PHILOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL COMMENTARY ON AMMIANUS MARCELLINUS XXV PHILOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL COMMENTARY ON AMMIANUS MARCELLINUS XXV BY J. DEN BOEFT J.W. DRIJVERS D. DEN HENGST H.C. TEITLER BRILL LEIDEN•BOSTON 2005 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A C.I.P. record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 90 04 14214 2 © Copyright 2005 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill Academic Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910 Danvers MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change. printed in the netherlands CONTENTS Preface ................................. vii Introduction ........................... ix Anoteonchronology ................. xv Legenda ................................ xxiii Map ..................................... xxvi CommentaryonChapter1 ........... 1 CommentaryonChapter2 ........... 39 CommentaryonChapter3 ........... 57 CommentaryonChapter4 ........... 111 CommentaryonChapter5 ........... 169 CommentaryonChapter6 ........... 197 CommentaryonChapter7 ........... 219 CommentaryonChapter8 ........... 251 CommentaryonChapter9 ........... 279 CommentaryonChapter10 ......... 307 Bibliography ........................... 345 Indices ................................. 369 PREFACE Book25oftheResGestaeisthelastofthebooksinwhichJulianplaysa leadingpart.Thecommentaryonthisbookisoursixthcontribution to the series which was initiated by P. de Jonge. As in book 24, the precise chronology of the events and the numerous geographical detailsposedmanyproblems.Owingtoalackofclearevidence,ina numberofcasesonlytentativesolutionswerefeasible. Weowethankstofriendsandcolleaguesfortheirhelpfuladvice andtoInesvandeWetering,whocorrectedourEnglish.TheFonda- tion Hardt at Vandoeuvres (CH) again offered its hospitality for some periods of undisturbed study. Dr Vera Enke of the Berlin- BrandenburgischeAkademiederWissenschaftenkindlygaveusthe opportunitytostudythearchivesofthe‘Arbeitsgruppefürspätrömis- chePhilologieundGeschichte’,ledbyDrW.Seyfarth(1906–1985), the editor of the Teubner edition of the Res Gestae. This material made us aware of the difficulties he had to cope with in his schol- arly work and also provided us with some welcome suggestions for our own task. Thanks are due to the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), which subsidized the correction of the Englishmanuscript. The cooperation with the publishing house Koninklijke Brill N.V.wasefficient. J.denBoeft J.W.Drijvers D.denHengst H.C.Teitler INTRODUCTION Book25oftheResGestae isthelastpartofthetrilogyonthePersian expedition.Book23describestheeventsinthefirstthreemonthsof 363,duringwhichthefinalpreparationsweremadeatAntiochand thearmymarchedtoCercusiumontheEuphrates,whereitinvaded Persianterritory.ThemarchtoCtesiphonandthebeginningofthe northbound katabasis, a period of two and a half months, are dealt withinbook24.Remarkably,book25coversalargerspaceandmore timethanthetwopreceedingbooksputtogether:ittakesthereader from a place about 35 kilometers north of Ctesiphon to Dadastana ontheborderbetweenGalatiaandBithynia,adistanceofmorethan 1700kilometers.Intime,itrunsfromJune17,363toFebruary17, 364,afulleightmonths. Suchbarecalendricalandgeographicaldetailsare,however,mis- leading: in fact, the first half of book 25 is devoted to a period of tendays,fromJune17toJune26,anditsfinalpages,markedoffas chapter 10, deal with around four months. Simple observations of thiskindillustratethehugedifferencebetweenapurelychronolog- icalsurveyandhistoriography.Ahistorianisrightlyexpectedtopay carefulattentiontoacorrectchronology,butwithinthisframework he selects the events to which he ascribes a particular importance, distinguishing them from any facts which he regards as less inter- esting or even not worth mentioning. Ammianus expresses this in thesewords:carptim,utquaequememoriadignasunt,explicabo(28.1.2) and, more precisely, sufficiet enim veritate nullo velata mendacio ipsas rerum digerere summitates (31.5.10). No reader will deny the histo- rian the right or, indeed, the duty to proceed selectively (carptim) and to restrict himself to the truly crucial events (ipsas rerum sum- mitates). Generally speaking, there is no reason for repeated com- plaints about Ammianus’ strategy, although at times more precise and detailed information would have been desirable. Nevertheless, the historian’s selection of material is as much determined by his interpretationof the past as is his presentationof the evidencein a well-composedaccount.Theseaspectsofthehistoriographicartwere hardlyproblematizedbyAmmianus,buttheyaretodaytheobjectof critical scrutiny in philosophical analyses of historiography in gen- eral. Inevitably, the Res Gestae has also become the object of such critical examinations, and many scholars have tried to pinpoint the x introduction author’s political principles and, more specifically, his biased views andprejudices,andsomehaveevencalledhisbasictrustworthiness into question. In recent books and articles the second half of book 25, which describes the short reign of Jovian, is regularly exploited asevidencetodemonstratehowAmmianusmanipulatedthefacts. The first pages of the book describe the continuation of the army’s katabasis in a northern direction, which the author never openly calls a retreat. The Romans are continually harassed by the Persians, but they finally defeat their enemies in a pitched battle, duringwhichRomanstaminagloriouslyovercomesPersianfragility. However,thissuccessdoesnotinanywayalteranotherproblem,viz. theacuteshortageoffood,whichseverelyworriestheemperorJulian. Suddenly two earlier threads, one in each of the books 23 and 24, cometogether:book23ischaracterizedbyaseriesofwarningomina, neglectedbyJulian;inbook24ominaareabsent,withoneexception; instead we find a number of reckless acts committed by Julian, in which he exposes himself to mortal danger. In chapter 2 of book 25JulianisfirstconfrontedwithanightlyappearanceoftheGenius publicus, who had also appeared to him in Paris during the night before he was proclaimed Augustus. This time, however, the Spirit of the Commonwealth leaves his tent in a somber mood, with the hornofplentyveiled.SomewhatlaterJulianseesashootingstar.The divinatoryexperts,whomheconsults,concludethatallfurtheraction oughttobepostponed,buttheyfailtopersuadeJulianandtherefore the next morning the army continues its march. When it is heavily attacked at various points, Julian involves himself personally in the necessary defensive actions, sine respectu periculi sui and forgetting to don a proper armour. Ammianus refrains from terms such as temeritas, but the reader cannot help fearing the outcome of this bravery. These fears come true: suddenly the emperor is severely wounded by a spear and he has to be brought back to his tent. Thissetbackignitesinhissoldiersaspiriteddeterminationandthey gain the upper hand. Ammianus hails their success in panegyric phraseology, but has to admit that there were some costly losses on theRomanside. In the meantime Julian has realized that his life is at its end. The author honours the man, whom, for all his shortcomings, he regarded as an outstanding ruler and general, in the best way he could think of, viz. by putting an impressive farewell address in his mouth. For the composition of this speech Ammianus draws on various literary traditions; the result is an admirable piece of writing,whichhonoursthereputationoftheonlyindisputablehero
Description: