Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 Cities, flexibility and pathways to carbon-neutrality Copyright © 2016 Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 OECD/IEA, 9 rue de la Fédération, 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France Nordic Energy Research, Stensberggata 25, NO-0170 Oslo, Norway, Risø DTU, Ea Energianalyse A/S, (EAEA), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), University of Iceland (UI), Institute For Energy Technology (IFE), Profu Ab (Profu) and IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL). This Nordic ETP technology paper is the result of a collaborative effort between the International Energy Agency (IEA), Nordic Energy Research (NER), Risø DTU, Ea Energianalyse A/S, (EAEA), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), University of Iceland (UI), Institute For Energy Technology (IFE), Profu Ab (Profu) and IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL). This Nordic ETP technology paper reflects the views of the IEA Secretariat, NER, Risø DTU, EAEA, VTT, UI, IFE, Profu and IVL, but does not necessarily reflect those of their respective individual Member countries or funders. The Nordic ETP technology paper does not constitute professional advice on any specific issue or situation. NER, the IEA, Risø DTU, EAEA, VTT, UI, IFE, Profu and IVL make no representation or warranty, express or implied, in respect of the contents of the Nordic ETP technology paper (including its completeness or accuracy) and shall not be responsible for any use of, or reliance on, it. For further information, please contact: [email protected]. This publication reflects the views of the IEA Secretariat, but does not necessarily reflect those of their respective individual member countries [or funders]. The IEA make no representation or warranty, express or implied, in respect to the publication’s contents (including its completeness or accuracy) and shall not be responsible for any use of, or reliance on, the publication This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries, and to the name of any territory, city or area. Figures and data in this report can be downloaded at www.iea.org/etp/nordic Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 Cities, flexibility and pathways to carbon-neutrality Figures and data in this report can be downloaded for free on the websites of the International Energy Agency and Nordic Energy Research: www.iea.org/etp/nordic www.nordicetp.org INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The International Energy Agency (IEA), an autonomous agency, was established in November 1974. Its primary mandate was – and is – two-fold: to promote energy security amongst its member countries through collective response to physical disruptions in oil supply, and provide authoritative research and analysis on ways to ensure reliable, affordable and clean energy for its 29 member countries and beyond. The IEA carries out a comprehensive programme of energy co-operation among its member countries, each of which is obliged to hold oil stocks equivalent to 90 days of its net imports. The Agency’s aims include the following objectives: Secure member countries’ access to reliable and ample supplies of all forms of energy; in particular, through maintaining effective emergency response capabilities in case of oil supply disruptions. Promote sustainable energy policies that spur economic growth and environmental protection in a global context – particularly in terms of reducing greenhouse-gas emissions that contribute to climate change. Improve transparency of international markets through collection and analysis of energy data. Support global collaboration on energy technology to secure future energy supplies and mitigate their environmental impact, including through improved energy efficiency and development and deployment of low-carbon technologies. Find solutions to global energy challenges through engagement and dialogue with non-member countries, industry, international organisations and other stakeholders. IEA member countries: Australia Austria Belgium Canada Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Secure Greece Sustainable Hungary Together Ireland Italy Japan Korea Luxembourg Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Slovak Republic © OECD/IEA, 2016 Spain International Energy Agency Sweden 9 rue de la Fédération Switzerland 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France Turkey www.iea.org United Kingdom United States Please note that this publication is subject to specific restrictions The European Commission that limit its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are also participates in available online at www.iea.org/t&c/ the work of the IEA. Page02_2015_20x27_Q.indd 1 18-01-2016 11:59:50 5 Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction 5 Foreword 5 Acknowledgements 7 Contact 9 Executive Summary 10 Nordic energy-related carbon dioxide emissions 26 Chapter 1 Nordic choices in a global world 28 Radical change is needed, but history gives cause for optimism 31 Three strategic issues facing Nordic countries 35 Power generation and district heating are almost there 42 Spotlight 1: The Nordic bioenergy market 52 Decarbonising transport poses significant challenges 57 Industry: Innovation will be the deal breaker 72 Spotlight 2: Iceland´s fishing sector 83 Buildings: Accelerating deep energy renovation is critical 88 Decarbonising the Nordic region will not cost the world 101 Chapter 2 Urban energy 104 Introduction 107 Overview of Nordic urban energy systems 108 Drivers of change in the urban context 114 Urban scenarios 119 Nordic capitals leading the low-carbon transition by example 129 Recommendations for action in urban areas 147 6 Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 Table of Contents Chapter 3 Electricity system integration 150 Introduction 153 Market integration of VRE 173 Electricity trade 180 Flexibility in the system and VRE integration 189 The role of nuclear in the Nordic energy system 210 Recommendations and near-term actions 213 Annexes 216 Annex A (Chapter 1) 217 Annex B (Chapter 2) 230 Annex C (Chapter 3) 235 References 245 List of Figures 254 List of Boxes 260 List of Tables 261 Also from the IEA 264 New releases 264 7 Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 Foreword Foreword Much has changed since the last edition of Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives (NETP) in 2013. Despite lower fossil fuel prices, the Nordic region has continued to reduce emissions. This decline is the result of efficiency improvements and strong renewables growth – evidence that energy policies suggested in the last report are producing results. Similar developments are evident across Europe, where the Energy Union has established a new framework for European energy policy. Globally, too, efforts to cut CO have gained momentum. At the time 2 of writing, 189 countries had pledged to reduce emissions under the framework of the Paris Agreement on climate change, which has already been signed by more than 170 country representatives. Policy makers around the world are now looking to fulfil these pledges. The experiences of the Nordic region in energy system transition can offer a valuable contribution as the world takes on this challenge. The highly interconnected regional electricity market is the cornerstone of the Nordic energy system, and it can serve as a key enabler for further emission reductions towards 2050. This report provides a case study on how to go beyond the 2°C target, towards a carbon- neutral energy system. For Nordic policy makers, the scenarios in this report identify both challenges and opportunities on the road towards the ambitious national climate targets of the region. Their success will depend on ensuring public acceptance of new power generation and grid investments, the continued competitiveness of energy-intensive industries amidst higher electricity prices, and the sustainable supply of biofuels for long-distance transport. In addition, there are significant opportunities to benefit from supplying and balancing the European electricity grid, and to harness urban leadership in the electrification of transport. NETP 2016 is the largest IEA collaborative analytical effort looking at regional long-term low-carbon technology pathways. The report applies the global energy scenarios of the IEA Energy Technology Perspectives report to the five Nordic countries, utilising rich national data and addressing issues specific to the Nordic countries. It builds directly on the first edition of the report from 2013, which has become a key point of reference for various subsequent analyses from Nordic governments, industry and civil society. Just as in the global IEA Energy Technology Perspectives report, urban energy systems and electricity system integration are topics garnering special attention in this edition, where leading Nordic researchers have used specialised modelling tools to supplement the IEA model central to the scenarios. The result is a more detailed and region-specific assessment of renewables buildout and electricity trade than was possible in the first edition. Tight co-operation between IEA and Nordic researchers has been critical to this endeavour, which has benefited both sides immensely. It is our hope that this fruitful co operation will continue and be extended to other countries and regions of the world. Kamel Ben Naceur Hans Jørgen Koch Director Executive Director Sustainability, Technology and Outlooks Nordic Energy Research, Oslo International Energy Agency, Paris 9 Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 Acknowledgements Acknowledgements Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives is a collaborative project between the International Energy Agency (IEA), Nordic research institutions and Nordic Energy Research – an intergovernmental organisation under the Nordic Council of Ministers. Benjamin Donald Smith at Nordic Energy Research was the coordinator of the project. Markus Wråke at IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute was the analytical project manager and had overall responsibility for the design and implementation of the study. Daniele Poponi led the analysis at the IEA. Special thanks go to Nordic Energy Research Executive Director Hans Jørgen Koch and Jean-Francois Gagné, head of the ETP division at the IEA, who have been driving forces behind the project. IEA team Pierpaolo Cazzola, Astrid Dumond, John Dulac, Araceli Fernández Palés, Marine Gorner, Lorcan Lyons, Luis Munuera, Daniele Poponi, Uwe Remme, Jacob Teter, Therese Walsh and Kira West. Nordic Energy Research Hans Jørgen Koch, Svend Søyland and Benjamin Donald Smith. Danish team Kenneth Bernard Karlsson, Marie Münster, Klaus Skytte, Cristian Hernán Cabrera Pérez, Giada Venturini, Raffaele Salvucci and Rasmus Bo Bramstoft Pedersen (DTU); Anders Kofoed-Wiuff, János Hethey, Nina Dupont and Simon Sawatzki (EA Energy Analyses). Finnish team Tiina Koljonen, Tomi J. Lindroos, Antti Lehtilä, Göran Koreneff and Miimu Airaksinen (VTT). Icelandic team Brynhildur Davidsdottir, Conor Byrne, Reza Fazeli, Ehsan Shafiei, Sigurdur Jóhannesson and Darri Eyþorsson (University of Iceland); Jonas Hlynur Hallgrimsson (EFLA Engineering). Norwegian team Kari Aamodt Espegren, Arne Lind, Eva Rosenberg (IFE); Glen Peters, Jonas Karstensen and Robbie Andrew (CICERO). Swedish team Fredrik Martinsson, Marcus Liljeberg and Markus Wråke (IVL); Thomas Unger and Mattias Bisaillon (Profu). 10 Nordic Energy Technology Perspectives 2016 Acknowledgements Editing Justin French-Brooks, Marilyn Smith and Jonas Wiesel. Layout Steffen Brückner Nordic Reference group The work was guided by the Nordic Reference Group, consisting of: Karsten Kapion and Peter Meibom (Danish Energy Association), Jeppe Lundbæk (Danish Energy Agency), Erla Björk Thorgeirsdottir and Jónas Ketilsson (National Energy Authority of Iceland), Jari Kostama (Finnish Energy), Petteri Kuuva (Ministry of Economy and the Employment, Birgitte Liard and Elin Økstad (Norwegian Environment Agency), Hans Otto Haaland (Norwegian Research Council), Filip Ehrle Elveling and Åsa Leander (Swedish Ministry of Environment and Energy), Klaus Hammes (Swedish Energy Agency), Estathios Peteves (EU Joint Research Centre, Petten) In addition, we are very grateful for input and comments from the following people: Anna Andersson (Swedish Energy Agency), Johan Berg (Heat Pump Centre), Brian Dean (IEA), Joakim Cejie (Swedish Ministry of Environment and Energy), Dag Christensen (Energy Norway), Chiara Delmastro (Politecnico di Torino), Audun Fidje (Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate), Iratxe Gonzalez (JRC IET) Klaus Hammes (Swedish Energy Agency), Anders Bavnhøj Hansen (Energinet DK), Ignacio Hidalgo (JRC IET), Hrönn Hrafnsdóttir (City of Reykjavik), Eva Jernbäcker (Swedish Ministry of Environment and Energy), Sigurður Jóhannesson (University of Iceland), Andreas Kannesten (Swedish Ministry of Environment an Energy) Marc LaFrance (US Department of Energy), Ágústa Loftsdóttir (National Energy Authority of Iceland), Jukka Leskela (Finnish Energy Industries), Elisabeth Lidbaum (Swedish Ministry of Environment and Energy), Ole Løfsnæs (Norsk Industri), Fredrik Norlund (Swedish Ministry of Environment and Energy), Roger Nordman (Heat Pump Centre), Wouter Nijs (JRC IET), Mikael Odenberger (Chalmers), Lina Palm (Uniper), Martin Palm (Swedish Ministry of Environment and Energy), Julia Panzer (Danfoss), Cristian Hernán Cabrera Pérez (Technical University of Denmark), Pentti Puhakka (Finland TEM), Eva Rosenberg (Institute for Energy and Technology Norway), Pablo Ruiz (JRC IET), Caroline Haglund Stignor (Heat Pump Centre), Andreas Zucker (JRC IET), Hans Rudling (Fortum Värme), Erik Dotzauer (Fortum Värme), Christer Boberg (Fortum Värme), Jan Bråten (Statnett). The project was made possible through funding from Nordic Energy Research. Special thanks go to then Board members: Nicolai Zarganis and Flemming G. Nielsen (Danish Energy Agency), Sebastian Johansson (Tekes, Finland), Gudni A. Jóhannesson and Erla Björk Þorgeirsdóttir (Orkustofnun, Iceland), Rune Volla and Hans Otto Haaland (Research Council of Norway), Astrid Stavseng (Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy), Lars Guldbrand (Swedish Ministry of Environment and Energy) and Birgitta Palmberger (Swedish Energy Agency). The individuals and organisations that contributed to this study are not responsible for any opinions or judgements contained in this study. Any errors and omissions are solely the responsibility of the IEA.