Piano Sonata in Ab, Op. 110: Beethoven’s Last Piano Sonatas, An Edition with Elucidation, Volume 2

177 Pages·2015·11.59 MB·English

by  Heinrich Schenker

Piano Sonata in A Major, Op. 110
♭

Piano Sonata in A Major, Op. 110
♭
Beethoven’s Last Piano Sonatas
An Edition with Elucidation, Volume 2
By Heinrich Schenker
Translated, Edited, and Annotated by John Rothgeb
1
1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of
Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research,
scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide.
Oxford New York
Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi
Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi
New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto
With offices in
Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece
Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore
South Korea Switzerland Thailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam
Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press
in the UK and certain other countries.
Published in the United States of America by
Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016
© Oxford University Press 2015
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior
permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted by law,
by license, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reproduction rights organization.
Inquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the above should be sent to the
Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above.
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Schenker, Heinrich, 1868–1935, author.
[Letzten fünf Sonaten von Beethoven. English]
Beethoven’s last piano sonatas : an edition with elucidation / by Heinrich Schenker ; translated, edited, and
annotated by John Rothgeb.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Translation of: Schenker, Heinrich. Die letzen fünf Sonaten von Beethoven: Kritische Ausgabe mit Einführung und
Erläuterung. Wien: Universal Edition, 1913–1921. 4 vols.
ISBN 978–0–19–991420–3 (volume 1 : alk. paper) — ISBN 978–0–19–991422–7 (volume 2 : alk. paper) —
ISBN 978–0–19–991424–1 (volume 3 : alk. paper) — ISBN 978–0–19–991426–5 (volume 4 : alk. paper)
1. Beethoven, Ludwig van, 1770–1827. Sonatas, no. 30, op. 109, piano, E major. 2. Beethoven, Ludwig van, 1770–1827.
Sonatas, no. 31, op. 110, piano, Aflat major. 3. Beethoven, Ludwig van, 1770–1827. Sonatas, no. 32, op. 111, piano, C minor.
4. Beethoven, Ludwig van, 1770–1827. Sonatas, no. 28, op. 101, piano, A major. I. Rothgeb, John, editor, translator.
II. Title.
ML410.B42S27713 2015
786.2′183092—dc23
2015001173
Music engraving by Woytek Rynczak, W. R. Music Service
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Printed in the United States of America
on acid-free paper
Contents
Editor’s Preface vii
About the Companion Website xiii
Foreword 1
Preliminary Remarks 3
COMMENTARY
First Movement 25
Second Movement 66
Third Movement 78
Appendix 149
Editions consulted, and Facsimiles 151
Bibliography of Cited Works by Heinrich Schenker 153
Bibliography of Cited Works by Other Authors 155
Index 157
v

Editor’s Preface
With the four books in this set, the translation into English of Heinrich
Schenker’s major works is complete. Publication of the original German of the
works translated here occurred in the following order: Op. 109 (1913),1 Op. 110
(1914), Op. 111 (1915), Op. 101 (1921). A second German edition, abridged, edited,
and annotated by Oswald Jonas, was published in Vienna by Universal Edition
in 1970–1971.2 Jonas provided in his annotations many insights and supplements
regarding both source appraisal and the music itself that are cited or quoted in the
present edition as space permits.
These commentary editions make available to English readers for the first
time some of Schenker’s best musical thinking. Among the features that may
have escaped the notice of many Anglophone musicians thus far, for example, is
Schenker’s fine sensitivity to the delicacies of Klaviersatz (piano writing or texture)
in the first movement of Op. 109, which fuels his withering critique of an earlier
editor’s “improvement” of Beethoven’s text. Another is Schenker’s revelation of the
spectacular link between the modulation and the second theme in the first move-
ment of Op. 111.
1 The Op. 109 edition was reprinted in 1922, with numerous corrections to the score. Schenker had marked a

copy of the first impression with hundreds of minor revisions to the text as well, but these were not incorpo-
rated into the reprint.
2 In addition to a large number of references to Schenker’s earlier publications, Jonas deleted most of Schenker’s
critiques of editions now long out of use as well as the Literature sections and the irrelevant political out-
bursts. The present edition is unabridged.
vii
viii Editor’s Preface
The unprecedented compression of sonata form in the first movement of
Op. 101 has often been noted, but from Schenker’s commentary we learn with
precision about Beethoven’s radically new way of integrating the form’s constit-
uent parts—especially the second theme—into this optimally compact struc-
ture. Beethoven’s composing of a far more expansive sonata-form piece in the
last movement of Op. 101 shows yet another innovation, again with respect to
the second theme.
Schenker’s detailed suggestions as to tempo, dynamics, rubato, fingering, and
pedaling—in short, much that is requisite for a finely nuanced performance—round
out the discussion of each formal section. These features need no further editorial
introduction.
A few words may, however, be in order regarding the relation of these editions to
the rest of Schenker’s output. The books were preceded by Harmonielehre (1906)
and Kontrapunkt I (1910), both of them components of the grand plan Neue musi-
kalische Theorien und Phantasien3 devoted to an investigation of the tonal system
and its language as they could be observed in and inferred from the masterworks.
But these treatises had been intermixed with still other publications whose pur-
pose was exclusively the elucidation of works of art. These two thrusts—theory and
application—were cultivated simultaneously during the first and second decades of
the twentieth century.4
Harmonielehre had been concerned most importantly and originally with
Schenker’s new vision of the Stufe, or scale degree, which at the time he regarded
as “far loftier and far more abstract than the conventional one . . . . The scale-step
[= scale degree] is a higher and more abstract unit” that “may even comprise sev-
eral harmonies… .”5 This insight alone led Schenker to a far more sophisticated
understanding of some complex music than earlier harmonic theories could have
done, as witnessed by his interpretations of passages from Wagner’s Tristan und
Isolde (Harmony, p. 149/193ff., 151/195f.) and especially Var. XV of Beethoven’s
Diabelli Variations (Harmony, p. 160f./206).6 Yet it would still be more than a
decade before Schenker would discern the primary instrument of the scale degree’s
concrete realization.
3 Harmonielehre, the first volume of the series, already bore this as its superior title. Authorship there was

attributed only to a Künstler (artist).
4 Works devoted to elucidation took the lead. The scrupulously edited and annotated selection of sonatas (and
one rondo) from the Kenner und Liebhaber collection in C .P. E. Bach’s Klavierwerke (1902) and Ein Beitrag
zur Ornamentik (1904) both belong to this category.
5 Harmony, §78. The formulation “may comprise several harmonies” suggests that Schenker’s vision of the
scale degree is not yet completely clear (see below).
6 Page-number citations are given first for English translations and then for German originals, the two sepa-
rated by a virgule, ‘/’.
Editor’s Preface ix
By 1913, the date of 109, Schenker had not progressed very far beyond the new
(but still incomplete) perception of the scale degree. His representation of harmony
in the sonata still relied on the Roman numeral—which was perfectly correct and
appropriate as far as it went—, but for the most part he still read more scale degrees
than he needed to.
A small and simple example will illustrate this. The Coda in the first movement
of Op. 109 begins in bar 65 (upbeat) with the triad of IV; Schenker read this and the
next three quarters as “IV—I—V—I.” Later, as he was revising the text for the 1922
reprint (see note 1), he crossed out the second Roman numeral. He did so in appre-
ciation of the meaning of the tones G and B of bar 66 as passing tones.
#
The year 1922 also saw the appearance, hard on the heels of the publication of
101, of the second book of Kontrapunkt, with its richly suggestive “Bridges to Free
Composition.”7 As early as Harmonielehre Schenker had formulated this analogy
between free composition and strict counterpoint: “That which, in free composi-
tion, would correspond to the tones consonant with the cantus firmus is the scale
degree; the entities that would correspond to the passing dissonance, however, are
the intermediate chords being unfolded in free voice leading.”8 It may well have
been as Schenker was working years later on Kontrapunkt II and was contemplat-
ing the phenomena of the “Bridges” (the combined species) that the insight came
to him: the “free” voice leading of free composition was not, after all, so completely
free; it constituted instead an elaboration, by diminution, of formations regulated
by the principles set forth in the “Bridges”; moreover, in free composition, the single
dissonant passing tone of strict counterpoint was generalized to stepwise progres-
sions through the triadic spaces of scale degrees. Any such progression he would
henceforth designate by the term Auskomponierungszug or, shorter, simply Zug
(linear progression),9 and this policy would take effect already in another work in
progress, namely 101.
The idea of the Zug, which becomes central to musical elucidation in the issues
of Der Tonwille and all subsequent works, makes its first appearance in the discus-
sion of the second movement of Op. 101. Schenker’s first observation about the
tonal structure of the movement is that “the voice leading in bars 1–4 is based on a
fourth-progression [Quartzug] F—C of the bass.” From that point on through the
remainder of 101, Schenker’s concentration on these progressions decisively influ-
enced the text.
7 Counterpoint II, p. 175ff./169ff.

8 Harmony, p. 159/204, although rendered more freely there.
9 In 101 and his analysis of the first movement of Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony (Tonwille I), Schenker occasion-
ally used the term Knotenpunkt as interchangeable with Zug. As early as Counterpoint II, p. 58/59, however,
he defined the former term in an entirely different (and more useful) way.