PEMBERTON CREEK/ BAKER CANAL AREA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MASTER PLAN Prepared for the Hillsborough County Board of County Commissioners By Public Works Department/Engineering Division Stormwater Management Section September, 2002 Daniel A. Kleman..........................................................County Administrator Patricia Bean..................................................... Deputy County Administrator Bernardo Garcia........................................................Director of Public Works Robert R. Gordon, P.E...........................................................County Engineer Eduardo J. Tapia, P.E ......................................................................... Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS PEMBERTON-BAKER AREA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS List Of Figures List Of Tables List Of Exhibits List Of Appendices EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Scope.............................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.1 Flood Control Level of Service.............................................................. 1-5 1.2.2 Water Quality Treatment Level of Service............................................. 1-6 1.3 Project Organization........................................................................................... 1-6 CHAPTER 2 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION 2.1 Overview............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Climate................................................................................................................ 2-4 2.3 Soils.................................................................................................................... 2-5 2.4 Physiography And Hydrology............................................................................ 2-9 2.5 Geology And Hydrogeology............................................................................. 2-10 2.5.1 Surficial Aquifer................................................................................... 2-11 2.5.2 Semi-confining Zone.............................................................................2-13 2.5.3 Upper Floridan Aquifer.........................................................................2-13 2.6 Existing And Future Land Use..........................................................................2-14 2.6.1 Existing Land Uses................................................................................2-14 2.6.2 Future Land Uses...................................................................................2-20 Pemberton-Baker Area Watershed Management Plan TOC - i TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 3 Major Conveyance Systems 3.1 Existing Conveyance Systems.........................................................................................3-1 3.2 The Flint Creek System...................................................................................................3-1 3.3 The Campbell Branch System.........................................................................................3-1 3.4 The Antioch Branch System............................................................................................3-1 3.5 The Baker Creek System.................................................................................................3-2 3.6 The Pemberton Creek System.........................................................................................3-2 3.7 The Baker Canal System.................................................................................................3-2 Chapter 4 Hydraulic/Hydrologic Model Methodology 4.1 General Methodology And Database Development............................................4-1 4.2 Hydrology............................................................................................................4-1 4.2.1 SCS-CN Method......................................................................................4-1 4.2.2 SCS Dimensionless Hydrograph............................................................4-10 4.2.3 Model Implementation...........................................................................4-11 4.2.4 Rainfall Depth........................................................................................4-12 4.2.5 Soil Data, Land Use And SCS-CN Number Determination..................4-13 4.2.5.1 Soil Data..................................................................................4-13 4.2.5.2 Land Use..................................................................................4-13 4.2.5.3 Run-Off Curve Numbers..........................................................4-14 4.2.6 Time Of Concentration..........................................................................4-14 4.3 Hydraulics..........................................................................................................4-15 4.3.1 Major Modification................................................................................4-15 4.3.2 Boundary / Initial Conditions................................................................4-18 4.3.3 Overflow Weirs......................................................................................4-18 4.3.4 Roughness Coefficients.........................................................................4-19 4.3.5 Numerical Instability.............................................................................4-19 Chapter 5 Hydraulic/Hydrologic Model Calibration And Verification 5.1 Boundary Conditions...........................................................................................5-1 5.2 Data Collection....................................................................................................5-1 5.3 Existing Conditions Model Calibration...............................................................5-6 5.4 Existing Conditions Model Verification..............................................................5-9 5.5 Summary............................................................................................................5-15 Pemberton-Baker Area Watershed Management Plan TOC - ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 6 Existing Conditions Flood Level Of Service 6.1 Introduction..........................................................................................................6-1 6.1.1 Standard Design Storm Events................................................................6-1 6.1.2 Existing Conditions Model Simulation Results.......................................6-2 6.2 Baker Canal ......................................................................................................6-2 6.3 Pemberton Creek..................................................................................................6-7 6.4 Campbel Branch.................................................................................................6-13 6.5 Antioch Branch..................................................................................................6-17 6.6 Flood Control Level Of Service Definitions......................................................6-21 6.7 Level Of Service Analysis / Methodology........................................................6-21 6.7.1 Establishment Of Landmark Elevations................................................6-23 6.7.2 Comparison Of Computed Results And Landmark Elevations.............6-23 6.8 Level of Service Designations...........................................................................6-23 6.8.1 Baker Canal............................................................................................6-24 6.8.2 Pemberton Creek....................................................................................6-26 6.8.3 Campbell Branch...................................................................................6-28 6.8.4 Antioch Branch......................................................................................6-29 Pemberton-Baker Area Watershed Management Plan TOC - iii LIST OF FIGURES PEMBERTON-BAKER AREA WATERSHED MANAGEMENT PLAN LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE # TITLE PAGE 1-1 Project Location Map...........................................................................................1-2 2-1 Watershed Water feature Map.............................................................................2-2 2-2 Subbasin Delineation Map...................................................................................2-3 2-3 Topographic Map.................................................................................................2-4 2-4 Soil Classification By Type.................................................................................2-7 2-5 Soil Classification By Hydrologic Group............................................................2-8 2-6 Representative Hydrologic Cross Section.........................................................2-12 2-7 1995 SWFWMD Land Use / Land Cover Map.................................................2-15 2-8 Property Appraiser Office Existing Land Use Map...........................................2-16 2-10 Planning Commission Generalized Future Land Use Map (2015)....................2-17 3-1 Major Conveyance Systems.................................................................................3-4 4-1 Definition Of Unit Hydrograph.........................................................................4-11 5-1 Gage Station Location Map.................................................................................5-3 5-2 Rainfall Distribution of September 26 & 27, 1997 Event...................................5-4 5-6 Comparison of Water Levels in Baker Canal (Muck Pond Road, September 26 & 27, 1997 Event)......................................5-7 5-7 Comparison of Water Levels in Pemberton Creek (McIntosh Road, September 26 & 27, 1997 Event)..........................................5-8 5-8 Comparison of Discharges in Pemberton Creek (McIntosh Road, September 26 & 27, 1997 Event)..........................................5-8 5-9 Comparison of Water Levels in Flint Creek (Kelso Road, September 26 & 27, 1997 Event)................................................5-9 Pemberton-Baker Area Watershed Management Plan LOF - i LIST OF FIGURES 6-1 Flood Control Level Of Service Diagram........................................End Of Chapter 6-2 2.33 yr/24 hr Level Of Service Map................................................End Of Chapter 6-3 5 yr/24 hr Level Of Service Map.....................................................End Of Chapter 6-4 10 yr/24 hr Level Of Service Map...................................................End Of Chapter 6-5 25 yr/24 hr Level Of Service Map...................................................End Of Chapter 6-6 Flooding Complaint Map.................................................................End Of Chapter Pemberton-Baker Area Watershed Management Plan LOF - ii INTRODUCTION This Stormwater Management Master Plan (SMMP) for the Pemberton Creek/Baker Canal Area (PBA) reports the results of a watershed study; which includes Pemberton Creek, Baker Creek, Baker Canal, Campbell Branch, Antioch Branch, Flint Creek and Lake Thonotosassa. The project was conducted by the Stormwater Management Section of the Engineering Division/Department of Public Works. It makes use of a previous Floodplain Analysis ("existing conditions") that was partially funded by the Hillsborough River Basin Board of the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD). This SMMP establishes the existing level of service (LOS) for stormwater facilities as described in the Stormwater Element of the Hillsborough County Comprehensive Plan (Future of Hillsborough). It also identifies deficiencies in existing infrastructure and recommends improvements for increasing the level-of-service provided. A water quality assessment is included in an accompanying report titled, "Pemberton Creek Environmental Conditions Report (1998)", as required by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit issued to Hillsborough County on September 9, 1995 (effective January 1, 1996). 1.1 General Description The PBA watershed lies in the northeastern portion of Hillsborough County, and encompasses approximately 65 square miles as shown in Figure 1.1. The project area is generally bordered on the east by the City of Plant City, on the west by Kingsway Road, on the north by U.S. Highway 301 and on the south by the CSX Railroad line near S.R. 60 in Brandon. The PBA watershed contains six (6) major stormwater conveyance systems and one (1) outfall. These conveyance systems are: 1) The Flint Creek System 2) The Campbell Branch System 3) The Antioch Branch System 4) The Baker Creek System 5) The Pemberton Creek System 6) The Baker Canal System Flint Creek is a tributary to the Hillsborough River which is used as a water supply source by the City of Tampa. The Hillsborough River outfalls to Tampa Bay. Flint Creek drains Lake Thonotosassa; the Lake is the receiving body for the other portions of the watershed including Pemberton Creek and Baker Canal. Pemberton Creek-Baker Canal Area Watershed Management Plan 1-1 CHAPTER ONE Introduction 1.2 Purpose The purpose of this project is to assess level of protection or level of service provided by the existing infrastructure and to identify improvements to increase that flooding level-of-service. The target level-of-service for major stormwater conveyance facilities is the protection of roads and property from substantial flooding during a 25-year storm (a storm with a 4-percent chance of occurrence during any one year). Due to existing development in basins, it is not always feasible to attain the 25-year level-of-service. Also, flood levels are in some cases controlled by natural systems that cannot be modified without extreme cost and/or environmental damage. This report identifies deficiencies in the existing stormwater management system and improvements needed to achieve an increased level of service. 1.3 Scope The scope of this plan includes the establishment of the existing conditions for the PBA stormwater management infrastructure in terms of computed water surface elevations and computed flows. A computer model of the physical characteristics of the stormwater conveyance/storage system has been developed to determine these existing conditions for the 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, 25- year and 100-year design storms. Survey data was acquired, and computer mapping performed to provide inputs for the computer model. The model was calibrated to available existing hydrologic data. The results of the existing conditions modeling were then evaluated to identify the locations and extent of flooding problems. Those flooding problems for which a history of actual flooding could be documented have been given priority. Public funding for deficiencies associated with the flooding of County roadways during the design event (25-year) have been prioritized above those associated with site flooding of private property. Potential solutions were formulated and then tested on the calibrated computer model. The most effective of the alternative solutions have been identified and recommended in this report. Water quality needs were considered in the selection of recommended alternatives. Planning-level cost estimates have also been developed for the proposed solutions. Implementation priorities have also been suggested. Based on the 1998 PBA Masterplan report, there are four areas of focus for recommended improvements in the proposed condition. The majority of these improvements have been implemented. These improvements include structural upgrades and non-structural improvements. All of these efforts will lead to achievement of the Level of Service (LOS), Level B in the Pemberton Creek/Baker Canal Area. Pemberton Creek-Baker Canal Area Watershed Management Plan 1-1 CHAPTER ONE Introduction 1.3 Background The 1998 Stormwater Management Master Plan (SMMP) for the Pemberton Creek-Baker Canal Area (PBA) utilized a combination of various studies prior to the 1991-1992 Pemberton Creek-Baker Flood Analysis Study. The 1991 Pemberton/Baker Creek Hydraulic Analysis Greiner study for the flooding of I-4 utilized the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-2 model information for Baker Canal. The 1991 Gee and Jensen HEC-2 data was utilized for the Campbell Branch and Pemberton Creek . Furthermor, the CDM Extran model for the Plant City portion was incorporated for the headwaters of Pemberton Creek. All of these studies were sources for the 1998 Hillsborough County’s PBA SMMP study and was prepared for the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and Hillsborough County. The County used the RUNOFF block of the EPA Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) to compute peak discharge values. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers HEC-2 model were used to compute flood elevations within the Pemberton Creek and Baker Canal channel system. The enclosed report is an 2002 update by the Hillsborough County Stormwater Section using a Federal Emergency Management Agency approved version SWMM modified by the County staff, HCSWMM4.31B respectively. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has published three versions of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) for the PBA watershed. The first was in 1984, and there were subsequent revisions in 1989 and 1992. Many of the existing conditions peak discharge values reported in the various reports are also shown in the FEMA Flood Insurance Study (1992). Since the completion of the 1993 Flood Analysis, and 1998 Hillsborough County Pemberton Creek-Baker Canal Stormwater Management Master Plan, most of the recommended improvements listed in both studies have been implemented. All these completed drainage construction projects have been included in the current existing conditions portion of this report. The modeling effort reported herein is based partially on the data used by County staff in 1998 and partially on additional data that was not available at the time of the previous studies. It is also based on a hydrodynamic modeling technology that computes discharge and water surface elevation as a function of simulated time. Pemberton Creek-Baker Canal Area Watershed Management Plan 1-3
Description: