ebook img

On the nexus of academic libraries, literacies, and lifelong learning for academic staff PDF

393 Pages·2017·6.47 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview On the nexus of academic libraries, literacies, and lifelong learning for academic staff

On the Nexus of Academic Libraries, Literacies, and Lifelong Learning for Academic Staff Submitted by Tatum T. McPherson-Crowie Bachelor of Arts (USYD), Masters of Arts (Curatorial Studies) (USYD), Graduate Diploma of Information Management (RMIT), Masters of Business Information Technology (RMIT) A thesis submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Education and Arts Australian Catholic University Date of Submission February, 2015 ii Declaration/Statement of Sources This thesis contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a thesis by which I have qualified for or been awarded another degree or diploma. No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of the thesis. This thesis has not been submitted for the award of any degree or diploma in any other tertiary institution. All research procedures reported in the thesis received the approval of the relevant Ethics/Safety Committees (where required). Signed Dated 30 January, 2015 iii Abstract This thesis is located in the changing context of higher education and concomitant changes in the management of higher education institutions (HEIs) and the nature of academic work. The research explores the role of academic libraries in providing opportunities to support the lifelong learning of academic staff. It is argued that within the evolving context and requirements of higher education, the provision of academic library lifelong learning opportunities are vitally important for academic staff to meet the changing nature and needs of their work in the short-term, and enhance their life chances, in the longer term. Changes in the context of higher education, the management of higher education institutions and the nature of academic work were found in this study to have shaped a range of academic staff perceptions pertaining to the provision of learning opportunities in HEIs. In particular, the ways in which academic staff discern the academic library’s capacity to provide information services and learning opportunities in a range of literacies deemed relevant to the lifelong learning of academic staff. The study was informed by the theoretical insights of the philosopher Karl Popper, the philosophical investigations of Ludwig Wittgenstein, and used a range of qualitative and quantitative research methods in a multiphase mixed methods design comprised of four phases. A total of 43 academic staff employed in an Australian university participated in various phases of this study. The mixed methods approach commenced with the collection of semi-structured interviews data from eight academic staff in phase one. A modified Delphi method for the collection and analysis of quantitative data from 25 participants was used in the second phase. This was followed by the collection of focus group interviews data from five participants in the third phase. The study concluded with personal lens interviews on lifelong learning from five participants in the fourth stage of the research. The findings show that the extent to which academic libraries meet the lifelong long learning needs of academic staff is shaped by the higher education context of iv their work. Learning opportunities, provided by academic libraries, are challenged by their setting within higher education institutions, which this study identified as conditioned and constrained by themes of intensification, within a culture of performance. Further learning opportunities are perceived to be impacted upon by institutional expectations of compliance and the effort required and tension experienced by academic staff in maintaining their own individual and professional sustainability. It was found that limiting the negative impact of the intensification of academic work was central to academic staff concerns about personal and professional sustainability. Understanding the intensified conditions within which staff are working, in compliance, to meet the expectations of higher education management and the expectations of students, and the importance of identifying an individual’s threshold for sustainability were emphasized as critical considerations in setting future priorities. Learning opportunities, incorporating a range of literacies, and the available learning options within HEIs were strongly perceived to contribute to academic staff productivity, performance and compliance. However, perceptions of current learning opportunities made available by higher education institutions were repeatedly characterised as training sessions, where the emphasis is on employee compliance for the overriding benefit of performance expectations and evaluations. These considerations, operating within the changing context of HEIs, condition and shape the academic library’s ability to fulfill its potential as a facilitator for learning opportunities, advantageous to academic staff facing institutional challenges and responsibilities, addressing the short- and long-term goals of academic work and pursuing their needs for lifelong and life-wide learning. Among the priority area for academic libraries to focus upon in meeting the lifelong learning needs of academic staff, statistically significant correlations highlighted the areas of new modes of learning and accessible publishing. For academic libraries to meet the identified lifelong learning needs of academic staff library management and staff need to work from an individually and institutionally informed approach to be able to provide and facilitate the authentic, complementary, and extensible learning opportunities deemed to be most relevant and preferred by academic staff. v I conclude from the analysis of data collected during the four phases of data collection in this study that critical to understanding current concerns and setting future priorities in the nexus of academic libraries, literacies and the lifelong learning of academic staff are the themes I have identified as intensification, sustainability, compliance, and performance. These themes were shown in the data to condition and shape academics’ perceptions of, participation in, and relationship with, academic libraries and their notions of lifelong learning. Academic staff, academic libraries and academic institutions, I suggest, are in a vulnerable position at a critical and complex juncture. Addressing the concerns and conditions identified in this thesis, would contribute to more resilient academic institutions and a more capable, better prepared, fulfilled and informed academic community with broader lifelong learning opportunities and life chances. vi Acknowledgements I would like to express my profound gratitude to my supervisors Emeritus Professor Judith D. Chapman and Associate Professor Sue McNamara. I would also like to express my special appreciation and thanks to Emeritus Professor David N. Aspin. I offer special thanks to colleagues, family, and friends who offered to read this work for their assistance, encouragement, critiques, corrections, patient support, and meaningful comments, which have helped me to improve the clarity of the thesis. I would also like to express my thanks to the generous people at several institutions and organisations for their encouragement and support during my candidature: Australian Catholic University Faculty of Education and Arts; Australian Catholic University Library; Cambridge University Faculty of Divinity Library; Cambridge University Faculty of Education; Cambridge University Faculty of Education Library; Cambridge University Judge Business School Information and Library Services; Cambridge University Library; The English Faculty Library, Cambridge University; The International Academic Forum; The Standing Committee for University Teaching and Research Education Association; and St. Edmund’s College Cambridge. vii Table of Contents Declaration/Statement of Sources ________________________________________________________ ii Abstract ______________________________________________________________________________________ iii Acknowledgements ________________________________________________________________________ vi Table of Contents __________________________________________________________________________ vii List of Tables ________________________________________________________________________________ xi List of Figures _____________________________________________________________________________ xiii List of Appendices _________________________________________________________________________ xiv Chapter 1 _____________________________________________________________________________________ 1 Introduction to the Study ___________________________________________________________________ 1 The Nexus of Academic Libraries, Literacies, and the Lifelong Learning of Academic Staff _ 2 Genesis of the Study _______________________________________________________________________________ 6 Assumptions, Values, and Beliefs Underpinning the Study _____________________________________ 8 The Aims of the Study ____________________________________________________________________________ 10 Significance of the Study _________________________________________________________________________ 11 Definition of Terms _______________________________________________________________________________ 13 The Research Design _____________________________________________________________________________ 16 The Research Site _________________________________________________________________________________ 16 ‘Glendalough’ University __________________________________________________________________________ 17 Higher Education Institutions _____________________________________________________________________ 18 Academic Libraries ________________________________________________________________________________ 21 Limitations and Delimitations ___________________________________________________________________ 23 Addressing the Potential for Researcher Bias __________________________________________________ 24 Chapter 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 26 Thesis Structure __________________________________________________________________________________ 24 Review of the Literature __________________________________________________________________ 26 Academic Libraries and the Learning Context__________________________________________________ 27 The Context of Higher Education Institutions ____________________________________________________ 27 Academic Libraries and Information Literacy ____________________________________________________ 30 Academic Libraries and Information Provision __________________________________________________ 34 Academic Libraries, Literacies, and Opportunities for Lifelong Learning ____________________ 36 Academic Libraries and Literacies ________________________________________________________________ 36 Opportunities for Literacies _______________________________________________________________________ 40 Literacies for Lifelong Learning ___________________________________________________________________ 44 Academic Staff and the Need for Lifelong Learning ____________________________________________ 45 The Changing Context for Academic Staff Learning ______________________________________________ 45 The Impetus for Academic Staff Learning ________________________________________________________ 49 The Opportunities for Academic Staff Learning __________________________________________________ 52 Lifelong Learning and Academic Libraries _____________________________________________________ 55 Lifelong and Life-wide Learning __________________________________________________________________ 55 Life Chances for Lifelong Learners ________________________________________________________________ 56 Life Chances Supported and Enhanced by Academic Libraries __________________________________ 58 Chapter 3 ___________________________________________________________________________________ 64 Concluding Comments ___________________________________________________________________________ 62 Research Methodology and Methods ___________________________________________________ 64 Theoretical Framework __________________________________________________________________________ 65 Evolutionary Epistemology _______________________________________________________________________ 65 viii Theoretical Perspective ___________________________________________________________________________ 66 The Design of the Study __________________________________________________________________________ 68 Philosophical Perspective _________________________________________________________________________ 73 Methods: Justification for the use of Mixed Qualitative and Quantitative Methods of Data Collection and Analysis ___________________________________________________________________________ 75 Instrumentation __________________________________________________________________________________ 79 Phase 1: Semi-structured Interviews _____________________________________________________________ 81 Phase 2: The Modified Delphi Method ____________________________________________________________ 83 Phase 3: Focus Groups _____________________________________________________________________________ 90 Phase 4: Personal Lenses on Lifelong Learning Interviews ______________________________________ 90 Participants _______________________________________________________________________________________ 91 Collection of the Data _____________________________________________________________________________ 92 Analysis of the Data _______________________________________________________________________________ 93 Verification ______________________________________________________________________________________ 101 Ethical Issues ____________________________________________________________________________________ 106 Chapter 4 __________________________________________________________________________________ 108 Concluding Comments _________________________________________________________________________ 106 Perceptions: Phase One Semi-structured interviews ________________________________ 108 Data Collection Phase One: Semi-structured Interviews ____________________________________ 109 Data Collection Procedures ______________________________________________________________________110 Phase One Data Synthesis ________________________________________________________________________114 The Delphi instrument as informed by the tentative findings of Phase One ___________________116 First Trial and Tentative Findings for Phase One _______________________________________________117 Second Trial and Tentative Findings for Phase One _____________________________________________118 Phase One Data Collection and Synthesis Summary ____________________________________________118 Data Analysis Phase One: Semi-structured Interview _______________________________________ 119 Summary of Phase One Analysis _________________________________________________________________125 Phase One Results ______________________________________________________________________________ 125 Support ____________________________________________________________________________________________128 Intensification ____________________________________________________________________________________130 Compliance________________________________________________________________________________________131 Academic Staff Conceptualisation of Literacies _________________________________________________133 Chapter 5 __________________________________________________________________________________ 137 Concluding Comments _________________________________________________________________________ 135 Issues, Concerns and Priorities: Phase Two Modified Delphi Method _____________ 137 Data Collection Phase Two: The modified Delphi method __________________________________ 137 Design of the modified Delphi method questionnaire___________________________________________138 Conduct of the Round One Delphi Questionnaire _______________________________________________142 Data Collection and Synthesis of the Round One Delphi Questionnaire ________________________146 Round One Delphi Questionnaire Summary _____________________________________________________146 Conduct of the Round Two Delphi Questionnaire _______________________________________________147 Data Collection and Synthesis of the Round Two Delphi Questionnaire _______________________147 Round Two Delphi Questionnaire Summary ____________________________________________________148 Conduct of the Round Three Delphi Questionnaire _____________________________________________148 Data Collection and Synthesis of the Round Three Delphi Questionnaire ______________________148 Round Three Delphi Questionnaire Summary ___________________________________________________151 Phase Two Data Collection Summary ____________________________________________________________151 Data Analysis Phase Two: The modified Delphi method ____________________________________ 151 Descriptive Statistics of the Delphi Panel ________________________________________________________152 Round One Delphi Questionnaire Analysis ______________________________________________________154 Round Two Delphi Questionnaire Analysis ______________________________________________________155 Round Three Delphi Questionnaire Analysis ____________________________________________________155 Data Analysis of the qualitative data collected in the modified Delphi method ________________156 Summary of Phase Two Analysis _________________________________________________________________158 Phase Two Results ______________________________________________________________________________ 159 ix Correlation 1: New Modes of Learning __________________________________________________________163 Correlation 2: Accessible Publishing _____________________________________________________________169 The Focus group instrument as informed by the findings of Phase Two _______________________175 Chapter 6 __________________________________________________________________________________ 186 Concluding Comments _________________________________________________________________________ 183 Opportunities and Services: Phase Three Focus Groups ____________________________ 186 Data Collection Phase Three: Focus Group ___________________________________________________ 186 Data Collection Procedures ______________________________________________________________________188 Phase Three Data Collection Summary __________________________________________________________189 Data Analysis Phase Three: Focus Groups ____________________________________________________ 189 Phase Three Coding Summary ___________________________________________________________________192 Summary of Phase Three Analysis _______________________________________________________________197 Phase Three Results ____________________________________________________________________________ 197 Chapter 7 __________________________________________________________________________________ 203 Concluding Comments _________________________________________________________________________ 201 Lived Experiences of Lifelong Learning: Phase Four Personal Lenses on Lifelong Learning ___________________________________________________________________________________ 203 Data Collection Phase Four: Personal Lenses on Lifelong Learning ________________________ 203 Data Collection Procedures ______________________________________________________________________204 Phase Four Data Synthesis _______________________________________________________________________205 Phase Four Data Collection Summary ___________________________________________________________208 Data Analysis Phase Four: Personal Lenses on Lifelong Learning __________________________ 208 Summary of Phase Four Analysis ________________________________________________________________223 Phase Four Results _____________________________________________________________________________ 224 Chapter 8 __________________________________________________________________________________ 227 Concluding Comments _________________________________________________________________________ 225 Results and Discussion: Achieving a Synthesis _______________________________________ 227 Summary of Results ____________________________________________________________________________ 227 Discussion of the findings ______________________________________________________________________ 235 Qualitative themes identified across three phases of the study ________________________________235 Intensification ____________________________________________________________________________________238 Sustainability _____________________________________________________________________________________240 Compliance________________________________________________________________________________________243 Performance ______________________________________________________________________________________248 Summary of qualitative findings _________________________________________________________________250 Statistically significant correlations resulting from the modified Delphi method _____________252 Chapter 9 __________________________________________________________________________________ 258 Concluding Comments _________________________________________________________________________ 255 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations _______________________________________ 258 Summary of the Study __________________________________________________________________________ 259 Consideration of the Findings in light of Current Debates __________________________________ 267 Conclusions _____________________________________________________________________________________ 269 Recommendations for the Advancement of Theory and Research _________________________ 276 Recommendations for Practice ________________________________________________________________ 279 Recommendations for Future Research ______________________________________________________ 282 References _________________________________________________________________________________ 286 Concluding Comments _________________________________________________________________________ 284 Appendices ________________________________________________________________________________ 301 x List of Abbreviations ALA American Library Association ALIA Australian Library and Information Association ANZIL Australia and New Zealand Information Literacy (framework) CAUL Council for Australian University Librarians CILIP Chartered Institute for Library and Information Professionals HE Higher Education HEIs Higher Education Institutions ICTs Information and Communication Technologies IFAP Information for All Program IFLA International Federation of Library Associations LIS Library and Information Science LMS Learning Management Systems NPM New Public Management OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development RIN Research Information Network RLUK Research Libraries United Kingdom UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization

Description:
Recommendations for the Advancement of Theory and Research . address this area of concern, my research has set out (McPherson-Crowie, required to engage in increasingly complex learning processes and interact I think if one is serious about being an academic then they're all entwined so.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.