SI 3.95 Not. long ago the respectable Tate Gallery in London came under heavy public: altac I; for purchasing a sculpture by the yo'mg A rican Carl Andre, because it seemed to De no more than a double layer of old bricks. Critics defended the work, but the public continued to believe that it was a “put-on” and failed to accept it as art. In doing so, they were enacting the familiar drama of modern art, whereby something that is difficult to grasp is thought of as fraudulent. For this public, Rodin’s sculp ture would constitute a standard of clarity and accessibility, while the works of artists such as Andre, Robert: Smithson, and Michael 1 Iei/er are rejected its meaningless. Rut it can be argued that Rodin’s work is itself defined by the same attitudes toward the body and its movement that were proposed a century later by these young artists. In this brilliant study of modern sculpture from Rodin to the present, Rosalind Krauss examines major works in the light of different approaches to general sculptural issues in order to illuminate the connections between them. By focusing clearly on such different examples as Brancusi’s Bird in Space, Picasso's Construction in Metal Wire, David Smith’s Tanklolcm /, and Robert Morris’s Columns, I by the author allows us to observe and understand klind E. Krauss the logical progression from the figurative works of the nineteenth century to ihe range of final Iron Works: abstract styles of the 1970s. Sculpture of David Smith The book is illustrated with many fine photographs of the works discussed, several made especially for this book. Since one of the most difficult problems involved in a sensible and clear analysis of sculpture is the photo graphing of the works themselves, this book is a valuable contribution to the literature on visual grounds as well as on critical and historical levels. Jacket design by Rosalind E. Krauss tuith Alan BuchslfSjtim B 6L3 Rosalind E K r a u s s THE VIKING PRESS NEW YORK In memory of my father, Matthew Epstein Copyright © Rosalind E. Krauss, 1977 All rights reserved First published in 1977 by The Viking Press 625 Madison Avenue* New York, N.Y. 10022 Published simultaneously in Canada by Penguin Books Canada Limited LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING IN PUBLICATION DATA Krauss, Rosalind E. Passages in modern sculpture. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Sculpture, Modern—20th century. I. Title. NB198.K69 735\29 7641914 ISBN 0-670-54133-8 Printed in the United States of America Set in Linotype Bodini Book acknowledgments The process of acknowledging the intellectual debts a writer incurs in the making of a book is often identical with the explanation of how a given project was arrived at and why it took its particular form. In the case of this work, two groups of individuals helped to shape my sense of the need and purpose for a critical history of modern sculpture. First of all, there were my students—at M.I.T., Princeton University, and Hunter College—to whom my efforts at clarifying certain issues and developing a lan guage of description were initially addressed. For their patience and endurance I am obviously grateful. But more than that, it was their probing questions and their un willingness to accept partial explanations that led me to reconsider the adequacy of what might be called the V canonical view of twentieth-century sculpture’s develop ment. In response to their need for clarity, and mine, I was motivated to write this book. In attempting to achieve that clarity, I had recourse to several sources of powerful intellectual aid from colleagues and friends among critics, scholars, and sculptors. Leo Steinberg, whose essay on Rodin (now collected in Other Criteria) I had read in the early 1960s, first demonstrated to me the impossibility of a view by which modern sculp ture was seen as being antithetical to Rodin’s work. My treatment of Rodin in these pages owes a tremendous debt to that essay, and while specific passages by Profes sor Steinberg are cited within the text, I wish to acknowl edge here the more general dependence I have had on his conception of Rodin’s relation to modernism. To Annette Michelson I am indebted not only for the cumulative effect of the critical essays she has been pub lishing on sculpture and film over the last ten years but for the many conversations during which she has frankly and generously criticized my own work. The effect of her thinking has had a great deal to do with the importance which issues of temporality assume in the discussion that follows. More generally, the community of exchange with fellow critics, made possible by my associate editorship of Artforum from 1971 to 1975, was incalculably valuable. In addition to my connection with Annette Michelson and Jeremy Gilbert-Rolfe, I wish to acknowledge the impor tance of my association there with John Coplans and Robert Pincus-Witten. The criticism of the latter, written and oral, continually called to my attention aspects of contemporary sculptural production which I had tended to overlook. The task of assessing the sculpture of the past decade has meant evaluating my own sense of the import of that work in the light of conversations with several of the sculptors who made it, particularly Richard Serra, Robert Smithson, Mel Bochner, and Robert Morris. For their friendship and generosity, both past and present, I am extremely grateful. At different stages of its development, parts of this text were read by, and discussed with, some of my friends vi in the art-historical community, particularly Nan Piene, whose work on kineticism I have found consistently illu minating, and Andree Hayum. For their suggestions and those made by Karen Kennerly and the painter Susan Crile, I am deeply indebted. My editor at Viking, Barbara Burn, provided the help and encouragement necessary to a project of this kind. I am grateful for her tact and expertise. Since this book is, in large part, addressed to students, it is my hope that it reflects a sense of those questions and demands raised by the initial encounter with aesthetic objects. To my own parents, Matthew and Bertha Epstein, who first sharpened my own sense of this experience, both as a problematic and a pleasurable one, I offer my deepest thanks. Dimensions indicate height if there is only one figure, height pre ceding width if there are two, and height, width, and depth if there are three. VII contents introduction 1 1 Narrative Time: the question of the Gates of Hell 7 2 Analytic Space: futurism and constructivism 39 Forms of Readymade: Duchamp and Brancusi 69 4 A Game Plan: the terms of surrealism 105 5 Tanktotem: welded images 147 0 Mechanical Ballets: light, motion, theater 201 7 The Double Negative: a new syntax for sculpture 243 notes 289 bibliography 299 index 303 IX Passages in Modern Sculpture