ebook img

Pigment Cell Growth. Proceedings of the Third Conference on the Biology of Normal and Atypical Pigment Cell Growth PDF

373 Pages·1953·8.417 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Pigment Cell Growth. Proceedings of the Third Conference on the Biology of Normal and Atypical Pigment Cell Growth

Pigment Cell Growth Proceedings of the Third Conference on the Biology of Normal and Atypical Pigment Cell Growth Edited by MYRON GORDON New York Zoological Society, New York 1953 ACADEMIC PRESS INC., PUBLISHERS NEW YORK, N. Y. Copyright 1953, by ACADEMIC PRESS INC. 125 EAST 23RD STREET, NEW YORK 10, N. Y. All Rights Reserved LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 52-13364 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LIST OF AUTHORS GLENN H. ALGIRE, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland BELLE F. ANDERSON, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland ALICE S. BAKER, Department of Chemistry, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida S. WILLIAM BECKER, University of Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois OLGA BERG, New York University and New York Zoological Society, New York, Neiv York DEAN BURK, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland CHARLES CHESNER, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, and St. Joseph Hospital, Lorain, Ohio RANDOLPH LEE CLARK, JR., M. D. Anderson Hospital for Cancer Research, Houston, Texas HELEN OLLENDORFF CURTH, Department of Dermatology, College of Physi- cians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York ALBERT J. DALTON, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland H. CLARK DALTON, Department of Biology, Washington Square College of Arts and Science, New York University, New York, New York H. G. DU BUY, Microbiological Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland EDWARD A. EDWARDS, Department of Anatomy, Harvard Medical School, and the Department of Surgery, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts MARIE D. FELIX, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland THOMAS B. FITZPATRICK, Department of Dermatology, University of Oregon Medical School, Portland, Oregon DAVID M. GERBER, Memorial Center for Cancer and Allied Diseases, New York, New York MYRON GORDON, Genetics Laboratory, New York Zoological Society, and New York University, New York, New York MARIE HESSELBACH, Microbiological Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland GEORGE HOBBY, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland F. B. HUTT, Department of Poultry Husbandry Cornell University, Ithaca, f New York AUTHORS M. J. KOPAC, Department of Biology, Washington Square College of Arts and Science, New York University, New York, New York FRANCES Y. LEGALLAIS, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland AARON BUN SEN LERNER, Department of Dermatology, University of Oregon Medical School, Portland, Oregon PROSPER LOUSTALOT, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland HERBERT Z. LUND, Institute of Pathology, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, and St. Joseph Hospital, Lorain, Ohio ELEANOR J. MACDONALD, M. D. Anderson Hospital for Cancer Research, Houston, Texas H. S. MASON, Departments of Biochemistry and Dermatology, University of Oregon Medical School, Portland, Oregon GEORGE T. PACK, Memorial Center for Cancer and Allied Diseases, New York, New York JEWEL I. PLUMMER, Department of Biology, Washington Square College of Arts and Science, New York University, New York, New York RONALD W. RAVEN, The Royal Cancer Hospital and Westminster (Gordon) Hospital, London, England MARY E. RAWLES, Department of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland VERNON RILEY, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland ISABEL M. SCHARNAGEL, Memorial Center for Cancer and Allied Diseases, New York, New York JANE L. SHOWACRE, Microbiological Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland HERBERT J. SPOOR, New York Medical College, New York, New York EUGENE F. TRAUB, New York Medical College, New York, New York J. P. TRINKAUS, Osborn Zoological Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut M. W. WOODS, Microbiological Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland PREFACE Conferences on the Biology of Normal and Atypical Pigment Cell Growth were organized to meet the needs of biologists, chemists, physicists, statis- ticians and medical research workers who are studying various aspects of this common problem. The meetings were designed to offer each specialist an opportunity to explore paths of inquiry other than his own. The program was arranged so that the nature of the pigment cell and its contained melanin would be described, possibly explained, and certainly discussed. The sessions were so planned that each member could evaluate, compare and integrate the speakers' experiences, results and conclusions with his own experiences and convictions. It is becoming evident that an understanding of atypical growth, whether of pigment cells or of any other cells, will be achieved most probably from a synthesis of knowledge from many research fields, not from one alone. The crossfire of facts and interpretations exchanged between members representing allied disciplines, and those exchanged between representatives from entirely different fields, produced information for everyone, some agree- ment, but principally an awareness of the magnitude of the problem. Its urgency was revealed to all by dermatologists, pathologists, and surgeons who see, study, and carry out the recommended procedures in the treatment of the melanoma patient. The malignant potentialities of melanocytes are great. What makes them so may be understood after we know where they originate, along what route they migrate and, most important, what factors control their normal or atypical growth. The papers presented at this conference may be compared with those given five years ago and published in "The Biology of Melanomas." While some papers in the present volume reemphasize the basic problems, others open new channels of thought and methods of dealing with pigment cell growth. Only this is certain and predictable: when sufficient fundamental information concerning the nature, development and growth of pigment cells is within our grasp, then a means of controlling the melanoma will follow. The Conferences on Pigment Cell Growth will continue in the future at two to three year intervals. They have provided the most practical method of bringing the new information to a common center for friendly and frank discussions. As always, the organizing chairman welcomes suggestions for titles of papers that will describe new aspects of the subject. Anyone who wishes to be kept informed of future meetings of the Pigment Cell Growth group has but to write to the chairmen, authors or discussants indicated in this volume. The only requirement for attendance or participation is an interest in the history of the pigment cell and in its growth. PREFACE PIGMENT CELL TERMINOLOGY Ordinarily in a volume of this kind, which represents cooperative en- deavor, the organizing chairman confines his preface briefly to its history and objectives. But an extraordinary event happened at the close of the Third Conference, and I have been asked to report it here. During the conference many speakers found it necessary to define their terms when referring to the pigment-bearing cells because definitions for the same word varied. For example, biologists in general used the word "melanophore" in referring to melanin-containing stellate cells which are responsible for color changes in reptiles, amphibians, fishes, and some inver- tebrates. A melanophore, thus, is a cell in which coloring matter may be either dispersed throughout the cell or concentrated in its center, depending upon the physiological state of the animal. This conforms to the use of the original Italian term cratnoforo, which was coined by Sangiovanni in 1819. Some medical workers had been following Bloch, who used the term "melano- phore" to denote a melanin-bearing macrophage. While the term melano- phore when literally translated means a melanin-carrying cell, biologists pointed out that this word had come to denote a special kind of pigment- carrying cell, one that is quite different from the macrophage. Because of confusion in terminology, it was decided to hold a post- conference session in an attempt to adopt a uniform nomenclature. The group unanimously recommended the following terms and definitions: Melanoblast: an embryonic cell potentially capable of producing melanin. Melanocyte: a mature melanin-producing and melanin-containing cell. Macrophage: a cell containing phagocytized melanin. Melanophore: a pigment effector cell in lower animals. The recommended terms were submitted by one of our conferees to the Subcommittee on Oncology within the Division of Medical Sciences of the National Research Council. The terms and definitions were sent to authors preparing fascicles for their comprehensive Atlas of Pathology. It is par- ticularly gratifying that the forthcoming fascicle on "Melanotic Tumors of the Skin" will adopt the terms suggested by our group. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The papers and discussions in this volume were presented at the Third Conference on the Biology of Normal and Atypical Pigment Cell Growth held at the New York Zoological Park, Bronx, New York, on November 15, 16 and 17, 1951, under the sponsorship of the New York Zoological Society. PREFACE Dr. Ralph G. Meader was the chairman of the first session. He opened the meetings by introducing Mr. Fairfield Osborn, President of the New York Zoological Society, who welcomed the members to the conference. During the first morning, papers were read on the embryological and genetic aspects of the subject. In the afternoon, papers covering the endocrino- logical and pathological phases of the problem were presented. The second day's papers, under the chairmanship of Dr. H. W. Chalkley, were devoted, during the morning, to methods of study and treatment of normal and abnormal pigment cell growth in man. The afternoon session took up the physiological, particularly the enzymatic problems of melanogenesis. The third day's presentations, under the chairmanship of Dr. Dean Burk, dis- cussed the chemical and physical nature and activity of melanin-containing cells. The Organizing Chairman takes this opportunity of thanking all the participants of the Third Conference for their splendid efforts which have made this volume possible. This conference, like the first and second, was encouraged by a grant from the Anna Fuller Fund upon the recommenda- tion of its Medical Advisor, Dr. George Milton Smith. It is with deep sorrow that I report the death of Dr. Smith, on February 26, 1951. His thoughtful suggestions inspired the formation of these Conferences, and his practical approach to their needs provided funds to implement them. Additional funds to meet the expenses of the Third Conference were made available by the New York Zoological Society. The publication of this volume was aided greatly by a generous grant from the Damon Runyon Memorial Fund, for which we express our thanks. MYRON GORDON, Organizing Chairman. Genetics Laboratory of the New York Zoological Society at the American Museum of Natural History, New York 24, New York. Origin of the Mammalian Pigment Cell and Its Role in the Pigmentation of Hair* BY MARY E. RAWLES Department of Biology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland CONTENTS Page I. Introduction 1 II. Source of Pigment Cells in the Embryo 1 III. Migration of Precursor Pigment Cells (Melanoblasts) into the Skin . 6 IV. Pigment Cells Essential for Pigmentation of Hair 8 V. Conclusion 12 References 12 I. Introduction Although the highly specialized branched cells which produce melanin pigment granules in the integument of vertebrates have been known and described for nearly a century, it is only within recent years and chiefly through the use of experimental methods that their true nature has been revealed and their origin definitely linked with a transitory embryonic struc- ture, the neural crest. Certainly, for all practical purposes the old and often heated controversy over the origin of the vertebrate pigment cell may be considered, at long last, to have come to an end. The purpose of this paper is to review the experimental evidence upon which the neural crest origin of the mammalian pigment cell is based and to show that this special- ized cell is essential for the pigmentation of hair. II. Source of Pigment Cells in the Embryo The techniques of modern experimental embryology have made possible the use of special methods for ascertaining causal relationships in develop- mental processes. The establishment of the origin of the vertebrate pigment cell from the neural crest may be cited as one of the striking examples of the application of the experimental method of attack. The mammalian embryo, owing to its development in utero, is by no means as well suited for experimentation as that of either the amphibian or the bird. It has there- fore been used very little in experimental embryological research. About ten years ago it was found that embryonic mouse tissues would grow and differentiate quite normally in the coelomic cavity of chick embryos (Rawles, 1940). This finding led to a systematic attack of the problem of pigment cell origin in a mammal for the first time. The experimental procedure has *I am indebted to my husband, Mr. John S. Spurbeck, for his skilful preparation of the illustrative material. 1 2 MARY E. RAWLES paralleled closely that used with success by Eastlick (1939) and Ris (1941) for determining the origin of pigment cells in birds (fowl) namely, the transplantation of isolated portions from various axial levels of potentially pigmented embryos at successive stages in their development, to the coelom of White Leghorn chick host embryos of approximately 2*4 days incubation. Isolates introduced into the embryonic coelom become attached readily either to the coelomic wall (Fig. 2) or to the mesenteries (Fig. 4) and are well vascularized by the blood vessels of the chick host. The surface of the graft is enveloped by the smooth transparent host peritoneum. Because the im- planted tissue tends to round up into a ball or vesicle, hairs when present are, as a rule, found directed towards the interior of the graft rather than growing directly into the body cavity (Figs. 2 and 3). The intracoelomic grafting method has a decided advantage for pigmentation studies, for in the coelom the grafted tissues may continue their development for a long period of time (approximately 17 days or even longer if necessary) which allows ample time for the differentiation of melanin granules within the pigment cells and for the development of hair. Before entering into a dis- cussion of the experimental data upon which the neural crest origin of the mammalian pigment cell is based, it may be of advantage to consider briefly the morphological development of the neural crest. The neural crest of the mouse follows closely the developmental pattern described not only for many other mammalian embryos (cat, rabbit, roe, ground squirrel, rat, man) but also birds (chick, starling), see Holmdahl (1928). It arises very early in development, disperses its cells, and dis- appears as a definite morphological structure, all within a short period of time (approximately three days). In the mouse the crest appears first in the midbrain region shortly after the formation of the fourth pair of somites and gradually progresses caudally as more and more somites are added. After the closure of the neural tube, it may be seen as an accumulation of rather loosely arranged cells interposed between the neural tube and the overlying ectoderm. From this mass, cells begin to wander out on each side in two directions; laterally toward the somite, pushing between it and the overlying ectoderm and ventrally, along the sides of the neural tube, between it and the somite. In transverse sections these two strands of cells often show a forked configuration. The crest cells soon become intermingled with mesenchyme cells of the developing somite and cannot be distinguished from them. Herein lies the main difficulty that has been encountered in tracing the prospective fate of neural crest cells. Owing to the characteristic progressive, wavelike development of the crest in an anteroposterior direc- tion and the fact that at any given level it completes its development rapidly and ceases to exist as a definite rudiment, it is not found in any vertebrate as a continuous body extending throughout the length of the embryo. ORIGIN OF THE MAMMALIAN PIGMENT CELL 3 By the time a mouse embryo has developed approximately twenty pairs of somites, all stages in the development of the crest may be found in the trunk region of one embryo by examining transverse sections at different axial levels. In the youngest, posterior-most region where segmentation of the paraxial mesoderm into somites is going on, the crest will be found as a rather discrete body overlying the dorsal portion of the neural tube; more anteriorly it will be found in its migrating phase with cells streaming out laterally and ventrally (Fig. 1); and still more anteriorly the crest will have completed its migration from the neural tube. The dorsal boundaries of the neural tube are now sharply defined and the crest is no longer found as a definite morphological structure. The region between the neural tube and the somites has become filled with mesenchyme contributed by both the crest and the somite but the two components are histologically in- distinguishable. It is readily seen, then, that a segment of neural tube isolated from a level at which the neural crest has not yet begun to migrate would contain the entire prospective crest material, while a segment of neural tube isolated from a level at which the crest had completed its migration would contain no crest cells whatsoever. Similarly, portions of the adjacent somite and lateral plate isolated before the crest cells had begun to migrate from the neural tube would be crest-free, while the same type of isolation after the crest cells had entered the region would contain numerous cells of crest origin. By allowing appropriately made isolates to continue their growth and differentiation in a site known to be favorable to pigment cell develop- ment, such as the embryonic chick coelom, it thus becomes possible to deter- mine whether or not there is any relationship between the appearance of pigment cells in the graft and the phase of development of the neural crest at the time the isolation was made. To obtain proof that pigment cells take their origin from the neural crest, it is necessary to correlate their presence or absence in the grafts with the morphological development of the neural crest at the various ages and axial levels tested and to show that only those tissues containing neural crest or its migratory cells can produce pigment. In the experiments now under discussion, these conditions have been met (Rawles, 1947). Data obtained from an extensive series of grafts (over 200) from embryos of a homozygous black strain of mouse (C57), ranging in age from 4 to 40 pairs of somites, have demonstrated clearly that only those tissues containing neural crest (prospective crest, histologically recognizable crest, or cells which have mi- grated from the crest) can produce pigment cells in grafts. Skin and hairs structurally normal but entirely pigment-free (white) developed regularly in grafts from which the neural crest was excluded (compare Figs. 7 and 8).

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.