OPTIMISING AC ELECTRIC RAILWAY POWER FLOWS WITH POWER ELECTRONIC CONTROL by THANATCHAI KULWORAWANICHPONG A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham For the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Electronic, Electrical and Computer Engineering School of Engineering The University of Birmingham November 2003 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. SYNOPSIS The latest generation of AC-fed traction drives, employing high-speed switching devices, is able to control the reactive power drawn from the overhead line by each equipment. If the conditions at each locomotive or train could be fed back to a central control point, it is possible for a centrally located controller to calculate optimal values for the reactive power in each drive and to send those commands back to the individual equipment. In this thesis, AC railway power flows are optimised in real time and the results are used to achieve some particular system objective via control of the PWM equipment as mobile reactive power compensators. The system voltage profile and the total power losses can be improved while the overall power factor at the feeder substation is also made nearer to unity. For off-line simulation purposes, high execution speeds and low storage requirements are not generally significant with the latest computer hardware. However, this real-time control employs on-line optimising controllers, which need embedded power solvers running many times faster than real time. Thus, a fast and efficient algorithm for AC railway power flow calculation was developed. The proposed scheme is compared to a conventional reactive power compensation, e.g. SVC, and found to be less expensive to implement. Several test cases for AC electric railway systems are examined. The centralised area control system leads to the best improvement where an existing fleet of diode or thyristor phase-angle controlled locomotives is partially replaced with PWM ones, compared to that obtained without compensation or to classical track-side Var compensation methods. From these results, the potential for PWM locomotives to improve overall system performance is confirmed. This thesis is dedicated to my family, KULWORAWANICHPONG, and the memory of my grand mother ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr Colin GOODMAN, for his guidance, and invaluable help and advice throughout the course of study and in writing this thesis. I would like to acknowledge financial support from the Energy Policy and Planning Office, Ministry of Energy, The Royal Thai Government, Thailand, and Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand, during the period of study. I am also grateful to Dr Sarawut SUJITJORN for his encouragement and sincere help for the last ten years. Thanks are also extended to my colleges in the Power & Control Research Group, The University of Birmingham, UK, for their help and interest in this work. I am eternally grateful to my parents and my family for their continually sincere support. Finally, I would like to express my gratitude to all whom I have failed to mention here, but have generously supported me. TABLE OF CONTENTS Synopsis Acknowledgements List of illustrations List of tables List of abbreviations and symbols Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Aim of research and structure of thesis 2 1.3 Arrangement of chapters 4 Chapter 2 General Review 2.1 Introduction to mainline railway electrification 6 2.2 AC railway overhead catenary feeding system 7 2.3 Conventional power flow solution method 10 2.4 Computer-based modelling and simulation 12 2.5 Power system control and reactive power compensation 14 2.6 Summary 20 PART I AC Railway Power Flow Calculation – Theory and Application Chapter 3 AC Railway Power Flow Analysis 3.1 Introduction 23 3.2 Modelling of AC power feeding systems 24 3.3 Newton-Raphson AC railway power flow method 31 3.4 Sequential linear power flow method 42 3.5 Convergence, memory analysis and computer programming 46 3.6 Simulation results and discussion 54 3.7 Summary 66 PART II AC Railway Power Flow Calculation – Exploitation of Sparsity Chapter 4 Efficient algorithm for AC railway system simulation 4.1 Introduction 69 4.2 Methods of solving a linear system 69 4.3 Sparse linear system and solution method 73 4.4 Exploitation of sparsity for AC railway power system simulation 76 4.5 Simulation results 82 4.6 Summary 93 PART III Optimal Area Control System Chapter 5 Optimal AC railway power flow 5.1 Introduction to AC railway power flow problems 96 5.2 Practical use of the SVC in AC railway electrification 96 5.3 PWM locomotive as a mobile reactive power compensator 98 5.4 Optimal AC railway power flow problem and its solution 114 5.5 Simulation results and discussion 120 5.6 Summary 130 Chapter 6 Optimal area control simulation 6.1 Introduction 131 6.2 Area control simulation with discrete time step 131 6.3 Multi-train simulation 133 6.4 Power network solver and network capture 141 6.5 Simulation results and discussion 143 6.6 Summary 151 PART IV Cost Estimation and Design Chapter 7 Cost estimation for reactive power compensation 7.1 Introduction 153 7.2 Cost estimation of reactive power compensation for AC railways 154 7.3 Cost estimation of increasing MVA capacity of PWM locomotives 156 7.4 Design of the AC railway reactive power compensation 161 7.5 Summary 173 Chapter 8 Conclusions and future works 8.1 Summary of the PhD thesis 175 8.2 Conclusions 176 8.3 Suggestions to future work 178 References 182 Appendices Appendix A Impedance and admittance matrices for a multi-conductor system A.1 Multi-conductor approach for AC railways A-1 A.2 Geometrical calculation of the impedance for an AT railway power feeding system A-3 A.3 Autotransformer model A-5 A.4 Power substation model A-7 A.5 Train or locomotive model A-9 Appendix B Newton-Raphson method for solving non-linear equations B.1 Newton-Raphson method B-1 Appendix C AC/DC power converter C-1 Appendix D Optimisation techniques D.1 Overview D-1 D.2 Method of steepest descent D-2 Appendix E System data for simulation E.1 Test systems for the single-phase AC railway power flow calculation E-1 E.2 Test systems for the bi-phase AC railway power flow calculation E-6 E.3 Double-track AT railway power feeding system (Fig. 4.17) E-7 E.4 Double-track AT railway power feeding system (Fig. 5.21) E-8 E.5 Double-track AT railway power feeding system (Fig. 5.21, Second test) E-9 E.6 Double-track AC railway power feeding system (Fig. 6.12) E-9 E.7 Double-track AC railway power feeding system (Section 7.4) E-10 Appendix F Numerical results F.1 IEEE 24-bus test system F-1 F.2 IEEE 57-bus test system F-2 Appendix G Simulation Programs Program structure and description G-1 Programming codes G-4 Appendix H Publication H-1 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Chapter 2 Fig. 2.1 Typical feeding diagram of a double-track 25 kV railway in UK 7 Fig. 2.2 Overhead catenary feeding systems for AC railways 8 Fig. 2.3 Typical bus representation 10 Fig. 2.4 A two-machine model for an AC transmission system 15 Fig. 2.5 Three basic compensation methods 16 Fig. 2.6 SVC and TCSC circuits 18 Fig. 2.7 SPS, STATCOM and DVC circuits 19 Fig. 2.8 HVDC and UPFC circuits 20 Chapter 3 Fig. 3.1 Single-phase AC railway power feeding model 24 Fig. 3.2 Power substation model 25 Fig. 3.3 Four locomotive models for power flow calculation 26 Fig. 3.4 Model representation of the AT feeding system 28 Fig. 3.5 Power substation model for the AT system 29 Fig. 3.6 Autotransformer modelFig. 3.7: Train model 29 Fig. 3.7 Train model 30 Fig. 3.8 Flow diagram of the NRPFM 50 Fig. 3.9 Flow diagram of the SLPFM 51 Fig. 3.10 Memory requirement of the NRPFM and SLPFM 53 Fig. 3.11 The modified standard IEEE 24-bus test system 54 Fig. 3.12 The modified standard IEEE 57-bus test system 55
Description: