Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 1993: Vol 22 Index

11 Pages·1993·2.2 MB·English

VOLUME XXII INDEX
, SPRING 1993 1-102 Equity in Public and Nonprofit Sectors,”
, SUMMER 1993 103-192 281-296; “The Field of Nonprofit and
, FALL 1993 193-274 Voluntary Action Research: Then and
, WINTER 1993 275-374 Now,” 197-200; “In Search of the
Impact of Staff Mix on Long-Term
Care Ombudsman Programs,” 69-91;
A “National Federations: The Role of Vol-
untary Organizations in Linking Macro
Abzug, R., review by, 93-100 and Micro Orders in Civil Society,”
Administration on Aging (AoA), 71, 72, 74, 121-136; “Nonprofit Advocacy in
81, 87, 89 Weakly Institutionalized Political Sys-
“African American Traditions of Civic tems: The Case of NGDOs in Lima,
Responsibility,” 137-153 Peru,” 317-337; “Of Books and the
African Americans: child rearing, 144-145; Scholarly Infrastructure,” 5—12; “Portfo-
and church role, 145-146, 149; civic lio Theory and Nonprofit Financial Sta-
culture, 137-138, 147-151; civil rights, bility,” 105-119; “Public Benefit and
139-140; conspicuous consumption, Member Benefit Nonprofit, Voluntary
142-143; and desegregation/deindustri- Groups,” 53-68; “Public Policy and the
alization, 150; donated time, 143-144; Performance of Nonprofit Organizations:
economic marginality, 142; and Great A General Framework,” 13-31; “Reli-
Society programs, 140; informal volun- gious People, Religious Congregations,
teerism, 144-145; political threat, 139; and Volunteerism in Human Services: Is
racial oppression, 138-140, 147; self- There a Link?” 33-51; “Response of
sufficiency, 139; urban situation, Community Organizations to the Civil
148-149 Unrest in Los Angeles,” 357-373; “Role
Altruism: defined, 184-185; and exchange Conflict, Role Ambiguity, and Role
theory, 184; and nonprofits research, Overload on Boards of Directors of Non-
223; weak, 298 profit Human Service Organizations,”
American Association for the Advancement 339-356 “The Role of the Nonprofit
of Science (AAAS), 198 Enterprise’ in 1993: Hansmann Revis-
American Foundation for AIDS Research, ited,” 297-316; “Sector Blurring and
293 Nonprofit Centers: The Case of the
American Kidney Foundation, 293 United Kingdom,” 241-257; “Twenty
American Sociological Association, 197 Years of the Journal of Voluntary Action
Architecture: and burial monuments, Research/Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector
170-173; urban, and public space, Quarterly: An Assessment of Past Trends
177-179 and Future Directions,” 207-218;
Architecture and the After-Life, reviewed, “Usable Knowledge: A Symposium,”
167-183 219-239
ARNOVA. See Association for Research on Association for Research on Nonprofit
Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Organizations and Voluntary Action
Action (ARNOVA) (ARNOVA): and Association of Volun-
“ARNOVA and Its Journal: Some Reflec- tary Action Scholars, 197-199,
tions,” 201-205 279-280; bureaucratization/formaliza-
Articles: “African American Traditions of tion, 204; centers, 199, 203-204, 279;
Civic —_ Responsibility,” 137-153; characteristics/goals, 203; future direc-
“ARNOVA and Its Journal: Some Reflec- tions, 203-204; infrastructure, 198;
tions,” 201-205; “Decentralization and internationalization, 198, 204, 278;
NONPROFIT AND VOLUNTARY SECTOR QUARTERLY, vol. 22, no. 4, Winter 1993 © Jossey-Bass Publishers 375
376
journal, 1-4, 198-199, 201-204; meet- Boulet, J., review by, 189-191
ings/affiliations, 198; origins/member- Brudney, J. L., “Twenty Years of the Journal
ship, 197, 202, 277; publications, 199; of Voluntary Action Research/Nonprofit and
purpose, 2-3; research communities, Voluntary Sector Quarterly: An Assess-
279-280; symposium, 219-238; theo- ment of Past Trends and Future Direc-
retical focus, 202; vision, 3—+ tions,” 207-218
Association of Voluntary Action Scholars
(AVAS), 197-199, 277-280. See also
Association for Research on Nonprofit c
Organizations and Voluntary Action
(ARNOVA): and Association of Volun- Cemeteries: architecture, 170-173; and
tary Action Scholars civic culture, 168-170; historical role,
AVAS. See Association of Voluntary Action 170-171; history, 173-176; life cycle,
Scholars 169-179; and Protestant Reformation,
AVAS/ARNOVA. See Association for 171-172; and religious organizations,
Research on Nonprofit Organizations 169; role, 168; and secular organiza-
and Voluntary Action (ARNOVA): and tions, 169; and symbolism, 168-169
Association of Voluntary Action Scholars Center for a Voiuntary Society, 277
Centers. See Nonprofit centers
Centre for Voluntary Organisation (CVO),
B 241
Charitable giving, 294-295. See also Gen-
Bender, T., Intellect and Public Life: Essays on erosity; Philanthropy
the Social History of Academic Intellectuals Civic culture: and academic professions,
in the United States, reviewed, 259-265 262; African American, 137-138,
Billis, D., “Sector Blurring and Nonprofit 147-151, artistic/public expressions of,
Centers: The Case of the United King- 167; and cemeteries, 168-176; changing
dom,” 241-257 vision of, 179-181; and Civil Rights
Board members: case examples, 343-351; Movement, 139-140; and conspicuous
effective, 353-354; expert role, 342, consumption, 142-143; defined, 162;
346-347; figurehead role, 342, European American, 138-140; and
349-350; prescriptive role, 341; repre- investment capitalism, 138; monocul-
sentative role, 342, 347-349; role ambi- tural image, 140-141; and privatization,
guity, 353; role conflict, 352-353; role 180; and public space, 177-181. See also
dysfunctions (study) 341-354; role Public culture
expectations, 353; role overload, 353; Civic responsibility: African American,
roles, 341-342; trustee role, 341-342, 137-138, 147-151; American vs. Japan-
343-344, 353; unique roles, 350-351; ese, 189-190; European American,
worker role, 342, 344-345. See also 138-139; and philanthropic studies,
Boards of directors 146-147; refedining, 146-147, 150;
Boards of directors: as boundary spanners, sociological concepts of, 140-141
354; education, 353; functions, 341; Civil society, 123-124, 133-134, 321-322.
member orientation programs, 352; and See also Communities; Society
member recruitment, 352; member roles Clotfelter, C. T., Who Benefits from the Non-
(study), 341-345; operating styles, 341; profit Sector? reviewed, 184-188
and organizational competencies, 354; Cnaan, R. A., “Religious People, Religious
research directions, 353-354; responsi- Congregations, and Volunteerism in
bilities/boundaries, 353. See also Board Human Services: Is There a Link?”
members 33-51; review by, 184-188
Books. See Nonprofits/voluntary action Colvin, H., Architecture and the After-Life,
research: book reviews, book sales reviewed, 167-183
Boris, E., “Usable Knowledge: A Sympo- Commons: and conflict, 270; defined, 267;
sium,” 219-239 and market/state, 269; and self, 268;
theory, 267-270 D
Commons: New Perspectives on Nonprofit
Organizations and Voluntary Action, The, “Decentralization and Equity in Public and
reviewed, 267-270 Nonprofit Sectors,” 281-296
Communities: action, 359; and govern- Development, and resource distribution,
mental voluntary organizations (study), 320
124-135; and disaster, 358; and fire Development and Technical Assistance,
fighters (study), 155-164; loss of, 121; Inc. (DATA), 277
mediator role, 360-361; resource depen- Diaz-Albertini, J., “Nonprofit Advocacy in
dency, 359-361. See also Civil society; Weakly Institutionalized Political Sys-
Community-based organizations; Society tems: The Case of NGDOs in Lima,
Community-based organizations: benefits, Peru,” 317-337
358-359; and disasters, 358; emergency Disasters, and community role, 358
response (case analysis), 361-369; and Donations/donors: charitable vs. amenity-
First African Methodist Episcopal supporting, 294-295; demands, 300;
Church, 363-364, 365-369; and Har- nonprofit organization, 285-287,
vard Heights Neighborhood Association, 299-300
361-363, 365-367; and Korean Youth Durden, T. K., “Twenty Years of the Journal
Center, 364-367; policy, 368-369; of Voluntary Action Research/Nonprofit and
research 369-370; and Unity House, Voluntary Sector Quarterly: An Assess-
362-363, 365-366, 368 ment of Past Trends and Future Direc-
Competition cushioning, 21-23 tions,” 207-218
Contract failure: and complex personal ser-
vices, 305; and day-care industry,
311-312; and health care, 310; hospital E
example, 304-310; and hospital ser-
vices, 306; and long-term care indus- Ellickson, R. D., Order Without Law: How
tries, 311-312; mathematical models, Neighbors Settle Disputes, reviewed,
301; measuring, 310; and nondistribu- 271-273
tion constraint, 299; and nonprofit orga- Emergency response, community organiza-
nizations, 300; and physician agency tion (study), 361-371
role, 308-309; and public policy, England, voluntary organizations (study),
304-310; and tax exemption, 312-313; 124-135
theory, 310-313; and third-party trans- Entrepreneurial sorting, 21, 26-27. See also
actions, 306-308 Sorting
Contracting: international policy compari- Entrepreneurs: and market entry, 21,
son, 93-97; in United Kingdom, 95-96, 26-27; and nonprofit organizations,
98, 99-100; in United States, 96-97, 300; and organizational objectives,
99-100 18-19
Contracting Lessons from the U.S., reviewed, Equity, in government aid, 295. See also
93-100 Generosity differences
Cooper, T. L., “Response of Community European American civic culture, 137-138
Organizations to the Civil Unrest in Los Exchange theory, and altrusim, 184
Angeles,” 357-373
Cooperation, and dispute settlement,
271-273 F
Corporate tax law, 299
Coston, J. M., “Response of Community “Farmers and Ranchers,” 271-273
Organizations to the Civil Unrest in Los “Field of Nonprofit and Voluntary Action
Angeles,” 357-373 Research: Then and Now, The,”
Culture. See Civic culture; Public culture 197-200
Customers/consumers cheating, 301-302; Filer Commission, 278-279
protection, 305; uncertainty, 28 Financial managers, 105-106
378
Financial predictability See Nonprofit Public sector; Sector blurring
financial predictability Government-nonprofits contracting. See
Financial risk, and nonprofit organizations, Contracting
105-118 Grass-roots organizations: central role of,
Fire fighters: career attributes, 161—162; 327-328; empowerment, 320; nature,
commitment, 163-164; and community 321-322; romantic notion of, 321; and
(study), 155-164; and community inte- weakened state/civil society, 322
gration/cohesion, 164; households Gray, B. H., “The Role of the Nonprofit
attributes, 159-161; personal attributes, Enterprise in 1993: Hansmann Revis-
157-159; recruitment, 164 ited,” 297-316
First African Methodist Episcopal Church Gutch, R., Contracting Lessons from the U.S.
(FAME), Los Angeles, 363-364, reviewed, 93-100
365-369
For-profit organizations: coexistence with
nonprofits, 299-301, 303-304; compe- H
tition, 303; and financial risk, 105; and
free entry, 20-27; hospitals as, 306; Hall, P. D., “Of Books and the Scholarly
monopolies, 26; and sector conversion, Infrastructure,” 5-12; “Review Essay:
19 The Scholar-Practitioner Gap and the
For-profits-in-disguise (FPIDs), 24-25, Dilemma of Expertise and Democracy,”
302-303 259-265; reviews by, 167-183,
Fox, D. M., “Usable Knowledge: A Sympo- 259-265; “Usable Knowledge: A Sym-
sium,” 219-239 posium,” 219-239
Free entry, 20-24 Harvard Heights Neighborhood Associa-
tion (HHNA), Los Angeles, 361-363,
365-367
G Health care: and contract failure, 310; and
public policy, 304, 310, 312-313; Third
Generosity differences: American Founda- World, 324-325; and universal insur-
tion for AIDS Research example, 293; ance system, 394. See also Hospitals;
American Kidney Foundation example, Physicians
293; charitable vs. amenity-support- ing, Hospitals: costs/outputs measurement,
294-295; and nonprofit sector, 310; nonprofit, vs. for-profit, 306; per-
283-284, 287-294; and public sector, sonal services complexity, 305; and
283-284; United Way example, physician agency role, 308-309; sup-
287-293. See also Nondistribution con- port, 304; tax exemption, 306; third-
straint; Philanthropy party transactions, 306-308
Giving: charitable vs. amenity-supporting, Huber, R., “In Search of the Impact of Staff
294-295; and conspicuous consump- Mix on Long-Term Care Ombudsman
tion, 142—143; European American vs. rograms,” 69-91
African American concepts of, 142-145; Hunter, A., “National Federations: The
patterns and nonprofits, 187. See also Role of Voluntary Organizations in Link-
Generosity; Philanthopy ing Macro and Micro Orders in Civil
Government: controlling, growth, Society,” 121-136
282-283; decentralization, 281-283,
295-296; and equity in aid, 295-296;
and fiscal disparities, 283; as Leviathan,
281-283; and nondistribution con-
straint, 299; public choice approach to, “In Search of the Impact of Staff Mix on
282; and redistributive programs, 283; Long-Term Care Ombudsman Pro-
and voluntary organizations (study), grams,” 69-91
124-135: and volunteers, 252. See also Independent sector: and boundary blurring,
243-244; terminology, 244-245 L
INDEPENDENT SECTOR (IS), 8, 198, 202,
219, 221-222, 229-230, 259, 278, 280 Last Great Necessity: Cemeteries in American
Information: asymmetrical, 302; nonprofit History, The, reviewed, 167-183
organization, structure, 27-29 Leviathan, government as, 281-283
Intellect and Public Life: Essays on the Social Lohmann, R. A., The Commons: New Per-
History of Academic Intellectuals in the spectives on Nonprofit Organizations and
United States reviewed, 259-265 Voluntary Action reviewed, 267-270;
Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 17, 299, “Farmers and Ranchers,” 271-273;
302 review by, 271-273
International Labor Organization, 320 London, N. R., Japanese Corporate Philan-
International Society for Third-Sector thropy reviewed, 189-191
Research, 198 Long-term care ombudsman programs: and
International Sociological Association, 198 client complaints, 76-85, 87-88; com-
International Voluntary Action and Volun- plications, 70-71; and long-term care,
tary Association Research Organization, 75-76; organizational environment/
198 dynamics, 70, 86; and staff mix (study),
72-86; value, 71-72; and volunteerism,
70
J Los Angeles, community organizations
emergency response (study), 361-371
Japanese corporate philanthropy: contribu-
tion structure, 190; laws, 190; vs. West-
ern philanthropy, 189-190 M
Japanese Corporate Philanthropy reviewed,
189-191 Markets: contestable, 20; and entrepeneur-
Journal of Voluntary Action Research/Non- ial sorting, 21, 26-27; entry models,
profit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly: aca- 24-27; and free entry, 20-27; and non-
demic disciplines, 211-212; article profit organizational research, 6-10
analysis (study), 209-218; authors, Mediating organizations, 360-361
210-212; future directions, 203-204, Member benefit nonprofit groups: activi-
209, 217-218; growth, 202; and INDE- ties, 60-62; affiliates/influence, 64;
PENDENT SECTOR, 202, 229-230; ori- defined, 53; heterogeneity, 65; impor-
gins, 198, 207-208; publishers, tance, 53-54; income, 62-63; labels,
198-199, 202; statistical analysis, 213; 54-55; members, 63-64; mission, 66;
theoretical orientation, 202, 208-209; populations served, 55, 59-60; vs. pub-
topics, 213-216 lic benefit nonprofit groups (study),
56-67; research, 54, 55; structure, 63;
tax status, 55, 65; unincorporation/infor-
K mality, 65
Kasternakis, A., “Religious People, Reli-
gious Congregations, and Volunteerism N
in Human Services: Is There a Link?”
33-51 “National Federations: The Role of Volun-
Kingma, B. R., “Portfolio Theory and Non- tary Organizations in Linking Macro and
profit Financial Stability,” 105-119 Micro Orders in Civil Society,” 121-136
Knowledge: diffusion, 225; politics, 227; National voluntary organizations: American
society, 263-264; specialized, 262. See vs. British, 130-132; confederations,
also Usable knowledge 129-130; and constituency power, 127,
Korean Youth Center (KYC), Los Angeles, 128; core funding, 130-131; formal
364-367 recognition, 131; government/community
380
National voluntary organizations (continued) (NVSQ), 9-11. See also Journal of Volun-
tary Action Research/Nonprofit and Volun-
(study), 124-135; interactive construc- tary Sector Quarterly
tion, 127-129; micro/macro issues, 127, Nonprofit centers: creation/budget, 199;
132-133; political nature, 313; and effects of, 203; and external forces, 204;
political partnerships, 128; public/pri- long-term implications of, 255; and
vate distinction, 133-134; scaling, research communities, 279; and sector
126-127; strategies/tactics, 131 blurring, 254-255
Netting, F. E., “In Search of the Impact of Nonprofit financial predictability: defined,
Staff Mix on Long-Term Care Ombuds- 108; and for-profit sector, 105; impor-
man Programs,” 69-91 tance, 108-109; literature, 106-108;
Nondistribution constraint (NDC): advo- measures, 108; modeling, 109-112; and
cacy strategy, 322-323; and asymmetri- organizational form, 109; and portfolio
cal information, 302; challenges, 334; managers, 105-106; and _ revenue
and cheating customers, 301-302; and sources, 106-107; study, 112-118
civil society, 320; compliance, 302; and Nonprofit organizations (NPOs): advan-
contract failure, 299; and corporate tax tages, 358-359; beneficiaries, 184-188;
law, 299; and customer protection, 305; boards of directors, 339-354; bureau-
defined, 15, 299; enforcement, 24-25, cracy, 251; cemeteries, 168-176; and
302; environmental issues (case exam- charitable vs. amenity-supporting gen-
ple), 326-327; and government, 299; erosity, 294-295; as clubs, 284; coexis-
and government-nonprofits relationship tence with for-profits, 299-301,
theories, 331-332; and grass-roots orga- 303-304; and contract failure, 300; and
nizations, 320-322; and nonprofit orga- cooperation theory, 272-273; cross-sub-
nizations, 298-300; and nonprofit sidization cheating, 303; cushioned,
sector definition, 15-17; and public sec- 21-23; customer cheating, 301-302;
tor definition, 298-299; and trustwor- defined, 297; disguised as for-profits,
thiness, 301 24-25; donations, 285-287; and
Nongovernmental development organiza- donors, 299-300; employees, 187; and
tions (NGDOs): and grass-roots empow- entrepreneurs, 300; and financial risk,
erment, 320; importance, 320; and 105-118; formation, 300; and free
institution building, 330-331; inter- entry, 20-27; and giving patterns, 187;
locuters, 322-328; international, 334; goals, 298; and government contracting,
networks, 329; origins, 319-320; 93-100; information structure, 27-29;
resource potentiation, 330; self-managed legal definition, 15-17; models, 16-17;
community (case example), 327-328; as monopolies, 26; and nondistribution
social movement organizations, 325- constraint, 15-17, 24-25, 298-300;
327; as social service providers, 323- objective functions, 17-18; organiza-
325; and state, 320-321, 331-333; as tional structure, 248-249; revenue con-
subsidiary to grass-roots organizations, ditioning, 23-24; sectoral conversions,
327-328; traits, 332-333; and underde- 20; social service provision, 323; sur-
velopment, 320; vertical integration, vival, 20, 21, 24-25; tax exemption,
329; and Western vs. Third World cir- 299, 302, 306; tax regulation, 15-17;
cumstances, 331-334; women’s health and trust-regulating mechanisms, 301;
issues (case example), 324-325. See also and zero-profit constraint, 16. See also
Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) Community-based organizations; Grass-
Nonprofit Academic Centers Council roots organizations; Member benefit
(NACC), 199 nonprofit groups; Nongovernmental
“Nonprofit Advocacy in Weakly Institu- development organizations (NGDOs);
tionalized Political Systems: The Case of Public benefit nonprofit groups; Volun-
NGDOs in Lima, Peru,” 317-337 tarism; Voluntary groups
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly Nonprofit sector: beneficiaries, 184-188;
=
and charitable vs. amenity-supporting Order Without Law: How Neighbors Settle Dis-
generosity, 294-295; conceptualization, putes, reviewed, 271-273
231-232; and cooperation theory, Organizational objectives: compromising,
272-273; core, 254; cost advantages, 18; and entrepreneurs, 18-19; origins,
247; defining, 298-299; and democratic 17-18; and regulatory policy, 18; and
welfare states, 223; disintegration, 227; stakeholders, 19; survivable, 18; types, 17
fragmented structure, 283-285; and Organizations: competencies, 354; mediat-
generosity differences, 283-284, 287- ing, 360-361; success, 263
294; history, 224; and independence/
interdependence, 203, 243-244; knowl-
edge base, 222; and minorities, 224; P
myths, 222; and nondistribution con-
straint, 298-299; public sector interde- Paton, R. N., “In Search of the Impact of Staff
pendence, 295; and_ redistributive Mix on Long-Term Care Ombudsman
transfers, 283-285; scholar-practitioner Programs,” 69-91
gap, 259-261; uniqueness, 247. See also Performance, research and unified policy
Independent sector; Sector blurring; framework, 13-15
Third sector; Voluntary sector Peru, nongovernmental development orga-
Nonprofit Sector Research Fund, 199 nizations (study), 319-334
Nonprofits boards. See Board members; Philanthropy: and civic responsibility,
Boards of directors 146-147; and Cold War mentality, 141,
Nonprofits research. See Nonprofits/volun- European American vs. African American
tary action research concepts of, 142-145; Japanese corporate,
Nonprofits unified policy framework: 189-191; and wealthy, 184. See also Gen-
advantages, 14; and policy questions, erosity differences; Giving
29; requirements, 14-15 Physicians: as patients’ agents, 208-209. See
Nonprofits/voluntary action research: and also Health care; Hospitals
advocacy, 5—6; book reviews, 8-9; book PONPO. See Program on Non-Profit Organi-
sales, 7-8; challenges, 231; communi- zations (PONPO)
ties, 279-280; and disciplines, 222-223, Portfolio management theory, 109-112. See
228; financial risk, 106-108; future also Nonprofit financial predictability
“Portfolio Theory and Nonprofit Financial
industry influence, 260; and Journal of Stability,” 105-119
Voluntary Action Research/Nonprofit and Privatization, and civic culture, 180
Voluntary Sector Quarterly (study), Program on Non-Profit Organizations
209-218; journals, 8-10; market, 6-10; (PONPO), 202, 219, 229-230, 277-290
and member benefit nonprofit groups, “Public Benefit and Member Benefit Non-
54; needs, 225; pitfalls, 221; and practi- profit, Voluntary Groups,” 53-68
tioner gap, 259-261; progress, 200; and Public-benefit nonprofit groups, vs. member
public policy, 225; sponsors, 202, benefit nonprofit groups (study), 56-67
229-230; and taxation, 225-226; Public culture: erosion, 261-263; and
United Kingdom, 241-255; and usable knowledge society, 263-264; redefining,
knowledge, 219-238 263-264. See also Civic culture
“Public Policy and the Performance of Non-
profit Organizations: A General Frame-
O work,” 13-31
Public sector: decentralization, 281-283,
“Of Books and the Scholarly Infrastructure,” 295-296; and generosity differences,
5-12 283-284; growth, 282-283; nonprofit
Older Americans Act, 69, 70, 86 sector interdependence, 295. See also
Ombudsman programs. See Long-term care Government
ombudsman programs Public space, and civic culture, 177-179
Q “Rich Are Always with Us, The,” 267-270
“Role Conflict, Role Ambiguity, and Role
Quality, product, 28 Overload on Boards of Directors of Non-
Quasi-autonomous nongovernmental orga- profit Human Service Organizations,”
nization (quango), 130 339-356
“Role of Nonprofit Enterprise, The,’ in
1993: Hansmann Revisited,” 297-316
R Role(s): ambiguity, 340-341, 353; conflict,
340, 352, 352-353; defined, 340 expec-
Racism, 138-140, 147 tations, 340-341, 353; nonprofits’ board
Religion: and African Americans, 145-146; members (study), 341-354; overload,
and burial practices, 171-172; and 340, 353; theory, 340-341
cemeteries, 169; and voluntarism, 35—40;
and voluntary sector origins, 33; and
volunteerism (study), 40-49 S
“Religious People, Religious Congregations,
and Volunteerism in Human Services: Is Scholarship. See Nonprofits research
There a Link?” 33-51 Sector blurring: case for/against, 243-244;
Research. See Nonprofits/voluntary action government-voluntary, 243; and inde-
research pendence, 243-244; and nonprofit cen-
Research Note: “Volunteers and Their ters, 254-255; and sector concept,
Communities: A Comparative Analysis 244-248; and sector parentage,
of Voiunteer Fire Fighters,” 155-166 251-253; structural approach, 248-251
Resource mobilization theory, 359 “Sector Blurring and Nonprofit Centers:
“Response of Community Organizations to The Case of the United Kingdom,”
the Civil Unrest in Los Angeles,” 241-257
357-373 Sector(s): ambiguity, 249-250; concept,
Responsibility. See Civic responsibility 244-248; and control, 252-253; divi-
Revenue: conditioning, 23-24; and finan- sions, 249; identifying, 251-253; and
cial predictability, 106-107; manage- membership identity, 252; partnerships
ment modeling, 109-112; shocks, 109 between, 295; and personal world, 249;
“Review Essay: The Scholar-Practitioner and property rights, 253. See also Inde-
Gap and the Dilemma of Expertise and pendent sector; Nonprofit sector; Sector
Democracy,” 259-265 blurring; Third sector; Voluntary sector
Reviews: Architecture and the After-Life, Sloane, D. C., The Last Great Necessity:
167-183; The Commons: New Perspectives Cemeteries in American History, reviewed,
on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary 167-183
Action, 267-270; Contracting Lessons from Smith, D. H., “The Field of Nonprofit and
the U.S., 93-100; “Farmers and Ranch- Voluntary Action Research: Then and
ers,” 271-273; Japanese Corporate Phil- Now,” 197-200; “Public Benefit and
anthropy, 189-191; The Last Great Member Benefit Nonprofit, Voluntary
Necessity: Cemeteries in American History, Groups,” 53-68
167-183; Order Without Law: How Society: civil, 123-124, 133-143; macro/
Neighbors Settle Disputes, 271-273; micro orders of, 122-123, 132-133;
“Review Essay: The Scholar-Practitioner monocultural image, 140-141; and
Gap and the Dilemma of Expertise and state, 123-124. See also Civic culture;
Democracy,” 259-265; “The Rich Are Communities
Always with Us,” 267-270; Variations on Sorkin, M., Variations on a Theme Park: The
a Theme Park: The New American City and New American City and the End of Public
the End of Public Space, 167-183; Who Space reviewed, 167-183
Benefits from the Nonprofit Sector? Sorting: entrepreneurial, 21, 26-27;
184-188 patron, 21
383
Stanfield, J. H., Il, “African American Tra- posium, 219-238
ditions of Civic Responsibility,” 137-153 “Usable Knowledge: A Symposium,”
Stanley, M. B., review by, 267-270; “The 219-239
Rich Are Always with Us,” 267-270
State. See Government
Steinberg, R., “Public Policy and the Per- V
formance of Nonprofit Organizations: A
General Framework,” 13-31; “The Role Van Til, J., “ARNOVA and Its Journal:
of the Nonprofit Enterprise’ in 1993: Some Reflections,” 201-205
Hansmann Revisited,” 297-316 Variations on a Theme Park: The New Amer-
Sundeen, R. A., “Response of Community ican City and the End of Public Space
Organizations to the Civil Unrest in Los reviewed, 167-183
Angeles,” 357-373 Voluntarism: moral basis, 36—39; and reli-
gious beliefs, 35-40, 46, 48-49; and
sociodemographic characteristics, 3-40.
¥ See also Voluntary groups; Volunteerism
Voluntary groups, 53-56. See also Volun-
Tax exemption: and contract failure theory, tarism; Voluntary organizations; Volun-
312-313; hospital, 308; and nondistrib- teerism
ution noncompliance, 302; and private Voluntary organizations: national govern-
party benefits, 299; rationale, 306 mental and community (study),
Taxation: breaks, 22, 23-24; Japanese, 124-135; United Kingdom, 241-255.
laws, 190; and member benefit non- See also Voluntarism; Voluntary groups;
profit, policy, 15-17, 225-226; non- Volunteerism
profit groups, 55, 65 Voluntary sector: defined, 247; nature,
Third-party government, 223 246-247; reasons for existence, 246;
Third sector: emergence of, in Peru, roots, 245-246; terminology, 245;
319-322; and informal cooperation, uniqueness, 247; United Kingdom, and
272; terminology, 245 boundary blurring, 241-255. See also
Third World, 317-319, 332. See also Peru Independent sector; Nonprofit sector;
Thompson, A. M., III, “Volunteers and Sector blurring; Third sector; Volun-
Their Communities: A Comparative tarism
Analysis of Volunteer Fire Fighters,” Volunteerism: and Afro-ethnic value orien-
155-166 tations, 144-146; devaluation, 35-36; in
Trust, and nonprofit organizations, 301 government, 252; historical religious
“Twenty Years of the Journal of Voluntary basis, 25; and long-term care ombuds-
Action Research/Nonprofit and Voluntary man programs, 70, 86-89; and religion
Sector Quarterly: An Assessment of Past (study), 40-49; rise of, 36 See also Vol-
Trends and Future Directions,” 207-218 untarism; Voluntary organizations
“Volunteers and Their Communities: A
Comparative Analysis of Volunteer Fire
U Fighters,” 155-166
United Kingdom: government contracting,
95-96, 98, 99-100; sector blurring (case WwW
example), 241-255
United Way, 278, 287, 293, 369 Who Benefits from the Nonprofit Sector?
Unity House (UH), Los Angeles, 362-363, reviewed, 184-188
365-366, 368 Widmer, C., “Role Conflict, Role Ambigu-
Usable knowledge: defined, 220-221; gains, ity, and Role Overload on Boards of
221-224; limitations, 224; and nonprofit Directors of Nonprofit Human Service
organizational research, 219-238; sym- Organizations,” 339-356
384
Wineburg, R. J., “Religious People, Reli-
gious Congregations, and Volunteerism
in Human Services: Is There a Link?”
33-51
Wolpert, J., “Decentralization and Equity in
Public and Nonprofit Sectors,” 281-296
z
Zero-profit constraint, 16