Perception and Psychophysics 2000: Vol 62 Table of Contents

7 Pages·2000·2 MB·English

Contents of Volume 62
Abrams, R. A , & Law, M. B. Object-based visual attention Boswell, A. E. See Berg, K. M.
with endogenous orienting 818 Bradlow, A. See Allen, J
Acker, B. E. See Hall, M. D Bregman, A. S., Ahad, P. A., Crum, P. A. C., & O'Reilly, J. Ef-
Adams, B. See Trainor, L. J fects of time intervals and tone durations on auditory
Ahad, P. A. See Bregman, A. S stream segregation 626
Allen, J., Kraus, N . & Bradlow, A. Neural representation of Breitmeyer, B. G., & Ogmen, H. Recent models and findings
consciously imperceptible speech sound differences 1383 in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and
update 1572
Altarriba, J. See Diliberto, K.. A
Breslin, P. A. S. See Shikata, H
Amelio, J. See Gibson, B. S
Andrew, H. See Haggard, P. Briand, K. A., Larrison, A. L., & Sereno, A B. Inhibition of
return in manual and saccadic response systems 1512
Arnott, S. R., & Shedden, J. M. Attention switching in depth
Brockhoff, P. T. M. See van der Steen, F. A. M
using random-dot autostereograms: Attention gradient
asymmetries ; peters 1459 Brown, G. M. See Stillman, J. A
\rterberry, M. E., & Yonas, A. Percoef tphrete-diimeonsinona l Brown, J. M. See Fowler, C. A
shape specified by optic flow by 8-week-old infants Brungart, D. S., Rabinowitz, W. M., & Durlach, N. I. Evalua-
550 tion of response methods for the localization of nearby
Atterbury, J. L.S ee Groome, L. J Cer 48
Auer, E. T., Jr. See Luce, P. A Burton, M. W. See Utman, J. A
Baird, J. C., & Harder, K. A. The psychophysics of imagery ‘anévet, G. See Teghtsoonian, R
113 ‘arlson-Radvansky, | A. See Currie, C. B
Baker, K. L., Williams, S. M., & Nicolson, R. |. Evaluating ataliotti, J. See Bonato, F
frequency proximity in stream segregation 81 ‘avanagh, P. See Shioiri, S
Baldwin, K. See Francis, A. I ‘hen, Z. An object-based cost of visual filtering . 482
Bandomir, C. A. See Flanagan,J . R ho, R. Y., Yang, V., & Hallett, P. E. Reliability and dimension-
Banks, M.S. See Freeman, T. C. A ality of judgments of visually textured materials 735
Bavelier, D., Deruelle, C., & Proksch, J. Positive and negative ‘holewiak, R. W., & Collins, A. A. The generation of vibro-
compatibility effects 100 tactile patterns on a linear array: Influences of body site,
Beale, J. M See Levin, D. T time, and presentation mode 1220
Bensmaia, S. See Hollins, M lark, V. D. See Post, R. B
Benso, F. See Turatto, M ollet, L. See Khalfa, S
Berg, K. M., & Boswell, A. E Noise increment detection in ollins, A. A. See Cholewiak, R. W
children | to 3 years of age 868 osta, A. See Sebastian-Gallés, N
Bernstein, L. E., Demorest, M. E., & Tucker, P. E.S peech per- owan, W. B. See Olds, E. S
ception without hearing 233 ‘raig, J. C. Processing of sequential tactile patterns: Effects
Bertelson, P., Vroomen, J., de Gelder, B., & Driver, J. The ven- of a neutral stimulus 596
triloquist effect does not depend on the direction of de- ‘raven, B. J. See Phillips, W. A
liberate visual attention 321
rowell, J. A. See Freeman, T. C. A
Bertera, J. H., & Rayner, K. Eye movements and the span of
‘rowther, C. S. See Nittrouer, S
the effective stimulus in visual search 576
‘rum, P. A. C. See Bregman, A. S
Bingham, G. P. See Wickelgren, E. A
Cuddy, F. See Symons, L. A
Blumstein, S. f See Utman, J. A
uijpers, R. H., Kappers, A. M. L., & Koenderink, J. J. Inves-
Blundell, J. See Haggard, P.
tigation of visual space using an exocentric pointing task
Bogdanov, S. V. See Maddox, W. T 1556
Bonato, F., & Cataliotti, J. The effects of figure/ground, per- ‘urrie, C. B., McConkie, G. W., Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., &
ceived area, and target saliency on the luminosity thresh- Irwin, D. E. The role of the saccade target object in the
old 34] perception of a visually stable world 673
Bonnet, C. See Pins, D usack, R., & Roberts, B. Effects of differences in timbre on
Boselie, F.S ee Hulleman, J sequential grouping 1112
Cutting, J. E., & Wang, R. F. Heading judgments in minimal Francis, A. L., Baldwin, K., & Nusbaum, H Effects of train-
environments: The value of a heuristic when invariants ing on attention to acoustic cues 1668
are rare 1146 Frawley, W. See Greene, I
ynader, M. S. See Dong, ¢ Freeman, T. C. A., Banks, M. S., & Crowell, J. A. Extraretinal
and retinal amplitude and phase errors during Filehne il-
Damper R. 1., & Harnad S. R. Neural network models of cat- lusion and path perception 900
egorical perception 843
Jannemiller, J. , & Stephens, B. R. Contrast discrimination Gale, C., & Monk, A. F. Where am I looking? The accuracy
under temporally varying contrast conditions 1039 of video-mediated gaze awareness S86
De Caro, S. A & Reeves, A. Rotating objects to determine Galera, C., Lopes, E. J., & von Griinau, M. Stimulus segmen-
orientation, not identity: Evidence from a backward- tation in the visual search task 505
masking/dual-task procedure 1356 Galfano, G. See Turatto, M
Dechief, L. G. See Di Lollo, V Gibson, B. S., & Amelio, J Inhibition of return and atten-
de Gelder B. See Bertelson, P. tional control settings 496
Den wrest, M. E. See Bernstein, L. f Goldinger, S. D. See Luce, P. A
Grant, A. C., Thiagarajah, M. C., & Sathian, K. Tactile per-
ee Bavelier, D
4\., Altarriba, J., & Neill, W. T. Novel popout and ception in blind Braille readers: A psychophysical study
familiar popout in a brightness discrimination task of acuity and hyperacuity using gratings and dot patterns
1494 30]
V., Enns, J. T., Yantis, S., & Dechief, I G. Response Greene, I Frawley, W., & Swimm, R. Individual differences
latencies to the onset and offset of visual stimuli 218 in collinearity judgment as a function of angular position
Dodd, B. See Thyer, N 1440
Dong, C.-J., Swindale, N. V., Zakarauskas, P., Hayward, V.,& Groome, | J., Mooney, D. M., Holland, S. B., Smith, Y. D., At-
( ynader M.S. The auditory motion aftereffect: Its tuning terbury, J. L.. & Dykman, R. A. Temporal pattern and
and specificity in the spatial and frequency domains spectral complexity as stimulus parameters for eliciting a
1099 cardiac orienting reflex in human fetuses 313
See Humphreys, G. W Grossberg. S. See Kelly, f
Haggard, P., Newman, C., Blundell, J., & Andrew, H. The per-
ceived position of the hand in space 363
Halli, M. D., Pastore, R. E., Acker, B. E., & Huang, W. Evi-
yastian-Galles, N
dence for auditory feature integration with spatially dis-
rungart, D.S tributed items 1243
Hallett, PR E. See Cho, R. Y
Handy, T. C., & Mangun, G. R. Attention and spatial selec-
P.. Thomas, J. P., Palmer, J., & Shimozaki, S. S.A
tion: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by
signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on
perceptual load 175
visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple
conjunction, and disjunction displays 425 Harder, K. A. See Baird, J. (
Harnad, S. R. See Damper, R
W. H. See Sokolov, A
chlaghecken Hayes, M. See Kurtz, D. B
W., & Faulhammer, G Empirical evaluation of Hayward, V. See Dong, C.-J
axioms fundamental to Stevens’s ratio-scaling approach: He, Z. J. See Mc arley, J. S
I. Loudness production 1505 Hickson, L. See Thyer, N
nns. J. 7 See Di Hillstrom, A. P. Repetition effects in visual search 800
Holcombe. \. O., Intriligator, J.. & Tse, P. U. The spoke
brightness illusion originates at an early motion process-
ing stage 1619
llermeier, W Holland, S. B. See Groome, L. J
nitzer, D Hollins, M , Bensmaia, S., Karlof, K., & Young, | Individual
& Bandomir, C. A. Coming to grips with differences in perceptual! space for tactile textures : Evi-
1534
weight perception: Effects of grasp configuration on per- dence from multidimensional scaling
ceived heaviness 1204 Hollins, M., & Risner, S. R. Evidence for the duplex theory
yrtier, M. A. See Yakel, D. A of tactile texture perception 695
\., & Brown, J. M. Perceptual parsing of acoustic Horner, D. T. Perceptual processing at adjacent locations on
consequences of velum lowering from information for a single finger: Masking and response competition
vowels 21 1545
Hornung, D. E. See Kurtz, D. B Kraus, N. See Allen, J
Houghton, G. See Milliken, B Kroeze, J. H. A. See Theunissen, M. J. M
Huang, W. See Hall, M. D Kuhl, P. K. See Iverson, P.
Hulleman, J., te Winkel, W., & Boselie, F. Concavities as basic Kurtz, D. B., Sheehe, P. R., Kent, P. F., White, 7 L., Hornung,
features in visual search: Evidence from search asym- D. E., & Wright, H. N. Odorant quality perception: A met-
metries 162~ ric individual differences approach 112]
Humphrey, K. See Symons, L. A Kurtz, D. B., White, T. L., & Hayes, M. The labeled dissimi-
Humphreys, G. W., & Donnelly, N. 3-D constraints on spa- larity scale: A metric of perceptual dissimilarity 152
tially parallel shape perception 1060
akatos, S. A common perceptual space for harmonic and
Humphreys, G. W. See Watson, D. G
percussive timbres 1426
Inhoff, A. W., Starr, M., & Shindler, K. | Is the processing of amb, M.R., & Yund, E. W. The role of spatial frequency in
words during eye fixations in reading strictly serial? cued shifts of attention between global and local forms
1474
Intriligator, J. See Holcombe, A. O amy, D. Object-based selection under focused attention: A
failure to replicate 11927792
Irwin, D. E. See Currie, C. B
amy, D. See Tsal, Y
Ishihara, M See Kitaoka, A
Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. Perceptual magnet and phoneme appin, J. S. See Norman, J. |
boundary effects in speech perception: Do they arise from arrison, A. L. See Briand, K. A
a common mechanism? 874 aw, M. B. See Abrams, R. A
ee, M. D., & Vickers, D. The importance of the convex hull
Jacobs, D. M., Michaels. C. F., & Runeson, S. Learning to for human performance on the traveling salesman prob-
perceive the relative mass of colliding balls: The effects of lem: A comment on MacGregor and Ormerod (1996)
ratio-scaling and feedback 332 7 6
ee Strayer, D. | evin, D. T., & Beale, J. M. Categorical perception occurs in
newly learned faces, other-race faces, and inverted faces
Ss
Jordan, T. R icCotter, M. V., & Thomas S. M. Visual and 346
audiovisual speech perception with color and gray-scale D. See Ward, L. M
facial images 1394 indell, A. K. See Nicholls, M. E. R
opes, E. J. See Galera, ¢
Kaji, N.. & Osaka, N. Optimal viewing position in vertically
uce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., Auer, E. T., Jr, & Vitevitch, M.S
and horizontally presented Japanese words 1634
Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN
Kanatuka, K.S Nakajim Y 615
Kandel, S.. Orliaguet, J.-P., & Viviani, P. Perceptual anticipa- ukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. Do spelling variations affect as-
tion in handwriting: The role of implicit motor compe- sociative and phonological priming by pseudohomo-
tence 706 phones? 196
M. | upianez, J. See Milliken, B
Culjpers, R. H
schoumans MacGregor, J. N., & Ormerod, T. C. Evaluating the impor-
Karlof, K. See Ho M tance of the convex hull in solving the Euclidean version
Kelly, F.. & Grossberg, S. Neural dynamics of 3-D surface of the traveling salesperson problem: Reply to Lee and
perception: Figure—ground separation and lightness per- Vickers (2000) 1501
ception 1596 Machado, | . & Rafal, R. D. Strategic control over saccadic
Kent, P. F. See Kurtz eye movements: Studies of the fixation offset effect 12 16
Maddox, W. T., & Bogdanoy, S. V. On the relation between
Kettenmann, B. See Spence, ¢
decision rules and perceptual representation in multi-
Micheyl, vam, E., Maison, S., Veuillet, E., &
dimensional perceptual categorization 984
Tones disappear faster in the right ear than in
the left 647 Maison, S. See Khalfa, S
Malkoc. G. See Webster, M. A
Khosla, R
Kingstone Mangun,G . R. See Handy, T. (
Kitaoka, A., & Ishihara, M. Three elemental illusions deter- Manhart, M. J. See Nittrouer, S
mine the Zollner illusion 569 Marrara, M. T., & Moore. C. M. Role of perceptual organi-
zation while attending in depth 786
Knowlton, B. J. See McAuliffe, S. P. (2)
Kobal, G see Spence, ( Maseetti, G. G See Turatto, M
Mattys, S. L. The perception of primary and secondary
Koenderink, J. J. See
stress in English 253
Cuijpers, R. H
Schoumans, N McAdams, S. See Pressnitzer, D
McAuliffe, S. P., & Knowlton, B. J. Dissociatintghe effectso f Ogmen, H See Br eitmeyer, B.G
featural and conceptual interference on multiple target O'Grady, R. B., & Miller, H Object-based selection oper-
processing in rapid serial visual presentation 187 ates on a grouped array of locations 1655
McAuliffe, S. P., & Knowlton, B. J. Long-term retinotopic Olds, E. S., Cowan, W. B., & Jolicceur, P. Partial orientation
priming in object identification 953 pop-out helps difficult search for orientation 134]
icC arieyJ,. S & He, Z. J. Asymmetry in 3-D perceptual or- O'Reilly, J. See Bregman, A. S
ganization: Ground-like surface superior to ceiling-like Orliaguet, J.-P. See Kandel, S
surface 540
Ormerod, T. C. See MacGregor, J. N
cCollough, C.D o McCollough effects provide evidence for
global pattern processing? 350 ( Jsaka, N. See Kaji, N
W. See Curt
Palmer, J. See Ec kstein, M. P.
S. See
Palmer, S. E., & Nelson, R. Late influences on perceptual
grouping: lilusory figures 1321
Pastore, R. E. See Hall, M. D
Pavlova, M., & Sokolov, A. Orientation specificity in biolog-
ical motion perception 889
Pavlova, M. See Sokolov, A
Pessoa, L. See Ross, W. D
Pham, E. See Khalfa, S
Phillips, W. A., & Craven, B. J Interactions between coinci-
dent and orthogonal cues to texture boundaries 1019
‘ P.. Houghton, G., & Lupianez, J. At- Pins, D., & Bonnet, C. The Piéron function in the threshold
tending, ignoring, and repetition: On the relation be- region 127
tween negative priming and inhibition of return 1280 Post, R. B., Welch, R. B., & Clark, V. D. Why do pitched hor-
M izontal lines have such a small effect on visually perceived
eye level? 726
Predebon, J Length illusions in conventional and single-
wing Miller-Lyer stimuli 1086
Pressnitzer, D McAdams, S., Winsberg, S., & Fineberg, J. Per-
ception of musical tension for nontonal orchestral tim-
R. > W. Attentional capture by abrupt onsets and bres and its relation to psychoacoustic roughness 66
feature singletons produce inhibitory surrounds 1485
Proksch, J See Bavelier, D
1 RR. W. Evidence for suppressive mechanisms in at-
tentional selection: Feature singletons produce inhibitory
P.C. Perceptual reference points for form and orien-
surrounds 169 tation in young infants: Anchors or magnets? 1625
M. See Brungart, D. S
Kanafuka, K., Mty amoto \
open, G. Hlusory recouplings of on-
sets and terminations of glide tone components ' 1 3
Reeves, A. See De Caro S.A
Remijn, G See Nakajima, Y
Risner, S. R. See Hollins, M
Roberts, B. See Cusack, R
Lindell, A. K. A left hemisphere, but
not right hemispace, advantage for tactual simultaneity Roncato, S. The effect of luminance variation on the appar-
judgments 717 ent position of an edge 762
son, R. |. See Baker, K. I Rosenblum, L. D. See Yakel, D. A
iller, M. E., Crowther, C. S., & Manhart, M. J Ross, W. D., & Pessoa, | Lightness from contrast: A selec-
The effect of segmental order on fricative labeling by tive integration model 1160
children and adults 266 Runeson, S. See Jacobs, D. M
Norman, H. | e Norman, J. |
Norman, J. F., Lappin, J. S., & Norman, H. | The perception Saporita, ] A. See Sinnott, J. M
of length on curved and flat surfaces 1133 Sasaki, T. See Nakajima, Y
Nusbaum, H. C. See Francis, A. | Sathian, K. See Grant, A. ¢
Sawusch, J. R., & Newman, R. S. Perceptual normalization Swimm, R. See Greene, f
for speaking rate II: Effects of signal discontinuities Swindale, N. V. See Dong, C.-J
285
Symons, L. A., Cuddy, F., & Humphrey, K. Orientation tun-
Schifferstein, H. N. J. See Theunissen, M. J. M ing of shape from shading . 557
Schlaghecken, F., & Eimer, M. A central—peripheral asym-
metry in masked priming 1367 Takeda, Y., & Yagi, A. Inhibitory tagging in visual search
Schoumans, N., Koenderink, J. J.. & Kappers, A. M. L.C hange can be found if search stimuli remain visible 927
in perceived spatial directions due to context 532 Teghtsoonian, M. See Teghtsoonian, R
Schoumans, N., & Sittig, A. ¢ Illusory contours and spatial Teghtsoonian, R., Teghtsoonian, M., & Canévet, G. The per-
judgment 119] ception of waning signals: Decruitment in loudness and
Sebastian-Gallés, N., Dupoux, E., Costa, A., & Mehler, J perceived size 637
Adaptation to time-compressed speech: Phonological de- ten Hoopen, G. See Nakajima, ¥
terminants 834 te Winkel, W. See Hulleman, J
Sereno, A. B. See Briand, K. A Theunissen, M. J. M., Kroeze, J.H. A., & Schifferstein, H. N. J
Sereno, S. C., & Rayner, K. Spelling—sound regularity effects Method of stimulation, mouth movements, concentration,
on eye fixations in reading 402 and viscosity: Effects on the degree of taste adaptation
Shedden, J. M. See Arnott, S. R 607
Sheehe, P. R. See Kurtz, D. B Thiagarajah, M. C. See Grant, A. ¢
Shih, S.-| Recall of two visual targets embedded in RSVP Thomas, J. P. See Eckstein, M. P.
streams of distractors depends on their temporal and Thomas, S. M. See Jordan, T. R
spatial relationship 1348 Thyer, N., Hickson, L., & Dodd, B. The perceptual magnet ef-
Shikata, H., McMahon, D. B. T., & Breslin, P. A. S. Psy- fect in Australian English vowels
chophysics of taste lateralization on anterior tongue Tipper, S. P. See Milliken, B
684 Trainor, L. J., & Adams, B. Infants’ and adults’ use of dura-
Shimozaki, S. S. See Eckstein, M. P. tion and intensity cues in the segmentation of tone pat-
Shindler K. | See Inhoff, A. W terns 333
Shinn-Cunningham, B Adapting to remapped auditory lo- Troscianko, T. See Stillman, J. A
calization cues: A decision-theory model 33 Tsal, Y., & Lamy, D. Attending to an object’s color entails at-
1OIrl, & Cavanagh, P. Nonlinearity in color space mea- tending to its location: Support for location-special views
sured by apparent motion 1182 of visual attention 960
Sinnott, J. M., & Saporita, T. A. Differencesi n American En- Tse, P. U. See Holcombe, A. O
glish, Spanish, and monkey perception of the say—stay Tucker, P. f See Bernstein, L. I
trading relation 1312
Turatto, M., Benso, F., Facoetti, A., Galfano, G., Mascett,
Sittig, A. C. See Schoumans, N G. G., & Umilta, C. Automatic and voluntary focusing of
Smith, Y. D. See Groome, L. J attention 935
Snyder, J. J.. & Kingstone, A. Inhibition of return and visual Turvey, M. T. See Lukatela, G
search: How many separate loci are inhibited? 452
Sokolov, A., Pavlova, M., & Ehrenstein, W. H. Primacy and Umilta, ¢ See Turatto, M
frequency effects in absolute judgments of visual velocity Utman, J. A., Blumstein, S. E., & Burton, M. W. Effecoft ssub -
998
phonetic and syllable structure variation on word recog-
Sokolov. A. See Pavlova, M nition 1297
Spence, C., Kettenmann, B., Kobal, G., & McGlone, I P. Se-
lective attention to the chemosensory modality 1265 van der Steen, F. A. M., & Brockhoff, P. T. M. Induction and
Spence, . Ranson, J., & Driver, J. Cross-modal selective at- impairment of saturated yaw and surge vection 89
tention: On the difficulty of ignoring sounds at the locus van Donkelaar, P., Miall, R. C.. & Stein, J. F.C hanges in mo-
of visual attention 410 tion perception following oculomotor smooth pursuit
Spirn, M. J. See Spivey, M. J adaptation : 378
van Ee, R., & Erkelens, C. J. Is there an interaction between
Spivey, M . & Spirn, M. J. Selective visual attention modu-
lates the direct tilt aftereffect 1525 perceived direction and perceived aspect ratio in stereo-
scopic vision? 910
Starr, M. See Inhoff, A. W
Vassilev, A. See Zlatkova, M
Stein, J. F.S ee van Donkelaar, P.
Veuillet, E.S ee Khalfa, S
Stephens, B. R. See Dannemiller, J. |
Vickers, D. See Lee, M. D
Stillman, J. A.. Brown, G. M., & Troscianko, 1 Influence of
sensitivity on response bias in taste and audition 1645 Vitevitch, M. S. See Luce, P. A
Strayer, D. | . & Johnston, W. A. Novel popout is an attention- Viviani, P. See Kandel, S
based phenomenon: An ERP analysis 459 von Griinau, M. See Galera, ¢
von Mihlenen, A., & Miller, H. J. Perceptual integration of Yonas, A. See Arterberry, M. E
motion and form information: Evidence of parallel- Young, F. See Hollins, M
continuous processing 517 Yund, E. W. See Lamb, M. R
men, J. See Bertelson, P.
Zakarauskas, P. See Dong, C.-J
Wang, R. F. See Cutting, J. |
Zlatkova, M., Vassilev, A., & Mitov, D. Temporal character-
Ward, L. M., McDonald, J. J & Lin, D. On asymmetries in istics of line orientation identification 1008
cross-modal spatial attention orienting 1258
Ward, L. M. See West, R. |
Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. Visual marking: Evi-
dence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection para-
GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS
digm 47]
Submissions, Formats, Permissions, Proof, Reprints, Tables,
Webster, M. A.. & Malkoc, G Color—luminance relation-
Figures, Computer Disks 229
ships and the McCollough effect 659
elch, R. B. See Post, R. B
West, R. L.. Ward, L. M., & Khosla, R. Constrained scaling:
The effect of learned psychophysical scales on idiosyn- NOTICES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
cratic response bias 137 Forthcoming Articles
White, T. L. See Kurtz, D. B. (2)
Wickelgren, E. A.,M cConnell, D. S., & Bingham, G. P. Reach-
ing measures of monocular distance perception: Forward
versus side-to-side head movements and haptic feedback
1051 Associate Editor Change for Perception & Psychophysics — 47
M. See Baker, K. | APA Block Travel Grant Program
Pressnitzer, D XVII International Congress of Psychology
D.B Nominations for the Editorship of Memory & Cognition
New Journal From Psychonomic Society Publications
C ognitive {ffective, & Behavioral Neuros« ence
i L. D., & Fortier, M \. Effects of
talker variability on speechreading 1405
4\st Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society