Pavement, Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pavement. Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020 (LCA 2020, Sacramento, CA, 3-6 June 2020) PDF
Preview Pavement, Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pavement. Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020 (LCA 2020, Sacramento, CA, 3-6 June 2020)
LP i fa e v e C Pavement, Roadway, m y ce ln An increasing number of agencies, academic institutes, and governmental and e t , and Bridge Life Cycle industrial bodies are embracing the principles of sustainability in managing their A R activities. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an approach developed to provide decision so s support regarding the environmental impact of industrial processes and products. ea LCA is a field with ongoing research, development and improvement and is being sd Assessment 2020 s w implemented world-wide, particularly in the areas of pavement, roadways and m bridges. Pavement, Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020 contains the ea y contributions to the International Symposium on Pavement, Roadway, and Bridge Life n , t Cycle Assessment 2020 (Davis, CA, USA, June 3-6, 2020) covering research and a 2 practical issues related to pavement, roadway and bridge LCA, including data and n 0 EDITED BY d tools, asset management, environmental product declarations, procurement, planning, 2 John Harvey, Imad L. Al-Qadi, vehicle interaction, and impact of materials, structure, and construction. 0B r i Hasan Ozer, and Gerardo Flintsch Pavement, Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020 will be of interest to d g researchers, professionals, and policymakers in academia, industry, and government e who are interested in the sustainability of pavements, roadways and bridges. H a r v e 22 22 LLCCAA y • A l - Q a d i • O z e r • F l i n t s c h ISBN: 978-0-367-55166-7 9 780367 551667 CRC Press titles are available as eBook editions in a range of digital formats PAVEMENT, ROADWAY, AND BRIDGE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT 2020 PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PAVEMENT. ROADWAY, AND BRIDGE LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT 2020 (LCA 2020), SACRAMENTO, CA, USA, 3-6 JUNE 2020 Pavement, Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020 Editors John Harvey University of California, Davis, USA Imad L. Al-Qadi University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, USA Hasan Ozer Arizona State University, Tempe, USA Gerardo Flintsch Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USA CRC Press/Balkema is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK Typeset by Integra Software Services Pvt. Ltd., Pondicherry, India All rights reserved. No part of this publication or the information contained herein may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without written prior permission from the publisher. Although all care is taken to ensure integrity and the quality of this publication and the information herein, no responsibility is assumed by the publishers nor the author for any damage to the property or persons as a result of operation or use of this publication and/or the information contained herein. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Applied for Published by: CRC Press/Balkema Schipholweg 107C, 2316XC Leiden, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] www.crcpress.com – www.taylorandfrancis.com ISBN: 978-0-367-55166-7 (Hbk) ISBN: 978-1-003-09227-8 (eBook) DOI: 10.1201/9781003092278 https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003092278 Pavement, Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020 – Harvey et al (eds) © 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-367-55166-7 Table of contents Forword ix Symposium organization xi Mapping of unit/product system/processes for pavement life-cycle assessment 1 C.G. Bhat, A. Mukherjee & J. Meijer Asphalt pavement resurfacing: A review toward a better selection and representativeness of LCI 12 A. de Bortoli Towards more sustainable airfield pavements using life-cycle assessment of design alternatives 24 K. Mantalovas, R. Roberts, G. Giancontieri, L. Inzerillo & G. Di Mino Recommendations for airfield life cycle assessment tool development 34 A.A. Butt, J.T. Harvey, J. Lea, A. Saboori & N. Garg Incorporating the impacts of climate change into a life cycle assessment of a slab-on-girder highway bridge 40 G. Guest, J. Zhang, B. Kadhom & J. Singh Life cycle environmental impact considerations for structural concrete in transportation infrastructure 51 S.A. Miller Life cycle assessment of ultra-high performance concrete bridge deck overlays 61 M. Rangelov, R.P. Spragg, Z.B. Haber & H. Dylla How do funds allocation and maintenance intervention affect the deterioration process of urban bridges in Shanghai 72 Y. Fang & L. Sun Assessment of asphalt concrete EPDs in Scandinavia and the United States 82 L. Strömberg, S. Hintze, I.L. Al-Qadi & E. Okte Life cycle assessment in public procurement of transport infrastructure 90 S. Toller, S. Miliutenko, M. Erlandsson, S. Nilsson & M. Larsson Technical and organizational challenges to developing product category rules for asphalt pavement construction 100 C.G. Bhat, J. Shacat & A. Mukherjee Using environmental product declarations to support pavement green public procurement 111 M. Rangelov, H. Dylla & N. Sivaneswaran A feasibility study to assess the use of EPDs in public procurement 122 L.K. Miller & B.T. Ciavola v Integrated evaluation method of life cycle economic and environmental impact for permeable pavement: Model development and case study 129 J. Liu, H. Li & Y. Wang Pavement life cycle management: Towards a sustainability assessment framework in Europe 142 A. Jiménez del Barco Carrión, T. Parry, E. Keijzer, B. Kalman, K. Mantalovas, A.A. Butt, J.T. Harvey & D. Lo Presti Impacts of climate-change and realistic traffic conditions on asphalt pavement and rehabilitation decisions using life cycle assessment 153 K. Haslett, E. Dave & W. Mo Pavement life cycle assessment of state highway network with Caltrans PaveM system 163 I.A. Basheer Exploring the cost benefit value and relative emissions of pavement preservation treatments using RoadResource.org 173 S. Casillas & A. Braham A case study of using life cycle cost analysis in pavement management system 181 D. Cheng & K. Joslin Pavement preservation and maintenance schedule evaluation using a life-cycle assessment tool 190 Q. Zhou, H. Ozer & I.L. Al-Qadi Climate action plans: Review and recommendations 200 M.T. Lozano, A.M. Kendall, A.A. Butt & J.T. Harvey LCA consortium for a road environmental-friendly infrastructure in Mexico City 209 N. Hernandez-Fernández, L.P. Güereca-Hernandez, A. Ossa-Lopez, M. Flores-Guzmán & C.E. Caballero-Güereca Lessons learned from the supply curve approach 216 A.A.Butt, J.T. Harvey, A. Saboori, C. Kim, M.T. Lozano & A.M. Kendall Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption between complete streets vs. conventional streets 227 A. Saboori, J.T. Harvey, M. Ostovar, A.A. Butt & A.M. Kendall Network-level life cycle assessment of reclaimed asphalt pavement in Washington State 234 M. Zokaei Ashtiani & S.T. Muench Including sustainability and life cycle perspectives in decision making 245 R.I. Karlsson & Å. Lindgren Combined life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis for the Illinois Tollway 255 E. Okte, I.L. Al-Qadi & H. Ozer eLCAP: A web application for environmental life cycle assessment of pavements focused on California 264 J.T. Harvey, J. Lea, A. Saboori, M. Ostovar & A.A. Butt Green Up pavement rehabilitation decision tool 274 D. Andrei & R.E. Kochan Fuel and non-fuel vehicle operating costs comparison of select vehicle types and fuel sources: A parametric study 284 R. Chkaiban, E.Y. Hajj, G. Bailey, M. Sime, H. Xu & P.E. Sebaaly vi Bayesian economic analyses of including reclaimed asphalt pavements in flexible pavement rehabilitation 294 H. Gong, M. Zhang, W. Hu & B. Huang Global warming potential and fossil depletion of enhanced rubber modified asphalt 304 A. Farina, A. Anctil & M.E. Kutay Interpreting life cycle assessment results of bio-recycled asphalt pavements for more informed decision-making 313 K. Mantalovas, A. Jiménez del Barco Carrión, J. Blanc, E. Chailleux, P. Hornych, J.P. Planche, L. Porot, S. Pouget, C. Williams & D. Lo Presti Use of recycled aggregates in concrete pavement: Pavement design and life cycle assessment 324 X. Shi, Z. Grasley, A. Mukhopadhyay & D. Zollinger Carbon footprint of asphalt road pavements using warm mix asphalt with recycled concrete aggregates: A Colombian case study 333 D.V. Araujo, J. Santos & G. Martinez-Arguelles Sustainable flexible pavement overlay policy for reduced life-cycle cost and environmental impact 343 C. Xin & Q. Lu LCA and cost comparative analysis of half-warm mix asphalts with varying degrees of RAP 354 T. Mattinzioli, F. Moreno, M. Rubio & G. Martínez Life cycle assessment of a thin bonded concrete overlay of asphalt project in Woodland, California 365 M. Ostovar, A.A. Butt, A. Mateos & J.T. Harvey Sensitivity analysis of the benefits of replacing virgin materials with RAP considering rejuvenator type and hauling distance 377 M. Elkashef, A. Saboori, M. Ostovar, J.T. Harvey, A.A. Butt & D. Jones A framework for selection between end-of-life alternatives at the project-level considering full life cycle environmental impacts 386 A. Saboori, J.T. Harvey, J. Lea & D. Jones Quantification of potential reductions in greenhouse gas emissions by allowing increased use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in Caltrans projects 396 A. Saboori, J.T. Harvey, A.A. Butt & M. Elkashef Pavement recycling: A case study of life-cycle assessment and life-cycle cost analysis 404 Q. Zhou, I.L. Al-Qadi, H. Ozer & B.K. Diefenderfer ACCIONA’s expertise in the use of LCA in construction sector 412 A.C. Ocampo & E.G. Bustamante LCA of construction and demolition waste recycling: Case study of production phase 422 T. Desbois, O. Yazoghli-Marzouk & A. Feraille Life cycle assessment of pervious concrete pavements reinforced by recycled carbon fiber composite elements 431 M. Rangelov, S. Nassiri & K. Englund Effect of durability on fiber-reinforced asphalt mixtures sustainability 442 E. Lizasoain-Arteaga, D. Castro-Fresno & G.W. Flintsch Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study on asphalt binders manufactured in North America 450 M. Buncher, R. Corun, M. Wildnauer & E. Mulholland vii Preliminary evaluation of using intelligent compaction for life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of pavement structures 460 S. Satani, S.F. Aval, J. Garrido, & M. Mazari Impact of allocation method on carbon footprint of pervious concrete with industry byproducts 469 X. Chen & H. Wang Development of pavement performance prediction models for in-situ recycled pavements in Virginia 482 E.A. Amarh, J. Santos, G.W. Flintsch & B.K. Diefenderfer Mechanistic modeling of the effect of pavement surface mega-texture on vehicle rolling resistance 493 S. Rajaei & K. Chatti Effect of pavement structural response on vehicle fuel consumption: Lessons learned from data collection, processing and analysis 502 A.A. Butt, J.T. Harvey, D.T. Fitch, D. Reger, D. Balzarini, I. Zaabar, K. Chatti, M. Estaji, E. Coleri & A. Louhghalam PVI related decision-making tools in use phase of LCA: A literature review 513 K. Mohanraj, D. Merritt, N. Sivaneswaran & H. Dylla Context-specific assessment of the life cycle environmental performance of pavements considering neighborhood heterogeneity 524 H. Azarijafari, X. Xu, J. Gregory & R. Kirchain Rapid ground-based measurement of pavement albedo 533 S. Sen & J. Roesler Author index 541 viii Pavement, Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020 – Harvey et al (eds) © 2020 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-367-55166-7 Forword An increasing number of agencies, academic institutes, and governmental and industrial bodies are embracing the principles of sustainability in managing their activities. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is an approach developed to provide decision support regarding the envir onmental impact of industrial processes and products. LCA, which is undergoing continued improvement, is being implemented world-wide, particularly in the areas of pavement, road ways and bridges. This includes standardization of practice, better alignment with inter national norms in other fields, resolution of gaps in data and technical approaches, and greater understanding of LCA advantages and challenges in assist decision-makers. The International Symposium on Pavement, Roadway, and Bridge Life Cycle Assessment 2020 provided a forum for sharing and discussing experiences and results, assessing status, plans for implementation, challenges, and identification of the extent of consensus on current issues. This symposium was organized by the University of California Pavement Research Center and the National Center for Sustainable Transportation. The symposium is a follow- on to the 2010 Pavement LCA Workshop in Davis, California; 2012 RILEM Symposium on LCA for Construction Materials in Nantes, France; 2014 Pavement LCA Symposium in Davis, California, and Pavement Life-Cycle Symposium 2017 in Champaign, Illinois. The conference brought together academic, government, and industrial leaders from around the world. Selected papers are included in these proceedings. Each paper has been peer-reviewed by at least three professionals in this field. Based on the reviewers’ recom mendations, the papers that suited the conference goals and objectives were included in the proceedings. The proceedings papers cover various research and practical issues related to pavement, roadway and bridge LCA, including data and tools, asset management, environ mental product declarations, procurement, planning, vehicle interaction, and impact of mater ials, structure, and construction. The technical program of the symposium consisted of keynote speeches, short invited pres entations on key topics, approximately 40 oral presentations of papers, and panel discussions. The symposium was developed in consultation with government and industry advisors and a scientific committee of over 60 members. The organizers of the symposium acknowledge the efforts of all members of the scientific committee whose help has vastly contributed to the suc cess of the symposium. We are thankful for all those who volunteered their time to thoroughly review the submitted papers and offer constructive comments to authors. John Harvey University of California, Davis Imad L. Al-Qadi University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Hasan Ozer Arizona State University Gerardo Flintsch Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University ix
The list of books you might like
