ebook img

Osteoporosis in Men, Second Edition: The Effects of Gender on Skeletal Health PDF

698 Pages·2009·41.667 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Osteoporosis in Men, Second Edition: The Effects of Gender on Skeletal Health

Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier 32 Jamestown Road, London NW1 7BY, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1900, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA First edition 1999 Second edition 2010 Copyright © 1999, 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means elec- tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone ( 44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (44) (0) 1865 853333; email: [email protected]. Alternatively, visit the Science and Technology Books website at www.elsevierdirect.com/rights for further information Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made Medicine is an ever-changing field. Standard safety precautions must be followed, but as new research and clinical experience broaden our knowledge, changes in treatment and drug therapy may become necessary or appropriate. Readers are advised to check the most current product information provided by the manufacturer of each drug to be administered to verify the recommended dose, the method and duration of administrations, and contraindications. It is the responsibility of the treating physician, relying on experience and knowledge of the patient, to determine dosages and the best treatment for each individual patient. Neither the publisher nor the authors assume any liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from this publication. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available from the Library of Congress ISBN : 978-0-12-374602-3 For information on all Academic Press publications visit our website at www.elsevierdirect.com Typeset by Macmillan Publishing Solutions www.macmillansolutions.com Printed and bound in United States of America 10 11 12 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 http://avaxho.me/blogs/ChrisRedfield Contributors RobeRt A. AdleR, Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical of Internal Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Center and Virginia Commonwealth University School of Belgium Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA Adele l. boSkey, Starr Chair in Mineralized Tissue Research and Director, Musculoskeletal Integrity Program, Hospital for Special MAtthew R. Allen, Departments of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Surgery, New York; Professor of Biochemistry, Weill Medical College Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA of Cornell University; Professor, Field of Physiology, Biophysics and ShReyASee AMin, Division of Rheumatology, College of Systems Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Weill Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA Medical College of Cornell University; Professor, Field of Biomedical Engineering, Sibley School, Cornell Ithaca; Adjunct Professor, diAnA M. Antoniucci, University of California, San School of Engineering, City College of New York, NY, USA Francisco; Physicians Foundation of California Pacific Medical RoGeR bouillon, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine Center, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Osteoporosis, and Endocrinology (LEGENDO), Katholieke Univeriteit Leuven San Francisco, CA, USA (KUL), Leuven, Belgium AndRe b. ARAujo, New England Research Institutes, Inc., dAvid b. buRR, Departments of Anatomy and Cell Biology Watertown, MA, USA and Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine; Department of Biomedical Engineering, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, lAuRA A.G. ARMAS, Creighton University Osteoporosis USA Research Center, Omaha, NE, USA Melonie buRRowS, Department of Orthopaedics, University GiAMpieRo i. bARoncelli, Department of Obstetrics, of British Columbia; Centre for Hip Health and Mobility, Gynecology and Pediatrics, 2nd Pediatric Unit, ‘S. Chiara’ Hospital, Vancouver, Canada Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy Filip cAllewAeRt, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, SilvAno beRtelloni, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology Leuven University Department of Experimental Medicine, and Pediatrics, 2nd Pediatric Unit, ‘S. Chiara’ Hospital, Azienda Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy GeeRt cARMeliet, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Endocrinology (LEGENDO), Katholieke Univeriteit Leuven ShAlendeR bhASin, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes (KUL), Leuven, Belgium and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA luiSellA ciAnFeRotti, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy john p. bilezikiAn, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, College of Physicians juliet coMpSton, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, UK and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA FeliciA coSMAn, Regional Bone Center Helen Hayes Hospital, neil c. binkley, University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine West Haverstraw, New York; Department of Medicine, Division of and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA Endocrinology, Metabolic Bone Diseases Unit, College of Physi- cians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA Steven boonen, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Department of Experimental Medicine, Katholieke Division of SeRGe cReMeRS, Division of Endocrinology, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Leuven University Hospital, Department Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA ix x contributors k. ShAwn dAviSon, Laval University, Quebec City, PQ, Canada deboRAh t. Gold, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA dAvid w. deMpSteR, Department of Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA X. edwARd Guo, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA john A. eiSMAn, Bone and Mineral Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; University of New South Wales; St pAtRick hAentjenS, Center for Outcomes Research, University Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia Hospital Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium GhAdA el-hAjj FuleihAn, Calcium Metabolism and Osteo- johAn hAlSe, Department of Endocrinology and Internal porosis Program, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Medicine, Aker University Hospital, Oslo; Spesialistsenteret Beirut, Lebanon Pilestredet Park, Oslo, Norway eRik Fink eRikSen, Department of Endocrinology and Internal dAvid j. hAndelSMAn, Department of Andrology, ANZAC Medicine, Aker University Hospital, Oslo; Spesialistsenteret Research Institute, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Pilestredet Park, Oslo, Norway Sydney, NSW, Australia MuRRAy j. FAvuS, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and elizAbeth M. hAney, Oregon Health and Science University, Metabolism, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Portland, OR, USA dieteR FelSenbeRG, Zentrum Muskel- & Knochenforschung, dAvid A. hAnley, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Freie Universität & Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany RobeRt p. heAney, Creighton University Osteoporosis Research Center, Omaha, NE, USA SeRGe FeRRARi, Service of Bone Diseases, Department of Rehabilitation and Geriatrics, WHO Collaborating Center for RAvi jASujA, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Osteoporosis Prevention, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Switzerland Boston, MA, USA dAvid p. FyhRie, David Linn Chair of Orthopaedic Surgery, helenA johAnSSon, WHO Collaborating Centre for Lawrence J. Ellison Musculoskeletal Research Center, Department Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of California, Davis; The Sheffield, UK Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Sacramento, CA, USA john A. kAniS, WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone pAtRick GARneRo, INSERM Research unit 664 and Synarc, Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK Lyon, France jeAn-MARc kAuFMAn, Ghent University Hospital, luiGi GennARi, Deparment of Internal Medicine, Endocrine, Department of Endocrinology and Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Sciences, and Biochemistry, University of Siena, Italy Metabolic Bone Diseases, Gent, Belgium piet GeuSenS, Department of Internal Medicine, Subdivision of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, RobeRt klein, Bone and Mineral Unit, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Biomedical Research Institute, OR, USA University Hasselt, Belgium vicente GilSAnz, Director, Childrens Imaging Research StAvRoulA kouSteni, Division of Endocrinology, Program, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Professor of Radiology Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, and Pediatrics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA CA, USA diAne kRueGeR, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA MonicA GiRotRA, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center; kiShoRe M. lAkShMAn, Section of Endocrinology, Dia- Joan and Sanford I. Weill Medical College of Cornell University, betes, and Nutrition, Division of Endocrinology & Metabolism, New York, NY, USA Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, AndReA GiuSti, Department of Gerontology & Musculo- Boston, MA, USA Skeletal Sciences, Galliera Hospital, Genoa, Italy thoMAS F. lAnG, Professor in Residence, Department of AndReA GiuStinA, Department of Endocrinology & Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, and Joint Bioengineering Metabolic Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Graduate Group, University of California, San Francisco, San The Netherlands Francisco, CA, USA SteFAn GoeMAeRe, Ghent University Hospital, Department bRuno lApAuw, Ghent University Hospital, Department of of Endocrinology and Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Endocrinology and Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Diseases, Gent, Belgium Diseases, Gent, Belgium Contributors xi joAn M. lAppe, Creighton University Osteoporosis Research SteFAno MoRA, Departments of Radiology and Pediatrics, Center, Omaha, NE, USA Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA; Laboratory of Pediatric Endocrinology, BoNetwork, San Raffaele benjAMin z. ledeR, Endocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA tuAn v. nGuyen, Bone and Mineral Research Program, Garvan Institute of Medical Research; University of New South Wales; St willeM leMS, Department of Rheumatology, Vrije Universiteit Vincent’s Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia Amsterdam; VU Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands AndeRS oden, WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone X. SheRRy liu, Departments of Medicine and Biomedical Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK Engineering, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA clAeS ohlSSon, Center for Bone Research, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Shi S. lu, Regional Bone Center, Helen Hayes Hospital, West Gothenburg, Sweden Haverstraw, New York, NY, USA teRence w. o’neill, Epidemiology arc Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK heAtheR M. MAcdonAld, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada eRic S. oRwoll, Bone and Mineral Unit, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA chRiStA MAeS, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Endocrinology (LEGENDO), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven SocRAteS e. pApApouloS, Department of Endocrinology & (KUL), Leuven, Belgium Metabolic Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands Ann e MAloney, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, Scarborough, ME, USA René Rizzoli, Division of Bone Diseases [WHO Collaborating Center for Osteoporosis Prevention] Department of Rehabilitation peGGy MAnnen cAwthon, San Francisco Coordinating and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Geneva, Switzerland Francisco, CA, USA cliFFoRd j. RoSen, Maine Medical Center Research Institute, clAudio MARcocci, Department of Endocrinology and Scarborough, ME, USA Metabolism, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy MARtin RunGe, Aerpah Clinic Esslingen, Esslingen, Germany lynn MARShAll, Department of Medicine, Bone and Mineral Unit, Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, john t. SchouSboe, Park Nicollet Health Services, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA Minneapolis; Division of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, MN, USA GheRARdo MAzziotti, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Brescia, Italy eGo SeeMAn, Endocrine Centre, Heidelberg Repatriation Hospital/Austin Health, Department of Medicine, University of euGene v. MccloSkey, WHO Collaborating Centre for Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK MARkuS j. Seibel, Bone Research Program, ANZAC Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia heAtheR A. MckAy, Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia; Centre for Hip Health and Mobility; Department deboRAh e. SellMeyeR, Metabolic Bone Center, The Johns of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA Canada elizAbeth ShAne, Columbia University College of Physi- chRiStiAn MeieR, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and cians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland jAy R. ShApiRo, Bone and Osteogenesis Imperfecta Programs, pAul d. MilleR, University of Colorado Health Sciences Kennedy Krieger Institute; Department of Physical Medicine and Center, Medical Director, Colorado Center for Bone Research, Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA Lakewood, CO, USA Shonni j. SilveRbeRG, Division of Endocrinology, biSMRutA MiSRA, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA Columbia University, New York, NY, USA xii contributors StuARt l. SilveRMAn, Cedars-Sinai/UCLA and the OMC kAtRien venken, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Clinical Research Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA Leuven University Department of Experimental Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium RAjAn SinGh, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston lieve veRlinden, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA Endocrinology (LEGENDO), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KUL), Leuven, Belgium eMily M. Stein, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, USA AnneMieke veRStuyF, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Endocrinology (LEGENDO), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven thoMAS w. StoReR, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes (KUL), Leuven, Belgium and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston QinGju wAnG, Endocrine Centre, Heidelberg Repatriation Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA Hospital/Austin Health, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia pAwel Szulc, INSERM Research Unit 831, Hôspital Edouard Heriot, Lyon, France connie M. weAveR, Department of Foods and Nutrition, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA MAhMoud tAbbAl, Calcium Metabolism and Osteoporosis Program, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, FeliX w. wehRli, Department of Radiology, University of Lebanon Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA youRi tAeS, Ghent University Hospital, Department of Sunil j. wiMAlAwAnSA, Professor of Medicine, Endo- Endocrinology and Unit for Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone crinology & Metabolism; Director, Regional Osteoporosis Center, Diseases, Gent, Belgium Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA chARleS h. tuRneR, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; Department of kRiStine M. wiRen, Bone and Mineral Unit, Oregon Health & Biomedical Engineering, IUPUI, IN, USA Science University; Portland VA Medical Center, Portland, OR, USA lieSbeth vAndenput, Center for Bone Research, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, RoGeR zebAze, Department of Endocrinology and Medicine, Gothenburg, Sweden Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia diRk vAndeRSchueRen, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Leuven University Department of Experimental huA zhou, Regional Bone Center, Helen Hayes Hospital, West Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Haverstraw, New York, NY, USA Foreword The field of osteoporosis has grown enormously over the last shorter in duration with surrogate, instead of fracture, end- 4 decades, with a focus upon the issues that relate to skeletal points. With this smaller database, it nevertheless appears health in women. It was only about 15 years ago that the sci- that men respond to available pharmacological approaches entific community began to acknowledge that osteoporosis to osteoporosis in a similar manner to women (Section 10). in men is also important. The first edition of Osteoporosis in Available clinical data support the efficacy of these therapies Men, published in 2001, was a seminal event in that it called in men with both primary and secondary osteoporosis. attention to the problem in an organized series of articles on Finally, Osteoporosis in Men, second edition provides male skeletal health and bone loss. Now, with this second a view of the future, underscoring a number of unresolved edition of Osteoporosis in Men, further progress in this area issues to be included in the agenda for future research in is emphasized with particular emphasis on new knowledge this area. These include discussions related to an appropriate that has appeared during the last decade. BMD-based definition for male osteoporosis, a further under- Osteoporosis in men is heterogeneous with many eti- standing of the factors implicated in age-related bone loss and ologies to consider besides the well known roles of aging idiopathic osteoporosis in men, and randomized-controlled (Sections 1-4) and sex steroids (Sections 6-8). The roots of studies directly assessing fracture risk reduction, particularly the problem in some individuals can be back dated to the for non vertebral fracture. In all these areas, more definitive pre-pubertal and pubertal growth periods that determine the information is needed. acquisition of peak bone mass. This thorough and comprehensive book integrates new, In addition, Osteoporosis in Men, second edition, deals accessible and informative material in the field. It will exhaustively with important clinical issues. Nutritional con- help investigators, as well as practitioners and students, to siderations, the clinical and economic burden of fragility improve their understanding of male skeletal health and fractures, and diagnostic approaches are particularly strong bone loss. The additional knowledge, assembled in such a aspects of the text (Sections 5, 7, 9). These chapters tran- readable manner, should help us achieve one of our ultimate scend, in part, the specific focus of the volume, making it a goals-better care of men with osteoporosis. useful resource and a valuable reference for an audience not necessarily well-informed in bone and mineral disorders. Gerolamo Bianchi, MD The last section of Osteoporosis in Men, second edition, Department of Locomotor System highlights therapeutic approaches. Treatment options are less Division of Rheumatology well defined in men than in women because virtually all of Azienda Sanitaria Genovese the clinical trials involving men have been much smaller and Genova, Italy xiii Preface to the Second Edition The first edition of Osteoporosis in Men was published The increased scope of the book is the result of contribu- in 1999, about 15 years after the earliest publications on the tions from prominent experts in the field, including many subject. Over the past decade, we have witnessed a surge who contributed chapters to the first edition. New authors of further interest in the subject of male osteoporosis. This also have provided novel insights for the second edition. second edition of Osteoporosis in Men is, thus, timely. Editorial responsibilities were shared by the three of us. In the second edition, we have made major additions to As was the goal before, Osteoporosis in Men, Second reflect increased areas of new knowledge, including genet- Edition, is meant to be useful to a broad audience, including ics and inherited disorders. Previous topics are updated and students of the field as well as those already knowledgeable. extended to make them timely also. New topics include: We have sought to summarize a compendium of informa- tion intersecting general and specific areas of interest. This l Important basic processes including bone biochemistry volume will make apparent that information available con- and remodeling cerning osteoporosis in men still lags behind what we know l Mechanical properties and structure about osteoporosis in women. On the other hand, major l Genetics and inherited disorders advances in our understanding of the male skeleton in health l Growth and puberty and in disease are being translated into practical approaches l Nutrition, including calcium, vitamin D, protein and to their clinical management. We hope this second edition other factors provides a valuable reference source for you and that it also l Sex steroids in muscle and bone will serve to stimulate further advances in the field. l Assessment of bone using DXA, CT, ultrasound, bio- chemical markers Eric Orwoll l Sarcopenia and frailty Portland, Oregon l Diagnostic approaches l Treatment approaches including bisphosphonates, parathy- John Bilezikian roid hormone, androgens and SARMS and newer agents. New York, New York A key element of the book continues to be sex differ- ences in bone biology and pathophysiology that can inform Dirk Vanderschueren our understanding of osteoporosis in both men and women. Leuven, Belgium xv 1 Chapter the Biochemistry of Bone: Composition and Organization Adele l Boskey Starr Chair in Mineralized Tissue Research and Director, Musculoskeletal Integrity Program, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York; Professor of Biochemistry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Professor, Field of Physiology, Biophysics and Systems Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Professor, Field of Biomedical Engineering, Sibley School, Cornell Ithaca; Adjunct Professor, School of Engineering, City College of New York, USA IntroductIon tubular (long and short) bones such as the femur and digits, respectively, and the flat bones, such as the calvaria in the As detailed throughout this book, osteoporosis is charac- skull. Slightly better resolved, at the millimeter level, are the terized by increased risk of fracture due to changes in the components of the bones, the cortices that surround the mar- ‘quality’ of bone [1]. To appreciate why bone becomes row cavity, the cancellous bone within the marrow cavity, weaker or less resilient to fracture with age in both men the marrow cavity itself, the cartilaginous ends, etc. At the and women and in individuals of different races, a gen- micrometer to millimeter level are the individual intercon- eral knowledge of bone development and age-dependent necting struts of the trabeculae, the lamellae and the osteons changes is necessary. In line with the theme of this book, that surround the vascular canals. The cells and the com- it is noted that there are both age- and sex-dependent dif- posite matrices also can be visualized as part of this micro- ferences in bone properties and composition, some related structure. Finally, at the nanometer level, bone consists of an to the rate at which bones develop in boys and girls, some organic matrix made mainly from collagen fibrils and non- related to the impact of genes on the X-chromosome which collagenous proteins, lipids, nanometer size mineral crystals produce proteins important for bone development and/or (discussed below) and water. There is also heterogeneity metabolism and some due to the direct effect of sex ster- in both the size of the collagen fibrils and the composition oids on bone cells [2]. To appreciate the discrete differ- and sizes of the crystals deposited on this matrix [3, 4]. This ences between bone structure and composition in men and heterogeneity is important for the mechanical competence women this chapter reviews the basics of bone composi- of the tissue [5]. To understand the process of mineraliza- tion and organization and the mineralization process from tion, knowledge of the cells and the extracellular matrices the point of view of sexual dimorphism, where such differ- of bone is required. ences between men and women are recognized. Emphasis is placed on those factors that contribute to bone strength; Bone cells geometry, architecture, mineralization, the nature of the organic matrix and tissue heterogeneity. Within the bone matrix are the cells that are responsible for bone formation and bone turnover. Three key cells are of mesenchymal origin – chondrocytes, osteoblasts and osteocytes. The chondrocytes that form cartilage within the Bone organIzatIon epiphysial growth plates produce a matrix that can be min- eralized, regulate the flux of ions that facilitate the miner- Bone Heterogeneity alization of that matrix and orchestrate the remodeling of The structure of bone appears different depending on that matrix and its replacement by bone [6]. The other mes- the scale at which it is examined. At the centimeter level, enchymal derived bone cells are the osteoblasts and osteo- whole bone can be viewed as an organ, for example, the cytes [7]. As seen in the electron micrograph in Figure 1.1, Copyright 22000190, Elsevier, Inc. Osteoporosis in Men  All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.  Osteoporosis in Men Osteoclasts Osteoblast Bone 50 Microns FIgure 1.2 Transmission electron micrograph of an osteoclast on the bone surface of a 70-year-old woman. The ruffled borders 0.5µm Osteocyte sealing the cell to the mineralized surface are indicated along with the magnification. Courtesy of Dr Stephen B. Doty, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York. FIgure 1.1 Transmission electron micrograph showing oste- oblasts lining the bone surface in an adult male Sprague-Dawley rat. Inside the bone are the osteocytes, connected to one another by canaliculae. The banded pattern of the collagen is also visible. in trabecular number, while in males there is a thinning of Magnification is marked on the figure. Courtesy of Dr Stephen B. trabeculae [13]. Some of the other functions of osteoblasts Doty, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York. and osteocyte proteins will be discussed later. The cells responsible for the turnover of bone, the osteo- clasts, are of hematologic and macrophage origin [14]. As osteoblasts line the surface of the mineralized bone. They seen in the electron micrograph in Figure 1.2, these multi- synthesize new matrix and regulate the mineralization and nucleated giant cells attach to the surface of the bone via a turnover of that matrix. Once these osteoblasts become ‘ruffled border’. They receive signals from osteoblasts that engulfed in mineral they become osteocytes and connect control bone remodeling and regulate the turnover of the with one another by long processes (canaliculae) (see Figure mineralized matrix. They remove bone by producing acid 1.1). The osteocytes are the cells that sense mechanical sig- and couple that with the transport of chloride out of the nals and then convey them through the matrix. Osteocytes cell. The acid dissolves the mineral (see below) and, after produce many of the same proteins as osteoblasts, but the the mineral is removed, release proteolytic enzymes that relative concentrations of these proteins are not the same degrade the matrix. During the dissolution of the matrix, and the ways in which these cells use regulatory pathways signaling molecules communicate with the osteoblasts and differ. As reviewed in detail elsewhere [8], the osteoblasts new bone formation is triggered. Androgens and estrogens use the WNT/beta-catenin pathway [9] to regulate synthesis inhibit osteoclast activity to different extents [15] explain- of new bone; the osteocytes use the WNT/beta-catenin path- ing some of the sexual dimorphism in osteoclast activity. way to convey mechanical signals. Osteoblasts synthesize There are a number of other cells in bone, marrow stromal more alkaline phosphatase, more type I collagen and more cells, pericytes, vascular endothelial cells, fibroblasts, etc that bone sialoprotein than osteocytes, while osteocytes specifi- function as stem cells [16] but their properties are beyond the cally produce sclerostin, a glycoprotein that is a WNT and scope of this chapter and will not be discussed here. BMP antagonist, and produce high levels of dentin matrix protein 1 [8]. Sclerostin, an osteocytes specific protein, Skeletal development inhibits osteoblast differentiation and, based on the sig- nificant increase in bone mineral density in the sclerostin The shapes of male and female adult bones are different and, knockout mouse [10], is believed to be important in deter- for archeologists, form the basis for the identification of sexes mining the high bone mass phenotype [11]. This increase in in skeletal remains [17]. The early development of the skel- bone mass was noted to be comparable for both sexes [10]. eton contributes markedly to these sexual differences. During There is sexual dimorphism in the density of osteocytes, as development, bone structure changes in length and width and females gain osteoclast lacunar density with increasing age, there is a concomitant alteration in tissue density, resulting in while males show a decrease in this parameter [12]. This a bone that is optimally designed to bear the loads imposed may explain why bone loss in women results in a decrease on it [18]. In the long and short tubular bones, endochondral

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.