ebook img

on chronic neuropathic pain PDF

37 Pages·2012·0.74 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview on chronic neuropathic pain

BEST (BIOFEEDBACK ELECTRO-STIMULATION THERAPY) ON CHRONIC NEUROPATHIC PAIN: EFFECTS ON PAIN SCORE AND PAIN BIOMARKER NITRIC OXIDE LEE ZHI SHAN FACULTY OF MEDICINE UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR 2014 ABSTRACT Background: Treatment of chronic pain has incorporated both pharmacotherapy and non-pharmacotherapy in view of the complexity of the nature of the pain. Avazzia BEST-RSI has been introduced as the latest innovation in the TENS-like technology in treating chronic pain. This study aims to determine the effects of its treatment on chronic neuropathic pain patients and the likely mechanism of action via nitric oxide. Method: This is a prospective single blinded randomised controlled study involving 20 patients from the Pain Clinic, University Malaya Medical Centre between 1st January 2014 and 31st June 2014. The patients were randomised to treatment and placebo arm. Measured outcomes were visual analogue score and serum nitric oxide level before and after treatment. Data was analysed using SPSS version 20 and the level of significance was set at p<0.05. Results: Baseline demographics, diagnosis and treatment modalities on both arms were similar. Pain score reduction post treatment in the Avazzia BEST-RSI group was significantly more (median of 7.5 to 3.5, p=0.005) compared to the placebo group (median of 5 to 4.5, p=0.039). The level of nitric oxide increased after Avazzia BEST- RSI treatment (median 5.7μM to 6.65µM, p=0.386) as compared to a drop in the placebo group (median 4.7μM to 3.7μM, p=0.202). Half of the patients in the treatment group felt that the treatment was effective versus only 30% patients in the placebo group. iii Conclusion: Avazzia BEST-RSI demonstrated better pain reduction and an increase in the serum nitric oxide level. It is therefore effective in treatment of chronic neuropathic pain after one single treatment and may be potentially effective in the long term management as well. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Materials and Methods/ Methodology 2.1 Sample size 4 2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria 4 2.3 Randomisation 5 2.4 Intervention 2.4.1 Avazzia BEST RSI 5 2.4.2 Placebo 6 2.5 Study protocol 6 2.6 Statistical Analysis 7 Chapter 3: Results 8 Chapter 4: Discussion 13 Chapter 5: Conclusion 16 References 17 Appendix 20 vi LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 3.1: Patients’ global satisfaction 12 Figure 3.2: Patients’ willingness to try the treatment again 12 vii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 3.1: Patient Baseline Demographic Characteristics 8 Table 3.2: Patient Diagnosis and Treatment Modalities 9 Table 3.3: Effects on Pain Score 10 Table 3.4: Effects on Nitric Oxide 11 viii LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS BEST Biofeedback Electro Stimulation Technology FDA Food and Drug Administration IASP International Association for the Study of Pain μM micromole N Number RSI Repetitive Strain Injury TENS Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation SD Standard deviation UMMC University Malaya Medical Centre ix CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION The International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) defines pain as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage or described in term of such damage (1). Acute pain is defined as pain of recent onset and probable limited duration. It usually has an identifiable temporal and causal relationship to injury or disease. Chronic pain however commonly persists beyond the time of healing of an injury and frequently there may not be any clearly identifiable cause (2). Arbitrarily the duration has been taken as more than 3 months. Neuropathic pain has been defined by IASP as pain initiated or caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system (3). It usually causes chronic symptoms. The mechanisms for neuropathic pain and its treatment differ from nociceptive pain (4). In the periphery, the threshold for activation of injured primary afferents is lowered and ectopic discharges may arise from the injury site or the dorsal root ganglion due to changes in the sodium channel expression. Within the spinal cord, the increased peripheral input induces central sensitization. Loss of inhibitory mechanisms, reparatory processes in damaged nerves and reactive changes in adjacent tissues (particularly glial cells and immune cells) may further increase central excitability. Functional (altered neurotransmitter expression) and anatomical (sprouting into superficial laminae in the dorsal horn) changes in A-beta fibres contribute to the tactile allodynia (pain induced by light touch) that is a frequent feature of neuropathic pain. 1 Symptoms of neuropathic pain can be positive and negative sensory symptoms (4). Positive symptoms such as dysthesias and paraesthesia are common. Stimulus independent pain maybe intermittent (shooting, lancinating or electric shock light) or continuous (superficial or deep pressure). Stimulus-evoked pain results from chemical, thermal or mechanical stimuli and is characterized by allodynia and hyperalgesia. In addition, most patients may experience co-existing negative sensory symptoms such as loss or impairment of sensory quality, numbness and reduced sensation. The definition of pain underlies the complexity of its measurement. Pain is an individual and subjective experience modulated by psychological, physiological and environmental factors. Therefore most measures of pain are based on self-report. These measures lead to sensitive and consistent results if done properly (5). A number of scales are available such as categorical scales and numerical rating scales. Categorical scales use words to describe the magnitude of pain and have the advantage of being quick and simple and especially useful for elderly, children and visually impaired. However the limited number of choices may make it more difficult to detect differences (6). Numerical rating scales such as visual analogue score and verbal numerical rating scales are simple and quick and allow for a wide choice of ratings and avoid imprecise descriptive terms (7). However, the scales need concentration and coordination and may not be suitable for children below 5 and 26% of adult (8). Management of chronic neuropathic pain includes pharmacotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, psychological therapy, interventional therapy and complementary therapy. Biofeedback electro-stimulation therapy (BEST) devise is the latest generation of peripheral electro-stimulation device. It is FDA approved for symptomatic relief and 2 management of chronic, intractable pain and adjunctive treatment in the management of post-surgical and post-traumatic pain. BEST generates electrical impulses (sine waves) that are physiologically similar to neurological impulses observed in the ‘C’ nerve fibres and ‘A’ fibres. Electrical signal characteristics of BEST are short duration pulses of high voltage amplitude and very low duty cycle, average currents in microcurrent range and damped bi-phasic sinusoidal waveforms. The device seeks decreased impedance on skin by ‘sticking’ to acupuncture or electron deficient points when gliding over the skin. This area may comprise of injured or diseased tissue or may be associated with an organ or corresponding structure with that anatomical segment. The device then communicates the electrical impulse with the neuro-endocine system through direct contact to the skin, sending signal through the epidermis and dermis to the ‘A’ and ‘C’ fibres. The nervous system then releases nitric oxide, endorphins and neuropeptides. Nitric oxide causes vascular dilation and increase blood circulation. Endorphin and neuropeptides are natural pain management chemicals that also promote healing. The process is the further enhanced by signals that change and adapt as the electrical properties of the tissue that is being treated change. Advantage of the BEST devise include quick relief from acute and chronic pain, pain relief of up to 12 hours, and asymmetrical wave signals and biofeedback that minimizes habituation and accommodation effects of the body. This study aims to use Avazzia BEST device on chronic neuropathic pain and evaluate the changes in perceived levels of pain and changes in nitric oxide. 3

Description:
Title of Project Paper/Research Report/Dissertation/Thesis (“this Work”):. BEST (BIOFEEDBACK ELECTRO-STIMULATION THERAPY) ON. CHRONIC NEUROPATHIC PAIN: EFFECTS ON PAIN SCORE AND. PAIN BIOMARKER NITRIC OXIDE. Field of Study: ANAESTHESIOLOGY, PAIN MEDICINE.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.