Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation

278 Pages·2020·3.322 MB·English

by  Jesús Fernández-Domínguez (editor), Alexandra Bagasheva (editor), Cristina Lara Clares (editor)

Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation
Empirical Approaches to
Linguistic Theory
Series Editor
Brian D. Joseph, The Ohio State University
Editorial Board
Artemis Alexiadou, University of Stuttgart
Harald Baayen, University of Alberta
Pier Marco Bertinetto, Scuola Normale Superiore
Kirk Hazen, West Virginia University
Maria Polinsky, Harvard University
volume 16
The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/ealt
Paradigmatic Relations
in Word Formation
Edited by
Jesús Fernández-Domínguez
Alexandra Bagasheva
Cristina Lara-Clares
LEIDEN | BOSTON
This publication has been supported by the Spanish State Research Agency (SRA, Ministry of Economy and
Enterprise) and European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) (Ref. FFI2017-89665-P).
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Fernández-Domiń guez, Jesús, editor. | Bagasheva, Alexandra,
 editor. | Lara-Clares, Cristina, editor.
Title: Paradigmatic relations in word formation / edited by Jesús
 Fernández-Domiń guez, Alexandra Bagasheva, Cristina Lara-Clares.
Description: Leiden ; Boston : Brill, 2020. | Series: Empirical approaches
 to linguistic theory, 22106243 ; volume 16 | Includes bibliographical
 references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2020024561 (print) | LCCN 2020024562 (ebook) | ISBN
 9789004433403 (hardback) | ISBN 9789004433410 (ebook)
Subjects: LCSH: Grammar, Comparative and general—Word formation. |
 Paradigm (Linguistics)
Classification: LCC P245 .P37 2020 (print) | LCC P245 (ebook) | DDC
 415/.92—dc23
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020024561
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2020024562
Typeface for the Latin, Greek, and Cyrillic scripts: “Brill”. See and download: brill.com/brill-typeface.
issn 2210-6243
isbn 978-90-04-43340-3 (hardback)
isbn 978-90-04-43341-0 (e-book)
Copyright 2020 by Koninklijke Brill NV, The Netherlands.
Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Brill Hes & De Graaf, Brill Nijhoff, Brill Rodopi,
Brill Sense, Hotei Publishing, mentis Verlag, Verlag Ferdinand Schöningh and Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system,
or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
without prior written permission from the publisher.
Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Koninklijke Brill NV provided
that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive,
Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Fees are subject to change.
This book is printed on acid-free paper and produced in a sustainable manner.
Contents
Editorial Foreword vii
Brian Joseph
List of Tables and Figures IX
Notes on Contributors XI
1 What Paradigms and What For? 1
Jesús Fernández-Domínguez, Alexandra Bagasheva, and
Cristina Lara-Clares
2 Paradigmaticity in Compounding 21
Alexandra Bagasheva
3 Characterizing Derivational Paradigms 49
Bernard Fradin
4 The Level of Paradigmaticity within Derivational Networks 85
Petr Kos
5 Doublet Formation in Palestinian Arabic—Where Do Paradigms
Interfere? 100
Lior Laks and Faten Yousef
6 What We Talk about When We Talk about Paradigms: Representing Latin
Word Formation 128
Eleonora Litta and Marco Budassi
7 A Paradigmatic Approach to Compounding 164
Jan Radimský
8 Of Brownie Girls and Aussie Families: A New Look at Morphosemantic
Paradigmaticity in Adj+ie/y Nominalisations 186
José A. Sánchez Fajardo and Elizaveta Tarasova
9 Neoclassical Word Formation in English: A Paradigm-Based Account
of -scope Formations 213
Ana Díaz-Negrillo
Index 263

Editorial Foreword
The Ancient Greek word παράδειγμα, the source of the term that furnishes
the first and key word in the title of this volume and provides the notion that
unifies its nine substantial chapters, originally meant an architect’s or sculp-
tor’s ‘model’. More germane to the volume at hand, it also meant ‘pattern’, and
that is the sense that most directly informs the linguistic concepts of para-
digm and concomitantly, paradigmatic relation, that are the focus of this latest
contribution to the Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory (EALT) series,
Paradigmatic Relations in Word Formation.
This word παράδειγμα had other meanings in Ancient Greek as well, and
interestingly, many of its extended meanings are relevant to the present
volume:
– For instance, it meant (and still does mean in Modern Greek) ‘example’ and
to be sure, there are a good many examples in this book, drawn from a num-
ber of different languages, those well-represented in the literature (Arabic,
Dutch, English, French, Italian, Latin, Russian), those less well represented
(Dogon, Rikbaktsa, Vietnamese), and those in-between (Czech, Slovak).
– It could also mean ‘lesson’, and there are certainly lessons to be learned
from the studies in this volume about derivation, about inflection, about
networks of words, about different kinds of connections among words—
semantic, formal, and other—and so on.
– Another meaning was ‘argument’, in the sense of an element of a proof in
philosophical debate, a meaning which clearly resonates with the nature of
argumentation in linguistics and thus in evidence in the chapters here.
– Finally, it could also mean ‘precedent’, and while this volume is not totally
unprecedented, in that there are many works on morphology and on deri-
vation today as morphological investigation is becoming, or has become,
a distinct subfield within linguistics in the past few decades, it is setting
a precedent by addressing various open issues—what the editors call “un-
settled matters” (pp. 12–13) in morphological analysis and theory.
Each new volume of EALT offers something important to the scholarly world
and with this work, editors Jesús Fernández-Domiń guez, Alexandra Bagasheva,
and Cristina Lara-Clares, along with the ten other authors whose work is show-
cased here, are offering an interesting and insightful group of studies that eluci-
date the role of the notion of “paradigm” in word-formation processes. Indeed,
through these studies, it becomes evident how patterns—παραδεἰγματα—are
viii Editorial Foreword
as essential for the understanding of word formation and derivational mor-
phology as they are for the understanding of inflectional morphology.
Brian D. Joseph
EALT Series Managing Editor
Columbus, Ohio USA
25 July 2020
Tables and Figures
Tables
1.1 An inflectional paradigm of Latin 3
1.2 A gap in a derivational paradigm 5
1.3 Three configurations post-Full Reanalysis Hypothesis 5
3.1 Distinction between agglutinative vs. fusional languages 55
3.2 Partial classification of pets and farm animals in French 60
6.1 Derivational paradigm for base DIC-: verbs 134
6.2 Derivational paradigm for base DIC-: nouns 134
6.3 Derivational paradigm for base DIC-: adjectives 135
6.4 Sub-paradigm of CAL- 141
6.5 List of sub-paradigms with the same derivational behaviour of cal- 141
6.6 List of sub-paradigms with no -sc-form corresponding to a -facio/-fio
formation 142
6.7 Sub-paradigm of terr- 143
6.8 Sub-paradigms based on base sue- 143
6.9 Sub-paradigm of ir- 144
6.10 Stem allomorphy in ago and duco 145
6.11 Most frequent WFRs in Classical Latin 146
6.12 Sketch of point iv. Towards the construction of a core derivational paradigm
for Latin 149
6.13 Core derivational paradigm for Latin filled with lemmas with bases fac-, dic-,
ag-, mitt- 150
7.1 Derivational paradigm 167
7.2 Examples of structures that may express an implicit “made of”
relationship 176
8.1 Colour/origin-based Adj+ie nominalisations used in the study 203
8.2 Colour-based Adj+ie nominalisations, and their corresponding senses,
extracted from normative and descriptive dictionaries 205
9.1 Distribution of formation types in the study 221
9.2 Distribution of [X -scope] instrument formations 222
N
9.3 Distribution of [entity -scope] instrument formations 224
N
9.4 Distribution of [mode of action -scope] instrument formations 225
N
9.5 Distribution of [agent -scope] instrument formations 226
N
9.6 Distribution of [-scope X] formations 227
9.7 [-scope X]event : realizations 228
N