ebook img

On Kleinbock's Diophantine result PDF

0.12 MB·
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview On Kleinbock's Diophantine result

On Kleinbo k's Diophantine result 1 by Ni ky Mosh hevitin. Abstra t. We give an elementary proof of a re ent metri al Diophantine result by D. Kleinbo k related to badly approximable ve tors in a(cid:30)ne subspa es. Rd (x ,...,x ) 1 d R1.d+1De(cid:28)nitions and notation. Let be a(Exu ,lxid,e.a..n,xsp)a e wixth∈thRed oorxd∈inaRtde+s1 , 0 1 d let be a Eu lidean spa e with the oordinates . For or we denote |x| 9 by its sup-norm: 0 |x| = max |xj| |x| = max |xj|. 0 16j6d or 06j6d 2 A ∈ Rd A ∈ Rd+1 n Consider an a(cid:30)ne subspa e and de(cid:28)ne the a(cid:30)ne subspa e in the following way: u A = {x = (1,x ,...,x ) : (x ,...,x ) ∈ A}. J 1 d 1 d 8 B B ⊂ A ] Let be another a(cid:30)ne subspa e su h that . De(cid:28)ne T B = {x = (1,x ,...,x ) : (x ,...,x ) ∈ B}, B ⊂ A. N 1 d 1 d . h t Put a a = dimA = dimA, b = dimB = dimB. m [ We de(cid:28)ne linear subspa es A B = spanA, = spanB 1 v Rd+1 A B 1 as the smallest linear subspa es in ontaining or respe tively. So 4 A B 5 dim = a+1, dim = b+1. 1 . 6 ψ(T), T > 1 T → +∞ 0 Let be a positive valued fun tion de reasing to zero as . We de(cid:28)ne an B ψ 9 a(cid:30)ne subspa e to be -badly approximable if 0 : v 1 inf inf |x−y| > 0. Xi x∈Zd+1\{0} ψ(|x|) y∈B ! (1) r a This de(cid:28)nition is very onvenient for our exposition. B HerBe w=e{wwo}uld like to note that in the ase whenwt=he(aw(cid:30),n.e...s,uwbs)p∈a Red has zero dimension (and 1 d hen e onsists of just one nonzero ve tor ) the de(cid:28)nition (1) gives 1 inf inf |x−tw∗| > 0 x∈Zd+1\{0} ψ(|x|) t∈R (2) (cid:18) (cid:19) w∗ = (1,w ,...,w ) 1 d with . Inequality (2) is equivalent to the ondition that there exists a positive γ = γ(w) onstant su h that max ||w x|| > γ ·ψ(|x|), ∀x ∈ Z\{0} j 16j6d (3) || · || (here denotes the distan e to the nearest integer). The ondition (3) is a usual ondition of ψ -badly simultaneously approximable ve tor. This is an explanation our de(cid:28)nition (1). 1 supported by the grant RFBR (cid:157) 09-01-00371 1 ψ(T),ϕ(T) In the sequel we onsider two positive de reasing fun tions under the onditions ϕ(T) 6 ψ(T), lim ψ(T) = 0. T→+∞ R > 1 For these fun tions and de(cid:28)ne a−b a a T ϕ(RT) ϕ(R(T +1)) (R) (R) µ = , λ = − . T ψ(RT) T T T +1 (cid:18) (cid:19) (cid:18) (cid:19) (cid:18) (cid:19) 2. The result. Now we are ready to formulate the main result of this paper. R > 1 B ⊂ A 0 6 b = dimB < a = Theorem 1. Let . Suppose that are a(cid:30)ne subspa es and dimA 6 d B ψ ϕ(T) 6 ψ(T) . Let be a -badly approximable a(cid:30)ne subspa e. Suppose that and the series +∞ (R) (R) µ λ T T (4) T=1 X w ∈ A |w| 6 R onverges. Then almost all (in the sense of Lebesgue measure) ve tors su h that are ϕ -badly approximable ve tors. b = 0 ψ(T) = T−1/d ψ w We onsider a spe ial ase and . Then -badly approximable ve tors are known as simultaneously badly approximable ve tors (see [1℄, Chapter 2). Take ϕ(T) = ψ(T)·(logT)−∆. In the ase 1 ∆ > a the series (4) onverges. So we have the followAin⊂g Rd Corollary1. Considerana(cid:30)nesubspa e . Supposethat there existsabadly approximable w ∈ A ∆ > 1 A 1 ve tor . Suppose that a. Then almost all ve tors from the subspa e are T1/d(logT)∆-badly approximable ve tors. b = 1 ψ(T) = T−1/d Here we should note that in the ase and su h a result was obtained re ently by Dmitry Kleinbo k (see [2℄, Theorem 4.2) by means of theory of dynami s on homogeneous spa es. R > 1 3. Proof of Theorem 1. Given it is enough to prove that almost all ve tors w = (1,w ,...,w ) ∈ A |w | 6 R ϕ 1 d j su h that are -badly approximable in the sense of the de(cid:28)nition ≪,≍ (2). In the sequel we do not take are on the onstants. All onstants in the symbols may d A,B R depend on ,Csu⊂bsRpad+ e1s and x. ∈ Rd+1 |x|C x C For a set and a point we de(cid:28)ne the distan e from to by |x|C = inf |x−y|. C y∈ Consider the set Ω = {z ∈ Rd+1 : 0 6 z 6 T, max |z | 6 RT, |z|B 6 γ ·ψ(RT)} T 0 j 16j6d γ > 0 B ψ where is a lower bound for the in(cid:28)mum in (1). As is a -badly approximable subspa e we see that Ω ∩Zd+1 = {0} T 1/2 (we use the de(cid:28)nition (1)). Now we observe that any translation of the -dilated set 1 ·Ω +c, c ∈ Rd+1 T 2 (5) 2 x,y onsists of not more than one integer point. Indeed if two di(cid:27)erent integer points belong to the 0 6= x−y ∈ Ω T same set of the form (5) then . This is not possible. Consider the set Π = {z ∈ Rd+1 : 0 6 z 6 T, max |z | 6 RT, |z|A 6 ϕ(RT)}. T 0 j 16j6d ϕ(T) 6 ψ(T) ν ≪ µ(R) As we see that this set an be overed by not more than T T di(cid:27)erent sets of the Π T form (5). So we dedu e a on lusion about an upper bound for the number of integer points in : # Π ∩Zd+1 ≪ µ(R). T T (6) T > 1 (cid:0) (cid:1) For an integer we onsider the set Z = {z = (z ,z ,...,z ) ∈ Zd+1 : z = T, max |z | 6 RT, |z|A 6 ϕ(RT)} T 0 1 d 0 j 16j6d of the ardinality ζ(R) = #Z , 0 6 ζ(R) ≪ Ta. T T T (7) ρ > 0 z ∈ Rd+1 For and put U (z) = {y ∈ Rd+1 : |z−y| 6 ρ}. ρ Consider the set U U = (z) T ϕ(RT) z [ z where the union is taken over all integer points su h that z = T, max |z | 6 RT, U (z)∩A 6= ∅. 0 j ϕ(RT) 16j6d Clearly U U = (z) T ϕ(RT) z[∈ZT Consider the one G = {x ∈ Rd+1 : x = t·y, t ∈ R,y ∈ U } T T and the proje tion G U = A∩ . T T Consider the series +∞ mes U a T (8) T=1 X mes a a where stands for the -dimensionalLebesgue measure. By the Borel-Cantellilemma arguments Theorem 1 follows froUm the onvergen e of the series (8()R.) ζ ϕ(RT) Note that the set T is a union of not more than T balls (in sup-norm) of the radius . (R) U ⊂ A ζ ϕ(RT)/T Hen e the set T an be overed by not more than T balls of the radius . So in order to prove the onvergen e of the series (8) one an establish the onvergen e of the series +∞ a ϕ(RT) (R) ζ · . T T (9) T=1 (cid:18) (cid:19) X 3 It follows from (6) that T (R) (R) ζ ≪ µ . j T j=1 X Now the onvergen e of the series (9) follows from the onvergen e of the series (4) by partial summation as from (7) we see that a ϕ(R(T +1)) ζ(R) · ≪ (ϕ(R(T +1)))a → 0, T → +∞. T T +1 (cid:18) (cid:19) Theorem 1 is proved. Referen es [1℄ W.M. S hmidt, Diophantine Approximations, Le t. Not. Math., 785 (1980) [2℄ D. Kleinbo k, Extremal supspa es and their submanifolds, GAFA 13:2 (2003), 437 - 466. 4

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.