ebook img

Nonlinear Problems in Theoretical Physics: Proceedings of the IX G.I.F.T. International Seminar on Theoretical Physics, Held at Jaca, Huesca (Spain), June 1978 PDF

219 Pages·1979·1.23 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Nonlinear Problems in Theoretical Physics: Proceedings of the IX G.I.F.T. International Seminar on Theoretical Physics, Held at Jaca, Huesca (Spain), June 1978

NONLINEAR PROBLEMS IN CLASSICAL AND QUANTUMELECTRODYNAMICS A.O. Barut The Univers i ty of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 Table of Contents Page I . Introduct ion 2 I I . Classical R e l a t i v i s t i c Electron Theory 2 I I i o Quantum Theory of Se l f - l n te rac t ion 5 Other Remarkable Solutions of Nonlinear Equations 10 Some Related Problems 11 References 13 NONLINEAR PROBLEMS IN CLASSICAL AND QUANTUMELECTRODYNAMICS A. O. Barut The Univers i ty of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 I . INTRODUCTION We present here a discussions of the non- l inear problems ar is ing due to se l f - f i e l d of the e lectron, both in c lassical and quantum electrodynamics. Because of some shortcomings of the conventional quantumelectrodynamics 11 an attempt has been made to carry over the nonperturbative rad ia t ion react ion theory of c lassical electrodynamics to quantum theory. The goal is to have an equation for the rad ia t ing and se l f - i n t e rac t i ng electron as a whole, in other words,an equation for the f i na l "dressed" electron. In addi t ion the theory and renormalizat ion terms are a l l f i n i t e . Each pa r t i c l e is described by a s ingle wave funct ion ~(x) moving under the inf luence of the s e l f - f i e l d as well as the f i e l d of a l l other par t i c les . In pa r t i cu la r , we dis cuss the completely covariant two-body equations in some de ta i l , and point out to some new remarkable solut ions of the non- l inear equations: These are the resonance states in the two-body problem due to the in terac t ion of the anomalous magnetic mo- ment of the par t i c le which become very strong at small distances. I I . CLASSICAL RELATIVISTIC ELECTRON THEORY The motion of charged par t ic les are not governed by the simple set of Newton's equations as one usual ly assumes in the theory of dynamical systems, but by rather complicated non- l inear equations invo lv ing even th i rd order of der ivat ives. To see th is we begin with Lorentz's fundamental postulates of the electron theory of mat- te r : ( i ) Matter consists of a number of charged par t ic les moving under the inf luence of the electromagnetic f i e l d produced by a l l charged par t i c les . The equation of mo- t ion of the i th charged par t i c le is given by m Z ( i ) : e F (x) ZV ( i ) l (1) lx=z ( i ) ' where Z (S) is the worl 'd- l ine of the par t i c le in the Minkowski space M4 in terms of an invar ian t time parameter S (e.g. proper time) - the der ivat ives are with respect to S, and F is the to ta l electromagnetic f i e l d . ~v ( i i ) The to ta l electromagnetic f i e l d F obeys Maxwell's equations P~ F '~(x) = j (x) , (2) where j (x) is the tota l current of a l l the charges. For point charges we have j~(x) = ~ e (k) ~(k)~ ~(x - Z (k)) (3) We have in p r inc ip le a closed system of equations i f we have in addi t ion some model of matter t e l l i n g us how many charged par t ic les there are. These equations taken together give for each par t i c le i a h igh ly nonl inear equation because due to the term k = i in (3), F (x) in (1) depends nonl inear ly on Z ( i ) . This is the socalled s e l f - f i e l d of the U~it h pa r t i c le . Ac tua l ly th is term is even i n f i n i t e at X = Z ( i ) due to the factor ~(X-Zki)") . ' In pract ice th is i n f i n i t e term does not cause as much trouble as i t should-one simply drops such terms in f i r s t approximation. The reason for th is is that a major part of the s e l f - f i e l d is already taken into account as the i ne r t i a or mass of the par t i c le on the l e f t hand side of e q . ( i ) : in other words, the mass m in ( I ) is the socalled renormalized mass mR as I shal l explain in more de ta i l . Unfortunately not the whole of the s e l f - f i e l d is an i n e r t i a l term in the presence of external forces. Otherwise the whole electrodynamics would be a closed and consistent theory wi thout i n f i n i t e s . For a s ingle pa r t i c l e , i t is true by d e f i n i t i o n , that a l l the s e l f - f i e l d is in the form of an i n e r t i a l term because then the equation is mR~, = O. But the presence of other par t ic les modifies the cont r ibut ion of the s e l f - f i e l d to an i n e r t i a l term mRZ. And th is is r ea l l y the whole story and problem of electrodynamics, c lassical or quantummechanical: How much of the s e l f - f i e l d is ine r t ia? . Af ter the i n e r t i a l term has been subtracted, the remainnder gives r ise to observable ef fects which we ca l l rad ia t ive phenomena l i ke anomalous magnetic moment, Lamb s h i f t , etc. I w i l l now show f i r s t how th is is done in c lassical electrodynamics, and the existence of nonl inear rad ia t ive phenomena l i ke anomalous magnetic moment and Lamb shCft even in c lassical mechanics. Let us separate in Eq.(1) the se l f f i e l d term: moZ~ = e~ FeXt(x) Z~ + eFself(x)pv ~v (4) ~v x=z where I have introduced a parameter ~(~=1) in order to study the l i m i t ~ ÷ 0 for a free pa r t i c l e . The f i r s t term on the r i gh t hand side of (4) is f i n i t e , but the se- cond term becomes i n f i n i t e at X=Z. By various procedures one can however study the st ructure of th is term 121. The resu l t is as fo l lows. The s e l f - f i e l d term in (4) can be wr i t t en , using (3), as a sum of two terms e 2 - ~÷olim2 --~-Z~ + ~ e2 (Z"" + ~ 2 ) (5) Here Z~ depends on x as we l l , Zp = Z (S,X)... The f i r s t term is an i n e r t i a l part which we wr i te as -6m Z and bring i t to the l e f t hand side of (4). We shal l now "renormalize" eq.(4) such that for x ÷ 0 we have the free par t i c le eq. m~ Z = O. The renormalizat ion procedure is not unambiguous: we have to know to what form we want to b r ing our e q u a t i o n s . The above r equ i r emen t f o r x ÷ 0 g ives us the f o l l o w i n g f i n a l equation mR ~ = e~ Fext.(x)~v ~v +2~ e 2 (Z"" + ~ 2 ) _°LI '2e2 ('~ ÷ ~ "~2) , (6) ~ x=O mR = mo + 6m Had we not subtacted the las t term, a "free" pa r t i c l e (~ = O) would be governed by a complicated equation, and that is not how mass is defined. Also, eq.(6) , shows without the las t term the pecul iar phenomena of preaccelerat ion and socalled run away solut ions 131whichhave bothered a l o t of people up to present time. The las t term in (6) el iminates these problems. The nonl inear term in (6) has a l l the correct physical and mathematical propeL t ies : I ) ? Z~ = O, where r = C (i" ÷ Z 22), 2) I t gives correct rad ia t ion formula and energy balance. 3) I t is a non-perturbative exact resu l t . I t has moreover, the physical i n te rp re ta t ion as Lamb-shift and anomalous magnetic moment. These can be seen by considering external Coulomb or magnetic f i e lds and evaluat ing i t e r a t i v e l y the e f fec t of the rad ia t ion react ion term 141. The c lassical theory can be extended to par t i c les with spin 151. The spin va- r iab les are best described today using quant i t ies forming a Grassman algebra 161. The main resu l t , except for addi t ional terms, is the same type non- l inear behaviour ra- d ia t ion term as in eq.(6). Some so lu t ions of the rad ia t i ve equations w i th spin are known 171. They exh i - b i t much of the t yp ica l e r r a t i c behavior of the t r a j ec to r y around an average t r a j e ~ to ry which we know from the Dirac equation as "z i t terbewegung". Conversely, the c lass ica l l i m i t of the Dirac equation is not a sp in less p a r t i c l e , but a p a r t i c l e w i th a c lass i ca l spin. Thus the spin of the e lec t ron must be an essent ia l feature of the s t ruc tu re of the e lec t ron (not j u s t an inessent ia l add i t i on ) . I I I . QUANTUM THEORY OF SELF-INTERACTION We see thus tha t the e lec t ron 's equation of motion is fundamental ly non- l i near . When we go over to quantum mechanics we do not quant ize the " r ad i a t i ng , s e l f - i n t e - rac t ing e lec t ron" but f i r s t the free e lec t ron . Let us compare the c lass ica l and quantum equations p a r a l l e l y : m Z = e ~ Fext ' (x=Z)Z ~ + e Fsel f (x=Z) ZU o p ~ p~ ( - i y p ~p - m)~ = e yUA (x) ¢,(x) + ? , (7) o r , n o n - r e l a t i v i s t i c a l l y and fo r A = O, ~2 (i~i ~ - ~ A ) ~ = U ~ + ? (8) We see that in the standard wave mechanics the non l inear terms coming from s e l f - f i e l d have been omit ted, and a renormalized mass have been used. But th i s is only an approximation. Hence we wish now to complete the wave equations by the inc luss ion of the s e l f - f i e l d terms. Nonl inear terms have been added to (7) and (8) in order to have s o l i t o n - l i k e so lu t ions 181, 191. I should l i ke to discuss here the non- l i near terms in the stan- dard theory, thus w i thou t in t roduc ing any new parameters. We consider the basic framework of Lorentz, eqs . (1 ) - ( 3 ) , but when the e lec t ron is described by a Dirac f i e l d ~(x) : ( - i y P ~ - mo) ~ : eyP~(x)A (x) (9) F v '~ (x ) = j (x) = e~(x)y ~(x) . (10) In the gauge Au = O, we can e l iminate A (x) from these equations and obtain the non- l i near i n t e g r o d i f f e r e n t i a l equations ( - i y u ~ - mo ) @(x) = I f we work with localized functions always, the theory, including renormaliza tion procedure, is f in i te , and nonperturbative; i t describes a dressed, radiating self-interacting particle. We consider now in a bit detail the two-body coupled equations for ~ and n: (y~P ml)~ = e yUA( 1)self e UA( 2) - i ~ ~ + i Y (~UPu - m2)q = e2~A(2)selfu n + e2~AJl) with (15) A(1)(x)u = e I Idy D(x-y) ~(y)yu~(y) A(2)(x)u = e2 idy D(x-y) ~(y)~ q(y) We shall bring these equations into a manageable radial form using the ansatz r ( i ) t -iL m #(i)(x ) = ~ #~i)(~)e (16) n where n labels the quantum numbers (En,J,M,K) and l i gn( i ) ( r ) ~ i ) ( ~ i ~ , ~JiM( ~) ~ ~CJ M Y~(~)× ~ , (17) Im;½ with these substitutions, and d4k e- ikx (18) D(x) = - ~ k2 +i~ one obtains after much computations the coupled radial equations 1101 2 df s Ks-1 l e l ~ - = dr' ( r , r ' ) dr r fs + (Es-ml)gs 2 - ~ 7 Es=Em-En+Er j VlEnEm n.m.l x I gr gn* gm' -T1n msr + f 'n* f 'm T~ 'm'sr + f r g'n* f 'm -T2n m' sr' f'*n gm' T~ 'msr' + 2i7 erle 22 s>Em En+Er fd r' V1EnEm ( r . r ' ) { gr -L,e*n em,~ln 1m sr + H-n, *H-m,T-1 n 'm'sr + fr e~* dm' T2n m'sr' _ dn. em' Tn2 'msr' K + 1 2 r dgs + s 1 el > r d--r- r gs - (Es + m) fs = - 27 r 2 dr ' VIEnE ( r , r ' ) Es=Em-En+Er m If r gn* gm-1 + f'*n f'm Tn1 m sr - gr gn'* f'm -2Tnm's'r-fn*gm' Tn'ms2 I 1 ele2> i { ~-e,.e,Tnms'r'+d,.d,T n'm's'r' 27 r 2 dr' V1 E E ( r , r ' ) f r n m 1 n m 1 Es=Em-En+Er n m - gr eL ~* d' mnm's'r d '* e' Tn'ms'r m'2 n m'2 ' f ' = f ( r ' ) , g' = ( r ' ) , etc. (.19) There are two similar equations for e r and d r . Here the Kernels V are known integrals f= k2dk j~ (k r ) j~ (kr ' ) ( r , r ' ) = - 17 r2r'2 (12o) V~EnEm o (En-Em)2- k2 + i 1 En ÷ Em 1 i 3/2 r< ~+~ , T2~+---- ~ (r<r>) (~) T 1 and T2 are known functions of Clebsch-Gordon coeff icients. The terms on the r i gh t hand side are the various in terac t ion and rad ia t ive po- t en t i a l s . To see these more c lear ly we special ize to the s tat ionary Is -s ta te (of positronium, for example): I = 0 , K = - I , a l l J = 1/2, etc. Then d-fr + ~2 f + (El - ml) g = 21~ rI 2 g Id r' VOEIE(1r , r ' ) x e (g 'g ' * + f ' * f ' ) + ele 2 (e '*e ' + d ' *d ' ) - ~-~ ~- f Id r ' ( r , r ' ) × e21 f ' g ' - e l e 2 d ' e ' (21) and s im i l a r l y the other equations. We shall refer to the f i r s t term as " e l e c t r i c " , to the second term as "magnetic" po ten t ia l , because they are mul t ip l ied by g and f , respect ively. One can see by e x p l i c i t ca lcu lat ion that the contr ibut ion of the second par- t i c l e , also in s-state, to the f i r s t gives an e lec t r i c po ten t ia l , in the l i m i t r ÷ ~ , ele 2 - - g + . . . . ( 2 2 ) 4~r as we have noted ea r l i e r , and as r ÷ 0 YZ4~-m-- ~g = const, g. (22') The magnetic potent ia l behaves l i ke 1 2 y + l ele2 f , as r ÷ ~ 8m 3 r 2 (23) 1 (Z~) 3 m2 - 3 4~y(2¥- I ) r f , as r ÷ O I f the second par t i c le is heavy for example, we can use the Coulomb potent ia l only and obtain 10 2 df K-I e eI >r dr r f + (E-m - A~--~) g = r2 g VOEE ( r , r ' ) (g'*g' + f ' * f , ) _ ~ 4K2 f I o~ d r 'V iEE ( r , r ' ) f ' g ' 1 - 2e7~ ~I F ( r ) f + G ( r ) g - Vmf + Veg (24) s im i l a r l y for the other equations. Here we introduced the e lec t r i c and magnetic form factors G(r) and F(r ) , res- pect ive ly . The magnetic form factor F(r) has the form (which we shall need la te r ) ~ - 2 r / r 0 F(r) = C dr' VIEE(r,r ' ) f ( r ' ) g ( r ' ) = C ' ( l - e ( l + p o l y n ( 2 r / r o ) ) , (25) i 0 thus star ts from zero and approaches a constant for large distances, a behavior which we know from perturbation theory. Let us compare this resu l t with the Dirac equations for the electron with an anomalous magnetic moment a in the Coulomb f i e l d df K-1 f + (E - m - ele 2 ) g = a ele 2 f (26) dr T ~ 2mr2 which is of course va l id for r ÷ ~, hence the i den t i f i ca t i on of the anomalous mag- net ic moment in teract ion. The anomalous magnetic moment has also an interact ion with the s e l f - f i e l d . S~ m i l a r l y , we have addi t iona l e lec t r i c potent ia ls , and, as we see from (21), a charge renormalization due to the term (e /4~) ~ g. But before using these values, we must renormalize the self-energy ef fects. In fac t , from the integrals evaluated with the t r i a l Coulomb type functions, for example we must subtract the i r values when e 2 ÷ O, the free par t ic le values. Other Remarkable Solutions of Nonlinear Equations The Dirac equation in Coulomb f i e l d without the rad iat ive terms on the r igh t hand side, has the well-known discrete spectrum and the continium, the complete set of solutions is known. We get a h int for a new class of solutions with radia- t i ve terms corresponding to sharp resonances from eq.(24). Eliminating one of the

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.