Butterworth-Heinemann isanimprintofElsevier 30CorporateDrive, Suite400,Burlington,MA01803, USA LinacreHouse,JordanHill, OxfordOX2 8DP,UK Copyright#2009,ElsevierInc.Allrights reserved. Nopartof thispublication maybereproduced,stored inaretrieval system,or transmittedinanyform orbyanymeans, electronic,mechanical, photocopying, recording,or otherwise,withoutthepriorwritten permissionof thepublisher. PermissionsmaybesoughtdirectlyfromElsevier’s Science &Technology Rights Department inOxford,UK:phone: (þ44)1865843830,fax:(þ44)1865853333, E-mail:[email protected] yourrequestonline viatheElsevierhomepage(http://elsevier.com),byselecting “Support&Contact” then“CopyrightandPermission” andthen“ObtainingPermissions.” Library ofCongress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Applicationsubmitted BritishLibrary Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Acatalogue recordforthisbookis availablefrom theBritishLibrary. ISBN:978-1-85617-802-0 Forinformationonall Butterworth–Heinemann publications visitourWebsite atwww.elsevierdirect.com PrintedintheUnitedStates ofAmerica 09 10 11 12 13 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 INTRODUCTION Contents 1. WhyDoWeCare? xiii 2. BoundingtheDiscussion xiii TheReactor xiv MaterialsofConstruction xiv pHControlAgents andCoolantAdditives xv Clarifying theDefinition xv 3. TheAnalyticalDomain xvi 1. WHY DO WE CARE? It would be pointless to proceed without a brief word about why anyone in the nuclear industry might care enough about Chalk River unidentified deposit(CRUD)tohavespentthepastsixdecadestryingtounderstandits behavior. There are two basic reasons. First, deposits of any kind on heat transfer surfaces are (in general) a bad thing. Second, CRUD, in almost all its forms, becomes highly radioactive and is the source of high radiation fields, which are most troublesome during reactor servicing evolutions. The first reason (basically fouling) is not unique to nuclear reactors, but the radioactive nature of CRUD is quite unique and shall be discussed in detail herein. Therefore, one can understand that if designers had a tool that would allow them to predict the behavior of CRUD within the primary reactor coolant circuit, then it might be possible to design equipment, processes, and/or procedures to mitigate (or at least minimize) these detrimental qualities. Thus the quest to understand the nature of CRUD. 2. BOUNDING THE DISCUSSION Manydifferentreactordesignsusewater(bothlightandheavy)asboththe moderator for the thermal fission reaction and the primary heat transfer working fluid. Similarly, these different designs may use a wide variety xiii xiv Introduction of structural materials and coolant chemistries, and they may operate in vastly different thermal-hydraulic domains with different operating objec- tives and conditions. This book is not intended to be the universal text to explain the nature ofCRUDinalltypesofreactorsandphysicaldomains.Infact,thecurrent horizon of scientific understanding is such that we are only just beginning to understand how to model its behavior in limited circumstances and conditions. Nonetheless, all types of water reactors share many similarities and thus there is value in understanding the nature of CRUD in a known setofcircumstancessothatothersmightdiscoverthesecretsofitsbehavior under different conditions. The Reactor The discussion of the nature of CRUD herein is limited to the context of pressurized light water reactors (PWRs) and specifically to those in which theprimaryreactorcoolantisalwaysintheliquidphase(except,ofcourse, in the pressurizer). Thus, the discussion does not focus on boiling water reactors, heavy water reactors, or groups of PWRs in which a certain degree of boiling is allowed to occur within the nuclear core. Heavy water reactors are excluded here because there is a considerably smaller body of fundamental corrosion kinetic data published for materials in heavy water relative to that of light water. Two-phase light water reac- torsare excluded becausethe modeling of CRUDin the presenceof boil- ing will add a significant complication to the discussion of fundamental driving forces for hydrothermal crystallization. The discussion of these fundamental models will, however, suggest how and where one might expand the model to account for a system in which boiling occurs. Materials of Construction The materials of construction (i.e., the wetted surface areas of the primary reactor coolant circuit) will define the source terms in our mathematical modeling,whichisbasicallyasetofequationsthatwillbeusedtocompute a mass balance. These materials define the sources of metal oxides that make up the composition of CRUD and the sources of cobalt, which is one of the most significant sources of radiation exposure from CRUD. In this text, the discussion focuses primarily on nickel- and iron-based corrosion-resistant alloys and high-cobalt content-bearing materials. Only those metal oxides that are either loose-adherent or have significant solu- bility in high-temperature, high-pH, hydrogenated water are important Introduction xv to the understanding of the nature of CRUD. Thus, for example, the oxide that forms on zircaloy alloys is not discussed because it is neither loose-adherent nor does it have a significant solubility. pH Control Agents and Coolant Additives ModernPWRreactorcoolantsarecloselycontrolledtomaintainverylow oxygen concentrations and very high pH (e.g., 9.0 < pH < 11.5 at room temperature). This has not always been the case. In the early years when neutral pH water was used, scientists and engineers learned that in time, the coolant of operating reactors would turn alkaline as hydrogen, formed by radiolysis, would combine with dissolved nitrogen in the coolant to form ammonia (NH ). It was also observed that the more alkaline the 3 coolant became, the less CRUD was formed. Thus, throughout the years, several different kinds of coolant additives have been used to control the coolant pH (e.g., LiOH, BaOH, and NH ). 3 The pH of the reactor coolant (and the presence of hydrogen in the water) is important because it determines the stable solid phases of metal oxide corrosion products in the reactor coolant system. The method of maintaining the coolant pH is only of secondary importance for funda- mental model development because it only affects the calculation of metal ion solubilities, as discussed herein. Two other important coolant additives have been employed in some commercial PWRs—boron (in the form of boric acid) and zinc. Boron is used as a neutron poison to aid in the control of the neutronics of the reactor, and zinc is sometimes used to reduce the absorption of cobalt into corrosion films and thus reduce pipewall radiation levels. Neither of these isdiscussedindetailexcepttosaythathowandwhyzincworksasacobalt inhibitor is directly related to the substitution of divalent metal ions into corrosion films and, thus, it will be discussed briefly. Clarifying the Definition Within this text, the definition of CRUD is somewhat broader than the historic interpretation of the acronym. For more than 50 years, CRUD, and its hydraulic behavior, was thought to be a particulate phenomenon. It is true that CRUD often manifests itself in a solid phase, either as metal oxide films or as micrometer-sized particles of metal oxide. However, these solid phases are directly in contact with high-temperature reactor coolant where Mother Nature wants there to be an equilibrium between the solid and liquid phases. xvi Introduction Virtually all transition metals have some solubility in hot water (except goldand platinum,which donotform oxides);thus, hydrolyzedspeciesof metal oxides do exist in the aqueous phase. Not modeling CRUD in the soluble phase ignores one of the most important mechanisms for mass transport—hydrothermal crystallization/dissolution. This is partly the rea- son why early attempts to model CRUD as a particulate phenomena have not been successful. Thus, in this text, CRUD is defined as metal (in either solid or soluble phases) that has been transformed from the metallic state to an oxide state bythediffusionofoxygenintothebasemetalsofconstructioninaprocess known as corrosion. One important distinction between this definition and the historic interpretation is that CRUD, taken in this sense, does not have to be an oxide. This definition is chosen because some of the hydrolytic equilibria between the metal oxide solid phases and aqueous phases simply result in divalent metal ions being the soluble species. Con- sequently, one of the assumptions that will ultimately be used to frame the modeling equations is that mass balances will be constructed to conserve grams of metal. 3. THE ANALYTICAL DOMAIN An important requirement in the construction of a successful fundamentals- based model is that all flowing hydraulic regions of the primary reactor coolant circuit (and, more precisely, all sources and sinks of CRUD) must bemodeled.Theconsequenceofthisrequirementisthatthemathematical models used to describe the fluxes of mass to and from the solid and aque- ous phases must be able to accurately perform over a huge range of thermal-hydraulic and chemical conditions for many decades of operation. A brief example of these analytical domains is summarized in Table 1. Regarding the temperature domain, which is purposely restricted to (cid:1) 300 Fonthelowerendoftheband,thereareoftenCRUDsinksincool- (cid:1) ant purification systems where the coolant temperature falls below 300 F; however, these regions require special analytical handling for several rea- sons.First,thecorrosionkineticsforstructuralmaterialsbecomeverysmall (andthusinsignificantassources)atlowertemperaturesand,second,metal ion solubilities can no longer be predicted based on thermodynamics as they become limited by kinetic processes at low temperatures. At first glance, these domains do not appear to present technical chal- lenges. However, most scientific investigations of mass transfer coefficients Introduction xvii Table1 Chemical,Thermal-Hydraulic, andTemporalDomain Domain Range Units Temperature 300 < T < 650 (cid:1) F Coolant velocity 1 < U < 102 ft/sec Reynolds number 102 < N < þ107 Unitless Re Hydraulic sheer 1 < t < þ102 Dynes/cm2 pH 9 < pH < 11.5 At room temperature H concentration 10 < H < 102 scc/kg 2 2 Time 0 < t < þ30 Years are conducted within the typical hydraulic domain of heat exchangers where 104 < N < 105. Thus, in many ways, these modeling efforts will Re push the limits of the current horizon of scientific understanding. None- theless, one must always start at the beginning, where the learning curve is the steepest and the science is at its infancy. It is from this vantage point that the potential for success and growth is the greatest. PREFACE At the birth of the nuclear age in the early 1950s, scientists and engineers set out to harness the power of the atom for peaceful use as a clean alter- natesourceofthermalenergy.IntheUnitedStates,almostallofthisinitial research was conducted by the government and would eventually be administrated by the U.S. Navy under NAVSEA08 (Naval Reactors). At that time, teams of the nation’s finest scientists and engineers were commissioned to investigate everything related to the task of converting the energy of nuclear fission to useable steam. This included the search for the optimum working fluid to be used as a heat transfer medium, and although many were tried and tested, light pressurized water would dominatethefieldofstudyandultimatelyseethelion’sshareofuseduring the next half century. Although water had been used for centuries as a versatile heat transfer working fluid, there were many new technical challenges relating to its use in nuclear reactors, including the high radiation fields within the nuclear core to which the coolant would be exposed. All of the initial research and investigation was performed in the absence of most of the fundamental science that is discussed in this book. What was understood, however, was that cleanliness was of paramount importance (to prevent the spread of radiation); thus, water purity was a critical concern. This understanding led to the use of the most corrosion-resistant struc- tural materials of the time (stainless steels)and ultrapure, neutral pHwater. (Note that within this context, the word “ultrapure” is a relative term. Chemists ofthe 1950scouldnotimaginethe puritythatis achievablewith today’s technology.) At one of the earliest Canadian reactors at Chalk River Laboratories, the entire primary coolant system was found to be fouled with a highly radioactive black “gunk” of unknown origin. The discovery spawned the acronym CRUD, which stands for Chalk River unidentified deposit. To this day, when the nuclear industry discusses primary reactor coolant corrosion products and their consequences, the acronym is used, even in international references. xi xii Preface For more than 60 years, governments, companies, universities, and agencies have employed thousands of engineers and scientists to under- standthenature ofCRUD, what causesit, how it buildsupandtransports in primary reactor circuits, what might be done to mitigate its undesirable effects, and how to predict its behavior in these aqueous systems. There is a remarkable body of excellent research in the public domain inthisfieldofstudy,rivaledonlybythegreaterbodyofworkthatissome- what less accomplished. Many have tried to develop predictive models of the physicochemical phenomena involved, but most have fallen short because the physical domain of chemistry and thermal-hydraulics required tomodelMotherNaturewithintheprimarycoolantofanuclearreactoris almost unfathomable. Most notable are attempts to build correlative mod- els of CRUD behavior; as discussed in this book, the forces and phenom- ena that affect the behavior of CRUD are far too complex to correlate based on a few physical parameters. Nonetheless, some success has been achieved, and although most of the validation of that work is shrouded in the secrecy of government classified documents, much of the fundamental science and understanding has been published (piecewise) in the public domain. This book attempts to string those pieces together into a cohesive state- mentofwhatisrequiredtoconstructafirst-principles,fundamentals-based analytical model to use as a predictive tool. 11 CHAPTER The Corrosion Source Contents 1. TheProcess 1 2. TheForm 2 3. WhyaDouble-LayeredFilm? 3 4. IonSitePreference 5 5. Kinetics 7 ModelingtheBehavior 7 ACloserLookatkp 9 ElementalSpeciationofkpandkr 20 6. TheCobalt Source 22 TrampCobaltinConstructionMaterial 23 HighCobalt ContentAlloys 24 7. APlaceToStart 30 1. THE PROCESS Understanding the nature of Chalk River unidentified deposit (CRUD) must start at the source—that is, with the discussion of how CRUD is formed and the physical forms it takes once it is formed. As the definition implies, CRUD is born as a result of the oxidation (or corrosion) of the materials of construction in the primary reactor coolant circuit that come in contact with the reactor coolant. An affordable structural material that will not corrode in the presence of high-temperature, high-pH, hydrogenated water has not been discovered. Eventhebestcorrosion-resistantalloys“rust”;theonlythingthatmakesone morecorrosionresistantthananotheristherateatwhichthecorrosionoccurs. Theprocessisthesameforbothiron-andnickel-basedalloysinprototyp- icalprimaryreactorcoolant.Whenthesealloysareexposedtoprimaryreactor coolant at high temperature under prototypic coolant chemistries, oxygen willdiffuseintothebasemetalatthewettedsurfaceandconverttheelements inthealloyfromthemetallicstatetoanoxidestate.Intheprocess,divalent metalionsarereleasedintothewaterassolublemetalions.Thetermsmost #2009ElsevierInc.Allrightsreserved. doi:10.1016/B978-1-85617-802-0.00001-3 1