ebook img

PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 1 - AMOS Online PDF

21 Pages·2012·6.18 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 1 - AMOS Online

RADIOLOGY RESEARCH Radiographic Tomosynthesis: Acquisition Parameters Michael J. Flynn, PhD Henry Ford Health System Detroit, MI Learning Objectives Learn .. 1. Appreciate the importance of scan direction , 2. Understand how tomosynthesis (TS) images can have better resolution than CT images 3. Learn guidelines for performing TS examinations, .. [with muskuloskeletal examples] M 2012 AP A 22 A -DR & Tomosynthesis (TS) Digital Radiography (DR) detectors capable of rapid sequence acquisitions are effective for xray TomoSynthesis (TS) imaging; • High resolution • No geometric distortion • High frame rate (pulsed) • Minimal lag Accurate mechanical movement of the detector M 2012 aton da cxh-ireavye thuibgeh idse rteaqilu ired AP from TS reconstruction. A 3 PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 1 A –Shimadzu Sonialvision / Safire •The Shimadzu Sonialvision / Safire system integrates the digital detector within a radiographic tilt table. •Shown in the tilt position for a lateral knee tomosynthesis acquisition ( 60o), the detector translates up and the x-ray tube moves downward. • The x-ray central beam is directed at the joint surface with an angle M 2012 t+h2a0t d veagrrieese sfrom -20 to AP A 4 A –GE VolumeRAD • For the GE VolumeRAD system, the tube angle APM 2012 • Tchhaen dgeeste acst othr er etmubaein ms oinu nat s mtaotvieosn alirnye paorlsyi.tion. A 5 B.1 –Acquisition lag •Tomosynthesis requires the acquisition of many views acquired as a very rapid sequence. •Minimal lag from frame to frame is required M 2012 AP A 6 PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 2 B.1 –Transient Response Rapid Edge Movement Test • 1.51 mm Cu edge • High edge position • Low central layer • 74 frames • 30 frames/second Radiographic technique • RQA5 ‘equivalent’ • 70 kVp, 1 mA-S M 2012 • .5 Cu, 2 mm Al AP A 7 B.1 –Transient Response Rapid Edge Movement Test • 1.51 mm Cu edge • High edge position • Low central layer • 74 frames • 30 frames/second Radiographic technique • RQA5 ‘equivalent’ • 70 kVp, 1 mA-S M 2012 • .5 Cu, 2 mm Al AP A 8 B.1 –Transient Response • Edge advances ~ 1 cm per frame • Signal measure from the same region for each frame. M 2012 AP A 9 PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 3 B.1 –Transient Response High to Low Transient 25000 Linear Image Value vs Time 20000 e u al15000 V e g ma10000 0.061 of transient change I T1/2= 2 frames (66 mS) 5000 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 M 2012 millisecs AP A 10 B.1 –Transient Response Low to High Transient 25000 Linear Image Values vs Time 20000 e alu15000 e V 0.062 of transient change mag10000 T1/2 = 1.5 frames (50 mS) I 5000 0 0 200 400 600 800 1000 M 2012 Time [sec] AP A 11 B.2 -Tomosynthesis Line Response Tomosynthesis Line Response • Slice sensitivity • Resolution (LSF FWHM) M 2012 AP A 12 PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 4 B.2 -TS Wire Phantom • Wire test phantom • 80 micron Tungsten M 2012 AP 1 : 10 pitch A 13 B.2 -TSAcquisition Response Acquisition frame 65 kv, 1 mA-S .5 Cu filtration 10 cm height .4 mm focal spot 0 degrees 6 degrees M 2012 AP A 14 B.2 -TS Reconstructed Response Tomosynthesis Reconstruction of wire phantom • Slice intervals of 1 mm • Well focused over 5 mm thickness • Slice sensitivity ~ 3 mm (FWHM) 3 mm M 2012 AP A 15 PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 5 B.2 -TS spatial response SliceThickness (Sensitivity): Peak contrast of a thin line vs height FWHM = 3.02 mm (rsna 2007) M 2012 AP A 16 B.2 -TS response TS Resolution: •Thin wire response at TS reconstruction maximum • 80 micron wire contrast. •• C40ut doefgfr feielt earc q#u4isition •Re-projection • 2x2 bin, 300x300 µm with 1/10thsub- pixels FWHM = 0.24 mm (rsna 2007) M 2012 AP A 17 B.2 -TS line response Fourier transform (magnitude) of TS reconstruction LSF •80 micron wire •Cutoff filter #4 •40 degree acquisition Extended spatial •2x2 bin, 300x300 µm frequency response but no low frequency, DC, information. M 2012 AP A 18 PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 6 B.3 –TS vs CT resolution • In the x direction, TS resolution is about 3 times better than current CT scanners. • In the x direction, TS slice thickness about 3 time worse than thin slice CT scans. M 2012 AP A 19 B.3 -3D spatial frequency domain CT ω Modern Multi-slice VCT z scanners have nearly ω y isotropic response with maximum spatial frequencies of .8 to 1.0 cycles/mm ω x M 2012 AP A 20 B.3 -CT Resolution (2006 SPIE) Clinical Multi-slice scanners • 64 slice scanners • GE Lightspeed VCT 64 • Siemens Sensation 32x2 • PlSF FWHM • Transverse 1.14 +/-.05 mm • Axial 0.87 +/-.11 mm • 10% MTF Freq. • Transverse 0.74 +/-.02 cycles/mm • Axial 0.92 +/-.12 cycles/mm For purposes of comparison, we express typical VCT performance as; M 2012 ••10..0803 cmymcl e s / m m ((1F0W%H MMT PFl)S F) AP A 21 PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 7 B.3 -3D spatial frequency domain TS Tomosynthesis ωz ω extends the y transverse response at the expense of the slice width (Z) ω x M 2012 AP A 22 B.3 -Frozen Cadaver –Tibial Plateau standard GE VCT Shimadzu TS APM 2012 Nearly matched coronal planes from reformatted 3D CT (GE) A 23 B.3 -Frozen Cadaver –Tibial Plateau Bone+ GE VCT Shimadzu TS M 2012 Nearly matched coronal planes from reformatted 3D CT (GE) AP A 24 PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 8 B.3 -3D spatial frequency domain • In the x direction, TS resolution is about 3 times better than current CT scanners. • In the x direction, TS slice thickness about 3 time worse than thin slice CT scans. • HOWEVER, the TS image is NOT a tomogram in that large segments of the volumetric spatial frequency domain are un-sampled. M 2012 AP A 25 B.3 -Tomosynthesis Reconstruction ωz Frequency coefficients Filtered Backprojection from the view acquired at -10o. • The reconstruction is similar to cone beam CT but C wanitghle a. limited acquisition A ωx • The tomosynthesis image B quality can be understood from the Fourier representation of the acquired data. US PAT #s 6643351, 6463116 A.High signal frequencies in the x,y directions provide in-plane detail. M 2012 BC..VFlaarti esdu rffilatceers c aurte- onfoft fsraemqpuleendc iaelso nvgs tahneg lωez lidmirite cZt isoingnal resolution. AP A 26 B.3 -3D spatial frequency domain TS vs CT ω z Unsampled frequencies ω y along the ωyaxis make TS and CT complimentary. ω x M 2012 AP A 27 PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 9 B.3 Orientation effect Grid phantom made from a the grid of a fluorescent ceiling light; • 1 cm aluminum louvers 12 cm x 12 cm • 14 mm spacing •45oto scan •0o/ 90oto scan M 2012 AP A 28 B.4 –MultipleTS views • Because of the large slice thickness and anisotropic spatial resolution, multiple TS view are needed to examine organs in different orientations. • This is an important distinction relative to CT where sagital, coronal, and transverse views are obtained from the same acquisition. M 2012 A1Y .Ao ZrP hM2o Vn2gi0e, 1wM2 ,CD Sh AeUsn-tdC eT-r2Ss1o8n-1 AP A 29 B.4 –MultipleTS views AP View 60-30 View APM 2012 Mdeutlatiilp ilne pTlSan aecsq oufis itdiiofnfse raernet r oerqiueinrteadt itoon get A 30 PACS: ERGONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS 10

Description:
CONSIDERATIONS. 1. RADIOLOGY and x-ray tube is required to achieve high detail .. Patient presented in the EM Dept with possible hip fx. • Radiographs
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.