Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information GLOBAL FORUM ON TRANSPARENCY AND EXCHANGE for Tax Purposes OF INFORMATION FOR TAX PURPOSES PEER REVIEWS, PHASE 2: LUXEMBOURG This report contains a “Phase 2: Implementation of the Standard in Practice” review, as well as revised version of the “Phase 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework” review already released for this jurisdiction. Peer Review Report The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is the multilateral framework within which work in the area of tax transparency and exchange of Phase 2 information is carried out by 120 jurisdictions, which participate in the Global Forum on an equal footing. Implementation of the Standard The Global Forum is charged with in-depth monitoring and peer review of the implementation of the international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. in Practice These standards are primarily refl ected in the 2002 OECD Model Agreement on Exchange of Information on Tax Matters and its commentary, and in Article 26 of the OECD Model P Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its commentary as updated in 2004. The ee LUXEMBOURG standards have also been incorporated into the UN Model Tax Convention. r R e v The standards provide for international exchange on request of foreseeably relevant ie w information for the administration or enforcement of the domestic tax laws of a requesting R party. Fishing expeditions are not authorised but all foreseeably relevant information must be ep o provided, including bank information and information held by fi duciaries, regardless of the r existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual criminality standard. t Ph a s All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identifi ed by the Global Forum as e 2 relevant to its work, are being reviewed. This process is undertaken in two phases. Phase 1 Im reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction’s legal and regulatory framework for the exchange p le of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of that framework. m e Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined – Phase 1 and Phase 2 – reviews. n ta The Global Forum has also put in place a process for supplementary reports to follow-up tio on recommendations, as well as for the ongoing monitoring of jurisdictions following the n o conclusion of a review. The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions to effectively implement the f th international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes. e S ta All review reports are published once approved by the Global Forum and they thus represent n d agreed Global Forum reports. a rd For more information on the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of in P Information for Tax Purposes, and for copies of the published review reports, please refer to ra www.oecd.org/tax/transparency and www.eoi-tax.org. ctic e L U X Consult this publication on line at http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264202672-en. E M B This work is published on the OECD iLibrary, which gathers all OECD books, periodicals and O U statistical databases. R G Visit www.oecd-ilibrary.org for more information. ISBN 978-92-64-20266-5 -:HSTCQE=WUW[[Z: 23 2013 30 1 P Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes Peer Reviews: Luxembourg 2013 PHASE 2: IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STANDARD IN PRACTICE November 2013 (reflecting the legal and regulatory framework as at May 2013) ThisworkispublishedontheresponsibilityoftheSecretary-GeneraloftheOECD. Theopinionsexpressedandargumentsemployedhereindonotnecessarilyreflect theofficialviewsoftheOECDorofthegovernmentsofitsmembercountriesor thoseoftheGlobalForumonTransparencyandExchangeofInformationforTax Purposes. Thisdocumentandanymapincludedhereinarewithoutprejudicetothestatusof orsovereigntyoveranyterritory,tothedelimitationofinternationalfrontiersand boundariesandtothenameofanyterritory,cityorarea. Pleasecitethispublicationas: OECD(2013),GlobalForumonTransparencyandExchangeofInformationforTaxPurposesPeer Reviews:Luxembourg2013:Phase2:ImplementationoftheStandardinPractice,OECDPublishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264202672-en ISBN978-92-64-20266-5(print) ISBN978-92-64-20267-2(PDF) Series:GlobalForumonTransparencyandExchangeofInformationforTaxPurposesPeerReviews ISSN2219-4681(print) ISSN2219-469X(online) CorrigendatoOECDpublicationsmaybefoundonlineat:www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. ©OECD2013 Youcancopy,downloadorprintOECDcontentforyourownuse,andyoucanincludeexcerptsfromOECD publications,databasesandmultimediaproductsinyourowndocuments,presentations,blogs,websitesand teachingmaterials,providedthatsuitableacknowledgmentofOECDassourceandcopyrightownerisgiven. Allrequestsforpublicorcommercialuseandtranslationrightsshouldbesubmittedtorights@oecd.org. Requestsforpermissiontophotocopyportionsofthismaterialforpublicorcommercialuseshallbeaddressed directlytotheCopyrightClearanceCenter(CCC)[email protected]çaisd’exploitationdu droitdecopie(CFC)[email protected]. TABLE OF CONTENTS – 3 Table of Contents About the Global Forum 5 Executive Summary 7 Introduction 11 Information and methodology used for the peer review of Luxembourg 11 Compliance with the Standards 19 A. Availability of Information 19 Overview 19 A1 Ownership and identity information 21 A2 Accounting records 54 A3 Banking information 59 B. Access to Information 65 Overview 65 B1 Competent Authority’s ability to obtain and provide information 67 B2 Notification requirements and rights and safeguards 84 C. Exchanging Information 89 Overview 89 C1 Exchange of information mechanisms 92 C2 Exchange of information mechanisms with all relevant partners 104 C3 Confidentiality 107 C4 Rights and safeguards of taxpayers and third parties 110 C5 Timeliness of responses to requests for information 112 Summary of Determinations and Factors Underlying Recommendations 119 PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 2 – LUXEMBOURG © OECD 2013 4 – TABLE OF CONTENTS Annex 1: Jurisdiction’s Response to the Review Report 125 Annex 2: List of all Exchange-of-Information Mechanisms in Force 126 Annex 3: List of all agreements signed, allowing for the exchange of banking information, to the standard and in force, including jurisdictions covered by the EU Council Directive on Administrative Cooperation in the Field of Taxation (2011/16/EU) 132 Annex 4: List of Laws, Regulations and Other Material Received 136 Annex 5: People Interviewed During the On-Site Visit 139 PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 2 – LUXEMBOURG © OECD 2013 ABOUT THE GLOBAL FORUM – 5 About the Global Forum The Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes is the multilateral framework within which work in the area of tax transparency and exchange of information is carried out by over 120 jurisdic- tions, which participate in the Global Forum on an equal footing The Global Forum is charged with in-depth monitoring and peer review of the implementation of the international standards of transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes These standards are primarily reflected in the 2002 OECD Model Agreement on Exchange of Information on Tax Matters and its commentary, and in Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital and its commentary as updated in 2004 The standards have also been incorporated into the UN Model Tax Convention The standards provide for international exchange on request of foreseeably relevant information for the administration or enforcement of the domestic tax laws of a requesting party Fishing expeditions are not authorised but all fore- seeably relevant information must be provided, including bank information and information held by fiduciaries, regardless of the existence of a domestic tax interest or the application of a dual criminality standard All members of the Global Forum, as well as jurisdictions identified by the Global Forum as relevant to its work, are being reviewed This process is under- taken in two phases Phase 1 reviews assess the quality of a jurisdiction’s legal and regulatory framework for the exchange of information, while Phase 2 reviews look at the practical implementation of that framework Some Global Forum members are undergoing combined – Phase 1 and Phase 2 – reviews The Global Forum has also put in place a process for supplementary reports to follow-up on recommendations, as well as for the ongoing monitoring of jurisdictions following the conclusion of a review The ultimate goal is to help jurisdictions to effectively implement the international standards of transparency and exchange of informa- tion for tax purposes All review reports are published once approved by the Global Forum and they thus represent agreed Global Forum reports For more information on the work of the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes, and for copies of the published review reports, please refer to wwwoecdorg/tax/transparency and wwweoi-taxorg PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 2 – LUXEMBOURG © OECD 2013 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – 7 Executive Summary 1 This report summarises the legal and regulatory framework for transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes in Luxembourg as well as the practical implementation of that framework The assessment of exchange of information in practice covers the three year period 2009 to 2011 The international standard laid down in the Terms of Reference of the Global Forum for monitoring and reviewing progress towards transparency and exchange of information, considers the availability of relevant information within a given jurisdiction, the ability of the competent authority to access it swiftly, and whether the information may be exchanged effectively with its partners in information exchange 2 Since its commitment to the international standard of transparency and exchange of information, in March 2009, Luxembourg has been very active and quick in negotiating EOI mechanisms that incorporate the full version of article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention 1 Luxembourg’s network of bilateral information exchange mechanisms now comprises 75 2 agreements, 45 of which contain article 26 allowing for the exchange of bank- ing information and 43 of which are to the standard Of the 43 agreements to the standard 23 are in force Luxembourg is also party to the EU Council Directive on Administrative Cooperation in the Field of Taxation 2011/16/ EU This Directive has been in effect since 1 January 2013 As a result, Luxembourg has EOI relationships to the standard with 54 jurisdictions and can already exchange information with 40 of them (arrangements in force) 3 In two cases – Austria and Panama – the obligations stipulated in the recently negotiated protocols are more restrictive than those established by the international standard However, since 2013, Austria has been covered by the EU Council Directive on Administrative Cooperation in the Field 1 The 2005 revised version 2 See Annex 3 for the agreements signed, allowing for the exchange of banking information, to the standard and in force, including the jurisdictions covered by the EU Council Directive on Administrative Cooperation in the Field of Taxation 2011/16/EU PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 2 – LUXEMBOURG © OECD 2013 8 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY of Taxation (2011/16/EU) Luxembourg has proposed to its treaty partners to update the treaties still not meeting the standard and is in negotiations with 24 jurisdictions A total of 18 new agreements or protocols 3 have been signed since 2011, all of which should be ratified shortly The two draft laws ratifying 15 4 of these new agreements or protocols have been enacted by Parliament on 7 June 2013 and the laws are expected to be published by the end of June 2013 Luxembourg needs to continue updating of its network of tax treaties so that all its partners can access the information held by financial institutions 4 In order to conform to the international transparency standard, Luxembourg introduced, legislation, in 2010, governing access to banking information or information protected by secrecy rules This legislation imple- ments Luxembourg’s international commitments into domestic law 5 Banking information is available due to the anti-money laundering (AML) legislation, amongst other things The rules according to which infor- mation relating to numbered accounts must be kept derive from a grand ducal regulation adopted on 1 February 2010 This regulation was complemented by a new CSSF (Financial Sector Supervisory Commission – Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier) regulation adopted on 14 December 2012, which clarifies that these rules are applicable to numbered accounts opened prior to the regulation of February 2010, and addresses concerns expressed in the Phase 1 review 6 Luxembourg law generally guarantees the availability of information on companies and partnerships All companies and partnerships must regis- ter with the Register of Commerce and Companies (Registre du commerce et des sociétés, “RCS”) within a month of their creation The law usually requires the provision of information to the RCS relating to the shareholders and partners of these companies and partnerships as well as updates to this information However sociétés anonymes (SAs, or public limited compa- nies), sociétés en commandite par actions (Secas, or partnerships limited by shares), and sociétés européennes (SE, European companies) are themselves required to keep information on the holders of registered shares, through a register of shares Comments received from peers confirm that ownership information has been provided in those cases where it has been requested 7 Luxembourg law authorises the issuance of bearer securities by SAs, Secas, and SEs, but there are no mechanisms in place to ensure the 3 Canada, Czech Republic, FYROM, Isle of Man, Italy, Jersey, Kazakhstan, Laos, Malta, Poland, Romania, the Seychelles, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Chinese Taipei and Russia 4 Canada, FYROM, Italy, Kazakhstan, Laos, Malta, Poland, Romania, Russia, the Seychelles, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Switzerland, Tajikistan and Chinese Taipei PEER REVIEW REPORT – PHASE 2 – LUXEMBOURG © OECD 2013