Philosophy of Psychology Mario Bunge and Ruben Ardila Philosophy of Psychology With 33 Illustrations Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris Tokyo Mario Bunge Ruben Ardila Foundations and Philosophy Departamento de Psicologia of Science Unit Universidad Nacional de Colombia McGill University Bogota Montreal H3A lW7 Colombia Canada Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bunge, Mario Augusto. Philosophy of psychology. Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. I. Psychology-Philosophy. I. Ardila, Ruben, 1942- II. Title. BF38.B85 1987 150'.1 86-26124 © 1987 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc. All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10010, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analy sis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adapta tion, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc. in this publication, even if the former are not especially identified, is not to be taken as a sign that such names, as understood by the Trade Marks and Merchandise Marks Act, may accordingly be used freely by anyone. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of going to press, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein. Typeset by TCSystems, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania. 987654321 ISBN-13: 978-1-4612-9118-3 e-ISBN-13: 978-1-4612-4696-1 DOl: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4696-1 Preface This book is about some topical philosophical and methodological prob lems that arise in the study of behavior and mind, as well as in the treatment of behavioral and mental disorders. It deals with such questions as 'What is behavior a manifestation of?', 'What is mind, and how is it related to matter?', 'Which are the positive legacies, if any, of the major psychological schools?', 'How can behavior and mind best be studied?', and 'Which are the most effective ways of modifying behavioral and mental processes?' These questions and their kin cannot be avoided in the long run because they fuel the daily search for better hypotheses, experimental designs, techniques, and treatments. They also occur in the critical examination of data and theories, as well as methods for the treatment of behavioral and mental disorders. All students of human or animal, normal or abnormal behavior and mind, whether their main concern is basic or applied, theoretical or em pirical, admit more or less tacitly to a large number of general philosophi cal and methodological principles. For example, they presuppose that mind is (or is not) distinct from brain function; that understanding the nervous system is (or is not) necessary to explain behavior and mind; that animal research is (or is not) necessary to advance the understanding of human behavior and mind; that statistics are (or are not) indispensable to assess the efficacy of treatments of behavioral and mental disorders; that psychology is (or is not) an autonomous discipline; that psychology has much (or little) to learn from artificial intelligence-and more. Some of these strategic principles guide research or practice, whereas others mislead them. As long as they remain tacit they are mere dogmas. Whereas some such dogmas may be fertile, others are bound to be barren or even harmful to the search for truth and efficacy. A principle used in scientific research or in professional practice becomes a hypothesis the moment it is rendered explicit. From then on it can be subjected to exami nation and evaluation, whereas before that it was out of consciousness, hence beyond criticism. Preface VI Explicit principles, in short, are not only guides to research and prac tice. They can also become objects of research, in particular of concep tual analysis, theoretical systematization, and empirical checking. A goal of the present study is to ferret out and examine some of the philosophical hypotheses and methodological rules held or used more or less tacitly by contemporary psychologists. Our exercise is not one in academic futility: it should be of some help to psychologists as well as philosophers. To the former because bad princi ples, particularly when hidden, are roadblocks, whereas good ones expe dite research and praxis, and they can occasionally reorient them in prom ising directions. Our exercise should be useful to philosophers because the philosophy of mind will continue to be obsolete, boring, and barren, as long as it remains out of touch with the forefront of research and practice. Our book, then, is not one of philosophical or armchair psychology but a work in the philosophy and methodology of psychology. We do not wish to usurp the job of psychologists but to study it from a certain viewpoint. In fact, our task will be to analyze psychological research and practice in the light of philosophy and methodology, and with the hope that such examination will in turn enrich both philosophY and psychology. We agree that philosophical psychology is at best the precursor and at worst the enemy of scientific psychology, but submit that the philosophy of psychology can be its ally. This work is the outcome of the joint effort of a research psychologist (R.A.) and a physicist turned philosopher (M.B.). The former wrote chap ters 10 and 12, and the senior author wrote the rest. Each author takes full responsibility for his own contribution, and neither endorses fully that of his partner. The authors undertook this venture on the strength of five beliefs. (1) Psychology has an extremely rich but largely untapped philosophical and methodological problematics. (2) Some of the philosophical and method ological principles at work in psychology are tacit, and hence are held somewhat uncritically. (3) All the principles that guide or misguide re search and practice in any field should be subjected to thorough investiga tion. (4) Because such investigation bears on norms that concern both research and practice, it should be taken seriously by all students of behavior, mind, and mental health. (5) Psychologists can make solid con tributions to such philosophical and methodological studies provided they become reasonably well acquainted with contemporary philosophy, and philosophers can do as much as long as they become reasonably conver sant with contemporary psychology. This being a tall order, it is best for psychologists and philosophers to cooperate with one another. Mario Bunge Ruben Ardila Foundations and Philosophy Departamento de Psicologia, of Science Unit, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, McGill University Bogota, Columbia Montreal, Canada Acknowledgments I am indebted to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for a research grant in support of this project. I thank the follow ing persons for having supplied valuable information, comments, or criti cisms on a variety of psychological or neuroscientific problems over the last few years: Ruben Ardila (Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Co lombia), the late Dalbir Bindra (Psychology, McGill University), David Blitz (Philosophy, Concordia University), Bernard Dubrovsky (Psychia try, McGill University), Mike Dillinger (Educational Psychology, McGill University), Hans Flohr (Neurobiology, Universitat Bremen), Lluis Garcia i Sevilla (Psychology, Universidad de Barcelona), the late Donald o. Hebb (Psychology, McGill University), Rodolfo Llinas (Physiology and Biophysics, New York University), Peter M. Milner (Psychology, McGill University), Mortimer Mishkin (Neurobiology, National Institute of Health, Bethesda), Meinrad Perrez (Psychology, U niversite de Fri bourg), Ernst Poppel (Medical Psychology, U niversitat Munchen), Viktor Sarris (Psychology, J.W. Goethe-Universitat, Frankfurt), and Endel Tulving (Psychology, University of Toronto). M.B. Contents Preface..................................................... v Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Vll I PRELIMINARIES WHY PHILOSOPHY OF PSYCHOLOGY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.1 Influence of Philosophy on Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.2 Philosophies of Mind. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 1.3 The Identity Hypotheses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 1.4 Philosophical Presuppositions of Scientific Research. . . 17 1.5 Philosophies of Psychology ......................... 21 1.6 Summing Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2 WHAT PSYCHOLOGY IS ABOUT.. ... ... .. .. ... . .. . ... . 25 2.1 Definitions of Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 2.2 Referents of Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.3 The Fragmentation of Psychology and How to Remedy It 30 2.4 Unification in Action. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.5 Aims of Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2.6 Summing Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 II APPROACH AND METHOD 3 APPROACHES TO BEHAVIOR AND MIND. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.1 Approach......................................... 44 3.2 Atomism, Holism, and Systemism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.3 Nonscientific Approaches to Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 3.4 Toward a Scientific Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 x Contents 3.5 Scientific Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 3.6 Summing Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 4 METHODOLOGy....................................... 62 4.1 Method........................................... 63 4.2 Observation ....................................... ·· 66 4.3 Measurement...................................... 71 4.4 Experiment........................................ 76 4.5 Inference.......................................... 81 4.6 Summing Up . . . . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . .. . ... . 85 III BRAINLESS PSYCHOLOGY 5 MENTALISM.......................................... 89 5.1 Subjective Experience. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 5.2 Classical Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 5.3 Gestalt Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 100 5.4 Information-Processing Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 105 5.5 Pop Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 111 5.6 Summing Up . . .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . ... .. . .. . .. .. ... . .. 115 6 BEHAVIORISM........................................ 116 6.1 Phenomenalism (Black-Boxism) ..................... 117 6.2 Environmentalism.................................. 120 6.3 Operationism...................................... 125 6.4 Intervening Variables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 130 6.5 Hypothetical Constructs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 132 6.6 Summing Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 134 IV BIOPSYCHOLOGY 7 NEUROBIOLOGy...................................... 139 7.1 Brain & Co........................................ 141 7.2 Plasticity.......................................... 146 7.3 Development...................................... 151 7.4 Evolution......................................... 155 7.5 Functional Localization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 160 7.6 Summing Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 165 Contents xi 8 BASIC FUNCTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 166 8.1 Movement........................................ 167 8.2 Affect............................................ 169 8.3 Sensation......................................... 173 8.4 Attention.......................................... 177 8.5 Memory.......................................... 179 8.6 Summing Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 184 9 HIGHER FUNCTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 185 9.1 Learning.......................................... 186 9.2 Perception........................................ 194 9.3 Conception........................................ 201 9.4 Cognition......................................... 207 9.5 Intention.......................................... 215 9.6 Summing Up . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. .. . .. . .. . . . . . . .. 218 V THE SOCIAL ASPECT 10 THE SOCIAL MATRIX OF BEHAVIOR. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 221 10.1 Psychology: Natural Science or Social Science? . . . . . .. 223 10.2 Culture........................................... 224 10.3 Social Classes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 227 10.4 Socialization....................................... 228 10.5 Cultural Homogenization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 231 10.6 Summing Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 232 11 CONSCIOUSNESS...................................... 233 11.1 Distinctions....................................... 234 11.2 Definitions........................................ 235 11.3 Applications....................................... 239 11.4 Hypotheses....................................... 243 11.5 Experimental Tests. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 247 11.6 Summing Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 250 12 PSYCHOTECHNOLOGY................................ 251 12.1 Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 252 12.2 Educational Psychology ............................ 255 12.3 Industrial and Organizational Psychology. . . . . . . . . . . .. 257 12.4 Designing Cultures. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 258 xii . Contents 12.5 The Goals of Psychotechnology ..................... 260 12.6 Summing Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 261 VI CONCLUSION 13 CONCLUDING REMARKS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 265 13.1 Reduction......................................... 265 13.2 Integration........................................ 270 13.3 Explanation....................................... 274 13.4 Prospects......................................... 280 13.5 Philosophical Harvest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 282 13.6 Summing Up . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 284 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 287 Name Index. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 309 Subject Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 317