ebook img

Non-microbial etiology: foreign body reaction maintaining post-treatment apical periodontitis PDF

21 Pages·2004·1.88 MB·English
by  
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview Non-microbial etiology: foreign body reaction maintaining post-treatment apical periodontitis

EndodonticTopics2003,6,114–134 CopyrightrBlackwellMunksgaard PrintedinDenmark.Allrightsreserved ENDODONTICTOPICS2003 Non-microbial etiology: foreign body reaction maintaining post- treatment apical periodontitis P.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR Thepolymerasechainreaction(PCR)isaneleganttechnologyforfaithfullyreplicatingandamplifyingthemaster moleculeoflife,butavalidscientificprocedureremainsessentialwithoutwhichtheresultingdatahaveonlyvery limitedvalue.Thepresenceofmicrobialinfectioninthecomplexapicalrootcanalsystemisthemajorcauseofpost- treatment apical periodontitis in well-treated teeth. However, in rare cases, non-microbial etiological factors, locatedbeyondtherootcanalsystem(withintheinflamedperiapicaltissues),canmaintainthediseaseinroot-filled teeth. These factors include foreign body reaction to exogenous materials or endogenous cholesterol crystals, a cystic condition of the lesion and extraradicular actinomycotic infections. This article addresses foreign body reactionattheperiapex,asapathobiologicalfactor thatmaintainspost-treatmentapicalperiodontitis. Apicalperiodontitisisessentiallyadiseaseofrootcanal because of the complexity of the root canal system infection (1–3).Therational treatmentofthedisease, formed by a main and several accessory canals, their therefore, has been by elimination or a substantial apical ramifications and anastomoses (15, 16) that reductionof theinfectiousagentsfrom the root canal cannotbeinstrumented,cleaned,medicatedandfilled and the exclusion of further pulp–canal infection by with existing instruments, materials and techniques. root filling. When the root canal treatment is carried Further, there are extraradicular etiological factors – out properly, healing of the periapical lesion usually located beyond the root canals, within the inflamed followswithboneregeneration,whichischaracterized periapical tissue – that can interfere with post- by a gradual reduction of the radiolucency on follow- treatmenthealingofapicalperiodontitis. up radiographs (4–13). Nevertheless, due to several The etiology of post-treatment apical periodontitis, reasons, complete healing or reduction of the apical persisting as asymptomatic radiolucencies in well- radiolucencydoes notoccur inallroot-filledteeth.In treated teeth, has been ill characterized. Early investi- certain cases, apical periodontitis still persists post- gations of periapical biopsies (17–21) have been treatment, a condition commonly referred to as limitedbytheuseofunsuitablespecimens,inappropri- ‘endodontic failures’. It is widely acknowledged that atemethodsandcriteria ofanalysisthatfailed toyield such post-treatment apical periodontitis occurs when relevant etiological information. Examples of proce- rootcanaltreatmenthasnotadequatelycontrolledand dural limitations include: light microscopy without eliminatedtheinfection.Problems,mostlyoftechnical correlativeelectronmicroscopicanalysis,evaluationof nature,thatleadtopost-treatmentapicalperiodontitis randomratherthanserialsections,paraffinembedding include:inadequateasepticcontrol, poor access cavity rather thanresin embeddingofspecimensandassign- design, missed canals, inadequate instrumentation, ment of overly broad criteria such as ‘bacteria and/or debridement and leaking temporary or permanent debris’,whichcanencompassmanypotentialetiologi- fillings(14).Evenwhenthehigheststandardsandthe cal agents. During the 1990s, a series of carefully moststringentproceduresarefollowed,apicalperiod- conducted investigations, which have taken into ontitismaystillpersistasasymptomaticradiolucencies, account appropriate case selection and methods, have 114 Non-microbial etiology:foreignbodyreaction shownthattherearefourbiologicalfactorsthatleadto surgery and the sampling procedures. Tissue samples asymptomatic post-treatment apical periodontitis. thus contaminated with intraradicular microbes can Theseareasfollows: givepositiveresultsforthepresenceofanextraradicular (i) intraradicularinfectionpersistingintheapicalroot infection. This may explain the renewed reporting of canalsystem(22); various microbes in the inflamed periapical tissue of (ii) extraradicular infection, mostly in the form of asymptomaticpost-treatmentlesionsbyculture(36,37) periapicalactinomycosis(23–26); and molecular techniques (38, 39) in spite of careful (iii) foreignbodyreactiontoextrudedrootcanalfilling asepticsurgicalandsamplingprocedures. (27), other foreign materials or endogenous Apartfromtheproblemofpossiblecontaminationof cholesterolcrystals(28)and the samples with intraradicular microbes and the (iv) cysticlesions(28). inabilityofthetechniquetodistinguishbetweenviable It must be emphasized that of all these factors, andnon-viableorganisms,italsodoesnotdifferentiate persistentinfectioninthecomplexrootcanalsystemis betweenmicrobesinphagocyticcellsfromextracellular the major cause of post-treatment apical periodontitis microorganisms in periapical tissues. In summary, the inwell-treatedteeth(22,29–31). problemofhowtosampletheinflamedperiapicaltissue In a very recent investigation using a molecular and keep it separate from what is on and in the root genetic technique (32), all the 22 investigated teeth apex is complex. While molecular genetic techniques with ‘no symptoms’ but unresolved post-treatment offerprecisionandsophistication,theydonotsolvethe apical radiolucencies revealed bacterial DNA in intrar- primary problem of how to sample accurately the adicular samples. In this context, the importance of periapicalgranulomawithoutcontamination. selecting appropriate cases for investigation cannot be Inrarecases,independentofalow-gradepresenceor overemphasized. As for instance, five of the 22 teeth a total absence of intraradicular microbes, exogenous ‘had temporary (coronal) restorations’, a factor that materials trapped in the periapical area (27, 40), would allow bacterial re-infection of the canals by endogenouscholesterolcrystalsdepositedinperiapical possiblecoronalmicroleakage.Apartfromthepossible tissuesandacysticlesioncanperpetuateapicalperiod- re-infectionand/orcontaminationthatcanoccureven ontitis after root canal treatment. The purpose of this in teeth with permanent coronal restorations, the articleistoprovideacomprehensivereviewonaforeign molecular technique does not differentiate between bodyreactionattheperiapexasapathobiologicalfactor viable and non-viable organisms, but can pick up a thatcanmaintainpost-treatmentapicalperiodontitis. minuscule amount of bacterial DNA that is amplified using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (33), resulting in an exponential accumulation of several Exogenous materials causing foreign millioncopiesoftheoriginalDNAfragments.Thedata body reaction at the periapex derivedfromthemoleculartechnique(32)requirevery Root-fillingmaterials,otherendodonticmaterials(27, careful interpretation in the light of the technique’s 40) and food particles (41) may reach the periapical many advantages and numerous limitations, so as to tissues and cause a foreign body reaction that may be avoid reaching an overestimating conclusion that all associated with radiolucency remaining asymptomatic post-treatment apical periodontitis is caused by the formanyyears(27). presenceofintraradicularinfection. Even greater caution is needed to interpret the published data on the role of non-actinomycotic Gutta percha extraradicular infections in apical periodontitis affect- ing well root-filled teeth. In addition to the possible The most widely used solid root canal filling material ‘extraneous’ sources, contamination of apical tissue is commercially prepared from gutta percha (trans- samples with microbes from the infected root canal polyisoprene),thecoagulatedexudatefromPlaquium remainsaconcern.Thisisbecauseinfectiousagentslive guttatreeofAsiaorfromsimilarlatexderivedfromthe at the apical foramen of teeth affected by the primary Mimisops globsa tree of South America (42). Dental (34) and post-treatment apical periodontitis (22, 35). guttaperchaconesarecomposedofabout20%ofgutta Microbesinthatlocationcanbeeasilydislodgedduring percha, 60–75% zinc oxide and varying amounts of 115 Nair metal sulfates for radioopacity, waxes and coloring macrophages and giant cells. The accumulation of agents. Based on in vivo implantation experiments in macrophages in conjunction with the fine particles of animals, gutta percha cones are considered to be gutta percha is significant for the clinically observed biocompatible and well tolerated by human tissues impairmentinthehealingofapicalperiodontitis,when (43–45). However, this view has not been consistent teetharerootfilledwithexcessofguttapercha.Piecesof with the clinical observation that the presence of gutta gutta percha cones in periapical tissue can gradually perchainexcessisassociatedwithinterruptedordelayed fragment into fine particles that in turn can induce a healingoftheperiapex(4,6,9,11,27).Ingeneral,bulk typical foreign body reaction (27, 54, 55) and activate forms of sterile materials with smooth surfaces placed macrophages (56). The latter are known to release a within bone or soft tissue evoke a fibrous tissue battery of intercellular mediators that include proin- encapsulation, while particulate materials induce a flammatorycytokinesandmodulatorsthatareinvolved foreign body and chronic inflammatory reaction (46– inboneresorption(57–60). 50).Apartfromtheparticlesize,thechemicalcomposi- Further,commercialguttaperchaconesmaybecome tionofguttaperchaisalsoofsignificance.Leachingzinc contaminatedwithtissue-irritatingsubstancesthatcan oxide from gutta percha cones has been shown to be initiate a foreign body reaction at the periapex. In a cytotoxic in vitro (51, 52), tissue irritating in vivo and follow-upstudyofnineasymptomaticpersistentapical associatedwithadjacentinflammatoryreaction(53,54). periodontitis lesions that were removed as surgical Tissueresponsetoguttaperchawasspecificallystudied block biopsies and analyzed by correlative light and (54) using subcutaneously implanted Teflon cages in transmission electron microscopy, one biopsy (Fig. 3) which the gutta percha evoked two distinct types of revealedtheinvolvementofcontaminatedguttapercha tissue reaction. Large pieces of gutta percha were well (27).Theradiographiclesionpersistedasymptomatically encapsulatedbycollagenandthesurroundingtissuewas and grew in size during a decade of post-treatment freeofinflammation(Fig.1).Incontrast,fineparticles follow-up.Thelesionwascharacterizedbythepresence of gutta percha evoked an intense, localized tissue of vast numbers of multinucleate giant cells with response (Fig. 2), characterized by the presence of birefringent inclusion bodies (Fig. 4). In transmission Fig.1. Guinea-pigtissuereactiontoguttapercha(GP)by1monthaftersubcutaneousimplantation(a).Largepiecesof guttaperchaarewellencapsulatedbycollagenfibersthatrunparalleltothesurfaceoftheguttaperchaparticle.The interfaceoftheguttaperchaparticleandthehosttissue(arrow)ismagnifiedinstagesin(b,c).Thegapbetweenthe implantandthecollagencapsuleisartifactual.Notethenon-inflamed,healthysoftdelicateconnectivetissue.Original magnifications:(a)(cid:1)42;(b)(cid:1)80;(c)(cid:1)200. 116 Non-microbial etiology:foreignbodyreaction Fig.2. Disintegrated gutta percha particles that maintain post-treatment apical periodontitis. As clusters of fine particles(a,b)theyinduceintensecircumscribedtissuereaction(TR)around.Notethatthefineparticlesofguttapercha (GPinc,%ind)aresurroundedbynumerousmononuclearcells(MNC).Originalmagnifications:(a)(cid:1)20;(b)(cid:1)80; (c)(cid:1)750;(d)(cid:1)200.From:NairPNR.Pathobiologyoftheperiapex.In:CohenS,BurnsRC.eds.PathwaysofthePulp,8 edn.StLouis:Mosby,2002.Reproducedwithpermission. 117 Nair Fig.3. Twolongitudinalradiographs(insetanda)ofaroot-filledandperiapicallyaffectedleftcentralmaxillaryincisor ofa54-year-oldman.Thefirstradiograph(inset)takenimmediatelyafterrootfillingin1977showsasmallexcessfilling thatprotrudesintotheperiapex(arrowheadininset).Notetheexcessfillinghasdisappearedintheradiographtaken10 yearslater(arrowheadina)andshortlybeforesurgerywasperformed.Theapicalblock-biopsyremovedbysurgerydoes notshowanyexcessfillingasisevidentfromthemacrophotographofthedecalcifiedandaxiallysubdividedpieceofthe biopsy(b).RF,rootfilling;D,dentine;GR,granuloma.Originalmagnification(b)(cid:1)10.From(27).Reproducedwith permission. electron microscopy, the birefringent bodies were granuloma (63) and food-induced granuloma (64). found to be highly electron dense (Fig. 5). Energy- Pulse granuloma has been reported in lungs (65), dispersive X-ray microanalysis of the inclusion bodies stomach walls and peritoneal cavities (66). Experi- using scanning transmission electron microscopy mental lesions have been induced in animals by (STEM) revealed the presence of magnesium and intratracheal,intraperitonialandsubmucousintroduc- silicon (Fig. 6). These elements are presumably the tion of leguminous seeds (67, 68). Periapical pulse remnants of talc-contaminated gutta percha that granulomas areassociated with teeth grossly damaged protruded into the periapex and had been resorbed bycariesandwithahistoryofendodontictherapy(41, duringthefollow-upperiod. 69). Pulse granuloma is characterized by the presence of intensely iodine and periodic acid-Schiff positive hyaline rings/bodies surrounded by giant cells and Oral pulse granuloma inflammatorycells(41,68–70).Thecelluloseinplants Oral pulse granuloma is a distinct histopathological has been suggested to be the granuloma-inducing entity (61). It denotes a foreign body reaction to agent (67). However, leguminous seeds are the most particles of vegetable foods, particularly leguminous frequently involved vegetable in such granulomatous seeds such as peas, beans and lentils (pulses) that get lesions.Thisindicatesthatothercomponentsinpulses, lodgedintheoraltissues.Thelesionsarealsoreferred suchasantigenicproteinsandmitogenicphytohemag- toasthegiantcellhyalinangiopathy(61,62),vegetable glutinins, may also be involved in the pathological 118 Non-microbial etiology:foreignbodyreaction 119 Nair Fig.5. Low-magnificationtransmissionelectronmicrographshowingtheprofilesofseveralgiantcellswithintheapical periodontitisshowninFigs3and4.Notethepresenceofmanyslit-likeinclusionbodies(BB –BB ),whichcontaina 1 6 highlyelectron-densematerial.Thismaterialmayremainintactwithintheinclusionbodyormaybepushedawayfrom itsoriginalsite(BB )ormayappeardisintegrated(BB andBB )bythetissueprocessing.NotethelinesofartifactsAL, 2 3 4 whicharecreatedbyportionsoftheelectrondensematerialhavingbeencarriedawaybytheknife-edge,leavingtracts behind.Originalmagnification (cid:1)1880.From:(27).Reproducedwithpermission. tissue response (67). The pulse granulomas are endodontic procedures (41). However, the epidemio- clinically relevant because particles of vegetable foods logical incidence of pulse-induced post-treatment can reach the periapical tissues via root canals of teeth apicalperiodontitisisunknown,asonlytwosuchcases exposed to the oral cavity by trauma, caries or havebeenreportedintheliterature(41,70). 3 Fig.4. Abrightfieldphotomicrographofaplasticembeddedsemithin(2mmthick)sectionoftheapicalareashownin Fig.1b.Notethelargeapicalperiodontitislesion(AP)(a).Thesamefieldwhenviewedinpolarizedlights(b).Notethe birefringentbodiesdistributedthroughoutthelesion(b).Theapicalforamenismagnifiedin(c)andthedarkarrow- headedcellsin(c)arefurtherenlargedin(d).Notethebirefringence(BB)emergingfromslit-likeinclusionbodiesin multinucleated(N)giantcells.B,bone;D,dentin.Originalmagnifications:(a,b) (cid:1)23;(c)(cid:1)66;(d) (cid:1)330.From: Nair PNR. Pathology of apical periodontitis. In: Ørstavik D, PittFord TR. eds. Essential Endodontology. Oxford: Blackwell,1998. 120 Non-microbial etiology:foreignbodyreaction Cellulose granuloma nantly cellulose-containing materials that are used in endodonticpractice(71–74).Endodonticpaperpoints Cellulose granuloma is the term used specifically for are utilized for microbial sampling and drying of root pathological tissue reaction to particles of predomi- canals. Medicated cotton wool has been used in root 121 Nair canals as well. Particles of these thermo-sterilized these materials might have been co-existing with materials can easily dislodge or get pushed into the unidentified etiological agents such as the presence of periapical tissue (74) so as to induce a foreign body intraradicularinfectioninthosecases. reaction at the periapex. Therefore, extreme caution should be exercised during clinical manipulation of Endogenous substances and foreign endodonticpaperpoints(72).Thepresenceofcellulose body reaction fibers in periapical biopsies with a history of previous Tissue-irritating endogenous substances are mainly of endodontictreatmenthasbeenreported(71–73).The crystallinefineparticularnature.Bothendogenousand overallincidenceofcellulose-inducedprimaryorpost- exogenous crystals induce a pathological tissue re- treatmentapicalperiodontitisisunknown.Thismaybe sponse by triggering the cytokine-network-mediated partly due to the inconspicuous nature of cellulose inflammation, hard-tissue resorption and soft-tissue material in periapical biopsies and the difficulty in damage. Endogenous crystalline substances that have identifying them without the application of special beenshowntocausepathogenictissuereactioninclude stains or micro techniques. In two histopathological monosodium urate (gout), calcium phosphate dihy- investigations in which 13 biopsies of post-treatment drate (pseudogout), basic calcium phosphate (hydro- apicalperiodontitiswereexamined,alldisplayedmate- xylapatite) and cholesterol. Although the presence of rial consistent with cellulose fibers (71, 72). The cholesterolcrystalsinapicalperiodontitishaslongbeen endodontic paper points and cotton wool consist of observedtobeacommonhistopathologicalfeature,its cellulose, which is neither digested by humans nor etiologicalsignificancetopost-treatmentapicalperiod- degraded by the body cells. They remain in tissues for ontitishasnotyetbeenfullyappreciated. long periods of time (73) and evoke a foreign body reaction around them. The particles, when viewed in Biology of cholesterol polarized light, reveal birefringence due to the regular structuralarrangementofthemoleculeswithincellulose Cholesterol (75) is a lipid of the steroid family that is (71). Paper points infected with intraradicular micro- presentinallanimaltissues.Thenameisderivedfrom organismscanprojectthroughtheapicalforameninto Chole-stereos meaning ‘bile-solid’ because of its occur- theperiapicaltissue(Fig.7)andallowabiofilmtogrow renceingallstones.Cholesterolwasthefirststeroidto aroundthepaperpoint(Fig.7c,d).Thiswillsustainand have its structure elucidated. It has the characteristic intensifypost-treatmentapicalperiodontitis. core of the ‘cyclopentanoperhydrophenanthrene’ ring (Fig. 8). Cholesterol is an important component of animal cell membranes and is a determinant of Other foreign materials membrane properties. It is abundant in ‘membrane- Amalgam,endodonticsealercementsandcalciumsalts rich’ tissues (myelin) and cells (secretory cells) and is derived from periapically extruded calcium hydroxide the precursor of bile acids, provitamin D3 and several {Ca(OH)2} also occur in periapical tissues. In a hormones(76). histological and X-ray microanalytical investigation of 29apicalbiopsies,31%ofthespecimenswerefoundto Cholesterol in health contain materials compatible with amalgam and endodontic sealer components (40). However, an Cholesterol is essential to life and most of the body etiological significance of these materials has not been cholesterol is produced in the liver. The entire body conclusively shown by experiments. It is possible that requirementofcholesterolcanbemetbyendogenous 3 Fig.6. High-magnificationtransmissionelectronmicrograph(c)oftheintactbirefringentbodylabeledBB inFig.5. 1 Notethedistinctdelimitingmembranearoundthebirefringentbody(BB).Energy-dispersiveX-raymicroanalysisofthe electrondensematerialcarriedoutinscanningtransmissionelectronmicroscope(STEM:carriedoutatthepointwhere thetwohairlinesperpendiculartoeachothercrossintheleftinset)revealedthepresenceofsilicon(Si),magnesium(Mg) andlead(Pb)in(a),whereasanothersiteintheneighboringcytoplasmofthesamegiantcell(arrowheadintheright inset)doesnotshowthepresenceofSiandMg(b).Leadanduranium(U)areusedforsectioncontrasting,andemission incopper(Cu)isfromthesection-supportinggridmadeofcopper.Originalmagnification (cid:1)11000;insets (cid:1)3300. From(27).Reproducedwithpermission. 122 Non-microbial etiology:foreignbodyreaction Fig.7. Amassivepaper-pointgranulomaaffectingaroot-canal-treatedhumantooth(a).Thedemarcatedareain(b)is magnifiedin(c)andthatinthesameisfurthermagnifiedin(d).Notethetipofthepaperpoint(FB)projectingintothe apicalperiodontitislesionandthebacterialplaque(BP)adheringtothesurfaceofthepaperpoint.RT,roottip;EP, epithelium; PC, plant cell. Original magnifications: (a)(cid:1)20; (b)(cid:1)40; (c)(cid:1)60; (d)(cid:1)150. From: Nair PNR. Pathobiology of the periapex. In: Cohen S, Burns RC. eds. Pathways of the Pulp, 8th edn. St Louis: Mosby, 2002. Reproducedwithpermission. 123

Description:
This article addresses foreign body reaction at the periapex, as a pathobiological factor that maintains post-treatment apical periodontitis.
See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.