Virus-Infection or 59ppp-RNA Activates Antiviral Signal through Redistribution of IPS-1 Mediated by MFN1 KazuhideOnoguchi1,2,3,KojiOnomoto1,ShioriTakamatsu1,2,MichihikoJogi1,2,AzumiTakemura1,Shiho Morimoto1, Ilkka Julkunen4, Hideo Namiki3, Mitsutoshi Yoneyama5,6, Takashi Fujita1,2* 1DepartmentofMolecularGenetics,InstituteforVirusResearch,KyotoUniversity,Kyoto,Japan,2GraduateSchoolofBiostudies,KyotoUniversity,Yoshida-KonoeSakyo, Kyoto,Japan,3GraduateSchoolofScienceandEngineering,WasedaUniversity,Tokyo,Japan,4DepartmentofVaccinationandImmuneProtection,NationalInstitutefor HealthandWelfare,Helsinki,Finland,5DivisionofMolecularImmunology,MedicalMycologyResearchCenter,ChibaUniversity,Chuo-ku,Chiba,Japan,6PRESTO,Japan ScienceandTechnologyAgency,Saitama,Japan Abstract In virus-infected cells, RIG-I-like receptor (RLR) recognizes cytoplasmic viral RNA and triggers innate immune responses including production of typeI andIII interferon (IFN) and thesubsequent expression ofIFN-inducible genes. Interferon-b promoterstimulator1(IPS-1,alsoknownasMAVS,VISAandCardif)isadownstreammoleculeofRLRandisexpressedon theoutermembraneofmitochondria.WhileitisknownthatthelocationofIPS-1isessentialtoitsfunction,itsunderlying mechanismisunknown.Ouraiminthisstudywastodelineatethefunctionofmitochondriasoastoidentifymoreprecisely itsroleininnateimmunity.Indoingsowediscoveredthatviralinfectionaswellastransfectionwith59ppp-RNAresultedin theredistributionofIPS-1toformspeckle-likeaggregatesincells.WefurtherfoundthatMitofusin1(MFN1),akeyregulator ofmitochondrialfusionandaproteinassociatedwithIPS-1ontheoutermembraneofmitochondria,positivelyregulates RLR-mediated innate antiviral responses. Conversely, specific knockdown of MFN1 abrogates both the virus-induced redistribution of IPS-1 and IFN production. Our study suggests that mitochondria participate in the segregation of IPS-1 through theirfusionprocesses. Citation:OnoguchiK,OnomotoK,TakamatsuS,JogiM,TakemuraA,etal.(2010)Virus-Infectionor59ppp-RNAActivatesAntiviralSignalthroughRedistribution ofIPS-1MediatedbyMFN1.PLoSPathog6(7):e1001012.doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001012 Editor:C.ChengKao,IndianaUniversity,UnitedStatesofAmerica ReceivedFebruary17,2010;AcceptedJune18,2010;PublishedJuly22,2010 Copyright:(cid:2)2010Onoguchietal.Thisisanopen-accessarticledistributedunderthetermsoftheCreativeCommonsAttributionLicense,whichpermits unrestricteduse,distribution,andreproductioninanymedium,providedtheoriginalauthorandsourcearecredited. Funding:TheMinistryofEducation,Culture,Sports,ScienceandTechnologyofJapan(http://www.mext.go.jp/english/),theMinistryofHealth,Labourand WelfareofJapan(http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/index.html),thePRESTOJapanScienceandTechnologyAgency(http://www.jst.go.jp/kisoken/presto/index_e. html),theUeharaMemorialFoundation(http://www.ueharazaidan.com/),theMochidaMemorialFoundationforMedicalandPharmaceuticalResearch(http:// www.mochida.co.jp/zaidan/l),andNipponBoehringerIngelheim(http://www.boehringer-ingelheim.co.jp/com/Home/index.jsp).Thefundershadnoroleinstudy design,datacollectionandanalysis,decisiontopublish,orpreparationofthemanuscript. CompetingInterests:Theauthorshavedeclaredthatnocompetinginterestsexist. *E-mail:[email protected] Introduction in the redistribution of IPS-1, as well as in virus-induced IFN production. Our study highlights the novel mitochondrial Type I and III interferons (IFNs) play central roles in innate regulatory function of specifically sorting IPS-1 and providing a immune responses to viral infections [1,2,3,4]. In a variety of signaling platformfor antiviral responses. tissues, IFN production is triggered by a cytoplasmic sensor, retinoicacidinduciblegeneI(RIG-I)-likeReceptor(RLR),which Results specificallysensesviralRNAandinducesantiviralsignaling[5,6]. Once RLR is activated, its signal is relayed through physical Dynamic redistribution of IPS-1 in virus-infected or interactiontoIFN-bpromoterstimulator1(IPS-1,alsoknownas 59ppp-RNA-transfected cells MAVS,VISAorCardif)[7,8,9,10].IPS-1 interactswithmultiple ToexaminethelocalizationofIPS-1duringviralinfections,we signal transducers and protein kinases that activate transcription generated HeLa cell lines stably expressing FLAG-tagged IPS-1 factors to induce IFN and other cytokine genes [11]. IPS-1 is (IPS-1-HeLaclones,Fig.1).Althoughthetemporaryexpressionof expressed on the mitochondrial outer membrane and this wildtype(wt)IPS-1resultsinconstitutivesignaling[7,8,9,10],the localization is essential for signaling to occur [9]. However the stable cell lines did not exhibit the constitutive activation of reason for this underlying mechanism is unknown. Here, we downstream target genes. However, upon infection with the investigatedthecellulardistributionofIPS-1invirus-infectedcells. Sendaivirus(SeV),thecellsexhibitedincreasedexpressionofIFN We observed that IPS-1 is usually distributed evenly in all and chemokine genes (IFNB1, IL29, IL28A, IL28B and CXCL11) mitochondria in uninfected cells, however upon viral infection or andinterferon-stimulatedgenes(DDX58,IFIH1,DHX58,IFIT1-3, the introduction of 59ppp-RNA, which mimics viral RNA and OASL) (Fig. 1Band C). Furthermore, the IPS-1-HeLa clones [12,13,14], a redistribution of IPS-1 occurred, resulting in a exhibited diminished susceptibility to Encephalomyocarditis virus speckle-like pattern on mitochondria. Furthermore, we demon- (EMCV) replication (1 to 2 log) (Fig. 1D). The low basal activity stratedthatamitochondrialGTPase,Mitofusin1(MFN1),which andelevatedsignalingafterSeV-infectionsuggestthatFLAG-IPS- regulatesmitochondrialfissionandfusion[15],playsacriticalrole 1isunderaregulatorycontrolsimilartothatofendogenousIPS-1. PLoSPathogens | www.plospathogens.org 1 July2010 | Volume 6 | Issue 7 | e1001012 RedistributionofIPS-1 foci of NP in the cytoplasm and induced foci of RIG-I to form Author Summary (Fig. 5A) [16]. RIG-I was evenly distributed in the cytoplasm, Virus-infections,suchasinfluenzaandchronichepatitisC, howeversomeofthefocico-localizedwiththoseofNP(Fig.5A).A areprominentdiseasesandoutbreaksofnewlyemerging similarformationoffociandco-localizationwithviralnucleopro- viruses are serious problems for modern society. Higher teincomplexwasobservedwithotherviruses(Ko.O.unpublished animals, including humans, are genetically equipped with observations). IPS-1 accumulated on the periphery of the foci of mechanisms, collectively known as innate immunity, to RIG-I (Fig. 5B) and NP (Fig. 5C). We speculate that activated counteract viral infections. RIG-I-like receptor (RLR), a RIG-I recruits IPS-1, because RIG-I and IPS-1 interacted with cytoplasmic sensor, contributes to immune regulation by eachotherthroughCARD-CARDinteraction[7,8].IPS-1didnot detectinginfectionsbyRNAvirusesandtriggeringaseries co-localizewithRIG-InorNPpresumablybecausemitochondria of responses which results in the activation of innate do not penetrate these foci nor is IPS-1 released from antiviral genes. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated mitochondria. Immunoelectron microscopy using the anti-NP that IPS-1, the adaptor protein of RLR, is expressed on antibody clearly identified the NP foci (Fig. 6A), and anti-FLAG mitochondrial outer membrane. Mitochondrion is an organelle of prokaryotic cell origin; it regulates energy staining (Fig. 6B) showed that mitochondrial IPS-1 accumulated production, and is involved in cell growth and cell death. on theperiphery of NPfoci inNDVinfectedcells. Why IPS-1 is located on the mitochondrial outer mem- brane and how mitochondria are involved in antiviral A dominant negative mutant of RIG-I does not induce signalingareyettobeexplainedclearly.Inthisreport,we IPS-1 redistribution discoveredthatmitochondrialfusionproteinMFN1playsa To determine if the observed redistribution of IPS-1 is novel function to mediate IPS-1 redistribution, which functionally relevant, we used a point mutant of RIG-I (K270A), appears tobe acritical stepin RLRsignaling. which normally recognizes ligand RNA but functions as a dominant negative inhibitor (Fig. 7A) [14]. It was observed that NDVinfectioninducedfociofbothwtandK270ARIG-Itoform Like endogenous IPS-1, FLAG-tagged IPS-1 is expressed on (Fig. 7B), however wt but not K270A promoted the speckled mitochondria in uninfected cells as shown by co-staining with staining pattern of IPS-1 (Fig. 7C). The results indicate that the MitoTracker (Fig. 2A, Mock). However, compared to the even redistributionofIPS-1isstronglycorrelatedwiththeactivationof cytoplasmicstaininginthemock-infectedcells,thestainingpattern antiviral signaling. ofIPS-1becamenoticeablyspeckledinSeV-infectedcells(Fig.2A, SeV). Quantification of the fluorescence image revealed that Mitofusin 1, but not Mitofusin 2, plays a critical role in mitochondriaheavilystainedwithMitoTrackerbutlightlystained with anti-FLAG antibody were produced in SeV-infected cells. RIG-I-induced antiviral signaling Thisredistributionwasalsoobservedwithanothermitochondrial RIG-I was originally identified by screening an expression marker, endoplasmic reticulum-associated amyloid b-peptide- cDNA library [17]. In addition to the cDNA encoding RIG-I, bindingprotein(ERAB)(Fig.2B),anddifferentviruses(Newcastle there were several other candidate cDNA clones which enhance disease virus (NDV), Sindbis virus, EMCV, Influenza virus, and virus-responsive reporter activity. Two of the independent clones Vesicular stomatitis virus(VSV)) (Fig.3). encodedafull-lengthprotein,Mitofusin1(MFN1).HumanMFN1 We also examined the distribution of IPS-1 in 59ppp-RNA- is composed of 741 amino acids and domains of GTPase and transfected cells. Unlike synthetic single stranded RNA (59OH- transmembranes(Fig.8A).MFN1togetherwithitsrelatedprotein RNA),59ppp-RNAisachemicalligandforRIG-Iandisknownto Mitofusin 2 (MFN2) is expressed on the outer membrane of mimic viral signaling [12,13,14]. Interestingly, as with a viral mitochondria and regulates mitochondrial dynamics [18,19]. infection, 59ppp-RNA induced a redistribution of IPS-1, suggest- Hyper- and hypo-functioning of either MFN1 or MFN2 result ingthattheredistributionwastriggeredthroughRIG-Isignaling. in elongated/aggregated and fragmented mitochondria, respec- ItisworthnotingthatEMCV,whichselectivelyactivatesanother tively. GTPase activity was previously shown to be essential for RLR, melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5), also mitochondrial morphological change, particularly the fragmenta- caused the redistribution of IPS-1, suggesting that this effect is tionofmitochondriainducedbyaGTP-binding-deficientmutant common to RLRs. We suspected that IPS-1-HeLa cells exhibit of MFN1(MFN1T109A)[18]. enhancedredistributionofIPS-1duetoenhancedsignaling(.10 Consistentwiththescreeningresults,overexpressionofMFN1, IFN-b mRNA accumulation, Fig. 1B). This led us to analyze the butnotMFN2,augmentedIFN-bpromoteractivity(Fig.8B).The distribution pattern of endogenous IPS-1 in HeLa cells, and we GTPase activity is involved in this MFN1 function, since MFN1 observed that the distribution pattern of endogenous IPS-1 T109A significantly inhibited the signaling induced by NDV or changed in SeV-infected cells, although exclusive staining by 59ppp-RNA(Fig.8CandD).Itisworthnotingthatoverexpression mitochondrialmarkerwasnotobserved(Fig.4A).SimilartoIPS- ofMFN1,whichresultsinelongatedmitochondria,isnotbyitself 1-HeLacells,weobservedthathepatocellularcarcinomaSKHep1 sufficient to deliver the signal. To confirm that the increased cells NDV, SeV, Influenza virus, or Sindbis virus infection also signaling observed by MFN1 overexpression was correlated with inducedaspeckledstainingpatterninendogenousIPS-1(Fig.4B), RIG-Iactivation,wetransfectedcellswithacombinationofRIG-I anddisplayedenhancedIRF-3dimerizationwhencomparedwith and MFN1. The RIG-I/MFN1 combination showed enhanced HeLa cells (our unpublished data). This suggests that the IFN-b promoter activity, but the RIG-I K270A mutant/MFN1 redistribution is not simply an artifact due to the overexpression combination failed to do so (Fig. 8E). MEFs derived from mice of FLAG-IPS-1. withdisruptedMfn1orMfn2genewasusedtoconfirmthespecific involvementofMFN1invirus-inducedantiviralsignaling(Fig.9A Localization of viral nucleocapsid, RIG-I, and IPS-1 and B). The results indicated that MFN1, but not MFN2, is InordertoactivateRLRsignaling,weusedNDVtoinfectcells essential for thesignal transduction mediatedby RIG-I. becauseitisavailableananti-nucleocapsidprotein(NP)antibody, We examined other regulatory proteins for mitochondrial aprobefortheviralRNA-NPcomplex.NDVinfectionresultedin fission/fusion mechanism. Optic atrophy protein 1 (OPA1) is PLoSPathogens | www.plospathogens.org 2 July2010 | Volume 6 | Issue 7 | e1001012 RedistributionofIPS-1 Figure1.StableHeLacellclonesexpressingFLAGtaggedIPS-1.A,ExpressionofFLAG-IPS-1wasexaminedincontrolandIPS-1-expressing HeLaclones(#2,17,and21)byimmunoblottingusinganti-FLAGantibody.B,ExpressionofIFNB1incontrolandIPS-1-HeLacellswasexaminedby quantitativerealtimePCR(qRT-PCR).Openandfilledbarsindicatemock-treatedandSeV-infectedcellsfor12h,respectively.Datarepresentmeans 6s.d.(n=3).C,ExpressionprofilesofcytokineandchemokinegenesincontrolandIPS-1-HeLacells.TotalRNAextractedfromindicatedcellsmock- treatedorSeV-infectedfor12hwassubjectedtoanalysisusingaDNAmicroarray.RelativemRNAlevelsusingacontrolexpressionof1.0areshown. D,ReplicationofEMCVincontrolandIPS-1-HeLaclones.TheindicatedcellcloneswereinfectedwithEMCVataMOIof1or10.Theviraltiterinthe culturemediumat24hpost-infectionwasdeterminedwiththeplaqueassay.Datarepresentmeans6s.d.(n=3). doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001012.g001 PLoSPathogens | www.plospathogens.org 3 July2010 | Volume 6 | Issue 7 | e1001012 RedistributionofIPS-1 Figure2.RedistributionofIPS-1inSeV-infectedcells.A,TheIPS-1-HeLaclone#2wasmock-treatedorinfectedwithSeVfor12handstained with MitoTracker (Mitochondria) and anti-FLAG antibody (FLAG-IPS-1). Nuclei were visualized by staining with DAPI throughout this study. The fluorescentimagewasquantifiedintheareaindicatedbyblueline(rightmostpanel).Quantificationresultsfrommock-orSeV-infectedcellsare shownatthebottom.FluorescenceofDAPIcorrespondstoareainthenucleus.ThemitochondriaheavilystainedwithMitoTrackerbutlightlystained withanti-FLAGareshownbyarrows.B,IPS-1-HeLacellsweremock-treatedorinfectedwithSeVfor12h.Cellswerestainedwithanti-FLAGantibody (FLAG-IPS-1)andanti-ERABantibody(ERAB). doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001012.g002 PLoSPathogens | www.plospathogens.org 4 July2010 | Volume 6 | Issue 7 | e1001012 RedistributionofIPS-1 Figure 3. Redistribution of IPS-1 induced by virus-infection and 59ppp-RNA-transfection. IPS-1-HeLa cells were infected with the indicatedvirusesortransfectedwith59OH-RNAor59ppp-RNAchemicallysynthesizedbyinvitrotranscriptionusingT7RNApolymerase.At12hpost- infectionor-transfection,thecellswerestainedwithanti-FLAGantibodyandMitoTracker(Mitochondria).Arrowheadsshowdeadcellswithshrunk nucleiinSindbisvirus-infectedcells. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001012.g003 PLoSPathogens | www.plospathogens.org 5 July2010 | Volume 6 | Issue 7 | e1001012 RedistributionofIPS-1 Figure4.RedistributionofendogenousIPS-1invirus-infectedcells.A,HeLacellswereinfectedwithMockorSeVfor12h.Thecellswere stainedwithanti-IPS-1antibodyandMitoTracker(Mitochondria).B,SKHep1cellswereinfectedwithNDV,SeV,Influenzavirus,orSindbisvirusfor 12h.Thecellswerestainedwithanti-IPS-1antibodyandMitoTracker(Mitochondria). doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001012.g004 PLoSPathogens | www.plospathogens.org 6 July2010 | Volume 6 | Issue 7 | e1001012 RedistributionofIPS-1 Figure 5. Localization of viral nucleocapsid, RIG-I, and IPS-1. A, HeLa cells were infected with NDV for 12h and stained with anti-RIG-I antibody(RIG-I)andanti-NPantibody(NDVNP).BandC,IPS-1-HeLacellswereinfectedwithNDVfor12handstainedwithanti-FLAGantibodyand anti-RIG-Iantibodyoranti-NPantibody. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001012.g005 PLoSPathogens | www.plospathogens.org 7 July2010 | Volume 6 | Issue 7 | e1001012 RedistributionofIPS-1 Figure6.LocalizationofIPS-1andmitochondria.A,IPS-1-HeLacellsinfectedwithNDVfor9hwerefixed,stainedwithanti-NPantibody,and subjectedtoultrathinsectioningasshownintheMethods.Theareaenclosedbyaredrectangleisenlarged.NP:NPfocistainedwiththeanti-NP antibody were visualized using gold particles. B, IPS-1-HeLa cells infected with NDV for 9h were fixed, stained with anti-FLAG antibody, and subjected to ultra thin sectioning. The area enclosed by a red rectangle is enlarged. NP: morphologically similar structures are in A. IPS-1 was visualizedusinggoldparticles.ThearrowheadsindicateboundariesbetweenIPS-1andNPfoci. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001012.g006 expressedon,andimplicatedinthefusion ofthemitochondrial Physical interaction between IPS-1 and MFN1 inner membrane [20]. Three independent siRNA targeting ToexplorethemolecularmechanismofhowIPS-1isregulated OPA1,down-regulatedOPA1expression(Fig.9C)andpartially by MFN1, co-immunoprecipitation was performed using cells (up to 50%) blocked NDV-induced signaling (Fig. 9D). How- stably expressing IPS-1. FLAG-IPS-1 was precipitated by anti- ever, the knockdown of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) FLAG and the associated proteins were analyzed by immuno- (Fig.9E),whichregulatesmitochondrialfission[21]resultingin blotting(Fig.10).BothMFN1andMFN2constitutivelyassociated elongated mitochondria, did not have a significant effect with IPS-1 in the cells, but an unrelated mitochondrial outer (Fig. 9F). To explore the site where MFN1 is active, we membrane protein, BCL-XL, did not associate with IPS-1. temporarily overexpressed the dominant active RIG-I (RIG-I Furthermore, OPA1 and DRP1 did not co-immunoprecipitate CARD) [17] or IPS-1 in wt and Mfn-knockout MEFs. Unlike with FLAG-IPS-1. These data suggest that IPS-1 selectively the signal generated by the overexpression of IPS-1, the signal associates withMFN1and MFN2. generated by overexpression of the RIG-I tandem caspase recruitment domain (CARD) clearly required MFN1. MFN1 however, is dispensable if IPS-1 is overexpressed (Fig. 9G). Knockdown of MFN1 inhibits the redistribution of IPS-1 Again, MFN2 exhibited little influence on the signaling induced by viral infection triggered by either stimulus. These results indicate that Next,weexaminedwhateffecttheknockdownofMFN1would MFN1, but not MFN2, is essential for signal transduction have on the virus-induced redistribution of IPS-1. Three mediated by RIG-I and IPS-1. independent siRNA efficiently knocked down MFN1 expression PLoSPathogens | www.plospathogens.org 8 July2010 | Volume 6 | Issue 7 | e1001012 RedistributionofIPS-1 Figure7.AdominantnegativemutantofRIG-IfailstoinduceIPS-1redistribution.A,IPS-1-HeLacellsstablyexpressingwild-typehuman RIG-I(RIG-IWT)ormutantRIG-I(RIG-IK270A)weremock-treatedorinfectedwithNDVfor12handexpressionofIFNB1mRNAwasanalyzedbyqRT- PCR.OpenandfilledbarsindicateRNAsamplesfrommock-treatedandNDV-infectedcells,respectively.Datarepresentmeans6s.d.(n=3).B,IPS-1- HeLacellsexpressingRIG-IWTorRIG-IK270AwereinfectedwithNDVfor12handstainedwithanti-RIG-Iantibodyandanti-NPantibody.RIG-I stainingisdiffuseinuninfectedcellshoweverinfectionbyNDVproducedRIG-Ifoci.SomeRIG-Ifociareco-localizedwithNDVNPfoci.C,IPS-1-HeLa cellsexpressingRIG-IWTorRIG-IK270AwereinfectedwithNDVfor12handIPS-1redistributionwasexamined.IPS-1andNPwerestainedwithanti- IPS-1antibodyandanti-NPantibody,respectively.Theareaenclosedbytheredrectangleisenlargedattheright.AlthoughtheredistributedIPS-1 surroundsNPfociinRIG-IWTcells,K270AmutationofRIG-IfailedtoinducetheredistributionofIPS-1,butnottheformationofNPfoci. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001012.g007 (Fig. 11A) resulting in a strong inhibition of the NDV-induced IFN gene activation. This correlates with prior observations that IFN-b gene expression in HeLa cells and IPS-1-HeLa cells although IFN production is inhibited by LGP2 overexpression, (Fig. 11B and 11C). This once again suggests that IPS-1-HeLa viral yield does not increase [22]. When control siRNA-treated cellstendtobehavelikenormalcells.UponNDVinfection,IPS-I cells were infected with NDV, a redistribution of IPS-1 was displayedaspeckledstainingpatternincontrolcells,butnotinthe observed (69.3615.7% of cells positive for NP). In MFN1- MFN1-knockdown cells (Fig. 11D). Though the intensity of NP knockdown cells, although NDV infection resulted in the stainingdidnotincrease,MFN1-knockdownsignificantlyinhibited formation of NP foci, IPS-1 redistribution did not occur PLoSPathogens | www.plospathogens.org 9 July2010 | Volume 6 | Issue 7 | e1001012 RedistributionofIPS-1 Figure8.MFN1isinvolvedinantiviralsignaling.A,SchematicrepresentationoftheMFN1domain.B,L929cellsweretransfectedwithavirus- responsive reporter gene (p-125 Luc) and either an empty vector (Empty), an expression vector for MFN1, or an expression vector for MFN2 as indicated.48hafterthetransfection,cellsweremock-treatedorinfectedwithNDV.Luciferaseactivitywasdeterminedat12hafterinfection.Cand D,L929cellsweretransfectedwithavirus-responsivereportergene(p-125Luc)andeitheranemptyvector(Empty)oranexpressionvectorforMFN1 oritsmutant(MFN1T109A)asindicated.At48haftertransfection,cellsweremock-treated,infectedwithNDV,ortransfectedwith59OH-RNAor 59ppp-RNA.Luciferaseactivitywasdeterminedat12h(C)or9h(D)afterinduction.E,L929cellsweretransfectedwithavirus-responsivereporter gene(p-125Luc)andcombinationsoftheindicatedvectors.48hafterthetransfection,cellsweremock-treatedorinfectedwithNDV.Luciferase activitywasdetermined12hafterinfection. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1001012.g008 (4.561.3%ofcellspositiveforNP).Asimilareffectwasobserved studyexhibitedverylowbasalexpressionofIFNgenes,whichled when MFN1-knockdown cells were infected with SeV (Fig. 12). us to speculate that IPS-I inhibitory protein(s) is up regulated in These results strongly suggest that MFN1 is critical to the theseclones.WealsoexaminedtheexpressionlevelofNLRX1,an redistribution of IPS-1 triggered by RIG-I mediated sensing of IPS-1 inhibitor [23], and noted no change in its expression level viral RNA. (notshown).Similarly,levelsofMFN1andMFN2didnotchange intheIPS-1-HeLa clones. (Fig.10,input). Discussion WeobservedthattheIPS-1leveldidnotchangeforupto12h in virus-infected cells and no specific modification of IPS-1 was RIG-Imediatedantiviralsignalingisacriticalantiviralresponse identified up to that point. We therefore hypothesize that the whichisinitiatedwhentheRIG-IsensorrecognizesviralRNA.A activationstatusofIPS-1isdeterminedbyitslocalizationpattern. signalisrelayedtoIPS-1,amitochondrialregulatorwhichdelivers We speculate that the mechanism of mitochondrial fusion is thesignaldownstream.Interestingly,theIPS-1-HeLaclonesinthis mediated by MFN1, and that IPS-1 translocates from some PLoSPathogens | www.plospathogens.org 10 July2010 | Volume 6 | Issue 7 | e1001012
Description: