Playing on Words a Guide to Luciano Berio's Sinfonia ROYAL MUSICAL ASSOCIATION MONOGRAPHS General editor: David Fallows This series is supported by funds made available to the Royal Musical Association from the estate of Thurston Dart, former King Edward Professor of Music in the University of London. The editorial board is the Publications Committee of the Association. No.1: Playing on Words: a Guide to Luciano Berids Sinfonia (1985) by David Osmond-Smith No. 2: The Oratorio in Venice (1986) by Denis and Elsie Arnold No. 3: Music for Treviso Cathedral in the Late Sixteenth Century: a Reconstruction of the Lost Manuscripts 29 and 30 (1987) by Bonnie J. Blackburn No. 4: The Breath of the Symphonist: Shostakovich's Tenth (1988) by David Fanning ROYAL MUSICAL ASSOCIATION MONOGRAPHS Playing on Words a Guide to Luciano Berio's Sinfonia DAVID OSMOND-SMITH Lecturer in Music, University of Sussex First published 1985 by Ashgate Publishing Published 2016 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OXI4 4RN 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017, USA Routledge is an imprint oft he Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © The Royal Musical Association 1985 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe. First published in 1985; unaltered reprint 1989 British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Osmond-Smith, David Playing on words: a guide to Luciano Berio's Sinionia. - (Royal Musical Association monographs; no. 1) 1. Berio, Luciano. Sinfonia 1. TItle II. Series 785.1 '1'0924 MU10.8491 ISBN: 9780947854003 (hbk) This book is typeset by Goodfellow & Egan., Cambridge The music examples were produced by Paul Courtenay Copies may be obtained from: Brian Jordan (agent) or RMA Secretary (members) 12 Green Street Cambridge CB23JU Transferred to Digital Printing 2014 Contents Preface vii 1 Sinfonia and its Precursors 1 Work in progress 4 An overview of Sinfonia 5 2 Mythologiques 8 The sources of Berio's text 9 Isolated words and their function 12 Phonetic materials 13 The poetics of fragmentation 13 Coherence as structure 15 Musical structure 15 3 '0 King' 21 Structural properties of the pitch set 22 The pitch set in macrocosm 23 Climax and epilogue 25 The rhythmic set 26 Upbeat patterns 27 The growth of rhythmic stability 28 Rhythmic commentary in Sinfonia 30 Parallel processes in rhythm and pitch 30 Selective resonance 31 Independent melodic lines 32 Pitches outside the set 33 Harmonic commentary upon the chamber version in Sinfonia 34 v The text and its structural potential 34 Permutation and troping 37 4 'In ruhig f1iessender Bewegung' 39 From sermon to scherzo 40 Texts for a sermon 41 Obliteration as form 43 Reduction and distortion 46 Quotation 47 Chromatic clusters 50 Semantic associations of Mahler's scherzo 53 Sources for the text 54 Interactions between text and music 56 An inventory of interrelations 57 5 Synthesis and Dissolution 72 The fourth movement 72 Rhythm and texture 73 The text 74 The fifth movement 74 Before '0 King' 77 Materials from '0 King' 78 Superposed materials 79 The final monody 81 Text and music 86 Firevs. Water 87 M.l vs. M.124 88 'La vie breve' 88 6 Epilogue 90 Bibliography 92 Index 94 vi Preface This study is indebted to several people. First, and most obviously, to Luciano Berio - not only because he provided the subject matter, but because he suggested to me many years ago that Sintonia would repay close attention. He read a version of the resultant monograph several drafts back, and I must thank him for some all-too pertinent criticisms. I must also thank Joan Peyser for permission to reprint materials from an essay on Berio and Levi-Strauss that appeared in The Musical Quarterly, and David Fallows for the benign editorial harassment without which this study would have made more arduous reading than it now does. None of these beneficent critics (d. p.ll and 88) is responsible for the lacunae which I wish other analysts the joy of discovering. I base my observations throughout on the printed score of Sintonia issued in 1972 (Universal Edition, no. 13783). This replaced a photo copy of the manuscript that was made available in 1%9 (no.13f783). It corrected a number of errors in the manuscript version (though alas, not all) and also allowed Berio to rethink various matters of detail. In two instances where this reworking has rather wider for mal implications the differences between the two versions have been noted; otherwise, I have confined myself to the 1972 score, regarded by the composer as definitive. The aim of the study is not to give a complete deScription, but rather to pursue through the work all musically pertinent processes - to avoid, in other words, the tautology of reasserting in words what will be self-evident to the score-reader, while seeking to deploy analytical propositions where they are most useful to the musician: in suggesting a wider formal context within which individual details make sense. vii 1 Sinfonia and its Precursors It is no accident that often I instinctively find myself working on different projects at the same time, amusing myself with one and sweating blood over another. But it is the tendency towards reunion that justifies the tendency to many-sidedness. Luciano Beriol Because Berio has found the simultaneous pursuit of two or three musical projects so congenial. his large-scale compositions have tended to take on a special role in relation to the rest of his work. They have provided the framework within which the exhilaration of these centrifugal enthusiasms could be countered by an act of synthesis. Such 'encyclopaedic' works recur throughout Berio's career: AlIez-Hop (1959), Epifanie (1961), Sinfonia (1968), Opera (1970) and Coro (1975--6) are all to a greater or lesser extent examples of this tendency. But whereas AlIez-Hop and Epifanie unite their disparate materials simply by placing them side by side, Sinfonia and Coro go beyond this, compelling different musical concerns to interact in the moment of composition itself. This is one of the primary reasons why they occupy so central a position within Berio's reuvre.2 In Sinfonia Berio synthesised several of his most long-standing concerns, making them literally 'sound together' as the title indicates. Throughout the sixties he had experimented with the resources of the human voice - not merely the range of articulation and tone that it could offer, but also the ways in which it could enhance the musical impact of language by emphasising, or indeed isolating its phonetic components. At first he had concentrated on the solo voice - in Circles (1%0), Epifanie (1961) and above all Sequenza III (1965--6) - while exploring in a fairly straightforward way the juxtaposition of singing and speaking groups in Passaggio (1962) 1 Berio 1985, p.lOO. 2 It is also, no doubl, one of the reasons why Sinton", in particular has attracted a good deal of commentary. The studies by Altmann and Hicks are referred 10 in Ihe lexl, bUI Ihe reader should also nole Budde 1972, Dressen 1982, Flynn 1975, Jahnke 1973, Krieger and Stroh 1971, Ravizza 1974 and Stoianova 1974. 2
Description: