Primate Locomotion: Linking Field and Laboratory Research

371 Pages·2011·7.492 MB·English

by  Evie Estelle Vereecke, Kristiaan D’Août (auth.), Kristiaan D'Août, Evie E. Vereecke (eds.)

Developments in Primatology:
Progress and Prospects
Series Editor:
Russell H. Tuttle
Department of Anthropology
The University of Chicago, Il, USA
For other titles published in this series, go to
www.springer.com/series/5852
wwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Kristiaan D’Août Evie E. Vereecke
●
Editors
Primate Locomotion
Linking Field and Laboratory Research
Editors
Kristiaan D’Août Evie E. Vereecke
Laboratory for Functional Morphology Anatomy
Department of Biology Faculty of Medicine
University of Antwerp Catholic University Leuven, KULAK
Belgium Belgium
[email protected] [email protected]
ISBN 978-1-4419-1419-4 e-ISBN 978-1-4419-1420-0
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1420-0
Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London
© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011
All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written
permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York,
NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in
connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software,
or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden.
The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they
are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are
subject to proprietary rights.
Printed on acid-free paper
Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com)
Foreword
Studies of primate locomotion in the field and in captivity spanned the entire 20th
century and first decade of the current century, and, as highlighted in Primate
Locomotion: Linking Field and Laboratory Research, they promise to continue for
many more decades as newer generations of scientists devise and employ ever more
refined tools and approaches. Major events in the evolutionary history of verte-
brates such as the tetrapod shift from water to land, and befeathered reptiles taking
to the air, have held special interest for scientists and laypersons alike. Standing
prominently among these evolutionary puzzles, human bipedalism also generated
great interest in how other primates are built and move and are motivated to do so,
thereby stimulating research to test models of precedent positional behaviors and
changes that might have occurred in the transition from quadruped to hominid
biped. Although the anthropological bias has been strong, many scientists have also
pursued topics on nonhuman primate species and a wide variety of other tetrapods
simply for their own sake or to illuminate broad biomechanical principles that
apply to them (Howell 1944; Young 1957; Hildebrand 1967; Alexander 1968,
2003; Biewener 2003).
Sir Arthur Keith must be counted among the earliest scientists to employ behav-
ioral observations and laboratory experiments, in addition to comparative morpho-
logical studies on nonhuman primates to illuminate our peculiar mode of posture
and locomotion. While a medical officer in Thailand (1889–1892), Keith set up a
primitive dissection laboratory in the dense forest where he resided. His initial goal
was to dissect gibbons (Hylobates lar) and sympatric colobine monkeys
(Trachypithecus germaini: Groves 2001; Roos et al. 2008) to see whether they, like
his patients, suffered from malaria (Keith 1940, 1950). Following earlier anato-
mists, he noted marked differences between their internal and external structures,
with gibbons more closely resembling humans. He further observed distinct differ-
ences between how brachiating gibbons and quadrupedal monkeys negotiated the
forest canopy.
When he returned to the United Kingdom he continued to dissect a greater
variety of apes and monkeys and conducted experiments to understand possible
selective effects of gravity on the human body in relation to obligate orthograde
v
vi Foreword
posture and locomotion. For instance, he inserted a mercury manometer into his
stomach and rectum (one expects in that sequence) to measure pressures on the
pelvic floor, abdominal wall, diaphragm, and viscera as he assumed a variety of
postures (Keith 1923).
Basic research slowed during World Wars I and II, but during the latter, Elftman
and Manter (1935a,b; Elftman 1944) published much-cited informative compari-
sons of human and chimpanzee footprints and feet as the subjects walked bipedally.
Later researchers have supported many of their observations on the functional mor-
phology of human and chimpanzee feet, but some of their generalizations from a
single 5-year-old chimpanzee can be challenged. For instance, chimpanzees more
commonly walk with extended lateral toes and an abducted hallux than with curled
lateral toes and an adducted hallux (Tuttle 1970, 1987, 1990, 2008; Tuttle et al.
1990, 1991, 1992, 1998). I suspect the extent to which subjects are comfortable
during experiments is a factor.
Studies, research papers, symposia, and books on primate locomotion and post-
cranial morphology in extant and fossil primates burgeoned from the 1960s
onwards (Kinzey 1967; Kondo et al. 1975; Jenkins 1974; Morbeck et al 1979;
Kondo 1985; Strasser et al. 1998; Ishida et al 2006; Stevens and Carlson 2008), and
virtually all meetings of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists,
International Primatological Society, and American Society of Primatologists have
hosted symposia and podium and poster presentations on these topics.
Clearly, although we have learned a good deal in comparison with the level of
pre-20th century knowledge, there are many more puzzles remaining to be solved
and envisioned. As a pioneer in the adaptation and application of fine-wire elec-
trode electromyography to apes (Tuttle et al. 1972, 1979, 1983, 1992; Tuttle and
Basmajian 1973, 1974a,bc, 1977, 1978a,b; Tuttle 1974, 1994; Tuttle, Basmajian,
and Ishida 1975, 1978, 1979; Ishida, Tuttle et al. 1978; Tuttle and Watts 1985;
Tuttle, Hallgrímsson, and Basmajian 1994, 1999), I must warn that the return of
useful information about the adaptive complexes of subject species, and especially
the application of it to interpret fossil primates, is very limited. The same holds for
new and refined technologies employed by researchers who report and reflect on
their projects in Primate Locomotion: Linking Field and Laboratory Research.
As some of the authors remind us, the environments in which one must work are
increasingly restricted by rules governing studies on primates, particularly great
apes. The good news is that some researchers meet the challenge by creatively
crafting protocols that limit or eliminate invasive techniques and physical restric-
tion of their subjects. A further encouraging sign for future advances is that there
are many more researchers, laboratories, field sites, and focal species than when I
began collaborative research with John V. Basmajian in the United States and
Hidemi Ishida, Tasuku Kimura, and Morihiko Okada in Japan. For instance, the 45
authors in Primate Locomotion: Linking Field and Laboratory Research are from
8 nations (Belgium, France, Germany, Greece, Japan, Madagascar, the United
Kingdom, and the United States).
Finally, I urge all laboratory workers, especially ones who have spent their lives
in urban settings, to venture into the field and spend notable spans watching
Foreword vii
primates and other animals moving on natural substrates. Films are fine, but they
really are not the same as one’s own direct observations to inform creative labora-
tory experiments and to bound evolutionary models based on them.
Russell H. Tuttle
Department of Anthropology
The University of Chicago, Il, USA
References
Alexander RMcN (1968) Animal Mechanics. Sidgwich & Jackson, London.
——— 2003. Principles of Animal Locomotion. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Biewener AA (2003) Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Elftman H (1944) The bipedal walking of the chimpanzee. J Mammal 24:67–71.
Elftman H, Manter J (1935a) Chimpanzee and human feet in bipedal walking. Am J Phys
Anthropol 20:69–79.
——— (1935b) The evolution of the human foot, with especial reference to the joints. J Anat
70:56–67.
Groves C (2001) Primate Taxonomy. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
Hildebrand M (1967) Symmetrical gaits of primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 26:119–130.
Howell AB (1944) Speed in Animals: Their Specialization for Running and Leaping. Hafner,
New York.
Ishida H, Tuttle RH, Okada M, Kimura T (1978) Activities of hindlimb muscles in a bipedal gib-
bon. In: Chivers DJ, Joysey KA (eds), Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 3: Evolution.
Academic Press, London, pp 459–462.
Ishida H, Tuttle R, Pickford M, Ohihara N, Nakatsukasa M (2006) Human Origins and
Environmental Backgrounds. Springer, New York.
Jenkins FA Jr, ed (1974) Primate Locomotion. Academic Press, New York.
Keith A (1923) Man’s posture: its evolution and disorders. Br Med J 1:451–454, 499–502, 545–
548, 587–590, 624–626, 669–672.
——— (1940) Fifty years ago. Am J Phys Anthropol 26:251–267.
——— (1950) An Autobiography. Watts, London.
Kinzey WG, ed (1967) Symposium on primate locomotion. Am J Phys Anthropol 26:115–275.
Kondo S (1985) Primate Morphophysiology, Locomotor Analyses and Human Bipedalism.
University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo.
Kondo S, Kawai M, Ehara A, Kawaura S (1975) Proceedings from the Symposia of the Fifth
congress of the International Primatological Society. Japan Science Press, Tokyo.
Morbeck ME, Preuschoft H, Gomberg N (1979) Environment, Behavior, and Morphology:
Dynamic Interactions in Primates. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart and New York.
Roos C, Nadler T, Walter L (2008) Mitochondrial phylogeny, taxonomy and biogeography of
the silvered langur species group (Trachypithecus cristatus). Mol Phylogenet Evol
47:629–636.
Stevens NJ, Carlson KJ, eds (2008) Bridging gaps between experimental and naturalistic
approaches in the study of primate behavior. Int J Primatol 29:1395–1480.
Strasser E, Fleagle J, Rosenberger A, McHenry H (1998) Primate Locomotion: Recent Advances.
Plenum Press, New York.
Tuttle RH, Watts DP (1985) The positional behavior and adaptive complexes of Pan gorilla. In:
Kondo S (ed), Primate Morphophysiology, Locomotor Analyses and Human Bipedalism, pp.
University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 261–28.
viii Foreword
Tuttle RH (1970) Postural, propulsive, and prehensile capabilities in the cheiridia of chimpanzees
and other great apes. In Bourne GH (ed), The Chimpanzee, Vol. 2. Karger, Basel, pp 167–253.
——— (1975) Electromyography of Pan gorilla: an experimental approach to hominization. In:
Kondo S, Kawai M, Ehara A, Kawamura S (eds), Proceedings from the Symposia of the Fifth
Congress of the International Primatological Society. Japan Science Press, Tokyo, pp 303–314.
——— (1987) Kinesiological inferences and evolutionary implications from Laetoli bipedal trails
G-1, G-2/3, and A. In: Leakey MD, Harris JM (eds), Laetoli, a Pliocene Site in Northern
Tanzania.Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 503–523..
——— (1990) The pitted pattern of Laetoli feet. Nat Hist 3/90:60–65.
——— (1994) Up from electromyography: primate energetics and the evolution of human
bipedalism. In: Corruccini RS, Ciochon RL (eds), Integrative Paths to the Past:
Paleoanthropological Advances in Honor of F. Clark Howell. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
NJ, pp 269–284.
——— (2008) Footprint clues in hominid evolution and forensics: lessons and limitations. Ichnos
15:158–165.
Tuttle RH, Basmajian JV (1973) EMG of locomotion in gorilla and man. In: Stein R, Pearson KB,
Smith RS, Redford JB (eds), Control of Posture and Locomotion. Plenum Press, London, pp
599–609.
——— (1974a) Electromyography of forearm musculature in gorilla and problems related to
knuckle-walking. In: Jenkins FA Jr (ed), Primate Locomotion. Academic Press, New York, pp
293–347.
——— (1974b) Electromyography of the manual long digital flexor muscles in gorilla. In:
Barnosell F (ed), Proceedings of the 6th Congreso Internacional de Medicina Fisica, Vol. II,
1972. Ministerio de Trabajo, Instituto Nacional de Prevision, Madrid, pp 311–315.
——— (1974c) Electromyography of brachial muscles in Pan gorilla and hominoid evolution.
Am J Phys Anthropol 41:71–90.
——— (1977) Electromyography of pongid shoulder muscles and hominoid evolution I. Retractors
of the humerus and “rotators” of the scapula. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 1976 20:491–497.
——— (1978a) Electromyography of pongid shoulder muscles. II. Deltoid, rhomboid and “rota-
tor cuff.” Am J Phys Anthropol 49:47–56.
——— (1978b) Electromyography of pongid shoulder muscles. III. Quadrupedal positional
behavior. Am J Phys Anthropol 49:57–70.
Tuttle RH, Basmajian JV, Ishida H (1975) Electromyography of the gluteus maximus muscle in
gorilla and the evolution of hominid bipedalism. In: Tuttle RH (ed), Primate Functional
Morphology and Evolution. Mouton, The Hague, pp 253–269.
———(1978) Electromyography of pongid gluteal muscles and hominid evolution. In: Chivers
DJ, Joysey KA (eds), Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 3, Evolution.Academic Press,
London, pp 463–468.
——— (1979) Activities of pongid thigh muscles during bipedal behavior. Am J Phys Anthropol
50:123–136.
Tuttle RH, Basmajian JV, Regenos E, Shine G (1972) Electromyography of knuckle-walking:
results of four experiments on the forearm of Pan gorilla. Am J Phys Anthropol 37:255–266.
Tuttle RH, Cortright G, Buxhoeveden D (1979) Anthropology on the move; progress in studies of
non-human primate positional behavior. Yrbk Phys Anthropol 1979 22:187–214.
Tuttle RH, Hallgrímsson B, Basmajian JV (1994) Electromyography and elastic mechanisms in
kunckle-walking Pan gorilla and Pan troglodytes. In: Thierry B, Anderson JR, Roeder JJ,
Herrenschmidt N (eds), Current Primatology, Vol. 1: Ecology and Evolution. Université Louis
Pasteur, Strasbourg, pp 215–222.
——— (1999) Electromyography, elastic energy and knuckle-walking: a lesson in experimental
anthropology. In: Lindburg D, Strum SC (eds), The New Physical Anthropology. Prentice-
Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp 32–41..
Tuttle RH, Hallgrìmsson B, Stein T (1998) Heel, squat, stand, stride: function and evolution of
hominoid feet. In: Strasser E, Fleagle J, Rosenberger A, McHenry H (eds), Primate
Locomotion: Recent Advances. New York: Plenum Press, New York, pp 435–448.
Foreword ix
Tuttle RH, Hollowed J, Basmajian JV (1992) Electromyography of pronators and supinators in
great apes. Am J Phys Anthropol 87:215–226.
Tuttle RH, Velte M, Basmajian JV (1983) Electromyography of brachial muscles in Pan troglo-
dytes and Pongo pygmaeus. Am J Phys Anthropol 61:75–83.
Tuttle RH, Webb DM, Baksh M (1991) Laetoli toes and Australopithecus afarensis. Hum Evol
6:193–100.
Tuttle RH, Webb DM, Tuttle NI (1991) Laetoli footprint trails and the evolution of hominid
bipedalism. In : Coppens Y, Senut B (eds), Origine(s) de la Bipédie chez les Hominidés.
C.N.R.S, Paris, pp 203–218.
Tuttle RH, Webb DM, Tuttle NI, Baksh M (1992) Footprints and gaits of bipedal apes, bears and
barefoot people: perspectives on Pliocene tracks. In: Matano S, Tuttle RH, Ishida H, Goodman
M (eds), Topics in Primatology, Vol. 3, Evolutionary Biology, Reproductive Endocrinology
and Virology. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 221–242.
Young JZ (1957) The Life of Mammals. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
wwwwwwwwwwwwwww