ebook img

Parkour and the city risk, masculinity, and meaning in a postmodern sport PDF

214 Pages·2017·5.905 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Parkour and the city risk, masculinity, and meaning in a postmodern sport

Parkour and the City Critical Issues in Sport and Society Michael Messner and Douglas Hartmann, Series Editors Critical Issues in Sport and Society features scholarly books that help expand our understanding of the new and myriad ways in which sport is intertwined with social life in the contemporary world. Using the tools of various scholarly disciplines, including sociology, anthropology, his- tory, media studies and others, books in this series investigate the growing impact of sport and sports-related activities on various aspects of social life as well as key developments and changes in the sporting world and emerg- ing sporting practices. Series authors produce groundbreaking research that brings empirical and applied work together with cultural critique and historical perspectives written in an engaging, accessible format. Jules Boykoff , Activism and the Olympics: Dissent at the Games in Vancouver and London Diana T. Cohen, Iron Dads: Managing Family, Work, and Endurance Sport Identities Jennifer Guiliano, Indian Spectacle: College Mascots and the Anxiety of Modern America Kathryn Henne, Testing for Athlete Citizenship: Th e Regulation of Doping and Sex in Sport Jeff rey L. Kidder, Parkour and the City: Risk, Masculinity, and Meaning in a Postmodern Sport Michael A. Messner and Michela Musto, eds., Child’s Play: Sport in Kids’ Worlds Jeff rey Montez de Oca, D iscipline and Indulgence: College Football, Media, and the American Way of Life during the Cold War Stephen C. Poulson, Why Would Anyone Do Th at?: Lifestyle Sport in the Twenty-First Century Parkour and the City Risk, Masculinity, and Meaning in a Postmodern Sport JEFFREY L. KIDDER Rutgers University Press New Brunwick, Camden, and Newark, New Jersey, and London 978-0-8135-7196-6 cloth 978-0-8135-7195-9 paperback 978-0-8135-7197-3 epub 978-0-8135-7198-0 web pdf 978-0-8135-9119-3 mobi Cataloging-in-Publication data is available from the Library of Congress. A British Cataloging-in-Publication record for this book is available from the British Library. All photos in the book are by the author unless otherwise indicated. Copyright © 2017 by Jeff rey L. Kidder All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the publisher. Please contact Rutgers University Press, 106 Somerset Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901. Th e only exception to this prohibition is “fair use” as defi ned by U.S. copyright law. ∞ Th e paper used in this publication meets the requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1992. www.rutgersuniversitypress.org Manufactured in the United States of America To Paul Lindsay (who taught the fi rst sociology class I ever took), Kenneth Allan (who inspired me to go to graduate school), and Jim Dowd (who encouraged me to fi nish) Contents Acknowledgments ix Introduction: Th inking Sociologically about Parkour 1 1 Developing the Discipline and Creating a Sport 18 2 New Prisms of the Possible 47 3 Young Men in the City 70 4 Hedging Th eir Bets 94 Conclusion: Appropriating the City 128 Appendix A: Brief Note on Data and Method 141 Appendix B: On the Parkour Terminology Used in Th is Book 145 Notes 149 Bibliography 179 Index 191 vii Acknowledgments Th is book would not have been possible without the openness and generosity of the Chicago parkour community. I was inspired by the a thleticism, creativity, and congeniality of the young people involved in the “art of movement” from my very fi rst jam. Regretfully, as a sociologist, what interests me about the social world of parkour inevitably diverges from those in the community, especially with respect to the ways they may prefer to see their activities portrayed. While my “ethnographic gaze” may leave many practitioners of parkour disappointed (or even frustrated) with the analysis that follows, I sincerely hope that my admiration for the community and the discipline comes through the text. Over the years, I have discussed parkour with a countless number of traceurs—from the Chicago-area and beyond—and they all helped shape this project. Th ere are far too many names to list them all here, but I owe a special thanks to Aaron Mikottis, Alex Meglei, Alex Paulus, Ando Calrissian, Angela Martin, Ben Zumhagen, Brandon Th read, Carolyn Steele, Chris Gorzelany, Chris Hal, Cody Beltramo, Dan Larson-Fine, David Yip, Eric Stodola, Evan Sink, Gerardo Carpio, Grant Lechner, Jake Markiewicz, Jaska, Jeff Strening, Jesse Anderson, Jesus Crespo, Jim Hotwagner, Jordan Oglesby, Kurt Gowan (and Parkour Ways), Luke Albrecht, Maria Von Dreele, Michael Zernow, Max Spadavecchia, Miko Vesović, Nathan Reed, Paul Canada (and Flipside Academy), Pavel Klopov, Phil Ashby, Rich Gatz, Ryan Cousins, Ryan Th ill, Sam Monarrez, Sean Kalinoski, Stephan Roberts, Seth Rujiraviriyapinyo, Steve Dahl, Tommy Gilmore, Tyler ix x • Acknowledgments Kelly, and Zach Jarzabek. Also, American Parkour, Team Farang, and Wexin Yang were kind enough to grant me permission to reprint images and stills from videos they had posted online. Peter Mickulas, from Rutgers University Press, is responsible for kick- starting the eff ort to expand my three published journal articles into a larger project. He took a chance on what was a rather slipshod prospectus and gave me the leeway necessary to gather more data and continue writing (well past the initial deadline). Paul Gilchrist and the press’s anonymous reviewers were especially adept in their critiques and guidance as the man- uscript progressed. Julia Ruth Dillon and the staff at Rutgers helped fi nesse this text into something readable. I owe a great deal to all their eff orts. As this book (slowly) developed, I had the opportunity to discuss my incipient analyses in a variety of forums. Th ese conference presentations, guest lectures, and job talks aff orded me the chance to converse with other researchers and better refi ne my ideas. Oft en it was a question asked from the audience or an informal chat with a stranger that opened up a new perspective for thinking about the social world of parkour. Simón Weff er graciously accepted the task of reading and commenting on the entire manuscript draft , and he provided much-needed feedback. I was also fortunate enough to have a graduate assistant, Patrick Dowling, to lend a hand with transcribing the fi nal interviews. My words here are limited, but my gratitude is boundless for all those who helped along the way. Parts of chapter two originally appeared as “Parkour, the Aff ective Appropriation of Urban Space, and the Real/Virtual Dialectic,” City & Community 11 (2012): 229–253. An earlier version of chapter three was published as “Parkour, Masculinity, and the City,” Sociology of Sport Journal 20 (2013): 1–23. Several aspects of chapter four can be found in “ Parkour: Adventure, Risk, and Safety in the Urban Environment,” Q ualitative Sociology 36 (2013): 231–250. Kristen Myers, Beth Schewe, Gregory Snyder, Patrick Williams, and the anonymous reviewers for these journals aided in the process of refi ning my analysis for the articles (as well as what would eventually become this book). Further, all three of these journals’ editors— Michael Atkinson (Sociology of Sport Journal), Hilary Silver (City & Community), and David Smilde (Qualitative Sociology)—showed a much-appreciated enthusiasm for the project. Additionally, I would be remiss if I did not mention the numerous talks I had about my research with friends whose lives exist far from aca- demia. It was on trips to the beach and hikes in the woods that I was able to

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.