ebook img

Politics to the Extreme: American Political Institutions in the Twenty-First Century PDF

263 Pages·2013·6.386 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Politics to the Extreme: American Political Institutions in the Twenty-First Century

Politics to the Extreme This page intentionally left blank Politics to the Extreme American Political Institutions in the Twenty-First Century Edited by Scott A. Frisch and Sean Q Kelly Foreword by Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein POLITICSTOTHEEXTREME Copyright © Scott A. Frisch and Sean Q Kelly, 2013. Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2013 978-1-137-32492-4 All rights reserved. First published in 2013 by PALGRAVE MACMILLAN® in the United States— a division of St. Martin’s Press LLC, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010. Where this book is distributed in the UK, Europe and the rest of the world, this is by Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited, registered in England, company number 785998, of Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS. Palgrave Macmillan is the global academic imprint of the above companies and has companies and representatives throughout the world. Palgrave® and Macmillan® are registered trademarks in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe and other countries. ISBN 978-1-137-36142-4 ISBN 978-1-137-31276-1 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9781137312761 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available from the Library of Congress. A catalogue record of the book is available from the British Library. Design by Newgen Knowledge Works (P) Ltd., Chennai, India. First edition: December 2013 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 CContents List of Illustrations vii AAcknowledgments ix Foreword xi Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein Introduction: Politics to the Extreme xvv Scott A. Frisch and Sean Q Kelly Part I Causes and Consequences of Partisan Polarization 1 Appropriations to the Extreme: Partisanship and the Power of the Purse 3 Geoffrey W. Buhl, Scott A. Frisch, and Sean Q Kelly 2 The Gingrich Senators, the Tea Party Senators, and Their Effect on the US Senate 23 Sean M. Theriault 3 The Weaponization of Congressional Oversight: The Politics of the Watchful Eye, 1947–2010 47 David C. W. Parker andMatthew Dull 4 Taking Incivility Seriously: Analyzing Breaches of Decorum in the US Congress (1891–2012) 71 Lawrence C. Dodd and Scot Schraufnagel 5 Let’s Play Hardball: Congressional Partisanship in the Television Era 93 Douglas B. Harris 6 Profile Politics: Examining Polarization through Congressional Member Facebook Pages 117 José Marichal 7 Necessary and Damaging: Presidential Base Electoral Strategies and Partisan Polarization 135 Lara M. Brown vi Contents 8 AA Pollarizing Court? AAnallyzing Juddiciall Decisions in a Red/Blue America 161 Kevin J. McMahon Part II Bridging the Partisan Divide 9 Growing Apart: “Civilista” Attempts to Bridge the Partisan Rift 187 Frank H. Mackaman 10 Can Polarization Be “Fixed”? California’s Experiment with the Top-two Primary 205 Seth E. Masket 11 How to Turn Democrats and Republicans into Americans 219 Mickey Edwards AAbout the Authors 227 Index 233 Illustrations Figures 0.1 The “Disappearing Center” in the House of Representatives xviii 0.2 The “Disappearing Center” in the Senate xix 0.3 Party Unity Votes in the House (Solid Line) and Senate (Dashed Line) xx 0.4 Theoretical Distributions of Voters in an American-style Two-stage Election xxi 1.1 Intra- and Interparty Distances on Appropriations Votes in the House 14 1.2 Intra- and Interparty Distances on Appropriations Votes in the Senate 16 1.3 Interparty difference in the House and Senate and the Passage of Appropriations Bills 18 2.1 Polarization Scores for the Democrats, Gingrich Senators, and the Other Republicans 32 2.2 Polarization Scores Based on Roll-Call Votes in 2011 33 2.3 Presidential Support Scores of Democrats, Other Republicans, Gingrich Senators, and Tea Party Senators 35 2.4 Amendments offered by Democrats, Other Republicans, Gingrich Senators, and Tea Party Senators 38 3.1 Congressional Investigations by Chamber, 1947–2010 55 3.2 Congressional Committee Investigations, Days, and Pages by Chamber, 1947–2010 56 3.3 TheNew York Timess Coverage of High-publicity Congressional Committee Probes, 1947–2010 60 4.1 Party Polarization and the Differentiation between the Depolarized and Polarized Spectrums of Conflict 78 4.2 I ncivility and Party Polarization over Time: rr = 0.58, p < 0.001 82 4.3 Percent of Articles on Incivilities by Partisan Context: Different Polarization Scenarios 84 viii Illustrations 4.4 P ercent off AArticlles on Incivillities bby Topic: Difffferent Polarization Scenarios 89 5.1 House “Democratic Message Board” Membership by Ideological Decile, One Hundred and First Congress. 100 5.2 House Republican “Theme Team” Membership by Ideological Decile 101 5.3 House Democrats’ Appearances on Hardball by Ideological Decile 102 5.4 House Republicans’ Appearances on Hardball by Ideological Decile 102 7.1 Percent of Polarized States, 1872–1892 147 7.2 Percent of Polarized States, 1992–2012 147 7.3 Difference of Means (DW-NOMINATE) in Congress, 1878–1892 and 1996–2010 149 7.4 Turnout Levels (VAP) in Presidential Elections, 1872–1892 and 1992–2012 150 10.1 Polarization in California 206 10.2 Percentage of Incumbents Challenged from Within their Party in Primaries, by Office 212 10.3 P ercentages of Incumbents Challenged from Within their Party in Primaries, by Party 213 10.4 Same-party Runoffs in Assembly, Senate, and US House Elections 215 Tables 2.1 DeMint Campaign Contributions to Senate Candidates, 2010 29 2.2 Polarization Scores for Republicans, 2011 31 3.1 The Mean Number and Intensity of Congressional Investigations in Divided and Unified Government, 1947–2010 57 3.2 Divided Government, Watergate, and the Effect of Increasing Committee Staff on Congressional Investigations, 1947–2010 58 3.3 High-publicity Congressional Probes in Divided and Unified Government, Pre- and Post-1974 61 4.1 Bivariate Correlations between Three Forms of Incivility and Landmark Productivity in Polarized versus Depolarized Congresses, 1891–1994 86 7.1 National Electoral Comparison of 1872–1894 and 1992–2012 143 7.2 Party Means by Chamber (DW-NOMINATE), 1878–1892 and 1996–2010 149 9.1 Obstacles and Solutions to Civility 190 Acknowledgments TTT he chapters for this book were first written for a conference titled Politicss to the Extreme: American Political Institutions in the Twenty-First Centuryy held on the campus of California State University Channel Islands October 17–18, 2012. In the course of our research on a book about the congressio- nal appropriations process, it was becoming increasingly clear that ideological and partisan extremism was infiltrating a traditional bastion of bipartisan- ship. With the encouragement of our campus president, Dr. Richard Rush, wwe resolved to invite some of the nation’s leading political scientists and ppolitical commentators to our campus to gauge the extent to which extrem- ity was affecting American politics generally. Shortly thereafter, Tom Mann and Norm Ornstein released their book It’ss Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collidedd With the New Politics of Extremism. Mann and Ornstein eagerly accepted our invitation to participate in the discussion, as did Mickey Edwards who was ppreparing to publish his own book The Parties Versus the People: How to Turnn Republicans and Democrats into Americans. The core of academics who pre- sented the papers reflected in this volume enthusiastically agreed to partici- ppate and contribute their essays, which reflect novel and creative attempts to understand the causes and consequences of extremity in American politics, and offer potential solutions for the hyperconflictual state of our contempo- rary national politics. It was not our purpose, however, to allow political scientists to simply “talk among themselves.” We included both political scientists and political ppractitioners and pundits in our sessions. The “practitioners and pundits” ensured that the political scientists did not bathe themselves in excessive and lofty theoretical debate; academic commentators ensured that the papers wwere properly vetted for academic quality. By combining academic and prac- tical perspectives in the conference, these chapters reflect both points off vview. We thank Brian Newman, Jennifer Merolla, Michael Willis, Christian Grose, Howard Marlowe, Lawrence Becker, Thomas Brunell, Les Francis, Darry Sragow, Sarah Anderson, Chris den Hartog, Lou Cannon, Rickk Hasen, Amanda Hollis-Brusky, Timm Herdt, and Joe Mathews for theirr wwiilllliinnggnneessss ttoo ppllaayy aann iinntteeggrraall ppaarrtt iinn tthhee ccoonnffeerreennccee aanndd pprroovviiddee vvaalluuaabbllee feedback for the authors.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.