ebook img

Organic Reaction Mechanisms 1974 PDF

658 Pages·1976·24.413 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Organic Reaction Mechanisms 1974

ORGANIC REACTION MECHANISMS * 1974 ORGANIC REACTION . MECHANISMS 1974 An annual survey covering the literature dated December 1973 through November 1974 Edited by A. R. BUTLER, University of St. Andrews M. J. PERKINS, Chelsea College, University of London An Interscience" Publzcarion JOHN WILEY & SONS - - - London New York Sydney Toronto An Interscience@P ublication Copyright 0 1976b y John Wiley & Lrd. Sons All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, elec- tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Copyright owner. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 66-23143 ISBN o 471 126934 Printed in Great Britain by William Clowes & Sons Limited London, Colchester and Beccles Contributors M. S. BARD Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne R. BAKER Department of Chemistry, The University, South- ampton T. W. BENTLEY Department of Chemistry, University College of Swansea R. B. BOAR Department of Chemistry, Chelsea College, University of London A. R. BUTLER Department of Chemistry, The University, St. Andrews B. CAPON Department of Chemistry, Glasgow University M. R. CRAMPTON Department of Chemistry, Durham University A. C. KNIPE Department of Chemistry, The New University of Ulster G. V. MEEHAN Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia D. C. NONHEBEL Department of Pure and Applied Chemistry, University of Strathclyde M. I. PAGE Department of Chemistry, The Polytechnic, Hudders- field M. J. PERKINS Department of Chemistry, Chelsea College, University of London B. V. SMITH Department of Chemistry, Chelsea College, Uni- versity of London I. D. R. STEVENS Department of Chemistry, The University, South- ampton J. C. WALTON Department of Chemistry, St. Salvator’s College, University of St. Andrews W. E. WATTS School of Physical Sciences, The New University of Ulster Preface This volume, continuing the general pattern now established for the series, covers literature actually dated December 1973 to November 1974. The principal aim is a general summary of the progress of work on organic reaction mechanism, rather than a detailed evaluation of selected topics ; therefore, some sections are inevitably somewhat fragmentary, but all are concise, although our contributors are encouraged to emphasise results which appear at the time to represent major advances. Since this is the tenth volume in the series, we have incorporated a second quinquennial subject index and would like to thank Terry Jenkins and Elizabeth Leitch (1970-74), for their major contributions to the demanding task of preparing this. Unfortunately, owing to circumstances beyond his control, Dr. Meehan was unable to complete the Chapter on Molecular Rearrangements by our normal deadline ; however, with his help we have been able to compile a survey which we hope affords adequate coverage of this important topic. In doing this we have been fortunate to have the sympathetic and expert co-operation of the British office of John Wiley and Sons, who also have once again done everything possible to expedite the rapid publication of this book. August 1975 A.R.B. M.J.P. Con tents 1. Reactions of Aldehydes and Ketones and their Derivatives by B. CAPON 1 2. Reactions of Acids and their Derivatives by M. I. PAGE . . 23 Radical Reactions by D. C. NONHEBEaLnd J. C. WALTON . . 69 3. 4. Oxidation and Reduction by T. W. BENTLEY . . 187 5. Carbenes and Nitrenes by M. S. BAIRD . . 223 . . 6. Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution by M. R. CRAMPTON 249 7. Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution by B. V. SMITH . . 269 8. Carbonium Ions by R. BAKER . . 293 9. Nucleophilic Aliphatic Substitution by I. D. R. STEVENS . . 327 . 10. Carbanions and Electrophilic Aliphatic Substitution by R. B. BOAR 377 . . 11. Elimination Reactions by A. C. KNIPE 399 12.1. Addition Reactions I. Polar Addition by A. C. KNIPE . . 421 12.11. Addition Reactions II. Cycloaddition by W. E. WATTS. . 441 13. Molecular Rearrangements by A. R. BUTLERG, . V. MEEHAN and M. J. PERKINS . . 455 Author Index, 1974 . . 509 Subject Index, 1970-74 . . 566 Errata . . 660 Errata for Organic Reaction Mechanisms 1969 P. 346, 9 lines from the bottom : Fur MnIII read Mn". Errata for Organic Reaction Mechanisms 1970 P. 150: The solvent for the reaction should be triglyme, not THF. Errata for Organic Reaction Mechanisms 1973 P. 345: In formula (37)t he bond from phosphorus should be to C-2 of thiophen, and not C-3 as to shown. 660 Organic Reaction Mechanisms 1974 Edited by A. R. Butler, M. J. Perkins Copyright © 1976 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. CHAPTER I Reactions of Aldehydes and Ketones and their Derivatives B. CAPON Chemistry Department, Glasgow University . Formation and Reactions of Acetals and Ketals - 1 . Hydrolysis and Formation of Glycosides . 4 . Non-enzymic Reactions - 4 Enzymic Reactions . . . - 5 . (a) Glucoeidasea . 5 . (b) Lysozymes (c) Galactoeidmes . . . * . -- 65 . . . . (d) Amylases. - 6 . . . (e) Other Glycosidases - 6 . Hydration of Aldehydes and Ketones and Related Reactions * 7 . . . Reactions with Nitrogen Bases SchiEBmes . . . . 8 Enamines . . . . . . . . .- 89 . . . , . . Nucleosides and Glycosylaminea 10 . Hydrazones, Oximes, Semicarbazones and Related Compounds 10 . . . . Hydrolysis of Enol Ethers 10 . . . . Enolization and Related Reactions 11 . . . . . Homoenolization 14 Aldol and Related Reactions . . . . 14 . * . . . Other Reactions 15 References . . , . . . . 16 Formation and Reactions of Acetals and Ketalsl-3 Craze and Kirby4 have studied the hydrolysis of a series of 4- and 5-substituted acids and analysed the results by Jafft5’s method to 2-(methoxymethoxy)benzoic (1) yield values of pphenol= 0.89 and pcarboxy = 0.02 for the spontaneous hydrolysis of the H 1 2 Organic Reaction Mechanisms 1974 un-ionized form. The small value of pearboxy suggests that there is little proton transfer in the transition state which is not consistent with a mechanism (2) in which the ionized form undergoes a rapid specific acid-catalysed hydrolysis owing to an electrostatic effects as here the proton should be completely transferred in the transition state. A mechanism involving intramolecular general-acid catalysis with a small amount of proton transfer seems more reasonable.5 It has been suggested that the hydrolysis of o-hydroxybenzaldehyde diethyl acetal involves intramolecular catalysis.6 Unfortunately, the rate constant was not compared with that for the corresponding para-compound and so it is difficult to judge this claim. The corresponding were studied in 1963 by Bender and 2-(hydroxyphenyl)-l,3-dioxans Silver7 who concluded that there was no intramolecular catalysis in the hydrolysis of the ortho-compound as it and the para-analogue reacted at very similar rates. The anion of o-hydroxybenzaldehyde diethyl acetal also undergoes measurable hydrolysis with kn/kH = 0.469; spontaneous ionization with a transition state (3) is a reasonable mechanism.6 It has been shown that hydrolysis of the four-membered cyclic acetal(4), like that of similar three-membered ones,8 is general-acid catalysed.9 Presumably ring opening is such an easy process that it starts on only partial transfer of a proton. The hydronium- ion-catalysed hydrolysis of the three-membered compound (5) is about ten times faster than that of (4), and the solvent isotope effects are k(D30+)/k(H30+)= 2.02 and 1.8(+0.9), respectively. At high pH, dehydration of the hemiacetal is the rate-limiting step (see p. 8). General-acid catalysis has been detected in the conversion of the spiro-Meisenheimer complex (6) into (7).10 This reaction stands in a logical sequence since it has been shown that increasing the stability of the intermediate carbonium ion formed from an acetal causes the reaction to become general-acidc atalysed.11 Since (6) is negatively charged the fragment which corresponds to a carbonium ion is uncharged and so the detection of general-acid catalysis in the conversion of (6) into (7) is not unexpected. It is interesting that decomposition of the 1,l-diethoxy-complex (8) is not general-acid catalysed. Reactions of Aldehydes and Ketones and their Derivatives 3 The hydrolysis of tetrahydro-2-( p-toly1thio)pyran is not general-acid catalysed. The plot of logk,b, against Ho is a straight line with slope -1.10 in hydrochloric acid and -1.19 in perchloric acid. The solvent isotope effect is k(D30+)/k(H30+)= 1.3, the entropy of activation +7.4 cal mol-1 K-1, and the p-value for hydrolysis of a series of tetrahydro-2-(p -substituted pheny1thio)pyrans is -0.96. An A-I mechanism which involves rate-limiting carbon-sulphur bond fission was proposed. The mercuric-ion- promoted reaction was also studied.'% Acid hydrolysis of is about 50 times slower 2,2-diphenyl-4-(2-piperidyl)-l,3-dioxolan than that of presumably because of the electrostatic effect 2,2-diphenyl-l,3-dioxolan, of the protonated piperidyl residue.12b The hydrolyses of 4,4-dimethyl-l,3-dioxan in aqueous dioxan,12c of diethyl acetal catalysed by ferric i0ns,13* and of the acetals formed from substituted diphenylacetaldehydes and ethylene glycol13b have been studied. It has been shown that the hydronium-catalysed hydrolyses of substituted aceto- phenone dimethyl acetals do not yield a linear Hammett plot when u+ constants are used.13c This behaviour is similar to that reported for the hydrolysis of substituted benzaldehyde diethyl acetals in 50% aqueous dioxan14 but differs from that reported for their hydrolysis in water15 (see also p. 10). If the group R of dioxolans (9) is changed from H to Ph there is only a four-fold increase in the rate of hydrolysis. The rate constants for the hydrolysis of (9) with R = substituted phenyl are not correlated by the U+ or u constants. Application of the (9) (10) (11) Yukawa-Tsuno equation leads to a p-value of -2.9 which is only slightly less than that for the hydrolysis of benzaldehyde diethyl acetals (p = -3.35). This suggests that the small effect of introducing a phenyl group does not arise mainly because there is steric inhibition to conjugation of this group with the developing carbonium ion in the transi- tion state, but from some other effect. It was suggested that this was steric interaction of the 2-methyl group with the dioxolan ring.16 General-acid catalysis has been detected in the hydrolysis of the orthoesters and (10) The catalytic constants for hydrolysis of are about forty times greater than (11). (11) for This contrasts with the results obtained with the acyclic orthoesters where the (10). phenyl-substituted compound reacts more slowly than the unsubstituted one. It was suggested that the latter result arose from steric inhibition of resonance because of steric interaction, absent in compound between the methoxyl and the phenyl (ll), groups.17 It would be interesting if the p-value for hydrolysis of were compared (11) with that for the hydrolysis of trimethyl orthobenzoate. The heats of hydrolysis of some orthoesters have been measured and their heats of formation calculated. There is a stabilizing interaction of 6-7 kcal mol-1 when three alkoxy-groups are attached to a single carbon atom.la The hydrolysis of ortho-thio-esters has been studied.10 Hydrolysis of the acylals and has been studied. The reactions are (12), (13) (14) specific-acid and general-base catalysed and also show a pH-independent reaction. The entropy of activation and the variation of rate-constant with acid concentration suggest that the mechanism of the acid-catalysed hydrolysis of is A2, presumably with (12)

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.