ebook img

Palorchestes selestiae, a new species of palorchestid marsupial from the Early Pliocene Bluff Downs Local Fauna, northeastern Queensland PDF

7 Pages·1995·2.4 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Palorchestes selestiae, a new species of palorchestid marsupial from the Early Pliocene Bluff Downs Local Fauna, northeastern Queensland

PALORCHESTESSELESTIAE, A NEW SPECIES OFPALORCHESTID MARSUPIAL FROMTHE EARLYPLIOCENEBLUFFDOWNS LOCALFAUNA, NORTHEASTERN QUEENSLAND BRIANMACKNESS Mackness,B.S. 1995 1201.Palorchestesselestiae,anewspeciesofpalorchestidmarsupial fromtheearlyPlioceneBluffDownsLocalFauna,northeasternQueensland.Memoirsofthe QueenslandMuseum38(2): 603-609. ISSN0079-8835 Palorchestesselestiaesp.nov.fromtheearlyPlioceneBluffDowtuLocalFaunaisdescribed onthebastsofan isolatedLMKItislargerthanP.patneiand P.parvusbutsmallerthan P. azaelinbothlengthand widthoflophs. Itisalsodiffercntiable fromall otherpalorchestids onthe basisofthecombination oflinksbetween,orstemming fromlophs. It is thesecond undoubted Pliocene species and shares features ofboth P. parvus and the Pleistocene P. azael.Withitsrelativelyderivedanteriormorphologyandplesiomorphicposteriormorphol- ogy, P, selestiae challenges current notions about the phyiogenetic relationships of diprotodontid marsupials which suggest that smalt size and simple structure are probably pleisomorphicfeatures. Palorchestes,palorchestids,BluffDownsLocalFauna,Pliocene, Diprotodontia,Marsupialia. Brian Maekncss, SchoolofBiologicalSciences, UniversityofNewSouth Wales, P.O. Box I. KensingtonNSW2033, Australia; IAugust J995. PalorchesteswasdescribedbyOwen(1873)on salt. Archer, inArcherScWade(1976)noted,but the basis of an anterior portion of a cranium didnotnamethreeotherdiprotodontoidsfromthe includingtherostrum.Theholotypewasobtained Bluff Downs Local Fauna, a species of Eu- by Dr Ludwig Becker and described by Owen ryzygoma, a species ofZygomaturus and an un- (1874)asP.azaelfromanunspecifieddepositin identified *notothere\ Victoria interpreted by Mahoney & Ride (1975) as the River Tambo in Gippsland. Owen Terminology (1873:387)consideredPa/a/rrteifestobe".. .the Dental homology of cheekteeth follows largestform ofkangaroohithertofound". Luckett (1993) such that the first adult molari- Owen regarded Palorchestes to be a form tooth is Mi and the deciduous molariform macropodid,aview followedbySimpson(1945) tooth isdp*. Terminology ofcrown morphology who placed the genus within the subfamily (Fig. 1)followsthatusedbyArcher(1976)except Macropodinae. Raven & Gregory (1946), how- that the metaconule is used instead of hypocone ever,placeditinthesubfamilySthenurinaewhile following Tedford & Woodburne (1987). Tbe- Tate (1948) placed it in anew subfamilyofkan- gotic terminology used follows Every (1972). garoos, the Palorchestinae. Woods (1958) was Abbreviations for specimen numbers: QMF, thefirsttorecognisethediprotodontidratherthan Queensland Museum fossil collection; UCMP, macropodid affinities ofPalorchestes. Archer& UniversityofCalifornia,Berkeley;P,SouthAus- Bartholomai(1978)followedthisassignmentbut tralian Museum. elevatedTate's Palorchestinae tofamily level. SYSTEMATICS Palorchestes selestiae sp. nov. is described LM here on the basis of an isolated ! from the fluviatile and lacustrine deposits of the Al- OrderDIPROTODONTIAOwen, 1866 lingham Formation, northwest ofCharters Tow- SuborderVOMBATIFORMES ers, northeastern Queensland. This formation Woodburne, 1984 VOMBATOMORPH1A containsadiverseassemblageknownastheBluff Infraorder & DownsLocal Fauna, and hasbeen the subjectof Aplin Archer, 1987 many studies, most recently including those of Family PALORCHESTIDAE(Tate, 1948) & Vickers-Rich (1991), Mackness et aL (1993), Archer Bartholomai (1978) Boles & Mackness (1994) and Mackness (in PalorchestesOwen, 1873 press). Archer& Wade (1976) assigned anearly Plioceneagetotheassemblageonthebasisofthe TypeSpecies mtepreted age ofthe overlying Aliensleigh Ba- PalorchestesazaelOwen 1873. 1 604 MEMOIRS OFTHEQUEENSLANDMUSEUM The anterior cingulum fails to extend around the base of the protocone. A slight anterobuccal cingulum is continuous with the anterior cingu- lum. Otherwise there are no lingual or buccal cingula.Anteriorcingulumhighresultingindeep fossae where the forelinks join the cingulum. Posterior cingulum closer to the metaloph than the anterior cingulum is to the protoloph. As a result, the posterior cingular valleys are not as deepastheanteriorones. There isaconspicuous interproximalwearfacetontheanterobuccalcor- ner ofthe tooth, presumably caused by abrasion againstP^. There are a number of blades on the crown. M Where the enamel has been breached, both sets FIsaeGrle.esa1tl.isaDoei.parRgeersgaeimnotnsesdhouuwssieindnggfottrehermmehiaonslouolrtoeygpmyeeon(ftQsaMnFin12Ta41b5ol5fe)P..1 ocfanlebaedinsgeeanndontratihleinpgrboltaodleosp(hseannsduEmveetrayl,op1h9.72A) Arrowindicatesanteriorofmolar.Abbreviations:ab.f numberofsecondarybladesarealsopresent.One anterobuccalfossa;a.c. anteriorcingulum; l.f. lingual blade (the apical margin ofthe lingual forelink) forelink; m. metaloph; me. metacone; mcl. leads from the protocone to the anterior cingu- metaconule; ml. midlirtk; pa. paracone.;p.c.posterior lum. Another blade (the apical margin of the cingulum;pl.f.postcrolingnal fo«a;pr. protocone. buccal forelink) connects the protoloph, approx- imately one third of the way between the Palorchestesselestiarn, sp. paracone and the protocone, to the anterior cin- (Fig. 2) gulum. A well-developed primary midlinkjoins the protoloph to the metaloph.The posteriorend Materialexamined of this midlink contacts the trailing edge of the QBHuloualfrofrtyDyo(pw1e9n:"s4QS3tM"aSFt,i1o21n,445n5°o5r3,t6h'eEaa)ns,teAirlsnollQtauntegeehdnasmLlaFMnodr1.m,aMtiaoinn, TMAB1LinEm1m,.ComparativemeasurementsofPalorchestes AW PW Specimen No. L Etymology P.selestiae Holotype 22.6 16.6 16.9 ForSelesti SmithofBluffDowns Station. P.pan'us QMF784(cast) 20.7 15.7 15.4 QMF12476 15.4 15.3 Diagnosis QMF2963 19.3 14.9 14,4 Small LM* with lingual forehnk terminated in the cingular valley and not in contact with the QMF3719(cast) 19.3 15 ri 14.: cingulum; second incipient buttress on theback QMi 2967 19.4 15.5 15.6 ofthemetaloph; posterolingualfossawelldevel- QMF2965 20.9 14.5 oped; posterior cingulum rises to an apex mid- QMF789 19.5 length;incipientbuttressingcmtheposteriorwall P. cfpQrvus P24097(R) 18.8 I3.fi 12.5 ofmetaloph; onemidlink and twoincipient mid- P24097(L) v, 13.9 13.6 1 links;doubleforelinks. P.azael QMF772(cast) 26.6 21.9 21.5 QMF3837 25.8 20.7 19.7 Description Ml370 28.3 21.8 21.4 The holotypeconsistsofacomplete, relatively P3137) 28.3 22.6 21.9 unworn LM*, lacking any remnant of the roots. The metaconule is the tallest cusp with the pro- P31372 26. 22.9 21.9 tocone, paracone and metacone subequal in P. painei UCMP70553(R) 16.5* 13.6* 13.8 height. Protocone linked to the paracone by a UCMP70553(X) 16.8 14.4 1-3,7 well-defined sinuous protoloph. Metaconule UCMP7055O(R) 16.7 13.9* 13.7 linkedtothemetaconebyawell-definedcrescen- UCMP6652KL> 17.8 14.0* , ; 2 tic metaloph whose ends are posteriorly de- =approximation flected. NEWSPECIESOFPALORCHESTiDMARSUPIAL (SOS TABLE2: Summaryoflinks inPatorchestesM1 PHYLOGEtfETIC AFFTN1TES ()Incipient link; -Link/sworn.*cast. The early Miocene Nagapkaidia tedfordi and Specimen Ml Forelinks Midlink Hindlinks Pitihanria dailyi (Stirton, 1967) from the Tirari & Desert of South Australia have previously been xelestiae Hoiotype 2 HI) (2) sp.tmv. regarded as thepleisomorphic sistergroup (sub- P.parvus QMF784* 2(1) i 2 familiaeIncertae)oftheapparentlymorederived QMP124T6 2 2 Palorchestinae based on synapomorphies in the qmr:^ auditory region and neurocranium (Stirton eta)., 2(1) 2 2 1967). Ithasbeen furthersuggestedby Stirton et QMF3719* 2 2 2 al.(1967:154)thatPitikantia"...ismuchnearer, OMF2967 2 2 2 if w\t in, an ancestral position to Palortkestes*'. OMF2965 2 j Archer(1984),however,observedthattherewas P.azael QMF772* 2 i(2) littleevidence toregard thetwogroupsasmono- QMF3837 2 phyletic, wilh species of Ngapakaldia and 1 P.painei UCMP70553 i 1 J PtirtaicLtaendiinaalsaaclkibnogntehse sopfecipaalliozrecdhemsotlianress,anedvreen- UCMF*552l J 1 1 thoughtheirbasicranial morphologywassimilar. posteriormetalophblade.Anotherlessdeveloped Murray (19S6) described the middle Miocene midlink occurs on the lingual side ofthe tooth. PropalorchestesnovacutacephalusfromtheBul- This smaller link is steeply v-shaped rather than lockCreek LocalFaunaand, based on itscranial shallowly v-shaped as is the primary midlink. base, glenoid fossa morphology and auditory re- There is a very deep fossa between these two gion, placed it within the subfamily Pal- midlinks. orchestinae. Subsequently, Murray (1990) Thereisalsoaswollenbuttressontheposterior describedthedentitionofP.Tiovaculacephalusas flank of the protoloph, buccal to the primary well as a new taxon. F, ponticulus from D-site midlink. Another steeply inclined buttress de- (System A), Riversleigh, Queensland. The latter scendsposteriorlytotheposteriorcingulumfrom was alsoplaced withinthe Palorchestinae. methneettatcibpolnoafudlteehettomheatttheaccpooonsntunelereicoatrnsdcistnuhgpeuplouarmpt.sexAansoimfnaclitlpheier- cohrTacrhhaeecsttieMdrsi1s,(eWdthobeoydmesol,asbt1o9rd5ai8ta;egdnWofosoortdei-bc,uhrtionnoedt,-ha1fn9od6r7m)pi.adli--l blade-like structure is present on the posterior links. These features are lacking in species of wall ofthe metaloph, buccal to the primary pos- Ngapakaldia and Pitikantiabutpresentorincip- teriorblade. There is some slight crenulation of ient in Propalorchesfes novaculacephalus* con- the enamel at thebase ofthe lophs. sidered to be the sister group of Palorchestet Murray(1986, 1990).Patorchestespaineihasthe Remarks simplestsystem Oflinkswithonefore-,onehind, P. selestiaeis approximately3/4the sizeofP. and one midlink which is thecondition alsoseen azael Owen and is 1/5 Larger than P. parvus De in P. novacutacephalus. All otherspeciesofPal- Vis.WhilstcloserinsizetoP.parrns* P.selestiue orchesteshsvctwolorchnksasasynapomorphy. IS morphologically closer to P. azael. P. azael differs in that the lingual forelink links the pro- tocone to the anterior cingulum, and lacks the second incipient buttress on the back of the metaloph. P. selestiae has a better developed posierolingual fossa and the apex midlength on the cingulum is absent in P. azael. In P. parvus the anterobuccal fossa is less developed, both forelinksjointheanteriorcingulum,therearctwo well-defined hindlinks which join directly with the posterior cingulum, and two midlinks are present. P.panelWoodburne has a definite mid- link,absentinP.selestiae,anditlacksthedouble forelink and the two incipient buttresses on the FIG. 2. Palorcheues seiestiae hoiotype QMF12455. posteriorwall ofthemetaloph. Actualsize.Occlusalviewstereopair.Anterioratinp. 606 MEMOIRSOFTHEQUEENSLAND MUSEUM verse correlates of age. By 23 - /** those measures, P. painei, A \ as the smallest species, \ ought to be the oldest fol- 22 ~ lowed, in decreasing age * 1 A : and increasing size by P. pan>us, P. selestiae and P. 21 i azael.However,P.selestiae A t I i comes from ademonstrably r early Pliocene site, whereas 20 thesmallerP.parvuscomes IJ* from early to middle Pliocene sites which does 19 not support the i biostratigraphic argument ofStirtone/a/.(1967). Several authors (Archer, 1976b; Murray, 1990) have 17 proposed that thebilophod- onl uppermolars ofspecies of Palorchestes are deriv- 16 ablefromsubselenodontan- imals such as wynyardiids. I I Murray (1990:49) suggests 15 b ". .The possibility of ; . paraphyletic bilophodonty could not be ruled out, par- 14 ticularly with respect to the diprotodontids". In this 13 view those animals such as the late Miocene P. painei II whichhadtheleastdevelop- 12 1 I i i i 1 1 i ment ofselenodontfeatures 16 1B 20 TOOT2H2 LENGT2H4 26 26 30 would be regarded as the most derived. It would then ANTERIORWIDTH P.paOfnel P.selOestiae P.paarvus P.azAael follow that,barringconver- POSTERIORWIDTH • A gence, the more elaborate the cresting, the more p^lesiomorphic the animal. FIG.3.Bivariateplotsoftooihlengthagainstanteriorwidthf)andtoothlength seledont groundplan is againstposteriorwidth M1 ofPalorchestesspecies. still evident in P. selestiae, even though ithas been ob- Palorchestesselestiae and P. azael share acces- scured to some degree by sory midlinks and the reduction ofhindlinks as the developmentoflophs. synapomorphies while P. parvus has two hindlinks and two midlinks as autapomorphies. PALAEOECOLOGY The developmentofaccessory hindlinks and the Ungualforelink notextending tothe anteriorcin- Palorchestidsare uncommon elements in most gulum in P. selestiae are considered au- Australian marsupial faunas although they have tapomorphies forthis taxon. a long Tertiary and Quaternary history (Murray, Palorchestes selestiae indicates need for cau- 1991).Theoldestknownrepresentativesarespe- tion in determining phylogenetic relationships cies of Ngapakaldia and Pitikantidia from the within diprotodontoid lineages based on size Oligo-Miocene deposits ofcentral Australia and alone. Stirton et al. (1967) suggested that molar Riversleigh in northwestern Queensland. At the sizeandcomplexity in diprotodontoids were in- younger end of their time range, some may be NEW SPECIES OFPALORCHESTID MARSUPIAL 60? P.Mfest/a* F.parvus equipped&with large laterally compressed claws. Flannery Archer(1985) haveused postcramal material and teeth to attemptareconstruction of twospecies. Their analyses suggested the possi- bility that speciesofPalorchestesweremedium- sizedfolivoresthatmayhaveusedtheirpowerful clawsandarmstoripbarkofftreesforfoodorlo uproot shrubs with tuberousroots. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS TWOFORELINK& I thank Michael Archerand Suzanne Hand for helpful comments on the manuscript. Sue Creagh, PeterMurray, NevillePledgeand Ralph Molnar for access to other palorchestid speci- TOiFEMVIEDLUONPKMSENT mens. Jack, Rhonda, Bram, Troy and Selesti SmithofBluffDownsStationcontinuetoprovide tremendous support for this ongoing research. 1 thank Henk Godthelp, Darren Sprott and Frank Coffafortheirassistance.CollectionoftheBluff Downsmaterial wassupportedinpartbyanARC Program Grant to M. Archer; a grant from the Department of Arts, Sport, the Environment, M Tourism and Territories to M. Archer, S. Hand FIG.4. Cladogramoftaxabasedon 1 morphology. andH.Godthelp;agrantfromtheNationalEstate Program Grants Scheme to M. Archer and A. only 30000 yBP(Murray, 1991) and it has been suggested that Palorchestes was contemporane- ous with humans. Murray & Chaloupka (1984) have interpreted an Aboriginal rock painting in the Arnhem Land escarpment as a possible ren- dition ofa species ofPalorchestesalthough this & hasbeenquestioned(Lewis, 1986; Chaloupka Murray, 1986; Mackness, 1992). The reduction and retraction of the nasals, along with a conspicuous fossae for large nasomaxillolabialis muscles and a narrow, pro- tracted rostrum have been used as a basis for reconstructingpalorchestids with atrunkand the basts of their popular description as *marsupial P.parvus tapirs* (Bartholomai, 1978; Flannery, 1983; & P Aml*xUiM Flannery Archer, 1985; Murray, 1991). The h- long,narrowdeeplygroovedsymphysissuggests that palorchestids had long protrusible giraffe- liketongues (Murray, 1991).Thespatulatelower incisorsarealmostparallel tostronglydeveloped diastemal crests and interpreted by Murray (1991) as probably being used to strip leaves or crop clumped vegetation. Little has been pub- lished about the postcranials of palorchestids. Woods (1958) cast doubt on the association of postcranialswithskullremainssuggestedbysev- eral authors (Owen, 1876; Gregory, 1902; Fletcher, 1945). Archer (1984), however, has FIG. 5. DistributionofspeciesofPalorchestes, noted that Palorchestes has powerful forclimbs . SOS MEMOIRS01"THEQtrEENSLANDMUSEUM Bartholomai; andgrantsinaid tothe Rivcrsleigh GREGORY. J.W. 1902. Some remains of an extinct Research Ptoject fromWang Australia,ICI Aus- kangaroointhedune-rockofthe Sorrento Penin- traliaand the Australian Geographic Society. sula, Victoria. Proceedings ofthe Royal Society of\'x:lorkjl4: 139-144. LITERATURECTTHD LEWIS,D. 1986.CommentTrieDrearnlimeAnimals'; areply. Archaeology inOccania21: 140-14. APUN, K. & ARCHER, A 1987. Recentadvancesin LUCKdEeTniTa,l hPo.mo1l9o9g3i.esAinntohnetroilaongimcaamlmaaslsse.ssPmpe.nt,182o-f marsupial systematicswith a new syncretic clas- 204. In SzJay, F.S., Novacek, M.J. & McKenna, sification. Pp. sv-Lxxii in Archer, M. fed.) 'Pos- M.C. (eds.) Mammal Phylogcny: Mesoxoic dif- sums and Opposums: Studies in Evolution. ferentiation,mullituberculates,monotremes.early (Surrey Beany &.Sons andtheRoyalZoological Iberians and marsupials (Springer-Vertag: New Society ofNew SouthWales: Sydney) York). ARCHER, M. 1976. Phascolarctidoriginsand thepo- MACKNESS. B.S. 1992. Aboriginal animal motifs in lenuaJoftheseknodontmolarindieevolutionol thefourthdimension.AustralianAnthropological (hprotodont marsupials. Memoirs oftheQueens- Society Conference, Canberra, September. (Ab- landMuseum 17; 367-371. 1984. TheAustraliaMn m&arsupial radiation, Pp.633- INsPtrRaEctS)S, Anhinga malagurala, anew speciesor b80r8a.teInZAorcohgeer.ographClyaytaonn,dG.Evloeld*u.t)i"oVnertien- dartertromtheearlyPlioceneBluffDownsLocal Fauna, northeasternQueensland. Emu. ARCHAmEuasRmt,rmaaMlal.ssi&ao.Bf(AHAeRussTptreHarOliiLaan:OPMarAessIsy:,noCpAatr.liic1s9l7reRe).v.iTeewr.tiaAnl,- MACKCNOELSESM,ABN.S..,SMC&NGAOMDATRHAE,LPa,,HM.IC19H9N3.A,ThPe, cheringa2: 1-19. SpnngParkLocalFauna,anewlateTertiaryfossil ARCHER, M, GODTHELP, H.. HAND, SJ. & assemblage from northern Ausualia. Conference MEGIRIAN, D. 1989. Fossil mammals of onAustralasian VertebrateEvolution, Palaeonto- logy and Systcmatics. Adelaide, 19-21 April Rivecslcigru iKtrthweslern Queensland: prelimi- ennavriyroovnemrevniteawlocfhabnigoes.traAuugsrtaraplhiya,ncoZroroelloagtiiosnta2n5d: MAHO1N99E3Y..PrJo.gA.ra&mmReIDaEn,dWA.bsDt.rLa.cts1.975. Indextothe 29-65. eeneraandspeciesoffossil Mammaliadescribed ARCHER, M.&WADE, M. 1976. ResultsoftheRay from Australia and New Guinea between 1838 E Lemley Expeditions, Part I, The Allingham and 1968' Western Australian Museum Special FforrommantoirotnhearnndAuastnreawliaP1Mi<exm:oeniersveorftctbhrea*Qeuefeanusn-a MURRPuAblYic,ation6;P.1-250.1986. PropdorchesScs landMuseum 17: 379-97. novaeulacephaius gen* ft $p. nov,% a new pal- BARTHOLOMAI, A, 1978. The rostrum in Pal- oichestid (Diproiodontoidca: Marsupiatia) from orchestes Owen (Marsuptalia: Diprolodonudac). the Middle Miocene Camfield Beds, Northern Resultsofthe Ray E Lemleyexpeditions, Part3. Territory. Australia. The Beagle. Occasional Pa- Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 18: 145- persoftheNorthernTerritoryMuseumol'Artsand 149, Sciences3: 195-211. BOLES, W.E.& MACKNESS, B.S. 1994. Birdsfrom 1990. Primitive marsupial tapirs {Propalonhcstcs theBluffDownsLocal Fauna,AllingtumForma- novaculacephalusMurray and P. ponticulussp. tion.Queensland.RecordsoftheSouthAustralian nov.) from the mid-Miocene ofNorth Australia Museum27: 13^-149. (Marsupialia:Palorehesiidae).TheBeagle,Occa- CHALOUPKA.G A MURRAY,P. 1986. Drcarotimc sional Papersofthe NorthernTerritory Museum orreality? ReplvtoLewis Archaeology inOcea- ofArtsand Sciences 7: 39-51. nia21: 145-147. 1991 The PleistocenemegafaunaofAustralia. Pp. EVERY, R.G. 1972. A new terminology for mamma- 1071-1164. In Vickers-Rich, P., Baird, R.F., lianteeth: foundedoo the phenomenonofthego- Monaghan, J. & Rich, T.H. (eds.) 'Vertebrate sis. (PegasusPress:Christchurch). Palaeontology of Australasia (Pioneer Design FLANNERY. T.F. 1983. Aunique trunkedgiant. Pal- Studio and Monash University Publications orctestesazael Pp.54-55. InQuirk.S&Archef. Committee: Melbourne). M.(eds.) 'Prehistoric Animals ofAustralia(Aus- MURRAY,P.&CHALOUPKA,G. 1984.TheDream- tralian Museum:Sydney). limeanimals: extinctmegafaunainAmhemLand FLANNERY.TJF.&ARCHER.M. 1985.Pahmkestcs rockart. Archaeology inOceania 19: 105 116. Owen, 1874. Large and small palorcheslids Pp OWEN. R. 1873. On the fossil mammalsofAuslralia. 234-239.InRickP.V.AG.V.Tets 'Kadimakara. Family Macropodidae. Genera Maa Extinct Vertebratesut Australia. (PioneerDesign Pachysiag&ti,Lepios'mgon Procxfpiodvnandrah- t Studio: Lilydale). ort'hestes. PartIX. Proceedings ofthe Royal So- FLETCHER, H.O. 1945. Putorchestes - Australia's ciety2L 12* exuncigiantkangaroo,AustralianMuseumMag- 1874. On the fossilmammalsofAustralia. Part IX. azine8:361-365. Family Macropodidae. Genera Macropus. NEW SPECIES OFPALORCHESTID MARSUPIAL 609 Pachysiagon, Leptosiagon, Procoptodon and TATE, G.H.H. 1948. ResultsoftheArchboldExpedi- Palorchestes.Ph\)osop\\\ca\ Transactions of the tions. No.59. On the anatomy and phylogeny of RoyalSociety ofLondon 164: 783-803. the Macropodidae (Marsupialia). Bulletin ofthe 1876. On the fossil mammals ofAustralia. Part X. American Museum of Natural History 91: 233- FamilyMacropodidae:mandibulardentitionand 352. parts ofthe skeleton ofPalorchestes;additional TEDFORD, R.H. & WOODBURNE,M.O. 1987. The evidences of Macropus titan, Sthenurus, and Ilariidae,anewfamilyofvombatiformmarsupials Procoptodon. Philosophical Transactions ofthe Royal SocietyofLondon 166: 197-226. from Miocene strata of South Australia and an 1880.Descriptionofaportionofmandibleandteeth evaluationofthehomologyofmolarcuspsinthe ofalargeextinctkangaroo{Palorchestescrassus Diprotodontia. Pp. 401-418. In Archer, M. (ed.) TOrwa.n)safcrtoiomnsanocfitehnetZfoloulvoigaliiclaeldSroifcti,etQyueofenLsolnadnodn. V'Poolsusmuems1 (aSnudrrOepyoBsesautmtsy:&SStuodnisesPtiynLEtvdolauntdiotnh.e 11:7-10. Royal Zoological Society ofNew South Wales: RAVEN, H.C. & GREGORY, W.K. 1946. Adaptive Sydney). branching of the kangaroo family in relation to VICKERS-RICH,P. 1991.TheMesozoicandTertiary habitat. AmericanMuseumNovitates 1309: 1-14. history ofbirds on the Australian plate. Pp.722- SIMPSON,G.G. 1945.Theprinciplesofclassification 808. InVickers-Rich,P., Baird,R.F.,Monaghan, and a classification ofmammals. Bulletin ofthe J. & Rich, T.H. (eds.) 'Vertebrate Palaeontology AmericanMuseumofNaturalHistoryHistory85: of Australasia (Pioneer Design Studio and 1-350. Monash University Publications Committee: STIRTON, R.A. 1967. The Diprotodontidae from the Melbourne). Ngapakaldi Fauna, South Australia, Bureau of WOODBURNE,M.O. 1967. TheAlcoolaFauna,cen- MineralResources,GeologyandGeophysicsBul- letin 85: 1^4. tral Australia: an integrated palaeontological and STIRTON, R.A., WOODBURNE, M.O. & PLANE, geological study. Bureau of Mineral Resources, M.D. 1967. A phylogeny of the Tertiary GeologyandGeophysics Bulletin87: 1-187. Diprotodontidae and its significance in correla- WOODS, J.T. 1958. The extinct genus Palorchestes tion. Bureau ofMineral Resources, Geology and Owen, Memoirs of the Queensland Museum GeophysicsBulletin 85: 149-160. 13(4): 177-193.

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.