OPTIMISM AT ARMAGEDDON Optimism at Armageddon Voices of American Participants in the First World War Mark Meigs in association with Palgrave Macmillan © Mark Meigs 1997 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1997 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 9HE. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the authors of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 1997 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world ISBN 978-1-349-13936-1 ISBN 978-1-349-13934-7 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-349-13934-7 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 99 98 97 In memory of Robert Rodgers Meigs Henry Howard Houston and Henry Howard Houston Woodward For my father and mother Contents Acknowledgements Vlll Introduction 1 Chapter 1 "It's a great life if you don't weaken:" American Participants' Understanding of their Involvement in World War I 8 Chapter 2 "It's a great life if you don't weaken, but believe me there are few who don't:" The Meaning Americans Gave to Action at the Front in World War I 36 Chapter 3 "From a hayloft to a hotel where kings have spent their summers:" Americans' Encounter with French Culture 69 Chapter 4 "Mad'moiselle from Armentieres, Parlez-vous?" Sexual Attitudes of Americans in World War I 107 Chapter 5 "A Grave Diggin' Feelin' in my Heart:" American War Dead of World War I 143 Chapter 6 "The best place to live on Earth:" Lessons for the Doughboys' Return 188 Conclusion 221 Notes 227 Bibliography 249 Index 259 Vll Acknowledgements Many organizations and individuals have contributed to this work over a long period of time. But the project truly started in Berkeley at the University of California, where the intellectual energy and generosity of the faculty and students have been a source of wonder and delight. There, Paula Fass, Suzanna Barrows, Carolyn Porter, James Kettner, Randolph Starn and Sam Haber read drafts of the manuscript and always gave advice and encouragement about the project. Jeffrey Lena, Reid Mit chell and Michael O'Malley, fellow students, but by now scat tered on their own careers, gave invaluable help and critical readings as well as the support of friendship. At later stages, historians Charles Royster and Russell Weigley helped as well, reading early drafts with understanding. A book needs all kinds of professional care and this one has been singularly blessed. Archivists and librarians across the United States and France have helped continuously, with pa tience and imagination. In France, town records in remote warehouses have been made available, and desks in busy town halls have been set aside for my visits. I must thank especially Dr. Richard Sommers and his assistant, David Keogh of the United States Army Military History Institute at Carlisle Barracks. They introduced me to the remarkable historical resources under their care. James Dallett, retired archivist at the University of Pennsyl vania, has several times sent me references and photocopies of documents I needed. The anonymous readers for publishers sent excellent detailed critiques. Editors Niko Pfund and Annabelle Buckley have been encouraging right to the the end of the process of creating this book. The author needs looking after as well. The family of Madame Genevieve De Bergh has welcomed me in its several branches across France. In Washington, Craig and Edith Eder opened their house to me. The French Republic and the United States Marine Corps also supported this work. Through the French Embassy, I received a Chateaubriand Scholarship that allowed me to spend a year in France. The Marine Corps Historical Foundation awarded me a fellowship to complete my research in Washington, D.C. Vlll Acknowledgements IX My new colleagues in France, at the University of Paris Nord, and on the Research Committee of the Historial de la Grande Guerre, Peronne, have given me an intellectual home in France, without which I could not have finisheq this book. Hubert Perrier's doctoral seminars on intercultural relations have reani mated American issues for me with a new perspective. Annette Becker and Stephane Audoin-Rouzeau of the Historial have raised my interest in and understanding of World War I to new levels. Finally, I must thank Divina Frau-Meigs for the completion of this book. At the earliest stages of research she lent me her car for trips. And since she has read, re-read, proofread, and advised on every version. I can only hope over a long life to repay this labor of love. M.M. Introduction World War I has been a matter of unresolved interpretation for American participants from the first moments of their involve ment to the return of the last soldiers and bodies of soldiers in the 1920s and even to the present day. The signs of the historical significance of the American effort were plentiful in Europe by the end of the war. American supplies had supported the allies. Americans had enlarged several ports in France and laid railroads to move goods and men to the Western front. There were camps, hospitals, and even a university of pre-fabricated buildings that had gone up with a speed and disregard for expense that astonished the French. They were abandoned or sold in 1919: solid, if ambiguous, testimony to the extent and importance of the American effort. Nothing is more real than the death of individual people by the violent destruction of their bodies. But the disposition of those bodies, some returned to the United States, some arranged in cemeteries in France, commemorated in individual graves or by the collective symbol of the 'unknown soldier,' leaves the inter pretation of that human loss ambiguous as well. The event has no obvious meaning in American history. On one level, the nation seemed to quit the isolation from European affairs that had characterised American foreign policy in the nineteenth century. But afterwards that policy revived. On another level, the war had been fought to a successful conclusion by the Allies with American help, but given the size of the United States, the contribution of Americans to the war, though essential at the end, cannot compare to the involvement of Europeans. At the same time because of the magnitude and stakes of the war effort - for a combatant soldier literally a matter of life and death - Ameri can participants were obliged to create meaning out of the materials around them. World War I is an opportunity for studying the creation of meaning in strange surroundings, adopt ing and accommodating beliefs to realities, testing a national identity against foreign identities. That the experience ofWorld War I differed for both America and Americans from the experience of the European combatant nations and combatants cannot be stated too strongly. European 1 2 Introduction soldiers may not have been generally enthusiastic for war, but few Germans or Englishmen or Frenchmen initially had doubts about why they fought, or later, that the actual experience of fighting the war changed Europe and their countries. Four years of trench warfare has become inextricably linked with the meaning of World War I to Europeans and the hegemony of the trench image has spread its disillusioning power back from the lines to symbolize the end of eras, cultures, world views and political systems. For Americans involved in the war, both the certainty of purpose and the position of the experience of combat as symbolic of the war's meaning must be questioned. To pinpoint changes brought about in American society and culture by the war is difficult too. Americans arrived late, fought briefly, and quickly found themselves among the victors. The fighting that they did required as much courage as fighting done by others. The conditions in which they fought and the tactics used were comparable to the conditions and tactics used by European armies since early in the war. But while their numbers were necessary to the victory, the contribution of the American forces must be seen as only part of the long process of exhausting Germany. Mter some delays, Americans returned home to a country whose political climate rejected the continued interna tional engagements that were the Wilsonian fruits of victory, embracing an agenda of "Normalcy" and isolationism. These "effects" of World War I on America seem to deny that the war had significant effects. The "Great War" for the people of the United States must either be the Civil War where the nation's survival was at stake, or World War II whose victory set the stage of American foreign policy for the second half of the twentieth century and whose social upheavals so altered American society. To be usefully understood, the connection between the military facts of World War I and American society and culture must be seen in some more carefully constructed context than a catalogue of the war's cultural effects. No cataclysm like Pearl Harbor, but rather an accumulation of events, lead the country from neutrality to war. No clear military victory or cataclysm like the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki put an end to the war either; the battles in which Americans fought were important as part of that general wearing away of all Germany. But the war nevertheless gives an opportunity to make a portrait of Americans
Description: