Proceedings of the Conference on Categorical Algebra This Conference was supported by the United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research Proceedings of the Conference on Categorical Algebra La Jolla 1965 Edited by S. Eilenberg . D. K. Harrison . S. MacLane . H. Rohrl Springer-Verlag Berlin . Heidelberg' New York 1966 Professor Dr. S. ElLENBERG Columbia University, Hamilton Hall. New York 27, N. Y. Professor Dr. D. K. HARRISON Department of Mathematics, University of Oregon, Eugene, are. Professor Dr. S. MACLANE Department of Mathematics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, JIl. Profe.sor Dr. H. RilHRL Department of Mathematics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla ISBN-13: 978-3-642-99904-8 e-ISBN-13: 978-3-642-99902-4 001: 10.1007/978-3-642-99902-4 All rights, especially that of translation into foreign languages,reserved. It is also forbidden to repro- duce this book, either whole or in part, by photomechanical means (photostat, microfilm and/or microcard) or by other procedure without written permission from Springer-Verlag. © by Springer-Verlag Berlin' Heidelberg 1966· Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 66-14575' Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1966 Title No. 1339 Preface This volume contains the articles contributed to the Conference on Categorical Algebra, held June 7-12,1965, at the San Diego campus of the University of California under the sponsorship of the United States Air Force Office of Scientific Research. Of the thirty-seven mathemati- cians, who were present seventeen presented their papers in the form of lectures. In addition, this volume contains papers contributed by other attending participants as well as by those who, after having planned to attend, were unable to do so. The editors hope to have achieved a representative, if incomplete, cover- age of the present activities in Categorical Algebra within the United States by bringing together this group of mathematicians and by solici- ting the articles contained in this volume. They also hope that these Proceedings indicate the trend of research in Categorical Algebra in this country. In conclusion, the editors wish to thank the participants and contrib. utors to these Proceedings for their continuous cooperation and encour- agement. Our thanks are also due to the Springer-Verlag for publishing these Proceedings in a surprisingly short time after receiving the manu- scripts. S. ElLENBERG D. K. HARRISON S. MACLANE H. ROHRL Resolved The members of the Conference on Categorical Algebra wish to ex- press their deep appreciation to those who have made this conference possible: To the University of California at San Diego and especially to Pro- fessors ECKART, GOLDBERG, STEWART and WARSCHAWSKI for holding the conference in this idyllic setting, To the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, and especially to Dr. R. J. POHRER, for providing the support and encouragement necessary for the conference, To Mrs. ILSE WARSCHAWSKI and Mrs. VIVIAN ROHRL, for hospitable reception and entertainment, To Mrs. BARI SACCOMAN, for daily assistance with many practical problems, Finally and most especially to Professor HELMUT ROHRL, for his manifest mastery of manifold arrangements. Unanimously adopted June 11, 1965 Contents LAWVERE, F. W.: The Category of Categories as a Foundation for Mathema- tics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 GRAY, J. W.: Fibred and Cofibred Categories ..... 21 LINTON, F. E. J. : Some Aspects of Equational Categories 84 FREYD, P.: Representation in Abelian Categories 95 FREYD, P.: Stable Homotopy . . . . . . . 121 FREYD, P.: Splitting Homotopy Idempotents 173 FABER, R., and P. Freyd: Fill-in Theorems 177 AUSLANDER, 1\1.: Coherent Functors. . . . 189 ISBELL, J. R.: Epimorphisms and Dominions 232 ENGELER, E.: Categories of Mapping Filters 247 HILTON, P.: Correspondences and Exact Squares 254 SONNER, J.: Canonical Categories . . . . . . . 272 WYLER, 0.: Operational Categories . . . . . . 295 GIVE'ON, Y.: Transparent Categories and Categories of Transition Systems 317 WATTS, C. E.: A Homology Theory for Small Categories 331 BARR, M., and J. BECK: Acyclic Models and Triples 336 BARR, M.: Cohomology in Tensored Categories. 344 HELLER, A.: Extraordinary Homology and Chain Complexes . 355 DICKSON, S.: Direct Decomposition of Radicals. . . . . . . 366 CHASE, S. U.: Abelian Extensions and a Cohomology Theory by Harrison 375 WALKER, C. L., and E. A. WALKER: Quotient Categories of Modules. 404 ElLENBERG, S., and G. M. KELLY: Closed Categories ....... 421 List of Participants AUSLANDER, B. L. FREYD, P. LINTON, F. E. J. AUSLANDER, M. GIVE' ON, Y. MAC LANE, S. BASS, H. GRAY, J. W. MORIMOTO, A. BECK, J. HARRISON, D. K. RINEHART, G. S. BUCHSBAUM, D. HELLER, A. ROHRL, H. CHASE, S. U. ISBELL, J. R. SONNER, J. DICKSON, S. E. KAN, D.M. TIERNEY, M. DIENER, K. H. KELLY, G.M. VERDIER, J. L. DUSKIN, J. W. KNIGHTEN, C. M. WALKER, C. L. DYSON, V.H. KNIGHTEN, R. L. WALKER, E. A. ElLENBERG, S. LAWVERE, F. \V. WATTS, C. E. ENGELER, E. LEICHT, J. B. WYLER, O. FABER, R. The Category of Categories as a Foundation for Mathematics *, ** By F. WILLIAM LAW VERE In the mathematical development of recent decades one sees clearly the rise of the conviction that the relevant properties of mathematical objects are those which can be stated in terms of their abstract structure rather than in terms of the elements which the objects were thought to be made of. The question thus naturally arises whether one can give a foundation for mathematics which expresses wholeheartedly this con- viction concerning what mathematics is about, and in particular in which classes and membership in classes do not play any role. Here by "founda- tion" we mean a single system of first-order axioms in which all usual mathematical objects can be defined and all their usual properties proved. A foundation of the sort we have in mind would seemingly be much more natural and readily-useable than the classical one when developing such subjects as algebraic topology, functional analysis, model theory of gene- ral algebraic systems, etc. Clearly any such foundation would have to reckon with the Eilenberg-MacLane theory of categories and functors. The author believes, in fact, that the most reasonable way to arrive at a foundation meeting these requirements is simply to write down axioms descriptive of properties which the intuitively-conceived category of all categories has until an intuitively-adequate list is attained; that is es- sentially how the theory described below was arrived at. Various meta- theorems should of course then be proved to help justify the feeling of adequacy. The system to be described is an improved version of the one sketched in Chapter 1 of the author's doctoral dissertation [Columbia, 1963]. By the elementary theory of aiJstract categories we mean the notions of formula and theorem defined as follows O. For any letters x, y, u, A, B the following are formulas Llo(x)=A, LlI(x}=B, r(x,y;u), x=y. * Research partially supported by an NSF-NATO Postdoctoral Fellowship. ** Received September 8, 1965 Conference on Categorical Algebra 1 S. Eilenberg et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference on Categorical Algebra © Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1966 2 F. W. LAWVERE These are to be read, respectively, "A is the domain of x", "B is the codomain of x", "u is the composition x followed by y", and "x equals y". 1. If l/J and lJI are formulas, then [l/J] and [lJI] [l/J] or [lJI] [l /J] => [lJI] not [l/J] are also formulas. 2. If l/J is a formula and x is a letter, then 'v'x[l/J] , 3x[l/J] are also formulas. These are to be read, as usual, "for every x, l/J" and "there is an x such that l/J", respectively. 3. A string of marks is a formula of the elementary theory of abstract categories iff its being so follows from 0, 1, 2 above. Of course we im- mediately begin to make free use of various ways of abbreviating for- mulas. The notion of free and bound variables in a formula can now be defined; we mean by a sentence any formula with no free variables, i. e. in which every occurence of each letter x is within the scope of a quan- tifier 'v' x or 3x. The theorems of the elementary theory of abstract categories are all those sentences which can be derived by logical inference from the following axioms (it is understood that .10, .11 are unary function symbols) Four bookkeeping axioms .1d.1j (x)) = .1j (x) , i, j = 0, 1. r(x, y; u) and r(x, y; u') => u = u', 3u[F(x, y; u)] <==> .1dx) = .10(Y) , r(x, y; u) => .1o(u) = .10 (x) and .1t{u) = .1dy). Identity axiom r(.1o(x),x;x) and r(X,.11(X);X). Associativity axiom r(x, y; u) and r(y, z; w) and r(x, w; f) and r(u, z; g) => f = g. Besides the usual means of abbreviating formulas, the following (as well as others) are special to the elementary theory of abstract categories: A (cid:0) (cid:0)B means .10(/) = A and .1df) = B,