferenceThrough Partnerships 167 JanetAndersen, U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency; Moderator Emerging Issues Influencing Integrated Pest Management (IPM) 169 MichaelFitzner, Cooperative StateResearch, Education, andExtension Service, USDA; Moderator VI. Working with Customersto Identify IPM Research and Implementation Priorities Introduction 181 Team Building forIPM Research, Implementation, and Outreach/Education 182 EdRajotte andLynn Garling, The Pennsylvania State University; Moderators IPM Programs forCotton Producers 186 ASM Allen Knutson, Texas University; Coordinator IPM Programs forWheat Growers 188 Greg Johnson, Montana State University; Coordinator IPM Programs forCom and Soybean Producers 190 Ken Ostlie, UniversityofMinnesota; Coordinator IPM Programs forForage-Crop Producers 192 BillLamp, University ofMaryland; Coordinator IPM Programs forPotato Growers 194 Mary Powelson and CarolMallory-Smith, Oregon State University; Coordinators IPM Programs forFresh-Market and Processing Vegetables 196 Larry Olsen, Michigan State University; Coordinator IPM Programs forTree-Fruit Growers 200 FrankZalom, University ofCalifornia; Coordinator IPM Programs forNurseries and Urban Ornamentals 205 MichaelRaupp, UniversityofMaryland; HarryHoitink, Ohio State University; Moderators IPM Programs for Urban Arthropods 211 Faith Oi, Auburn University; Coordinator VII. Focus on the Future Introduction 213 Institutional Support forIPM 214 byJim Cubie, Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee, U.S. Senate Achieving the National IPM Goal 216 byBarryJacobsen, Cooperative State Research, Education, andExtension Service, USDA Summary Comments: National Integrated Pest Management Symposium/Workshop 221 byEldon Ortman, Purdue University Appendix PosterAbstracts 222 Index 291