Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Anxiety, Depression, and Post-Traumatic Stress in Substitute Decision-Makers of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit by Orla Marie Smith, RN, MN, CNCC(C) A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto © Copyright by Orla Smith, 2016 Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Anxiety, Depression, and Post-Traumatic Stress in Substitute Decision-Makers of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit Orla Marie Smith Doctor of Philosophy Lawrence S. Bloomberg, Faculty of Nursing University of Toronto 2016 Abstract Background: Most intensive care units (ICU) patients are incapable of participating in decision- making. Substitute decision-makers (SDMs) generally assume decision-making responsibility yet may vary in preferred level of involvement. Role incongruence refers to discordance between preferred and actual role in decision-making. Role preferences and incongruence may be associated with psychological symptoms (anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress) after ICU. Purpose: The primary objective was to explore prevalence and risk factors for symptoms of psychological distress in SDMs after an ICU experience. Methods: Cross-sectional, multi-centre, interviewer-administered survey of SDMs of critically ill adults requiring mechanical ventilation (MV) for greater than 48 hours. Psychological distress was defined as any symptoms of anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress using pre-defined cut-points on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Impact of Events Scale (IES). The Control Preferences Scale (CPS) was used to evaluate decision-making role preferences and incongruence. Results: 180 SDMs were recruited; response rate was 64%. Active, shared, or passive roles were preferred by 24% (n=43), 44% (n=79), and 31% (n=56) respectively. Almost half (n=85/174; 49%) reported incongruence. Using high thresholds, symptom prevalence was 50% (n=88/176), ii 32% (n=57/177), and 16% (n=29/177), for post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and depression respectively. The composite outcome of any psychological distress symptom was associated with patient death [OR 2.95 (CI 1.08-8.02); p=0.03], female sex of the SDM [OR 2.96 (95% CI 1.49- 5.89); p = 0.002], and role incongruence [OR 3.26 (95% CI 1.67-6.36); p = 0.0005] when high thresholds were considered. High threshold depressive symptoms were associated with spousal relationships [OR 3.01; 95% CI 2.93-3.09; p=0.01] and high threshold post-traumatic stress symptoms were associated with spousal relationships [OR 2.29 (95% CI 1.18-3.26); p=0.01], female sex [OR 2.56 (95% CI 1.28-5.12); p=0.008], role incongruence [OR 2.57 (95% CI 1.33- 4.97); p=0.005], and patient death [OR 3.36 (95% CI 1.27-8.86); p=0.01]. Conclusions: High rates of adverse psychological symptoms in this study highlight the need to identify and implement preventative and management strategies for SDMs. Strategies to prepare proxies to engage in decision-making, to enhance shared decision-making, and to mitigate psychological distress symptoms, should be considered before, during, and after the ICU experience. iii Acknowledgments I would like to recognize and thank the members of my thesis committee for their individual and collective advice and support in the design and completion of this study: Dr. Kelly Metcalfe, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto (Supervisor); Dr. Jan Friedrich, Critical Care Department and Keenan Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto; Dr. Martine Puts, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto; and Dr. Souraya Sidani, Ryerson University. Through this challenging and rewarding process, their contributions of time and intellect have been exceptionally valuable and appreciated. Additionally, I want to thank Ella Ferris, Lianne Jeffs, John Marshall, and Deborah Cook for providing research opportunities locally at St. Michael’s Hospital and nationally within the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group over the past several years. Through the generosity of their time and wisdom, I have been afforded tremendous opportunities to learn. This study would not have been possible without the following individuals who assisted with obtaining REB approvals, literature retrieval, data collection, and data entry across the study sites: Snezhana Bessonova, Raphael Faraj, David Lightfoot, Arlene Lobrin, Ellen McDonald, Kathy Matuszeswka, Kathleen Quinn, and Pragma Roy. Their contributions to this project were immense. Drs. Rosane Nisenbaum and Shivon Sue-Chee are also to be thanked for their expert statistical advice and support. I am grateful for funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Sigma Theta Tau International (Appendix A), the Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, and St. Michael’s Hospital. This funding allowed the dedicated time necessary to focus on the development and completion of this project. I will always be grateful to the 180 individuals who shared their time and experiences with me during a time of uncertainty and distress. I hope sharing their experience with others may lead to improvements in decision-making processes for future SDMs of the critically ill. Finally, to my husband Brian, my son Jack, my mom, dad, Aisling, Sinead, Caelainn, and Tadhg, I thank you for your love and encouragement always. And for GF, another unicorn is born! iv Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ....................................................................................................................................IV LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................................. VIII LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ X LIST OF APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................................... XI LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................................................ XII CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH PROBLEM AND STUDY OVERVIEW ............. 1 1 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 CHALLENGES IN SUBSTITUTE DECISION-MAKING IN THE ICU .................................................................... 2 1.2 RATES AND RISK FOR ADVERSE PSYCHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES IN ICU SUBSTITUTE DECISION- MAKERS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 THE RESEARCH PROBLEM ....................................................................................................................................... 5 1.4 STUDY PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 1.5 STUDY RELEVANCE .................................................................................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................................................ 7 2 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 SEARCH STRATEGY ................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 DECISION-MAKING IN THE ICU .......................................................................................................................... 10 2.3 DECISION-MAKING ROLE PREFERENCES AND ROLE CONGRUENCE IN THE ICU .................................. 11 2.4 ICU-ASSOCIATED ANXIETY ....................................................................................................................................... 15 2.4.1 Prevalence and risk factors for anxiety – Observational studies .................................................... 17 2.4.2 Interventions for ICU-associated anxiety .................................................................................................. 20 2.5 ICU-ASSOCIATED DEPRESSION ................................................................................................................................ 22 2.5.1 Prevalence and risk factors for depression- Observational studies............................................... 24 2.5.2 Interventions to decrease ICU-associated depression ......................................................................... 27 2.6 ICU-ASSOCIATED POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS ........................................................................................................ 27 2.6.1 Prevalence and risk factors for post-traumatic stress- Observational studies ........................ 29 2.6.2 Interventions to decrease ICU-associated post-traumatic stress ................................................... 31 2.7 ROLE PREFERENCES, CONGRUENCE, AND PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS ............................................................... 32 2.8 SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE, LIMITATIONS, AND KNOWLEDGE GAPS ...................................................................... 34 2.9 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................................. 36 2.9.1 A framework for research in health-care decision-making ................................................................. 36 2.9.2 The control preferences construct .................................................................................................................. 37 2.9.3 A framework for decision-making in the ICU ............................................................................................ 38 2.9.4 Decisional uncertainty and adverse psychological outcomes............................................................. 38 2.9.5 Conceptual framework for proposed study ................................................................................................. 39 CHAPTER 3 STUDY METHODS .................................................................................................................... 42 3 OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................................... 42 3.1 STUDY PURPOSE ...................................................................................................................................................... 42 3.2 RESEARCH QUESTIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 42 3.3 PRIMARY HYPOTHESIS ........................................................................................................................................... 42 3.4 STUDY DESIGN ......................................................................................................................................................... 43 3.5 SETTING ..................................................................................................................................................................... 43 3.6 POPULATION AND SAMPLE ................................................................................................................................... 44 3.6.1 Inclusion criteria .................................................................................................................................................... 45 v 3.6.2 Exclusion criteria................................................................................................................................................... 45 3.7 SCREENING AND RECRUITMENT ......................................................................................................................... 45 3.8 SAMPLE SIZE ............................................................................................................................................................. 46 3.9 DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES ...................................................................................................................... 47 3.10 VARIABLES AND MEASUREMENT ....................................................................................................................... 49 3.10.1 Demographic data .............................................................................................................................................. 49 3.10.2 Decision-making role preferences and role incongruence ................................................................ 50 3.10.3 Satisfaction with ICU care and decision-making .................................................................................. 51 3.10.4 Anxiety and depression ..................................................................................................................................... 52 3.10.5 Post-traumatic stress ......................................................................................................................................... 53 3.11 DATA MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................................. 55 3.12 DATA ANALYSIS ...................................................................................................................................................... 56 3.12.1 Descriptive Data ................................................................................................................................................. 56 3.12.2 Question 1- Risk Factors for Symptoms of Psychological Distress .............................................. 56 3.12.3 Question 2- Variables Associated with Decision-Making Role Preference .............................. 58 3.12.4 Question 3- Variables Associated with Decision-Making Role Incongruence ........................ 58 3.12.5 Question 4- Variables Associated with ICU Satisfaction .................................................................. 58 3.12.6 Question 5- Decision-Making Preferences for Treatment and Research ................................. 59 3.13 ETHICS REVIEW .......................................................................................................................................................... 59 3.14 INFORMED CONSENT .............................................................................................................................................. 60 3.15 PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY ...................................................................................................................... 60 3.16 RISKS AND BENEFITS.............................................................................................................................................. 61 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS .......................................................................................................................................... 62 4 OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................................................... 62 4.1 SAMPLE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 62 4.1.1 Screening and Recruitment .............................................................................................................................. 62 4.1.2 Enrolment Deviations ......................................................................................................................................... 63 4.1.3 Participant Characteristics .............................................................................................................................. 64 4.1.4 Patient Characteristics ....................................................................................................................................... 65 4.1.5 Documented Decision Making in the ICU................................................................................................... 66 4.2 DATA QUALITY ........................................................................................................................................................... 68 4.2.1 Data Distribution .................................................................................................................................................. 68 4.2.2 Missing Data............................................................................................................................................................ 68 4.2.3 Reliability of Outcome Measures ................................................................................................................... 69 4.3 SYMPTOMS AND PREDICTORS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS ........................................................................... 69 4.3.1 Prevalence and Severity of Symptoms of Psychological Distress ................................................... 69 4.3.2 Factors Associated with Symptoms of Psychological Distress ......................................................... 70 4.3.3 Sensitivity Analysis for Risk Factors for Symptoms of Psychological Distress ......................... 81 4.4 DECISION MAKING PREFERENCES AND EXPERIENCES ........................................................................................ 82 4.4.1 Decision Making Role Preferences ................................................................................................................ 82 4.4.2 Predictors of Decision Making Role Preferences .................................................................................... 83 4.4.3 Decision Making Role Preferences and Symptoms of Psychological Distress ........................... 85 4.4.4 Decision Making Role Congruence................................................................................................................ 86 4.4.5 Predictors of Decision Making Role Incongruence ................................................................................ 88 4.4.6 Satisfaction with Care and Decision Making ........................................................................................... 88 4.4.7 Variables Associated with Satisfaction with Care and Decision Making .................................... 92 4.4.8 Participant Commentary on Satisfaction with Care and Decision-Making............................... 95 4.5 TREATMENT VERSUS RESEARCH PREFERENCES .................................................................................................. 98 4.6 SUMMARY OF RESULTS ............................................................................................................................................. 99 vi CHAPTER 5 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 101 5 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................... 101 5.1 RESEARCH QUESTION #1: PREVALENCE OF AND RISK FACTORS FOR SYMPTOMS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS .................................................................................................................................................................. 102 5.1.1 Prevalence of Symptoms of Psychological Distress ............................................................................. 102 5.1.2 Risk Factors for Symptoms of Psychological Distress ........................................................................ 106 5.1.3 Decision-Making and Psychological Distress ......................................................................................... 109 5.2 RESEARCH QUESTION #2: DECISION-MAKING ROLE PREFERENCES AND VARIABLES ASSOCIATED WITH PREFERENCE ............................................................................................................................................................ 111 5.3 RESEARCH QUESTION #3: DECISION MAKING ROLE INCONGRUENCE AND VARIABLES ASSOCIATED WITH INCONGRUENCE ....................................................................................................................................................... 114 5.4 RESEARCH QUESTION #4: SATISFACTION WITH ICU CARE AND DECISION-MAKING ................................ 115 5.5 RESEARCH QUESTION #5: DECISION-MAKING ROLE PREFERENCES FOR TREATMENT AND RESEARCH 118 5.6 STUDY STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS ............................................................................................................... 120 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY, PRACTICE, AND RESEARCH . 124 6 MAIN FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................................... 124 6.1 IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY ................................................................................................................................. 124 6.2 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE .............................................................................................................................. 125 6.2.1 Pre-ICU Strategies .............................................................................................................................................. 126 6.2.2 ICU Strategies ....................................................................................................................................................... 127 6.2.3 Post-ICU Strategies ............................................................................................................................................ 133 6.3 IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH ............................................................................................................................. 133 vii List of Tables Table Title Page Number 1 Survey framework 49 2 Demographic characteristics and levels of measure 50 3 Summary of research questions, variables, and measurement tools 55 4 Participant (SDM) Characteristics 65 5 Patient Characteristics 66 6 Documented Decision-making Events and Family Meetings 67 7 Internal Consistency of Outcome Measures 69 8 Prevalence and Severity of Symptoms of Anxiety, Depression, and Post-Traumatic Stress 70 9 Risk Factors for Symptoms of Psychological Distress Using Low Screening Thresholds 72 10 Risk Factors for Symptoms of Psychological Distress Using High Screening Thresholds 73 11 Risk Factors for Symptoms of Anxiety Using Low Screening Threshold 74 12 Risk Factors for Symptoms of Anxiety Using High Screening Threshold 75 13 Risk Factors for Symptoms of Depression Using Low Screening Threshold 76 14 Risk Factors for Symptoms of Depression Using High Screening Threshold 77 15 Risk Factors for Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Using Low Screening Threshold 79 16 Risk Factors for Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Using High Screening Threshold 80 17 Comparison of Logistic and Linear Regression Models for Symptoms of Psychological Distress 81 18 Decision-Making Preferences for Treatment 82 19 Patient and SDM Characteristics Associated with Preferred Role In Treatment Decision-Making 84 20 Decision-Making Role Preferences and Prevalence of Symptoms of Anxiety, Depression, and Post-Traumatic Stress 85 21 Patient and SDM Characteristics Associated with Decision-Making Role Incongruence 88 22 Family Satisfaction In Intensive Care Unit [FS-ICU (24)] Scores 91 23 Variables Associated with Complete Satisfaction with ICU Care 93 24 Variables Associated with Overall Satisfaction in the ICU 94 25 Variables Associated with Decision-Making Satisfaction in the ICU 95 U1 Descriptive Data for Participants With and Without Psychological Distress at the Low Screening Threshold 290 U2 Descriptive Data for Participants With and Without Psychological Distress at the High Screening Threshold 291 U3 Descriptive Data for Participants Enrolled With and Without an Enrolment Deviation 292 U4 Sensitivity Analysis for Predictors of Psychological Distress Using Low Screening Thresholds and Excluding Participants with Eligibility Deviations 293 U5 Sensitivity Analysis for Predictors of Psychological Distress Using High Screening Thresholds and Excluding Participants with Protocol Deviations 294 viii U6 Patient and SDM Characteristics Associated with Preferring an Active Role in Treatment Decision-Making for Female SDMs 295 U7 Patient and SDM Characteristics Associated with Preferring an Active Role in Treatment Decision-Making for Male SDMs 296 U8 Patient and SDM Characteristics Associated with Preferring an Active Role in Treatment Decision-Making for Spouses 297 U9 Patient and SDM Characteristics Associated with Preferring an Active Role in Treatment Decision-Making for Non-Spouses 298 U10 Participant Comments About ICU Experience and Decision-Making 299 ix List of Figures Figure Title Page Number 1 Literature search results 9 2 Conceptual framework for study 41 3 Study flow 47 4 Control Preferences Scale 51 5 Flow diagram of screening and recruitment 64 6 Types of decisions documented in the medical chart 68 7 Decision-making role preferences and symptoms of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress 86 8 Actual and preferred decision-making roles for ICU treatment decisions 87 9 Satisfaction with elements of care provided in the ICU 90 10 Decision-making role preferences for treatment and research 98 x
Description: