Microbiology(2013),159,1–11 DOI10.1099/mic.0.049601-0 Pre-existing immunity against vaccine vectors – Review friend or foe? Manvendra Saxena,13 Thi Thu Hao Van,23 Fiona J. Baird,3 Peter J. Coloe2 and Peter M. Smooker2 Correspondence 1Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia PeterM.Smooker 2School of Applied Sciences, RMITUniversity, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia [email protected] 3Comparative Genomics Centre, School ofPharmacy andMolecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia Overthelastcentury,thesuccessfulattenuationofmultiplebacterialandviralpathogenshasled toaneffective,robustandsafeformofvaccination.Recently,thesevaccineshavebeenevaluated asdeliveryvectorsforheterologousantigens,asameansofsimultaneousvaccinationagainsttwo pathogens.Thegeneralconsensusfrompublishedstudiesisthatthesevaccinevectorshavethe potentialtobebothsafeandefficacious.However,someofthecommonlyemployedvectors,for example Salmonella andadenovirus, often havepre-existing immune responses inthehost and this has thepotential tomodify the subsequent immuneresponse toa vectored antigen. This reviewexaminestheliteratureonthistopic,andconcludesthatforbacterialvectorstherecanin fact,insome cases,beanenhancement inimmunogenicity, typicallyhumoral, while forviral vectorspre-existingimmunityisahindranceforsubsequentinductionofcell-mediatedresponses. Introduction et al., 1997) and Salmonella (Dougan et al., 1987) are considered to be suitable candidates for the delivery of Inthefieldsofmedicineandveterinarymedicine,thereare vaccine antigens due to their capability to induce robust T numerouslive,attenuatedbacterialandviralvaccinesinuse cellimmuneresponses(Aldertonetal.,1991;Loetal.,1999; todayworldwide.Thesafetyandefficacyofsuchvaccinesis Mastroeni et al., 2001; Mittru¨cker & Kaufmann, 2000; well established and allows further development as vector Nauciel, 1990). Salmonella is one genus that has been well systemstodeliverantigenoriginatingfromotherpathogens. examined as a vector, building on the extensive research Various attenuated bacteria, including Escherichia coli, available on the micro-organism’s physiology and patho- Vibrio cholerae, lactic acid bacteria (LAB), specifically Lactococcus lactis, Mycobacterium, Listeria, Shigella and genesis (Basso et al., 2000; Killeen & DiRita, 2000; Sirard Salmonella, have been tested for the targeted delivery of et al., 1999; Ward et al., 1999). There exist several heterologousantigensofbacterial,viralandparasiticorigin commercial vaccines that are used as anti-Salmonella into a variety of animal hosts (Bahey-El-Din et al., 2010; vaccines in humans and animals (e.g. Ty21a for typhoid Innocentin et al., 2009; Johnson et al., 2011; Tobias et al., fever in humans, several Salmonella serovars against 2008,2010;Tobias&Svennerholm,2012).Bacteriasuchas salmonellosis in chickens and other animals). The general E.coliandlacticacidbacteriahaverecentlygainedfavour,as strategy for vectoring heterologous antigen is depicted in E.coliisacommensalandlacticacidbacteriaarepresentin Fig. 1. The first clinical trial of a recombinant, which was most fermented food items and are therefore naturally conductedover20yearsagousinganattenuatedSalmonella presentinthehost.Theyarealsoamuchsaferoptionthan as a delivery vector, led to the widespread testing of this traditional attenuated vaccines in children and immune- bacterium as a mucosal delivery system for antigens from compromisedpeople.Asthisreviewdiscussestheeffectsof non-Salmonella pathogens (Dougan et al., 1987). These pre-existing immune responses to attenuated vaccines, studies have demonstrated the utility of live bacteria to further discussion of LAB and E. coli as potential vectors deliver expressed antigens and DNA vaccines to the host will not be undertaken; however, the reader is directed to immune system (Atkins et al., 2006; Husseiny & Hensel, severalinterestingreviews(Bermu´dez-Humara´netal.,2011; 2008;Jiangetal.,2004;Kirbyetal.,2004).Sincethenseveral Wells&Mercenier,2008). other intracellular bacterial vectors have been successfully IntracellularbacteriafromthegeneraMycobacterium(Guleria tested for their capability to deliver a variety of antigens etal.,1996),Listeria(Gentschevetal.,2001),Shigella(Levine from various pathogens, as well as vaccination against cancer.Onegenuswhichhasbeenwidelytestedasvectoris 3Theseauthorscontributedequallytothiswork. Listeria. Listeria species are Gram-positive intracellular 049601G2013SGM PrintedinGreatBritain 1 M.Saxenaandothers (a) (b) M N pMOInv 98 64 50 36 22 Fig.1.(a)Generalapproachtousingbacteriaasvaccinevectors.Inthiscase,theheterologousantigenisdepictedasbeing expressed on the bacterial surface. (b) Salmonella secretion of heterologous antigen. STM-1 was engineered to secrete a haemolysin protein. Western blot probed with anti-haemolysin antisera. M, Marker lane (in kDa); N, concentrated growth medium after STM-1 growth (no plasmid); pMOInv, medium after growth of STM-1 with the pMOInv plasmid, encoding haemolysin. food-bornepathogens.TheadvantagesofListeriaarethatit Stoyanov et al., 2010; Weli & Tryland, 2011). Amongst can invade a variety of cells, including antigen presenting them, YFV (YF-17D strain) was the first to be licensed for cells (APCs). After invading the host cell, Listeria resides use in humans, where the cDNAs encoding the envelope inside the phagosome; however, it can escape the phago- proteins of YFV were replaced with the corresponding somewiththehelpoflisteriolysinO(LLO;Hly)andreside genes of an attenuated Japanese encephalitis virus strain, in the cytoplasm of the cells, thereby efficiently presenting SA14-14-2(Appaiahgari&Vrati,2010;Rollieretal.,2011). antigentobothCD8andCD4Tcells(Cossart&Mengaud, Poxvirusesarealsostudiedextensivelyascandidatevectors 1989; Kaufmann, 1993; Pamer et al., 1997). Several studies for human use, among which attenuated derivatives of have demonstrated the effectiveness and ease of using vaccinia virus [such as modified vaccinia virus Ankara Listeria monocytogenes to deliver heterologous vaccine (MVA) and New York attenuated vaccinia virus NYVAC antigens and DNAvaccines (Brockstedt et al., 2004; Jensen strains] are the most promising vectors (Esteban, 2009; et al., 1997; Johnson et al., 2011; Peters et al., 2003; Shen Go´mezetal.,2008;Rimmelzwaan&Sutter,2009).Theyare etal.,1995;Yinetal.,2011). ideal candidate vectors due to their large DNA-packing capacity and their thermal and genetic stability (Minke Similarly,variousviralvectorshavebeensuccessfullytested etal.,2004).TheNYVACvectorhasbeenshowntoinduce for their capability to deliver heterologous vaccine + CD4 T cell-dominant responses, and MVA induces both antigens, and this generally results in the induction of + + strong CTL immune responses. In the veterinary field, CD4 andCD8 Tcellresponses(Mooijetal.,2008).The there are numerous viral vector vaccines that are currently adenovirus (Ad) vector is another of the most widely licensed for use in livestock and domesticated animals. evaluated vectors to date to express heterologous antigens, These recombinant vaccines are based on both DNA due to ease of production, safety profile, genetic stability, viruses (such as fowlpox virus-based vaccines which target the ease of DNA genome manipulation, and the ability to avian influenza virus and fowlpox virus, or vaccinia virus- stimulate bothinnateandadaptiveimmuneresponses and based vectorsagainsttherabiesvirus inwildlife) andRNA inducebothTandBcellresponses(Alexanderetal.,2012; viruses [such as Newcastle disease virus-based vaccines to Fitzgerald et al., 2003; Gabitzsch & Jones, 2011; Lasaro & be used in poultry or yellow fever virus (YFV)-based Ertl, 2009; Vemula & Mittal, 2010; Weyer et al., 2009). vaccines to be used in horses against West Nile virus] Theyhavebeenextensivelyexaminedasadeliveryvectorin (Draper&Heeney,2010).Basedonthesafetyrecordinthe several preclinical and clinical studies for infectious veterinaryfield,manyviruseshavebeenstudiedforhuman diseases such as anthrax, hepatitis B, human immunodefi- use as a vector in vaccine development (Beukema et al., ciency virus (HIV)-1, influenza, measles, severe acute 2006; Esteban, 2009; Schirrmacher & Fournier, 2009; respiratory syndrome (SARS), malaria and tuberculosis 2 Microbiology159 Pre-existingimmunityagainstvaccinevectors (Chengalvalaetal.,1994;Gaoetal.,2006;Hashimotoetal., thevector strain. Whittle& Verma (1997)reported similar 2005; Hsu et al., 1992; Limbach & Richie, 2009; Radosevic findings. Mice immunized via the intra-peritoneal route et al., 2007; Shiver et al., 2002). with a Salmonella dublin aroA mutant expressing hetero- logous antigen after being exposed to the same vector However,beforevectoredvaccinescanbeusedinthehuman showedahigherimmuneresponsetothevectoredantigenin population they need to satisfy several important criteria. comparison to mice without any immunological memory Safety is a major concern, as even a low level of toxicity is againstthevector. unacceptable (of course the minor discomfort that accom- panies many vaccinations is normal). Secondly, a vaccine Subsequently, several studies have been conducted to should be inexpensive, so that it can be administered to a examine the effect of pre-existing immunity in the host large population at minimal cost, and this is particularly againstSalmonella.TheseresultsaresummarizedinTable1. important in resource-poor countries (Killeen & DiRita, The various reports are contradictory in their findings and 2000).Similarconstraintsapplytoveterinaryvaccines,with seem to paint a rather confusing picture. Some studies cost often an even more important consideration. Finally, concludedthatpre-existingimmunityagainsttheSalmonella long-lasting cellular and (where appropriate) humoral vector leads to stronger immune responses against the immuneresponsestothevectoredantigenmustbeinduced deliveredantigen(Bao&Clements,1991;Jespersgaardetal., followingadministrationofthesevaccines,preferablywitha 2001; Kohler et al., 2000a, b; Metzger et al., 2004; Saxena singledose(Atkinsetal.,2006). et al., 2009; Sevil Dome`nech et al., 2008; Whittle & Verma, 1997),withothersconsideringpre-existingimmunitytobea Assomeofthevectorsinusewillhavebeenseenbythehost limiting factor in the long-term use of Salmonella as an immune system prior to vaccination, whether the presence efficient vector for antigen delivery (Attridge et al., 1997; of pre-existing immune responses is detrimental for the Gahanetal.,2008;Robertsetal.,1999;SevilDome`nechetal., further development of a vector-based vaccine scheme, or 2007;Vindurampulle&Attridge,2003a,b). canaugmentresponsestothevectoredantigen,needstobe considered in detail. This is the subject of this review. In Aslightmajority of thestudies listedinTable 1(10 versus discussingthepossibleeffectsonpre-existingimmunity,the eight)indicatetheupregulationofimmuneresponsesafter natural immunity to the vector needs to be considered. animalshavebeenexposedtoeitherhomologousorrelated Therefore,consideringavectorsuchasSalmonella,ifahost strains before the delivery of heterologous antigen using a haspreviouslybeeninfectedtherewillexistrobustBandT Salmonella vector. A study by Metzger and co-workers on memory responses, and as such, when a vaccination is human volunteers using Salmonella Typhi as a vector delivered,ananamnesticresponsetotheSalmonellaantigens suggested that there was no change in the T cell immune willbeinduced(whiletheresponsetothevectoredantigen response against the heterologous antigen in human willbeaprimaryresponse).Thiswilltheoreticallyreducethe volunteers who were exposed to empty vector in compar- exposureoftheheterologousantigentotheimmunesystem, ison with volunteers who were immunologically naive of asthevectorisrapidlycleared.Surprisingly,aswillbeseenin the vector strain (Metzger et al., 2004). In these subjects, someoftheexamplesgivenbelow,thiscanhaveresultsthat humoral responses were moderately elevated in pre- differ depending on the magnitude of the response to the exposed individuals. Similarly, Saxena et al. (2009) vectoredantigen.Similarly,forvirallyvectoredantigens,the indicated higher humoral and T cell responses in mice existence of pre-existing immunity to the vector (particu- pre-exposed to homologous or heterologous Salmonella larlyneutralizingantibody)willrestrictdeliveryofthevirus strains. The interleukin 4 (IL4) response was significantly into cells, thereby effectively reducing the dose of the higher when the animal host was exposed to the vectoredantigen.Again,thismightbeexpectedtoresultina homologous strain, whereas pre-exposure to a related reduction intheantigenicityofthevectoredantigen. species did not have such an impact on IL4 responses. Conversely interferon (IFN)-c responses were higher, Effects of prior immunological exposure to irrespective of the strain to which mice were pre-exposed. vectors – bacterial vectors This study also indicated that the presence of homologous or heterologous opsonizing antibodies leads to a higher In the case of bacterial vectors, the effect of pre-existing uptake of Salmonella by macrophages in vitro, which may immune responses has only been tested using Salmonella explain the higher immune responses in exposed mice. As serovarsandListeriaspp.Concernthatpriorimmunological maybeexpected,uptakewashigherwhenhomologoussera experience of the host with either the homologous were used as the opsonin rather than heterologous sera. Salmonellavectorstrainorarelatedstrainmightcomprom- This is depicted in Fig. 2. iseitsabilitytodeliverheterologousvaccineantigenwasfirst raised in 1987 (Dougan et al., 1987). Bao and Clements Conversely,therearereportsthatindicatethatpre-existing subsequently reported experimental evidence of the con- immunity against the bacterial vector downregulates sequences of prior exposure of animals to the vector strain immune responses against the delivered heterologous (Bao&Clements,1991).Thisworkshowedthatbothserum antigen using similar or related vectors. Attridge and co- andmucosalantibodyresponsesagainsttheforeignantigen workersreportedthatthepresenceofimmunityagainstthe were in fact upregulated in animals with prior exposure to bacterial vector prior to the delivery of vectored antigenic http://mic.sgmjournals.org 3 4 M . S a x e n a a n d o th e rs Table1. Summary ofpublished reportsandtheir conclusions NA,Notapplicable;ND,notdetermined. Vaccine Vaccinevector Pre-existingimmunity Vectoredantigen CMIresponse Humoral Reference recipient organism response Mouse S.dublin S.dublin NA ND + Bao&Clements(1991) Mouse S.dublin S.typhimurium NA ND ++ Bao&Clements(1991) Mouse S.typhimurium S.typhimurium Glucan-bindingdomainof ND ++ Jespersgaardetal.(2001) glucosyltransferase,Streptococcusmutans Mouse S.typhimurium S.typhimurium Haemagglutinin,Porphyromonasgingivalis ND ++ Kohleretal.(2000a,b) Human S.typhiTy21a StyphiTy21a UreasesubunitsAandB,Helicobacterpylori Nochange ++ Metzgeretal.(2004) Mouse S.typhimurium S.typhimurium Ovalbumin,G.gallus ++ +++ Saxenaetal.(2009) Mouse S.typhimurium Salmonellaenterica Ovalbumin,G.gallus ++ ++ Saxenaetal.(2009) serovarEnteritidis Mouse S.dublin S.typhimurium FusionproteinofYersiniaouterproteinE ++ ND SevilDome`nechetal.(2008) andp60fromL.monocytogenes Mouse S.typhimurium S.dublin FusionproteinofYersiniaouterproteinE ++ ND SevilDome`nechetal.(2008) andp60fromL.monocytogenes Mouse S.dublin S.dublin Envelopeprotein,MurrayValley ND +++ Whittle&Verma(1997) encephalitisvirus Mouse S.stanley S.stanley FimbrialproteinK88,E.coli ND 222 Attridgeetal.(1997) Mouse S.stanley Salmonellastrasbourg FimbrialproteinK88,E.coli ND 2 Attridgeetal.(1997) Mouse S.typhimurium S.typhimurium Cfragmentoftetanustoxin, ND 22 Gahanetal.(2008) Clostridiumtetani Mouse S.typhimurium S.typhimurium Cfragmentoftetanustoxin,C.tetani ND 222 Robertsetal.(1999) Mouse S.typhimurium S.dublin Cfragmentoftetanustoxin,C.tetani ND 22 Robertsetal.(1999) Mouse S.typhimurium S.typhimurium FusionproteinofYersiniaouterproteinE 222 ND SevilDome`nechetal.(2007) andp60fromL.monocytogenes Mouse S.stanley S.stanley FimbrialproteinK88,E.coli ND 222 Vindurampulle&Attridge(2003b) Mouse S.dublin S.stanley FimbrialproteinK88,E.coli ND 222 Vindurampulle&Attridge(2003b) M ic ro b io lo g y 1 5 9 Pre-existingimmunityagainstvaccinevectors 120 100 %) 80 1 ( M- ST 60 of e ak 40 pt U 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Time (min) Fig.2.UptakeofSTM-1byJ774macrophages,relativetothehighestuptakepercentage.X,Opsonizedwithnaivesera;m, opsonizedwithserumfrommiceexposedtoSalmonellaenteriditis;&,opsonizedwithserumfrommiceexposedtoSTM-1. proteincandownregulateimmuneresponsesinmiceagainst responses in mice when exposed to a similar strain used the delivered antigen (Attridge et al., 1997). Similar results as vector (Sevil Dome`nech et al., 2007). In contrast, werereportedbyRobertsetal.(1999)andVindurampulle& another study by the same authors reported that animals + Attridge(2003a,b).However,thelatterauthorsfoundthat exposed to related vectors induce much higher CD8 the hypo-responsiveness could be largely eliminated by responseswhencomparedwithanimalswhichdonothave exposing animals to the foreign antigen prior to vector- any pre-existing Salmonella immunity (Sevil Dome`nech priming(Vindurampulle&Attridge,2003b).Unfortunately, et al., 2008). The difference between these two studies was this would appear to be impractical for an immunization that in the first, the prime and boost were with identical regimen! serovars,whileinthesecondstudy,differentserovarswere used.Thismaypointtoawayofavoidingdownregulation Astudy presentedbyGahan etal.(2008)immunized mice of CD8 responses by pre-existing immunity. This is with S. Typhimurium expressing C fragment of tetanus important, as one of the advantages of using Salmonella toxin antigen from an expression plasmid or as a DNA (an intracellular pathogen) is that strong cellular immune vaccine. Vaccinated mice developed humoral responses to responses can be induced. LPS and tetC (for the plasmid-bearing vaccines). Animals from all groups (including a previously unvaccinated It must be noted that in the case of Salmonella vaccines, group) were immunized on day 182 with Salmonella effects other than strictly immunological responses (par- expressing tetC. At this time, the anti-LPS and tetC titres ticularly adaptive responses) should be considered. In the were beginning to wane. Fourteen days after the second contextofinnateimmunity,itwasshownthatadministra- immunization, the colonization of various mouse organs tion of non-virulent Salmonella to gnobiotic pigs elimi- was assessed. The ability to colonize was found to be nated disease following challenge with a virulent strain significantly reduced in groups that had been previously (Foster et al., 2003). Interestingly, protection was not by vaccinated with Salmonella. In view of this finding, it was competitive exclusion, as the virulent strain was in high perhaps not surprising that at day 210 the LPS titres were numbersinthegutbutdidnotdistributesystemically.The not significantly different between groups receiving one or protectionwasproposedtobemediatedbytheinfiltration two vaccinations. More interestingly, mice that had been of a large number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes into primed with Salmonella alone, and then boosted with the gut, and although perhaps impractical as a general Salmonella expressing tetC, induced much lower anti-tetC prophylactic (as the time between vaccination and responsesthanmicethathadnotbeenprimed.Thisargues infection is short), this may be an option for short-term strongly that prior immunological immunity to the vector or perhaps therapeutic vaccination (as reviewed by Foster canseriouslydampensubsequentantigen-specifichumoral et al., 2012). responses. Whether the same is true for cellular responses Chickens (Gallus gallus) are a natural animal reservoir for was not evaluated. Salmonella, which makes them an important source of Otherstudieshaveevaluatedcellularresponses.Astudyby Salmonella-associatedgastroenteritisinhumans.Theability Sevil Dome`nech and colleagues reported that pre-existing to use oral Salmonella vaccines to immunize against + anti-vector immunity seriously compromises CD8 heterologous pathogens would be of enormous benefit to http://mic.sgmjournals.org 5 M.Saxenaandothers the poultry industry in both broiler and layer flocks. Both negative impact of vector-specific immune responses can vertical and horizontal transmission is associated with alsobecounteredbyrepeatedimmunizationwiththesame Salmonella in chickens (Liljebjelke et al., 2005). Vertical vaccine and dose; this in effect leads to higher priming of transmissionviainovotransmissionisparticularlyimportant, naive T cells against the delivered antigen. Of course, such because if there is prior exposure to the vaccine strain, repeated vaccination may not be practicable in real-world subsequentvaccinationusinganoralSalmonellavectorcould situations. be severely compromised. A considerable number of studies oncross-protectiveimmunityandcompetitiveexclusionhave Effects of prior immunological exposure to been undertaken in chickens. Protective cross-reactive vectors – viral vectors immunity against Salmonella strains has been demonstrated against both homologous and heterologous challenges (Beal Despitethemanyadvantageswhichviralvectoringcanoffer, et al., 2006), although cross-serogroup protection was not pre-existing immunity is a major obstacle of many viral- strong. Furthermore, a recent study reported that pre- vectored vaccines, such as Ad serotype 5 or herpes simplex treatment of newly hatched chickens with different virus type 1 (HSV-1), where the rate of seroprevalence to Salmonella strains could produce a complete invasion– thesevirusesisveryhigh[40–45%and70%(ormore)ofthe inhibition effect on any subsequent exposure to both US population, respectively] (Hocknell et al., 2002; Pichla- homologous and heterologous strains (Methner et al., Gollon etal., 2009).Vector-specific antibodiesmayimpede 2010). Pre-exposure with a highly invasive form of the induction ofimmuneresponsestothevaccine-encoded Salmonella Enteritidis caused a largeinflux of heterophilsto antigens,astheymayreducethedoseandtimeofexposure the caecal mucosa in 1-day-old chicks, and subsequent of the target cells to the vaccinated antigens (Pichla-Gollon heterologouscaecalcolonizationwasinhibitedforaperiodof et al., 2009; Pine et al., 2011). In a large-scale clinical trial 48 h(Methneretal.,2010).Theimplicationsofthiskindof (STEP)ofanAdserotype5(AdHu5)-basedHIV-1vaccine, colonization-inhibitionstudyontheimmunologicalstatusof thevaccinesshowedalackofefficacyandtendedtoincrease theaffectedchickensareyettobefullyelucidated.Itshouldbe the risk of HIV-1 infection in vaccine recipients who had notedthatthestudieslistedinTables1and2arecontrolled pre-existing neutralizing antibodies to AdHu5 (Buchbinder laboratory studies, with the possibility of a competitive etal.,2008).ForanHSV-1-basedvectorvaccine,ithasbeen exclusioncomponenttoimmunitynotdiscussed. demonstrated that pre-existing anti-HSV-1 immunity reduced,butdidnotabolish,humoralandcellularimmune SimilarlystudiesofL.monocytogenesandtheeffectsofpre- responses against the vaccine-encoded antigen (Hocknell existing immune responses indicate conflicting results. A et al., 2002; Lauterbach et al., 2005). However, Brockman study by Bouwer et al. (1999) indicates that pre-existing and Knipe found that the induction of durable antibody immune responses against the Listeria vector do not responses and cellular proliferative responses to HSV- diminish immune responses against the delivered hetero- encoded antigen were notaffected by prior HSV immunity logous antigen, and a similar study by Starks et al. (2004) (Brockman& Knipe,2002).Similarly, pre-existingimmun- also concluded that prior exposure of mice to the empty ity to poliovirus has little effect on vaccine efficacy in a Listeria vector did not influence anti-cancer immune poliovirus-vectored vaccine (Mandl et al., 2001). Different responses when a similar mutant was used as a carrier of effects of pre-existing immunity on the efficacy of recom- amelanomacancerantigen.Similarfindingswerereported binant viral vaccine vectors are summarized in Table 2. by Whitney et al. (2011) in rhesus macaques in which L. Thereareseveralapproachestoavoidingpre-existingvector monocytyogens was used as a carrier of gag-HIV antigen. immunity, such as the use of vectors derived from non- Conversely, studies by Stevens et al. (2005) in which L. humansources,usinghumanvirusesofrareserotypes(Kahl monocytogens was used to deliver feline immunodeficiency etal.,2010;Lasaro&Ertl,2009),heterologousprime–boost virus(FIV)gagproteinandasacarrierofDNAvaccinesto approaches (Liu et al., 2008), homologous reimmunization vaccinatecatsagainstFIVenvelopeproteinindicatedlower (Steffensen et al., 2012) and removing key neutralizing immune responses against the delivered antigen in cats epitopesonthesurfaceofviralcapsidproteins(Gabitzsch& exposedtoemptyListeriavector incomparison withnaive Jones, 2011; Roberts et al., 2006). The inhibitory effect of animals (Stevens et al., 2005). Similar findings have been pre-existing immunity can also be avoided by masking the reported by Tvinnereim et al. (2002) and Leong et al. Ad vector inside dendritic cells (DCs) (Steffensen et al., (2009). However, taken together, these studies conclude 2012).Inaddition,mucosalvaccinationoradministrationof that prior exposure of host animals to empty vector does higher vaccine doses can overcome pre-existing immunity not abrogate immune responses to the vectored antigen, problems (Alexander et al., 2012; Belyakov et al., 1999; but only reduces them somewhat. Only the study by Vijh Priddyetal.,2008;Xiangetal.,2003). et al. (1999) indicated that exposure to the empty vector may completely abrogate immune responses against the Concluding remarks and perspective delivered antigens (Vijh et al., 1999). However, these studies also indicate that downregulation of antigen- As we search for new vaccine approaches for the array of specific immune responses is highly dependent on dose pathogensforwhichnoneisyetavailable,revisitingproven and time. Leong et al. (2009) also demonstrated that the vaccines and developing these further has gained 6 Microbiology159 Pre-existingimmunityagainstvaccinevectors Table2.Different effects ofpre-existingimmunity on theefficacy ofrecombinant viralvaccine vectors ND,Notdetermined. Vaccine Vaccine Pre-existing Vectoredantigen CMIresponse Humoral Reference recipient vector immunity response organism Mouse Poliovirus Poliovirus Chickenovabumin 2 Nochange Mandletal.(2001) Mouse HSV HSV Chickenovabumin 222 222 Lauterbachetal.(2005) Mouse HSV HSV E.colib-galactosidase Nochange Nochange Brockman&Knipe(2002) Mouse Ad Ad HIV-1gag 222 ND Pichla-Gollonetal.(2009) Human Ad Ad HIV-1gag/pol/nef 22 ND McElrathetal.(2008) Mouse Ad Ad H5haemagglutinin 2 2 Alexanderetal.(2012) Mouse Ad Ad Ovabumin/glycoproteinof 2 ND Steffensenetal.(2012) lymphocytic choriomeningitisvirus Mouse Ad Ad H5haemagglutininand 22 22 Pandeyetal.(2012) N1nucleoprotein momentum. Hence, attenuated bacteria and viruses which responses(Kohleretal.,2000b).Thisisinconflictwiththe havealonghistoryofefficacyandsafetyarebeingbrought above result, although it should be mentioned that they into use. While very attractive, a common theme in these used different Salmonella species. Vindurampulle and experimentalapproacheshasbeenthelimitationsthatpre- Attridgealsoexamined theimpactoftheSalmonellastrain existingimmunitytothevectormaypose.However,asthis and the nature of the antigens used. In their study, they examination of the relevant literature shows, there is a used S. Dublin and Salmonella Stanley aroA mutants to rather confusing picture, with some studies in fact deliver E. coli K88 and LT-B antigens, and concluded that indicating that pre-existing immunity may be a friend, the effect of pre-existing immunity depends on both the rather than foe. strainusedandthetypeofantigendelivered(Vindurampulle &Attridge,2003b). Few studies using viral vectors have reported on the influence of pre-existing immunity on humoral responses. All these studies on the effect of pre-existing immunity Generally speaking, for bacterial-delivered antigens, the discusstheimpact onhumoralresponses. SevilDomenech humoral responses were influenced by pre-existing and colleagues reported that pre-exposing animals to the immunity,withslightlymorestudiesfindingaugmentation homologous Salmonella vector leads to a significant + rather than diminution. Why is there variation? This may reduction in CD8 responses; however, exposure of be due to several factors, including the type of Salmonella animals to a heterologous strain leads to significantly used and its invasiveness. Dunstan and colleagues tested higher CD8+ responses (Sevil Dome`nech et al., 2007, theabilityofsixisogenicSalmonellaserovarTyphimurium 2008). Saxena and colleagues also reported that antigen- strains harbouring different mutations for their ability to specificTcell responses wereeither similar or significantly induce immune responses against the C fragment of higher, with no downregulation in T cell responses tetanus toxin and concluded that the strain which had observed after pre-exposing mice to either homologous the least ability to colonize Peyer’s patches induced the or heterologous strains (Saxena et al., 2009). lowest immune responses (Dunstan et al., 1998). For viral vectors, the impact of cell-mediated immunity Similarly,theboostingtimeandnatureoftheantigenused was more pronounced, and as depicted in Table 2, almost might be important. Attridge and colleagues indicated the always resulted in a reduction in the subsequent immune importance of boosting time. In one experiment, boosting response. Presumably this is because viruses will induce mice at 10 weeks led to complete inhibition of antibody neutralizing antibody on the first dose, and in subsequent responses against the delivered heterologous antigen; doses this antibody will limit the number of transduced however, when the mice were boosted at 4 weeks, the cells,thereforelimitingtheresponses.Thisisparticularlya downregulation of antibody responses was not so prom- problem with a common viral vector such as Ad, where a inent (Attridge et al., 1997). A similar study conducted by large proportion of the population will have immuno- Kohlersandcolleaguesshowsthatboostingat7 weeksafter logical memory against common serotypes (Lasaro & Ertl, pre-exposing animals to empty vector leads to lower 2009). As these authors conclude, it will be possible to antigen-specificIgGandsecretory IgAresponses; however, utilize such vectors only by developing vaccines from boostingat14 weeksleadstohigherIgGandsecretoryIgA alternative serotypes. It may be that a vector such as http://mic.sgmjournals.org 7 M.Saxenaandothers attenuatedinfluenzavirus,withtheabilitytoeasilydevelop Beal,R.K.,Wigley,P.,Powers,C.,Barrow,P.A.&Smith,A.L.(2006). reassortants, will be useful in this context. Cross-reactivecellularandhumoralimmuneresponsestoSalmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis are associated with In addition, immunological memory in the form of protectiontoheterologousre-challenge.VetImmunolImmunopathol opsonizing antibody certainly plays an important role in 114,84–93. the early uptake of Salmonella by macrophages and DC. Belyakov, I. M., Moss, B., Strober, W. & Berzofsky, J. A. (1999). Thismaybebeneficial,asthelivebacterialvectorusedfor Mucosal vaccination overcomes the barrier to recombinant vaccinia delivery purposes harbours mutations in genes encoding immunization caused by preexisting poxvirus immunity. Proc Natl AcadSciUSA96,4512–4517. proteins responsible for their survival in the animal host. This not only encumbers their ability to cause disease, Bermu´dez-Humara´n, L. G., Kharrat, P., Chatel, J. M. & Langella, P. (2011). Lactococci and lactobacilli as mucosal delivery vectors for making them safe livevectors, but also limitsthe number therapeuticproteinsandDNAvaccines.MicrobCellFact10(Suppl.1),S4. of replications. The presence of opsonizing antibodies Beukema,E.L.,Brown,M.P.&Hayball,J.D.(2006).The potential should mean a higher level of bacterial uptake, leading to roleoffowlpoxvirusinrationalvaccinedesign.ExpertRevVaccines5, higher presentation to the immune system and therefore 565–577. a better immune response. We have previously shown Bouwer,H.G.,Shen,H.,Fan,X.,Miller,J.F.,Barry,R.A.&Hinrichs, that this is indeed the case (Saxena et al., 2009) (depicted D. J. (1999). Existing antilisterial immunity does not inhibit the in Fig. 2). It would be of great benefit to address these development of a Listeria monocytogenes-specific primary cytotoxic issues not only in mice but also in other organisms such T-lymphocyteresponse.InfectImmun67,253–258. as chickens, which are the most likely host to be targeted Brockman,M.A.&Knipe,D.M.(2002).Herpessimplexvirusvectors for the use of live Salmonella vectors, specifically where elicit durable immune responses in the presence of preexisting host the vaccines are developed for use in livestock and immunity.JVirol76,3678–3687. poultry. Brockstedt,D.G.,Giedlin,M.A.,Leong,M.L.,Bahjat,K.S.,Gao,Y., Luckett,W.,Liu,W.,Cook,D.N.,Portnoy,D.A.&Dubensky,T.W.,Jr To summarize, bacterial vectors such as Salmonella and (2004).Listeria-basedcancervaccinesthatsegregateimmunogenicity viral vectors such as Ad show great promise as delivery fromtoxicity.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA101,13832–13837. vehiclesforheterologousantigens;however,priorexposure Buchbinder,S.P.,Mehrotra,D.V.,Duerr,A.,Fitzgerald,D.W.,Mogg, tothevector mustbe considered.By judiciousselection of R., Li, D., Gilbert, P. B., Lama, J. R., Marmor, M. & other authors the strain/serotype it will be possible to avoid the negative (2008). Efficacy assessment of a cell-mediated immunity HIV-1 effectsanditmayindeedbepossibletopositivelyinfluence vaccine (the Step Study): a double-blind, randomised, placebo- the response, particularly for humoral immunity. controlled,test-of-concepttrial.Lancet372,1881–1893. Chengalvala,M.V.,Bhat,B.M.,Bhat,R.,Lubeck,M.D.,Mizutani,S., Davis,A.R.&Hung,P.P.(1994).Immunogenicityofhighexpression References adenovirus-hepatitis B virus recombinant vaccines in dogs. J Gen Virol75,125–131. Alderton,M.R.,Fahey,K.J.&Coloe,P.J.(1991).Humoralresponses Cossart, P. & Mengaud, J. (1989). Listeria monocytogenes. A model and salmonellosis protection in chickens given a vitamin-dependent system for the molecular study of intracellular parasitism. Mol Biol Salmonellatyphimuriummutant.AvianDis35,435–442. Med6,463–474. Alexander, J., Ward, S., Mendy, J., Manayani, D. J., Farness, P., Dougan, G., Hormaeche, C. E. & Maskell, D. J. (1987). Live oral Avanzini, J. B., Guenther, B., Garduno, F., Jow, L. & other authors Salmonellavaccines:potentialuseofattenuatedstrainsascarriersof (2012).Pre-clinicalevaluationofareplication-competentrecombin- heterologous antigens to the immune system. Parasite Immunol 9, ant adenovirus serotype 4 vaccine expressing influenza H5 hemag- 151–160. glutinin.PLoSONE7,e31177. Draper, S. J. & Heeney, J. L. (2010). Viruses as vaccine vectors for Appaiahgari, M. B. & Vrati, S. (2010). IMOJEV(1): a Yellow fever infectiousdiseasesandcancer.NatRevMicrobiol8,62–73. virus-based novel Japanese encephalitis vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines Dunstan,S.J.,Simmons,C.P.&Strugnell,R.A.(1998).Comparison 9,1371–1384. oftheabilitiesofdifferentattenuatedSalmonellatyphimuriumstrains Atkins,H.S.,Morton,M.,Griffin,K.F.,Stokes,M.G.,Nataro,J.P.& to elicit humoral immune responses against a heterologous antigen. Titball,R.W.(2006).RecombinantSalmonellavaccinesforbiodefence. InfectImmun66,732–740. Vaccine24,2710–2717. Esteban,M.(2009).AttenuatedpoxvirusvectorsMVAandNYVAC Attridge, S. R., Davies, R. & LaBrooy, J. T. (1997). Oral delivery of as promising vaccine candidates against HIV/AIDS. Hum Vaccin 5, foreign antigens by attenuated Salmonella: consequences of prior 867–871. exposuretothevectorstrain.Vaccine15,155–162. Fitzgerald, J. C., Gao, G. P., Reyes-Sandoval, A., Pavlakis, G. N., Bahey-El-Din,M.,Casey,P.G.,Griffin,B.T.&Gahan,C.G.(2010). Xiang,Z.Q.,Wlazlo,A.P.,Giles-Davis,W.,Wilson,J.M.&Ertl,H.C. ExpressionoftwoListeriamonocytogenesantigens(P60andLLO)in (2003). A simian replication-defective adenoviral recombinant Lactococcus lactis and examination for use as live vaccine vectors. vaccinetoHIV-1gag.JImmunol170,1416–1422. JMedMicrobiol59,904–912. Foster, N., Lovell, M. A., Marston, K. L., Hulme, S. D., Frost, A. J., Bao, J. X. & Clements, J. D. (1991). Prior immunologic experience Bland,P.&Barrow,P.A.(2003).Rapidprotectionofgnotobioticpigs potentiatesthesubsequentantibodyresponsewhenSalmonellastrains against experimental salmonellosis following induction of polymor- areusedasvaccinecarriers.InfectImmun59,3841–3845. phonuclearleukocytesbyavirulentSalmonellaenterica.InfectImmun Basso, H., Rohde, M. & Guzma´n, C. A. (2000). Vectors to achieve 71,2182–2191. selectiveexpressionofvaccineantigenswithineukaryoticcellsusing Foster, N., Berndt, A., Lalmanach, A. C., Methner, U., Pasquali, P., Salmonellaspp.ascarrierstrains.FEMSMicrobiolLett182,219–223. Rychlik,I.,Velge,P.,Zhou,X.&Barrow,P.(2012). Emergency and 8 Microbiology159 Pre-existingimmunityagainstvaccinevectors therapeuticvaccination–isstimulatinginnateimmunityanoption? Johnson,P.V.,Blair,B.M.,Zeller,S.,Kotton,C.N.&Hohmann,E.L. ResVetSci93,7–12. (2011).AttenuatedListeriamonocytogenes vaccinevectorsexpressing influenzaAnucleoprotein:preclinicalevaluationandoralinoculation Gabitzsch,E.S.&Jones,F.R.(2011).NewrecombinantAd5vector ofvolunteers.MicrobiolImmunol55,304–317. overcomes Ad5 immunity allowing for multiple safe, homologous immunizations.JClinCellImmunolS4,001. Kahl,C.A.,Bonnell,J.,Hiriyanna,S.,Fultz,M.,Nyberg-Hoffman,C., Chen,P.,King,C.R.&Gall,J.G.(2010).Potent immune responses Gahan, M. E., Webster, D. E., Wijburg, O. L., Wesselingh, S. L. & and in vitro pro-inflammatory cytokine suppression by a novel Strugnell,R.A.(2008).Impactofpriorimmunologicalexposureon adenovirusvaccinevectorbasedonrarehumanserotype28.Vaccine vaccinedeliverybySalmonellaentericaserovarTyphimurium.Vaccine 28,5691–5702. 26,6212–6220. Kaufmann,S.H.(1993).Immunitytointracellularbacteria.AnnuRev Gao, W., Soloff, A. C., Lu, X., Montecalvo, A., Nguyen, D. C., Immunol11,129–163. Matsuoka, Y., Robbins, P. D., Swayne, D. E., Donis, R. O. & other authors (2006). Protection of mice and poultry from lethal H5N1 Killeen,K.&DiRita,V.(2000).Liveattenuatedbacterial vaccines.In avianinfluenzavirusthroughadenovirus-basedimmunization.JVirol NewVaccineTechnologies.EditedbyR.Ellis.Georgetown,TX:Landes 80,1959–1964. Bioscience. Gentschev,I.,Dietrich,G.,Spreng,S.,Kolb-Ma¨urer,A.,Brinkmann, Kirby, A. C., Sundquist, M. & Wick, M. J. (2004). In vivo V., Grode, L., Hess, J., Kaufmann, S. H. & Goebel, W. (2001). compartmentalization of functionally distinct, rapidly responsive Recombinantattenuatedbacteriaforthedeliveryofsubunitvaccines. antigen-specificT-cellpopulationsinDNA-immunizedorSalmonella Vaccine19,2621–2628. entericaserovarTyphimurium-infectedmice.InfectImmun72,6390– 6400. Go´mez, C. E., Na´jera, J. L., Krupa, M. & Esteban, M. (2008). The poxvirus vectors MVA and NYVAC as gene delivery systems for Kohler,J.J.,Pathangey,L.,Hasona,A.,Progulske-Fox,A.&Brown, vaccinationagainstinfectiousdiseasesandcancer.CurrGeneTher8, T. A. (2000a). Long-term immunological memory induced by 97–120. recombinant oral Salmonella vaccine vectors. Infect Immun 68, 4370–4373. Guleria,I.,Teitelbaum,R.,McAdam,R.A.,Kalpana,G.,Jacobs,W.R., Jr&Bloom,B.R.(1996).Auxotrophicvaccinesfortuberculosis.Nat Kohler,J.J.,Pathangey,L.B.,Gillespie,S.R.&Brown,T.A.(2000b). Med2,334–337. EffectofpreexistingimmunitytoSalmonellaontheimmuneresponse torecombinantSalmonellaentericaserovarTyphimuriumexpressing Hashimoto,M., Boyer,J. L., Hackett, N. R., Wilson,J. M. & Crystal, a Porphyromonas gingivalis hemagglutinin. Infect Immun 68, 3116– R.G.(2005).Inductionofprotectiveimmunitytoanthraxlethaltoxin 3120. withanonhumanprimateadenovirus-basedvaccineinthepresence of preexisting anti-human adenovirus immunity. Infect Immun 73, Lasaro, M. O. & Ertl, H. C. (2009). New insights on adenovirus as 6885–6891. vaccinevectors.MolTher17,1333–1339. Hocknell, P. K., Wiley, R. D., Wang, X., Evans, T. G., Bowers, W. J., Lauterbach, H., Ried, C., Epstein, A. L., Marconi, P. & Brocker, T. Hanke, T., Federoff, H. J. & Dewhurst, S. (2002). Expression of (2005). Reduced immune responses after vaccination with a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 from herpes simplex recombinant herpes simplex virus type 1 vector in the presence of virustype1-derivedampliconsresultsinpotent,specific,anddurable antiviralimmunity.JGenVirol86,2401–2410. cellularandhumoralimmuneresponses.JVirol76,5565–5580. Leong,M.L.,Hampl,J.,Liu,W.,Mathur,S.,Bahjat,K.S.,Luckett,W., Hsu, K.-H., Lubeck, M. D., Davis, A. R., Bhat, R. A., Selling, B. H., Dubensky,T.W.,Jr&Brockstedt,D.G.(2009).Impactofpreexisting Bhat,B.M.,Mizutani,S.,Murphy,B.R.,Collins,P.L.&otherauthors vector-specific immunity on vaccine potency: characterization of (1992). Immunogenicity of recombinant adenovirus-respiratory Listeria monocytogenes-specific humoral and cellular immunity in syncytial virus vaccines with adenovirus types 4, 5, and 7 vectors in humans and modeling studies using recombinant vaccines in mice. dogsandachimpanzee.JInfectDis166,769–775. InfectImmun77,3958–3968. Husseiny, M. I. & Hensel, M. (2008). Construction of highly Levine,M.M.,Galen,J.,Barry,E.,Noriega,F.,Tacket,C.,Sztein,M., attenuatedSalmonellaentericaserovarTyphimuriumlivevectorsfor Chatfield, S., Dougan, G., Losonsky, G. & Kotloff, K. (1997). delivering heterologous antigens by chromosomal integration. AttenuatedSalmonellatyphiandShigellaasliveoralvaccinesandas MicrobiolRes163,605–615. livevectors.BehringInstMitt98,120–123. Innocentin,S.,Guimara˜es,V.,Miyoshi,A.,Azevedo,V.,Langella,P., Liljebjelke,K.A.,Hofacre,C.L.,Liu,T.,White,D.G.,Ayers,S.,Young, Chatel,J.M.&Lefe`vre,F.(2009).Lactococcuslactisexpressingeither S. & Maurer, J. J. (2005). Vertical and horizontal transmission of Staphylococcus aureus fibronectin-binding protein A or Listeria Salmonella within integrated broiler production system. Foodborne monocytogenes internalin A can efficiently internalize and deliver PathogDis2,90–102. DNAinhumanepithelialcells.ApplEnvironMicrobiol75,4870–4878. Limbach,K.J.&Richie,T.L.(2009).Viralvectorsinmalariavaccine Jensen, E. R., Shen, H., Wettstein, F. O., Ahmed, R. & Miller, J. F. development.ParasiteImmunol31,501–519. (1997).RecombinantListeriamonocytogenesasalivevaccinevehicle Liu,J.,Ewald,B.A.,Lynch,D.M.,Denholtz,M.,Abbink,P.,Lemckert, andaprobeforstudyingcell-mediatedimmunity.ImmunolRev158, A.A.,Carville,A.,Mansfield,K.G.,Havenga,M.J.&otherauthors 147–157. (2008). Magnitude and phenotype of cellular immune responses Jespersgaard, C., Zhang, P., Hajishengallis, G., Russell, M. W. & elicitedbyrecombinantadenovirusvectorsandheterologousprime- Michalek, S. M. (2001). Effect of attenuated Salmonella enterica boostregimensinrhesusmonkeys.JVirol82,4844–4852. serovar Typhimurium expressing a Streptococcus mutans antigen on Lo, W. F., Ong, H., Metcalf, E. S. & Soloski, M. J. (1999). T cell secondary responses to the cloned protein. Infect Immun 69, 6604– responses to Gram-negative intracellular bacterial pathogens: a role 6611. for CD8+ T cells in immunity to Salmonella infection and the Jiang,P.,Jiang,W.,Li,Y.,Wu,S.&Xu,J.(2004).Humoral immune involvementofMHCclassIbmolecules.JImmunol162,5398–5406. responseinducedbyoraladministrationofS.typhimuriumcontain- Mandl, S., Hix, L. & Andino, R. (2001). Preexisting immunity to ing a DNA vaccine against porcine reproductive and respiratory poliovirus does not impair the efficacy of recombinant poliovirus syndromevirus.VetImmunolImmunopathol102,321–328. vaccinevectors.JVirol75,622–627. http://mic.sgmjournals.org 9 M.Saxenaandothers Mastroeni, P., Chabalgoity, J. A., Dunstan, S. J., Maskell, D. J. & andCD8T-cellepitopemappingandroleofgammainterferon.Infect Dougan,G.(2001).Salmonella:immuneresponsesandvaccines.VetJ Immun75,4105–4115. 161,132–164. Rimmelzwaan, G. F. & Sutter, G. (2009). Candidate influenza McElrath,M.J.,DeRosa,S.C.,Moodie,Z.,Dubey,S.,Kierstead,L., vaccines based on recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara. Janes, H., Defawe, O. D., Carter, D. K., Hural, J. & other authors ExpertRevVaccines8,447–454. (2008).HIV-1vaccine-inducedimmunityinthetest-of-conceptStep Roberts,M.,Bacon,A.,Li,J.&Chatfield,S.(1999).Priorimmunityto Study:acase-cohortanalysis.Lancet372,1894–1905. homologous and heterologous Salmonella serotypes suppresses local Methner, U., Barrow, P. A. & Berndt, A. (2010). Induction of a and systemic anti-fragment C antibody responses and protection homologous and heterologous invasion–inhibition effect after from tetanus toxin in mice immunized with Salmonella strains administration of Salmonella strains to newly hatched chicks. expressingfragmentC.InfectImmun67,3810–3815. Vaccine28,6958–6963. Roberts,D.M.,Nanda,A.,Havenga,M.J.,Abbink,P.,Lynch,D.M., Metzger, W. G., Mansouri, E., Kronawitter, M., Diescher, S., Ewald,B.A.,Liu,J.,Thorner,A.R.,Swanson,P.E.&otherauthors Soerensen, M., Hurwitz, R., Bumann, D., Aebischer, T., Von (2006). Hexon-chimaeric adenovirus serotype 5 vectors circumvent Specht, B. U. & Meyer, T. F. (2004). Impact of vector-priming on pre-existinganti-vectorimmunity.Nature441,239–243. theimmunogenicityofaliverecombinantSalmonellaentericaserovar Rollier,C.S.,Reyes-Sandoval,A.,Cottingham,M.G.,Ewer,K.&Hill, Typhi Ty21a vaccine expressing urease A and B from Helicobacter A.V.(2011).Viralvectorsasvaccineplatforms:deploymentinsight. pyloriinhumanvolunteers.Vaccine22,2273–2277. CurrOpinImmunol23,377–382. Minke, J. M., Audonnet, J. C. & Fischer, L. (2004). Equine viral Saxena, M., Coloe, P. J. & Smooker, P. M. (2009). Influence of vaccines:thepast,presentandfuture.VetRes35,425–443. promoter,genecopynumber,andpreexistingimmunityonhumoral Mittru¨cker, H. W. & Kaufmann, S. H. (2000). Immune response to andcellularresponsestoavectoredantigendeliveredbyaSalmonella infectionwithSalmonellatyphimuriuminmice.JLeukocBiol67,457– entericavaccine.ClinVaccineImmunol16,78–87. 463. Schirrmacher, V. & Fournier, P. (2009). Newcastle disease virus: a Mooij, P., Balla-Jhagjhoorsingh, S. S., Koopman, G., Beenhakker, promisingvectorforviraltherapy,immunetherapy,andgenetherapy N.,vanHaaften,P.,Baak,I.,Nieuwenhuis,I.G.,Kondova,I.,Wagner, ofcancer.MethodsMolBiol542,565–605. R. & other authors (2008). Differential CD4+ versus CD8+ T-cell Sevil Dome`nech, V. E., Panthel, K., Meinel, K. M., Winter, S. E. & responses elicited by different poxvirus-based human immunodefi- Ru¨ssmann,H.(2007).Pre-existinganti-Salmonellavectorimmunity ciency virus type 1vaccine candidates provide comparable efficacies prevents the development of protective antigen-specific CD8 T-cell inprimates.JVirol82,2975–2988. frequenciesagainstmurinelisteriosis.MicrobesInfect9,1447–1453. Nauciel, C. (1990). Role of CD4+ T cells and T-independent Sevil Dome`nech, V. E., Panthel, K., Winter, S. E. & Ru¨ssmann, H. mechanisms in acquired resistance to Salmonella typhimurium (2008). Heterologous prime–boost immunizations with different infection.JImmunol145,1265–1269. Salmonella serovars for enhanced antigen-specific CD8 T-cell Pamer, E. G., Sijts, A. J., Villanueva, M. S., Busch, D. H. & Vijh, S. induction.Vaccine26,1879–1886. (1997). MHC class I antigen processing of Listeria monocytogenes Shen, H., Slifka,M. K., Matloubian, M., Jensen, E. R., Ahmed, R. & proteins: implications for dominant and subdominant CTL Miller, J. F. (1995). Recombinant Listeria monocytogenes as a live responses.ImmunolRev158,129–136. vaccinevehiclefortheinductionofprotectiveanti-viralcell-mediated Pandey,A.,Singh,N.,Vemula,S.V.,Coue¨til,L.,Katz,J.M.,Donis,R., immunity.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA92,3987–3991. Sambhara,S.&Mittal,S.K.(2012).Impactofpreexistingadenovirus Shiver,J.W.,Fu,T.M.,Chen,L.,Casimiro,D.R.,Davies,M.E.,Evans, vector immunity on immunogenicity and protection conferred with R.K.,Zhang,Z.Q.,Simon,A.J.,Trigona,W.L.&otherauthors(2002). anadenovirus-basedH5N1influenzavaccine.PLoSONE7,e33428. Replication-incompetent adenoviral vaccine vector elicits effective Peters,C.,Peng,X.,Douven,D.,Pan,Z.K.&Paterson,Y.(2003).The anti-immunodeficiency-virusimmunity.Nature415,331–335. induction of HIV Gag-specific CD8+ T cells in the spleen and gut- Sirard,J.C.,Niedergang,F.&Kraehenbuhl,J.P.(1999).Liveattenuated associated lymphoid tissue by parenteral or mucosal immunization Salmonella:aparadigmofmucosalvaccines.ImmunolRev171,5–26. with recombinant Listeria monocytogenes HIV Gag. J Immunol 170, Starks, H., Bruhn, K. W., Shen, H., Barry, R. A., Dubensky, T. W., 5176–5187. Brockstedt, D., Hinrichs, D. J., Higgins, D. E., Miller, J. F. & other Pichla-Gollon, S. L., Lin, S. W., Hensley, S. E., Lasaro, M. O., authors(2004).Listeriamonocytogenesasavaccinevector:virulence Herkenhoff-Haut,L.,Drinker,M.,Tatsis,N.,Gao,G.P.,Wilson,J.M. attenuation or existing antivector immunity does not diminish & other authors (2009). Effect of preexisting immunity on an therapeuticefficacy.JImmunol173,420–427. adenovirusvaccinevector:invitroneutralizationassaysfailtopredict Steffensen, M. A., Jensen, B. A. H., Holst, P. J., Bassi, M. R., inhibitionbyantiviralantibodyinvivo.JVirol83,5567–5573. Christensen, J. P. & Thomsen, A. R. (2012). Pre-existing vector Pine,S.O.,Kublin,J.G.,Hammer,S.M.,Borgerding,J.,Huang,Y., immunity does not prevent replication deficient adenovirus from Casimiro, D. R. & McElrath, M. J. (2011). Pre-existing adenovirus inducing efficient CD8 T-cell memory and recall responses. PLoS immunitymodifiesacomplexmixedTh1andTh2cytokineresponse ONE7,e34884. toanAd5/HIV-1vaccinecandidateinhumans.PLoSONE6,e18526. Stevens, R., Lavoy, A., Nordone, S., Burkhard, M. & Dean, G. A. Priddy, F. H., Brown, D., Kublin, J., Monahan, K., Wright, D. P., (2005). Pre-existing immunity to pathogenic Listeria monocytogenes Lalezari, J., Santiago, S., Marmor, M., Lally, M. & other authors does not prevent induction of immune responses to feline (2008). Safety and immunogenicity of a replication-incompetent immunodeficiency virus by a novel recombinant Listeria monocyto- adenovirus type 5 HIV-1 clade B gag/pol/nef vaccine in healthy genesvaccine.Vaccine23,1479–1490. adults.ClinInfectDis46,1769–1781. Stoyanov,C.T.,Boscardin,S.B.,Deroubaix,S.,Barba-Spaeth,G., Radosevic, K., Wieland, C. W., Rodriguez, A., Weverling, G. J., Franco, D., Nussenzweig, R. S., Nussenzweig, M. & Rice, C. M. Mintardjo,R.,Gillissen,G.,Vogels,R.,Skeiky,Y.A.,Hone,D.M.& (2010). Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a recombinant otherauthors(2007).Protectiveimmuneresponsestoarecombinant yellowfevervaccineagainstthemurinemalarialparasitePlasmodium adenovirus type 35 tuberculosis vaccine in two mouse strains: CD4 yoelii.Vaccine28,4644–4652. 10 Microbiology159