ArchSexBehav(2011)40:699–712 DOI10.1007/s10508-010-9671-7 ORIGINAL PAPER Physiological and Subjective Sexual Arousal in Self-Identified Asexual Women LoriA.Brotto • MoragA.Yule Received:27October2009/Revised:27July2010/Accepted:27July2010/Publishedonline:21September2010 (cid:2)SpringerScience+BusinessMedia,LLC2010 Abstract Asexuality can be defined as a lifelong lack of ofinteroceptiveawarenessamongasexuals.Takentogether, sexualattraction.Empiricalresearchonasexualityrevealssig- thefindingssuggestnormalsubjectiveandphysiologicalsex- nificantlylowerself-reportedsexualdesireandarousaland ualarousalcapacityinasexualwomenandchallengetheview lowerratesofsexualactivity;however,thespeculationthat thatasexualityshouldbecharacterizedasasexualdysfunc- there may also be an impaired psychophysiological sexual tion. arousalresponsehasneverbeentested.Theaimofthisstudy wastocomparegenital(vaginalpulseamplitude;VPA)and Keywords Asexuality(cid:2)Genitalarousal(cid:2) subjectivesexualarousalinasexualandnon-asexualwomen. Vaginalpulseamplitude(cid:2)Hypoactivesexualdesiredisorder(cid:2) Thirty-eight women between the ages of 19 and 55years Sexualattraction (10heterosexual,10bisexual,11homosexual,and7asexual) viewedneutralanderoticaudiovisualstimuliwhileVPAand self-reportedsexualarousalandaffectweremeasured.There Introduction werenosignificantgroupdifferencesintheincreasedVPA and self-reported sexualarousal response to the erotic film Humanasexualityis,looselydefined,astheabsenceofsexual betweenthegroups.Asexualsshowedsignificantlylesspositive attraction.Inthelastseveralyears,therehavebeenanumberof affect, sensuality-sexual attraction, and self-reported auto- empiricalexaminationsfocusedonthedescriptionofasexu- nomicarousaltotheeroticfilmcomparedtotheothergroups; alityandthecharacterizationofasexualindividuals.Theonly however,therewerenogroupdifferencesinnegativeaffect existingstudytoexploretheprevalenceofasexualityfound or anxiety. Genital-subjective sexual arousal concordance thatapproximately1%ofthepopulationreportalackofsexual was significantly positive for the asexual women and non- attraction (Bogaert, 2004) and therefore likely identify as significantfortheotherthreegroups,suggestinghigherlevels ‘‘asexual.’’Otherswhohavestudiedasexualityhaveemployed differing definitions, including: a lack of sexual behavior (Rothblum&Brehony,1993),alackofsexualorientation(Storms, 1980), and a lack of sexual desire or excitement (Prause & Graham,2007).WiththeemergenceofGoogle,thisallowed L.A.Brotto individuals who previously had great difficulty finding and DepartmentofObstetricsandGynaecology,UniversityofBritish Columbia,Vancouver,BC,Canada interactingwithotherasexualsonlinetoeasilylocateoneanother and develop an online group where questions and answers M.A.Yule couldbeposed,andexperiencescouldbesharedandexplored. DepartmentofPsychology,UniversityofBritishColumbia, Thelargestonlineweb-communityofasexuals,knownasthe Vancouver,BC,Canada AsexualityVisibilityand Education Network (AVEN), was L.A.Brotto(&) foundedin2001byJay,andthegroupcametodefinethem- DivisionofGynaecologicOncology,UniversityofBritish selvesanotherway—focusingonthelackofsexualattraction Columbia,2775LaurelSt.,6thFloor,Vancouver,BCV5Z1M9, butaddingthat‘‘everyasexualexperiencessexualdesireand Canada e-mail:[email protected] arousalsomewhatdifferently’’(Jay,2003). 123 700 ArchSexBehav(2011)40:699–712 The development of this ‘‘community,’’ led by AVEN’s and that this might be due to a higher threshold for sexual founder,Jay,hasfacilitatedtheemergenceofanonline‘‘asexual arousalintheformer.Ifthisweretrue,itwashypothesizedthat identity’’(Scherrer, 2008), as the structure of AVEN’s pages theasexualswouldshowlowerscoresonameasureofsexual werespecificallydesignedaround‘‘theprocessofidentityfor- arousability.AlowscoreontheSexualArousabilityInventory mation’’(Jay,2003,p.6).Asthecuriousbutnot-yet-self-iden- (Hoon, Wincze, & Hoon, 1976) was the best predictor of tified asexual navigated from‘‘static pages’’providing basic membership in the asexual compared to the sexual group. informationandadefinitionofasexualitytotheinteractive‘‘web Moreover, low scores on the dyadic sexual desire and the forum,’’ a collective identity of asexuality was thought to solitarysexualdesiresubscalesoftheSexualDesireInventory emerge(Jay,2003;Scherrer,2008).Thelabelingandidentifi- (Spector, Carey, & Steinberg, 1996) as well as the sexual cationofoneselfasasexualisamajoraimofAVENandthe excitationsubscaleoftheSexualInhibitionandSexualExci- asexualitymovement,andlikelyrepresentssomethingakinto tation Scales (Janssen, Vorst, Finn, & Bancroft, 2002) also thehomosexualityidentitymovementofthe1950sand1960s significantlypredictedasexualitygroupmembership.Thus,in that was facilitated by the Mattachine society (Sears, 2006). additiontoPrauseandGraham’sspeculationsaboutlowdesire Morethanavehicleforfacilitatingidentityformation,AVEN best differentiating asexuals from sexuals, it was, in fact, isalsousedtotransformthiscollectiveidentityintocollective measures of arousability that best distinguished the groups. action,providingeducationtothegreaterpublicwiththegoalof PrauseandGrahamsuggestedthatmeasuringsexualarousal lesseningstigmaassociatedwithasexuality. withpsychophysiologicalinstrumentsmightfurtherelucidate There has been a recent frenzy of media attention on iftheseobservedgroupdifferencesinarousalmightalsoapply asexuality(e.g.,20/20,2006;CNNShowbizTonight,2006; toasexuals’sexualphysiologicalresponding. FoxNewsDayside,2006;MontelWilliamsShow,2007;The Inamorerecentstudydesignedtoexploresexualresponse View,2006;TuckerCarlson,2006),someofwhichhassug- anddistressinasexuals,187asexualmenandwomencom- gested that asexual individuals experience a type of sexual pletedaweb-basedquestionnairefollowedbyin-depthtele- dysfunction known as Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder phoneinterviewswithasubsetof15asexuals(Brottoetal., (HSDD),andthatthisgroupmayrepresentthepolarlowerend 2010).Amongthoseasexualswhohadbeensexuallyactivein ofthedesirecontinuum(MontelWilliamsShow,2007).The thepast4weeks,womenshowedlowarousalscoresonthe implications,ifthisassumptioniscorrect,aresignificantgiven FemaleSexualFunctionIndex(Rosenetal.,2000)compara- thecurrentclimateofsexualpharmaceuticalsandincreasing bletoalargervalidationgroupofwomenwithFemaleSexual concentrationondiagnosing,treating,andcuringlowsexual ArousalDisorder(FSAD;Wiegel,Meston,&Rosen,2005). desire(Tiefer,2002,2006).Upontheasexual’spresentationto However, asexual men showed normal levels of erectile thesextherapyclinic,perhapsattheinsistenceofadistressed functioning(theanalogueofarousalinmen)ontheInterna- anddissatisfiedpartner,theremaybeaprematuretemptation tional Index of Erectile Functioning (Rosen et al., 1997), on the part of the clinician to seek pharmaceutical and/or suggestingthatifarousalwasimpaired,itmightbeafeature hormonal treatments for the lifelonglackofsexualinterest. onlyoffemaleandnotofmaleasexuality.Inthequalitative However, the existing data suggest that asexuals do not phaseofthisstudy,severalasexualsspokeabouttheirgenitals experiencedistressnorwanttobe‘‘fixed’’(Brotto,Knudson, insomewhattechnical,emotionallybarelanguageandmost Inskip, Rhodes, & Erskine, 2010; Pagan Westfall, 2004), believed that they lacked a sexual arousal response (Brotto makingasexualityfundamentallydifferentfromHSDD.And etal.,2010). althoughasubgroupofwomenwithHSDDsimilarlyreport Althoughthislimitedresearchproposesthatgenitalsexual being satisfiedwiththe prospect ofnever havingsex again, arousalinasexualsmightbeimpaired(alongwithself-repor- what seems to separate this group from asexuals is that the ted desire), to date, there have been no studies of asexuals’ latter report never having experienced desire or sexual psychophysiological sexual response to a competent sexual attractionwhereastheformermayhaveexperienceddesireat stimulus,andpriorstudiesthathavemeasuredsexualarousal somepointbutthenlostit.Inreality,theprecisedelineation utilized a self-report questionnaire focused on retrospective between lifelong HSDD and asexuality is unclear, and this recalloverafixedperiodoftime.Thus,theextenttowhich ‘‘grayzone’’requiresfurtherstudy. asexuals’self-reportsoflackofsexualarousalreflectsubjective In one qualitative study with four asexuals, Prause and only,physiologicalonly,orbothaspectsofsexualrespondingis Graham(2007)notedthatsexualarousal,inadditiontosexual unknown. desire, might also be impaired. One female participant Sexualpsychophysiologicaltechniqueshavebeenusedin expressedthatasexuallyexplicitfilmwouldhavenoeffecton researchthroughoutthetwentiethcentury,andmorerecently hersexualarousal(thoughsexualarousalwasnotassessedin havebeenusedinstudiesofsexualorientation.Thefieldgained that study). In a follow-up quantitative phase, Prause and widespreadinterestfollowingtheworkofMastersandJohnson Grahamthereforepredictedthatasexualswouldreportlower (1966)whostudiedthesexualarousalpatternsoftheirpatients levelsofsexualarousalcomparedtoagroupofnon-asexuals usingavarietyofphysiologicalmeasures.Inwomen,vaginal 123 ArchSexBehav(2011)40:699–712 701 photoplethysmography is one of several psychophysiological The concordance between subjective and psychophysio- techniques (Sintchak & Geer, 1975). It involves a tampon- logical sexual arousal has been a very important and inter- shaped,usuallyacrylic,probe,whichemitsinfraredlightand estingaspect ofstudy inthe vaginal photoplethysmography providesanindexofabsorbedlightcorrespondingtothedegree literature.Thisresearchhasconsistentlyshownalowcorre- ofgenitalcongestion.Thestudyofvaginalphotoplethysmog- lationbetween self-reported sexualarousal and VPAacross raphyhasledtosomeimportantadvancesinourunderstanding numerous studies (as summarized in the meta-analysis by ofwomen’ssexualresponse.Forexample,whereasmenshow Chivers,Seto,Lalumiere,Laan,&Grimbos,2010),andcon- patternsofgenitalarousalthatcorrespondtotheirstatedsexual cludesthatwomenshowsignificantlylessgenital-subjective orientation(Rieger,Chivers,&Bailey,2005),lesbianandhet- concordancethanmen.Intheirreview,Chiversetal.predicted erosexualwomenshowedthesamedegreeofincreaseinvaginal thatconcordancewouldbelowwhenactualgenitalresponding pulseamplitude(VPA;themoresensitiveandspecificindexin waslow.Itfollows,therefore,thatifVPAwaslowinasexual vaginalphotoplethysmography),regardlessoftheirstatedsex- women,genital-subjectiveconcordancemightalsobelowdue ualorientationandirrespectiveofthestimulishown—whether toinabilitytodetectchangesinbloodflow(Heiman,1977). heterosexual,homosexual,ornon-humanprimate(Chivers, Theaimofthepresentstudywastocomparegenitaland Rieger, Latty,& Bailey, 2004; Chivers, Seto, & Blanchard, subjectivesexualarousalinasampleofasexualwomenwith 2007). If such ‘‘target non-specificity’’ was a feature of all responses to women from other sexual orientation groups women,includingasexuals,thenonemightpredictthatasexual (heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual women). We pre- women would show a similar degree of genital response to dicted lower levels of self-reported sexual arousal in the stimulicomparedtoheterosexualandlesbianwomendespite asexual women compared to the other groups. Regarding theirstatedpreferencefornosexualpartners. VPA, we predicted that if asexuality was characterized by AnotherreasonwhyonemightpredictsimilarVPAresponses atypicalsexualresponses,thenwewouldfindlowerVPAin inasexualwomencomparedtoothersexualorientationgroups the asexuals compared to the other three groups, but we stemsfromtherecentfindingthatthemajority(77%)ofasex- hypothesized no significant group differences in VPA if ual women had engaged in masturbation—the average fre- asexualitywasnotreflectiveofproblematicsexualrespond- quencyofwhichwasonce/month(Brottoetal.,2010),aresult ing.Weincludedahomosexualandbisexualsampleofwomen thatreplicatespreviousresearchindicatingthatasexualsdid basedontheconclusionsofChiversetal.(2004,2007)that not differ significantly from non-asexuals in their desire to womenshowanon-targetspecificpatternofgenitalrespond- masturbate (Prause & Graham, 2007).Although this specu- ing.Thus,weexpectedthatallgroupsofwomenwouldshow lationisbasedonindirectreasoning,itispossiblethatbecause thesamepatternofVPAtotheheterosexualstimuli.Wealso ahighlevelofgenitalarousalisnecessaryfororgasmtooccur explored the degree of concordance between genital and (Bassonetal.,2003;Masters&Johnson,1966),andbecause subjective sexual arousal in each of these subgroups sepa- orgasm is a positive reinforcer of masturbation (Herbenick rately. etal.,2009),itmaybethatasexualsexperienceanormallevel ofgenitalarousalwhich,inpart,providesincentivefortheir masturbatoryactivity. Method If,ontheotherhand,asexualitywassimplyonemanifes- tationofalifelongsexualdysfunction,ashasbeensuggested Participants bysome(seereviewofthistopicontheonlineasexualityblog byPretzelboy,2009),thenonemighthypothesizelowerlevels A total of 38 women between the ages of 19 and 55years ofsexualarousalwhilebeingtestedinacontrolledlaboratory participated in this study (10 heterosexual, 10 bisexual, 11 environmentwithpotentsexualstimuli.Thereissomelimited homosexual,and7asexual),andwereassignedtosexualori- evidence for this assertion: In some select subgroups of entation group according to self-identification. Participants women,thosewithself-reportedgenitalarousalimpairments were recruited through several separate avenues, including were found to have significantly lower VPA compared to a postings on local websites (e.g., Craigslist), on the AVEN sexuallyhealthycomparisongroup(Brotto,Basson,&Gorz- onlineweb-community,throughtheuniversity’shumansub- alka, 2004; Pieterseetal.,2008; Wincze, Albert, &Bansal, jectpool,andthroughadvertisementsinthecommunity.The 1993),andwomenwithHSDDwerefoundtohavedifferent wordingofadvertisementsdiffereddependingonwhichsex- patternsofactivationonfunctionalmagneticresonanceimag- ual orientation group was being targeted. Two separate ads ingcomparedtowomenwithoutHSDD(Arnowetal.,2009). wereusedtotargetasexuals.Bothadsread,‘‘Doyouexperi- Thus,ifasexualitywascharacterizedbyatypicalsexualresponse encealackofsexualattractiontowardsothers?’’and‘‘Doyou intheformoflackofsexualexcitement,thenonemightpredict findithardtorelatewhenpeopletalkaboutsexualattraction?’’ significantly lower levels of physiological arousal in asexual Thefirstadalsoincludedthetext‘‘TheSexualHealthLabis womencomparedtowomenofothersexualorientationgroups. looking for female participants who identify as asexual, 123 702 ArchSexBehav(2011)40:699–712 straight,lesbianorbisexualtotakepartinastudyonsexual desiredomainincludeditemssuchas‘‘Overthepast4weeks, orientation.’’Thesecondaddeliberatelydidnotcontainany howoftendidyoufeelsexualdesireorinterest?’’Examples referencetoself-identificationasasexual.Bothadsfurtherread of items from the arousal domain included:‘‘Over the past ‘‘Ifyoucanrelatetothestatementsabove,pleasecontactusfor 4weeks,howoftendidyoufeelsexuallyaroused(‘‘turnedon’’) moreinformationaboutthisstudy.’’Themajorityofasexual duringsexualactivityorintercourse?’’and‘‘Overthepast4 women(N=6)wererecruitedviatheAVENwebsiteandone weeks,howconfidentwereyouaboutbecomingsexuallyaroused asexualwomanwasrecruitedviathesecondad.Self-identi- duringsexualactivityorintercourse?’’Thetotal FSFIscore ficationasasexualwasfurtherverifiedinpersonaccordingto was obtained by summing the scores from the individual thefree-responseitemonthedemographicquestionnairethat domains,withhigherscoresonthismeasureindicatingbetter askedwomentowritetheirsexualorientationstatus. levelsofsexualfunction.Ifonedomainsubtotalcouldnotbe Theaverageageofparticipantswas28.1yearsforhetero- calculated(duetomissingitems),thenneithercouldtheFSFI sexuals(SD=3.8),22.8yearsforbisexuals(SD=4.4),36.3 total score. The FSFI has been validated as an appropriate years for homosexuals (SD=11.1), and 33.6 for asexuals tooltodifferentiatebetweenwomenwithandwithoutFSAD (SD=9.9),andtherewasasignificantgroupdifferenceinage, (Wiegeletal.,2005),hasahighdegreeofinternalconsistency F(3,34)=5.76,p\.01,withbisexualwomenbeingyounger (Cronbach’saof0.82andhigher),andhightest–retestreli- than the other groups. There were no significant group dif- ability(r=.79–.86).Inlightofsomeconceptualandstatistical ferencesinhighestlevelofeducationachieved,v2(3)=5.58, problemsidentifiedbyMeyer-BahlburgandDolezal(2007), p\.05,withthemajorityofparticipants(100%ofhomosex- adjustmentsweremadetothescoringoftheFSFIinthecurrent ual,90%ofbisexual,91%ofhomosexual,and86%ofasexual) study in that any woman who had not engaged in sexual havingatleastsomepost-secondaryuniversityeducation. activity over the preceding month received‘‘missing value Fiftypercentofheterosexuals,70%ofbisexuals,63%of codes’’foritemsinquiringaboutsexualresponseduringsexual homosexuals,and28%ofasexualsindicatedthattheywere activity(asopposedtoreceivingazeroscore,whicherrone- currentlyinacommittedrelationship,andtheseproportions ously inflates scores denoting dysfunction (Brotto, 2009)). differed significantly, v2(3)=10.21, p\.05, with asexuals Missingcodeditemswerethenexcludedfromthecalculation beingleastlikelytobeinarelationship.Themajority(70–90% oftheFSFItotalscoreandwerenotincludedinthecalculation acrossgroups)identifiedthemselvesasEuropean/Canadian. ofthemeanforthatsubscaleacrossallparticipants. DetailedAssessmentofSexualArousal(DASA) Measures TheDASAisanunpublishedquestionnairethathasbeenfound DemographicInformation tosignificantlydifferentiateaspectsofsexualarousalinwomen with arousal difficulties (Basson & Brotto, 2003). Subscales Participantswereaskedtocompletedemographicinformation include:mentalexcitement,genitaltingling/throbbing,genital on ethnicity, sex/gender, sexual orientation, occupation, wetness, and pleasant genital sensations, with each subscale annualincome,education,presenceofsexualconcerns,rela- assessinglevelofarousalinresponsetoavarietyofdifferent tionshipstatus,numberofsexualandromanticpartners,and formsofsexualstimulation(e.g.,fromverbal/writtenstimulito masturbationfrequency.Allquestionswereinafree-response breaststimulationtovariousformsofgenitalstimulation).Items formatgiventhefindingthatasexualsresponddifferentlyto wereratedona1–7Likertscalefrom(1)lowto(7)intense. forced choice versus free response formats in answering questionsaboutgenderandsexualorientation(Brottoetal., SexualDesireInventory(SDI) 2010; Prause & Graham, 2007), apart from questions per- taining to education, relationship status, and masturbation TheSDI(Spectoretal.,1996)isa15-itemself-administered frequency,whichhadforced-choiceresponseoptions. questionnaire intended to be a specific measure of sexual desire.UnliketheFSFIsubscaleofdesire,whichfocuseson frequencyandintensityoffeelingdesire,theSDIattemptsto FemaleSexualFunctionIndex(FSFI) captureacognitive(ratherthanbehavioral)aspectofsexual desire,andproducesatotalSDIscoreaswellasdyadicand TheFSFI(Rosenetal.,2000)isa19-itemscaleassessingsix solitarydesiresubscalescores.Individualsnotinarelationship domainsofsexualfunction:desire,subjectivearousal,lubri- areabletoreceiveascoreonthedyadicsubscale,astheitems cation, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain during sexual activity focusonsexualthoughtsanddesiresinvolvingapartner,and overthepastmonth.Itemswereratedona6-pointscale,with notsexualbehavior,asillustratedwiththefollowingitemon lowerscoresindicatinglowerlevelsofsexualfunctioning,and the SDI:‘‘During the past month, how often have you had azeroscoreindicatingnosexualactivityinthepastmonth.The sexual thoughts involving a partner?’’ The SDI has been 123 ArchSexBehav(2011)40:699–712 703 validatedwithnon-clinicalpopulationsofhealthywomenand joined by accompanying background music). A 1-min seg- men.Itemswereratedonan8-pointscale,withhigherscores mentinwhichtheword‘‘Relax’’wasdisplayedonthetelevi- indicatingbetterlevelsofsexualdesire. sion screen with no audio output preceded these films. Participantswatchedoneoftwofilmsets,eachcontaininga FilmScale neutral and erotic segment, and previous research has sup- portedthesimilarityofwomen’sarousaltoandratingsofthese TheFilmScale(Heiman&Rowland,1983)isa34-itemself- twofilmsets(Brotto,Basson,&Luria,2008). reportquestionnairethatassessesperceptionofgenitalsexual arousal(e.g.,warmthingenitals,genitalpulsingorthrobbing), Procedure subjectivesexualarousal(e.g.,turnedon),autonomicarousal (e.g.,fasterbreathing,fasterheartbeat),anxiety,positiveaffect Our university’s clinical research ethics board approved all (e.g.,pleasure,interested,excited),negativeaffect(e.g.,wor- procedures.Participantsrespondingtocommunityandonline ried, angry, disgusted), and sensuality-sexual attraction (e.g., advertisementstookpartinatelephonescreeningprocesswith sensuous,adesiretobeclosetosomeone,sexuallyattractive)in onetrainedfemaleresearchassistantinwhichtheproceduresof responsetosexualstimuli.Itemswereratedona7-pointLikert the study were described and any questions answered. They scalefrom(1)notatallto(7)intenselyinwhichparticipants weretoldthattheywouldbewatchingheterosexualfilmsand indicated how much they endorsed each item at the present that if this were objectionable to them, they could withdraw moment. fromthestudy.Nonewithdrewfollowingthetelephonescreen- ing.Thepurposeofthescreeningwasalsotoensurethatwomen PsychophysiologicalRecording inthe‘‘probableasexual’’groupdidnotmeetcriteriaforHSDD. Todoso,aseriesofquestionsbasedontheDSM-IV-TRcriteria Genitalarousalwasmeasuredusingthevaginalphotoplethys- for HSDD (American Psychiatric Association, 2000) were mographandtheVPAsignalwastheprimaryendpointgiven askedbyatrainedinterviewer.Althoughwomenmayhavemet that it is a sensitive and specific measure of genital arousal criterionA(i.e.,absent/deficientdesireforsexualactivity),none (Laan,Everaerd,&Evers,1995).Asinglevaginalprobe(Behav- met criterion B (i.e., marked distress). Women in the other ioral Technology Inc., Salt Lake City, UT) measured VPA, sexualorientationgroupsweresimilarlyaskediftheyexperi- whichwasmonitoredthroughoutexposuretoeachneutraland encedanysexualdifficultieswiththeintentthatanywomanwho erotic film segment. VPA was recorded on a personal com- didwouldbeexcluded;nonemetthisexclusioncriterion. puter(HPPentiumMLaptop),whichcollected,converted(from Participants were tested from 2008 to 2009 in a psycho- analogtodigital,usingaModelMP150WSWdataacquisition physiologicalresearchroomlocatedintheuniversityhospital, unit[BIOPACSystems,Inc.]),andtransformeddata,usingthe whichcontainedacomfortablerecliningchair,twobookcases, softwareprogramAcqKnowledgeIII,Version3.8.1(BIOPAC alargescreenTV,anintercom,andasinkwithsmallcupboard Systems,Inc.,SantaBarbara,CA).Thesignalwasband-pass unit. A thin blanket was placed over the seating areaofthe filtered(0.5–30Hz)andasamplingrateof200samples/swas chair.Followingwrittenconsent,participantsweretestedbya usedforVPAthroughouttheneutralanderoticfilmexposure. femaleresearcher. Artifactsmoothingtookplacefollowingvisualinspectionofthe Next, participants completed the questionnaire battery in databyaninvestigatorwhowasblindtothesexualorientation the private psychophysiology room and were provided with groupoftheparticipant,anddataweresubsequentlyanalyzedin further instructions about the vaginal photoplethysmograph 30-ssegments.ForanalysesofVPA,wecomparedthefirstthree andtheremainderoftheprocedures.Theresearcherthenleft 30-ssegmentsoftheneutralconditiontothelastfive30-sseg- theroomwhileparticipantsinsertedtheprobeandinformedthe mentsoftheeroticcondition.Theprobewasdisinfectedina researcheroftheirreadinessviaintercom.Inordertohabituate solutionofCidexOPA(ortho-phthalaldehyde0.55%),ahigh to the testing environment, participants were encouraged to leveldisinfectant(AdvancedSterilizationProducts,Irvine,CA, relaxonacomfortablerecliningchairfora10minperiodafter USA),promptlyfollowingeachsession. theprobewasinsertedbutbeforewatchingthevideosegments. Subjectivesexualarousalandaffectwereassessedattheendof SexualStimuli theadaptationperiodusingtheFilmScale. FollowingthecompletionoftheFilmScale,thevideosequence Participantsvieweda3-minneutralfilm(eitheradocumentary began.Theaudiocomponentwasdeliveredviawirelesshead- aboutleimakingoratravelogueaboutHawaii)followedbyan phones.Immediatelyafterthevideosequence,participantsfil- 8-min erotic film (a Candida Royalle, female-friendly film ledoutasecondFilmScale,whichaskedthemtoevaluatehow consisting of progressively increasing sexual intensity of theyfeltduringthelast(erotic)film.Theyweretheninstructed heterosexualmanualgenitalstimulation,oralsex,andpenile- toremovetheprobeandmeettheresearcherinaseparateroom vaginal intercourse clips which were spliced together and wheretheyhadtheirfinger-lengthsmeasuredusingastandard 123 704 ArchSexBehav(2011)40:699–712 computerscanner(datanotpresentedhere).Participantswere scored significantly lower than every other group of women, debriefedandprovidedwitheither$20remunerationor2course with no significant between-group differences between the credits,dependingonrecruitmentmethod. heterosexual,homosexual,orbisexualwomen(Table1). DuetooneparticipantnotcompletingtheSDI,information StatisticalAnalyses ondesireforsolitaryanddyadicsexwasbasedonsixasexuals. OntheSDIDyadicsubscale,theoverallANOVAwassignifi- Baselinegroupcomparisonsusedanalysisofvariance(ANOVA) cant,F(3,33)=12.83,p\.001,withaTukey’stestshowing followedbytheTukey’smultiplecomparisonstestincasesofa significantlylowerdyadicdesireintheasexualscomparedto significant overalleffect. Giventhesignificantgroup differ- theheterosexual(p\.001),homosexual(p\.001),andbisex- enceinage,weconductedarepeatedmeasureANOVAwith ual(p\.001)women.TheoverallANOVAwasnotsignifi- age as the covariate (ANCOVA) for all sexual arousal end- cantontheSDISolitarysubscale,F(3,33)\1,indicatingno points.TherewasnosignificantFilmxAgeinteraction,p[ significantgroupdifferencesindesireforsolitarysexualactiv- .05.Wethusdidnotcovaryforageinremaininganalysesand ity(Table1). insteadconductedaseriesofGroup9FilmANOVAs.Effect Duringtheneutralbaselineperiod,therewerenosignificant sizesforallrepeatedmeasuresanalyseswerecalculatedwith groupdifferencesonanymeasureofsubjectivesexualarousal, thepartialeta-squared(g2). affect,orperceivedautonomicarousalontheFilmScale,all ps[.05. Results PhysiologicalSexualArousal MeasuresofSexualFunction There was a significant main effect of Film on VPA, F(7, 231)=30.77,p\.001,partialg2=0.48,suchthattheerotic Due to incomplete data from one asexual, information on film increased VPA in all groups. There was no significant masturbationfrequencywasbasedonsixasexuals.Therewere Group9Film interaction, F(21, 231)\1, partial g2=0.04 no significant group differences in masturbation frequency, (Fig.1). F(3,33)\1,withameanfrequencyofbetweenonetothree timespermonth(Table1),andtheserateswerecomparableto Self-ReportedSexualArousal thoseinapreviousstudyofmasturbationfrequencyinasex- uals(Brottoetal.,2010).AccordingtotheFSFI,four(57%) Onsubjectivesexualarousal,therewasamaineffectofFilm, outofsevenasexualshadbeensexuallyactive,eitheraloneor F(1, 34)=61.33, p\.001, partial g2=0.64, such that sub- withapartner,inthepast4weeks.Thecorrespondingratesfor jective arousal increased after the eroticfilm.There was no heterosexual,bisexual,andlesbianwomenwere:90,100,and significant Group9Film interaction, F(3, 34)\1, partial 82%.There wasa significantoverallANOVAeffectonthe g2=0.06 (Fig.2A). On perceived physical sexual arousal, FSFIDesiresubscale,F(3,37)=8.67,p\.001.ATukey’stest therewasasignificantmaineffectofFilm,F(1,34)=101.34, showedtheasexualwomentohavesignificantlylowerscores p\.001, partial g2=0.75, such that the erotic film signifi- than the heterosexual (p=.001), bisexual (p\.001), and cantly increased reports of perceived genital arousal. There homosexual(p=.011)women,withnoneoftheothergroups was also a marginally significant Group9Film interaction, significantlydifferingfromoneanother.Therewerenosig- F(3, 34)=2.52, p=.075 which suggested that there was a nificantoverallANOVAeffectsonFSFIArousal,F(3,31)= morerobustincreaseinperceivedgenitalarousalinthenon- 1.88;FSFILubrication,F(3,30)\1;FSFIOrgasm,F(3,31)\ asexualgroupscomparedtotheasexualgroup;however,the 1;FSFISatisfaction,F(3,25)=1.41;FSFIPain,F(3,22)\1; effectsizewassmall,partialg2=0.18(Fig.2b).Onthesen- ortheFSFITotalScore,F(3,21)\1(Table1).Scoresonthe suality-sexualattractiondomainoftheFilmScale,therewasa FSFI subscales of Desire, Arousal, and Lubrication in the significant Group9Film interaction, F(3, 34)=3.41, p= presentstudywerealsocomparabletothoseofasexualwomen .028,partialg2=0.23,whichrevealedsignificantincreasesin in previous research (Brotto et al., 2010); however, asexual sensuality-sexualattractionwithexposuretotheeroticfilmin womeninthepresentstudyhadslightlyhigherscoresonthe the heterosexual, homosexual, and bisexual women but no FSFIsubscalesofOrgasmandPainandslightlylowerscores significantchangeamongtheasexualwomen(Fig.2c). ontheSatisfactionsubscale. OntheDASA,therewasasignificantoverallANOVAfor Self-ReportedAffect mentalsexualarousal,F(3,34)=15.79,p\.001;genitaltin- gling/throbbing, F(3, 34)=12.44, p\.001; genital wetness, TherewasasignificantGroup9Filminteractiononpositive F(3,33)=4.19,p=.013;andpleasantgenitalsensations,F(3, affect,F(3,34)=2.96,p=.046,partialg2=0.21,whichshowed 34)=12.51,p\.001.Foreachofthefoursubscales,asexuals thatonlythenon-asexualgroupsexperiencedasignificant 123 ArchSexBehav(2011)40:699–712 705 Table1 Sexualbehaviormeasuresasafunctionofgroup Measure Group p Heterosexual Bisexual Homosexual Asexual (n=10) (n=10) (n=11) (n=7) Masturbationi Never 3(30%) 1(10%) 2(18.2%) 2(33.3%) ns Fewtimes/year 1(10%) 2(20%) 3(27.3%) 1(16.7%) Once/month 1(10%) 0(0%) 1(9.1%) 1(16.7%) 2–3/month 2(20%) 1(10%) 0(0%) 1(16.7%) Once/week 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(27.3%) 0(0%) 2–4/week 2(20%) 6(60%) 2(18.2%) 0(0%) Once/day 1(10%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(16.7%) [Once/day 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) M(SD) M(SD) M(SD) M(SD) FSFIdesirea 3.90(1.55) 4.38(1.23) 3.38(1.32) 1.37(0.29) \.01 FSFIarousalb 4.87(1.58) 4.77(1.20) 4.67(1.24) 3.00(1.82) ns FSFIlubricationb 4.90(1.47) 5.22(1.22) 5.27(0.87) 4.60(1.14) ns FSFIorgasmb 5.02(1.56) 4.76(1.40) 4.80(1.61) 4.30(1.58) ns FSFIsatisfactionc,j 4.67(1.25) 4.67(1.30) 5.20(0.56) –h ns FSFIpainb,j 5.45(0.83) 5.30(0.97) 5.20(1.60) –h ns FSFItotalscored 28.61(7.15) 28.21(7.11) 28.47(7.23) –h ns DASAmental 5.56(1.11) 5.29(0.67) 4.63(1.43) 2.19(0.76) \.001 arousale DASAgenital 5.23(1.15) 5.27(0.91) 4.72(1.47) 2.21(0.81) \.001 tingling/throbbinge DASAgenital 4.86(1.65) 4.56(1.32) 4.61(1.51) 2.48(1.43) \.01 wetnesse DASApleasant 5.96(1.24) 5.64(0.79) 4.71(1.65) 2.28(1.41) \.001 genitalsensationse SDIdyadici,f 39.30(14.58) 46.20(6.89) 38.27(13.96) 10.33(5.16) \.001 SDIsolitaryi,g 11.70(7.83) 11.80(6.83) 10.45(5.28) 7.00(6.20) ns Absoluteranges:a1.2–6,b0–6,c0.8–6,d2–36,e1–7,f6–62,g2–23;hnotavailable;ibasedon6asexuals;jbasedon1asexualsodataarenotpresented nsnon-significant increase in positive affect with the erotic film (Fig.3a). On 1.00 negativeaffect,therewasneitheramaineffectofFilm,F(1, 34)\1, partial g2=0.02, nor a significant Group9Film 0.80 interaction,F(3,34)=1.71,partialg2=0.13(Fig.3b).Anxi- V) 0.60 ety significantly decreased following exposure to the erotic m filminallgroups,F(1,32)=10.07,p=.003,partialg2=0.24, VPA ( 0.40 with no Group9Film interaction, F(3, 32)\1, partial g2= 0.04(Fig.3c). 0.20 neutral erotic 0.00 Self-ReportedAutonomicArousal 30 60 90 300 330 360 390 420 Time (s) TherewasasignificantinteractionbetweenGroupandFilmon heterosexual bisexual homosexual asexual self-reported autonomic arousal, F(3, 34)=5.06, p=.005, partialg2=0.31,aswellasamaineffectoferoticfilm,F(1, Fig.1 Effectsofneutralanderoticstimulionvaginalpulseamplitude 34)=40.08,p\.001,partialg2=0.54.Multiplecomparison (VPA) during the first 90s of neutral and last 150s of erotic film conditions.Errorbarsindicatestandarderrorofmeasurement(SEM) revealedasignificantincreaseinautonomicarousalwiththe 123 706 ArchSexBehav(2011)40:699–712 Fig.2 Effectsofneutraland neutral eroticstimulionasubjective sexualarousal,bself-reported erotic physicalsexualarousal,and 5 5.5 a b csensuality-sexualattraction inheterosexual,bisexual, sal u homosexual,andasexual 4 o 4.4 women.Errorbarsindicate sal al ar SEM u u o x exual ar 3 sical se 3.3 e s 2 phy 2.2 ctiv ed ubje 1 port 1.1 S e elf-r S 0 0.0 heterosexual bisexual homosexual asexual heterosexual bisexual homosexual asexual 5 c 4 n o cti a Attr 3 al u x e 2 S y/ alit u ns 1 e S 0 heterosexual bisexual homosexual asexual Feriogt.i3cstEimffueclitsonofanpeoustirtaivleaanfdfect, a 5.5 b 2.0 neutral bnegativeaffect,canxiety, 1.6 anddautonomicarousal ct 4.4 erotic ect ihnomheoteseroxsueaxl,uaanl,dbaisseexxuuaall, e affe 3.3 ve aff 1.2 wSEoMmen.Errorbarsindicate Positiv 2.2 Negati 0.8 1.1 0.4 0 0 heterosexual bisexual homosexual asexual heterosexual bisexual homosexual asexual c 3.5 d 5 2.8 al 4 s u o y 2.1 ar 3 et c xi mi An 1.4 no 2 o ut 0.7 A 1 0 0 heterosexual bisexual homosexual asexual heterosexual bisexual homosexual asexual 123 ArchSexBehav(2011)40:699–712 707 eroticfilminallgroupsexcepttheasexuals,wheretherewas nosignificantincrease(Fig.3d). Physiological-SubjectiveConcordance Differencescoresbetweeneroticandneutralstimuluscondi- tions were calculated for subjective sexual arousal and per- ceivedphysicalsexualarousal.Apercentchangescorewas calculatedfor VPA((erotic-neutral)/neutral).The Pearson product-momentcorrelationwasthencalculatedbetweenthese transformedvariablesandexaminedineachgroupseparately. Amongtheasexualwomen,therewasastrongpositivecor- relationbetweenVPAandsubjectivesexualarousal(p=.036) andperceivedgenitalarousal(p=.05).Ascanbeseenbythe scatterplots for the asexual women, these results were not accountedforbyoutliers,andinstead,representarelatively linear pattern (Fig.4). Correlations between VPA and self- reportmeasureswerenotsignificantforanyoftheotherthree subgroups(Table2). Discussion SummaryofFindings Overall,thefindingsrevealednosignificantdifferencesbetween asexualwomenandheterosexual,homosexual,orbisexual womeninthegenitalarousalresponsetoaheterosexualaudio- visualeroticstimulusinacontrolled,laboratoryenvironment. Instead,allwomenshowedasignificantincreaseinresponseto theeroticfilm.AmaineffectofFilmwasalsofoundforsub- jectivesexualarousalinthatallgroupsshowedasignificant Fig.4 ScatterplotsofapercentchangeinVPAvs.subjectivesexual arousal,andbpercentchangeinVPAvs.self-reportedphysicalsexual increase,withnosignificantgroupdifferences.Onperceived arousalforasexualwomen(n=7) genital arousal, there was a trend towards a Group9Film interactionsuchthattherewaslessofanincreaseamongthe asexualscomparedtotheothergroups;however,thisdidnot GenitalArousalResponses reachstatisticalsignificance.Giventhesmalleffectsize,this effectmightnotbemagnifiedwithalargersample.Aspre- The lack of a significant Group9Film interaction on VPA dicted,therewasasignificantGroup9Filminteractiononthe cannotonlybeattributedtolowsamplesizesgiventhatthe sensuality-sexualattractiondomainoftheFilmScalesuchthat effect size (partial g2) was small. Nonetheless, these results therewasasignificantincreasefollowingtheeroticfilminall shouldbereplicatedinalargersampleofasexuals.Inwomen, groupsexcepttheasexualwomen. physiological measures such as VPA (Brotto et al., 2004; On other self-report measures of affect, there was a sig- Pieterseetal.,2008)andfMRI(Arnowetal.,2009)havebeen nificant Group9Film interaction for positive affect to the found to differentiate women with and without sexual dys- eroticstimulussuchthatasexualsdidnotshowtheincreasein functioninsomestudiesbutnotinothers(Laan,vanDriel,& positive affect with the erotic stimulus seen by the other vanLunsen,2008).Ourfindingslendsupporttothespecula- groups.Therewerenomaineffectsofgrouporfilmonneg- tion(Bogaert,2006;Brottoetal.,2010;PaganWestfall,2004) ativeaffect,andanxietydecreasedbyasimilarmagnitudefor thatasexualityisnotasexualdysfunction—orperhaps,more allwomenwithexposuretotheeroticstimulus.Interestingly, precisely, it is not a disorder of sexual arousal. In studies there was a significant Group9Film interaction for auto- exploringVPAdifferenceswithregardtosexualorientation, nomicarousalinthatallwomenshowedasignificantincrease heterosexualandhomosexualwomendidnotdiffer,regardless withtheeroticfilmexcepttheasexuals. ofthestimulustypeshown(Chivers&Bailey,2005;Chivers 123 708 ArchSexBehav(2011)40:699–712 Table2 Correlationsbetween Perception p Subjective p percentchangeinVPAand ofgenital sexualarousal perceptionofgenitalsexual sexualarousal arousalandsubjectivesexual arousalasafunctionofgroup Heterosexual r(9)=.327 ns r(9)=-.038 ns Bisexual r(9)=-.229 ns r(9)=-.108 ns Note:ValuesrepresentPearson Homosexual r(10)=-.392 ns r(10)=-.247 ns productmomentcorrelation Asexual r(6)=.753 .05 r(6)=.787 .036 coefficients.dfinparentheses etal.,2004,2007;Peterson,Janssen,&Laan,2010).Thatasex- domainanalysis, lower scoreswould have been revealed in ual women responded to heterosexual stimuli despite their thisgroup. statedpreferencefornosexualpartnersisconsistentwiththe Sinceallwomenwereincludedinanalysesoflaboratory- targetnon-specificityseeninhetero-andhomosexualwomen. inducedsubjectivearousalandthisshowedanoverallsignif- Specifically, work by Chivers et al. has consistently shown icantincrease,thissuggeststhat,regardlessofcurrentsexual that,amongwomen,thereisthesame(strong)magnitudeof activity, asexual women are capable of experiencing sub- VPA among different sexual orientation groups to stimuli jective sexualarousal inresponseto a sexualstimulus. One depictingmale–male,female–female,andmale–femaleactor recentstudythatexaminedsubjectivesexualarousalbasedon pairings,despitethefactthatself-reportedarousallevelscor- thedegreeof‘‘absorption’’(i.e.,theabilitytoimmerseoneself respondedwiththestimulioftheirstatedpreference.Ourdata in a stimulus without being distracted by other competing alsoshowedthatbisexualwomen—whopreviouslyhavenot stimuli;Koukounas&McCabe,1997)intheeroticfilmfound beenthesubjectofVPAresearch–hadthesamemagnitudeof thatthosewomenwhoweregiveninstructionstobecomemore VPAincreaseasallothergroups.Ifourspeculationthattarget absorbedinthefilmshowedhigherlevelsofsubjectivesexual non-specificityisaphenomenonaspertinenttoasexualwomen arousalcomparedtothosewhowereinstructedtoviewasa asitistowomenofothersexualorientationgroups,thenthis passiveobserver(Sheen&Koukounas,2009).Becauselackof alsosuggeststhatconclusionsdrawnabouttheautomaticityof absorption has been associated with difficulties with infor- women’ssexualresponding,whichmayhaveevolvedtobe mationprocessingandpossiblyattentionaldisruption(Cran- adaptationstopromotefacilegenitalpenetrationandminimize ston-Cuebas&Barlow,1990),ourfindingssuggestthatthese physicaldamage(Chiversetal.,2007),alsoextendtoasexual cognitiveandattentionalpathways,whichareimportantfor women.Furthermore,one might alsospeculate that asexual sexualresponding,areintactinasexualwomen,andanystated women’s VPA responses to male-male and female-female apathytowardssexualstimulioractivityisnotduetofaulty eroticstimuliwouldbeasrobustastheircurrentlyobserved cognitiveorattentiveprocesses. responsestomale-femalestimuli,andwouldnotdifferfrom There was a significant Group9Film interaction on sen- heterosexualandhomosexualwomen. suality-sexual attraction in the predicted direction with all womenexcepttheasexualsshowingasignificantincreaseto SubjectiveArousalResponses theeroticstimulus.Theindividualitemscomprisingthissub- scaleinclude:‘‘adesiretobeclosetosomeone’’and‘‘sexually Therewerenosignificantgroupdifferencesinsexualarousal attractive.’’Giventhatasexualsdefinethemselvesaccordingto whenmeasuredbytheself-reportFSFIorwhenmeasuredin alackofsexualattraction(Jay,2005),ourfindingssuggestthat response to a laboratory stimulus. However, on the DASA, despiteasexuals’normalsexualarousalresponsetocompetent which assessesdifferent components ofsexual arousal (i.e., stimuli,theydonotexperiencethecorrespondingmotivationto mental sexual arousal vs. genital tingling vs. lubrication vs. directthatexcitementtowardsapotentialsexualmate.Clarity pleasantgenitalsensations),asexualwomenreportedsignifi- onthismaybegleanedbyconsideringtheincentivemotivation cantlylowerlevelsthantheotherthreegroups.Thesedatasug- modelofsexualresponse,whichpositsthateachindividualhas gestthatwithacompetentsexualstimulus(suchasthecondi- asexualresponsesystemthatcanbeactivatedbycompetent tions during the psychophysiological assessment), asexuals sexual stimuli (Both, Everaerd, & Laan, 2007; Everaerd & showeda robustsubjectivesexualarousal responsethatdid Laan,1995).Acomponentofthemodelisthedispositionto notsignificantlydifferfromnon-asexuals.Moreover,because respond to those stimuli with some form of sexual activity, FSFIarousalratingswerebasedonlyonthose(asexuals)who which,inandofitself,thengeneratessexualdesire.This‘‘dis- weresexuallyactive(57%),thelackofsignificantgroupdif- position’’islikelyinfluencedbycentralandperipheralneuro- ferencessuggeststhatasexualitydoesnotinterferewithasex- transmitter-hormone interactions (Laan & Both, 2008), and uallyactivewoman’sabilitytobecomearoused.Thearousal can be measured by reflexes of the Achilles tendon, reflect- patterns of sexually inactive women are unknown, and it is ing an‘‘action tendency’’(Both, van Boxtel, Stekelenburg, possiblethatifallwomenwereincludedintheFSFIarousal Everaerd,&Laan,2005).Themodelviewssexualdesireasan 123
Description: