ebook img

New Zealand English grammar, fact or fiction?: a corpus-based study in morphosyntactic variation PDF

228 Pages·1998·17.912 MB·English
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview New Zealand English grammar, fact or fiction?: a corpus-based study in morphosyntactic variation

NEW ZEALAND ENGLISH GRAMMAR FACT OR FICTION? Varieties of English Around the World General Editor: Edgar W. Schneider Department of English & American Studies University of Regensburg Universitätsstraße 31 D-93053 REGENSBURG Germany [email protected] Editorial Assistants: Alexander Kautzsch, Melanie Schäfer (Regensburg) Editorial Board: Michael Aceto (Puerto Rico); Laurie Bauer (Wellington) J.K. Chambers (Toronto); Jenny Cheshire (London) Manfred Görlach (Cologne); Barbara Horvath (Sydney) Jeffrey Kallen (Dublin); Thiru Kandiah (Singapore) Vivian de Klerk (Grahamstown, South Africa) William A. Kretzschmar, Jr. (Athens, GA) Caroline Macafee (Aberdeen); Michael Montgomery (Columbia, SC) Peter Mühlhäusler (Adelaide); Peter Patrick (Washington, DC) GENERAL SERIES Volume 23 Marianne Hundt New Zealand English Grammar - Fact or Fiction? A corpus-based study in morphosyntactic variation NEW ZEALAND ENGLISH GRAMMAR FACT OR FICTION? A CORPUS-BASED STUDY IN MORPHOSYNTACTIC VARIATION MARIANNE HUNDT University of Freiburg JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY AMSTERDAM/PHILADELPHIA The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of bo American National Standard for Information Sciences — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hundt, Marianne. New Zealand English grammar, fact or fiction? : a corpus-based study in morphosyntactic variation / Marianne Hundt. p. cm. - (Varieties of English around the world. General series, ISSN 0172-7362 ; v. 23) Includes bibliographical references (p. ) and index. 1. English language-New Zealand-Grammar. 2. English language-Variation-New Zealand. 3. English language-New Zealand-Discourse analysis. I. Title. II. Series. PE3602.H86 1998 427' 993--dc21 98-23346 ISBN 90 272 4881 8 (Eur.) / 1 55619 721 7 (US) (alk. paper) CIP © Copyright 1998 - John Benjamins B.V. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. John Benjamins Publishing Co. · P.O.Box 75577 · 1070 AN Amsterdam · The Netherlands John Benjamins North America · P.O.Box 27519 · Philadelphia, PA 19118-0519 · USA To Markus vii Contim ts List of Figures and Tables X Abbreviations xii Preface xiii 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Previous research 1 1.1.1 NZE and its relation to other national varieties 3 1.1.2 NZE and language change 6 1.1.3 Stylistic variation within NZE 6 1.2 Aim and scope of the study 7 2. Theoretical and methodological foundations 9 2.1 The notion of'standard' in English 9 2.2 International English and national standards 11 2.3 Variation studies and corpus linguistics 19 2.3.1 Corpus linguistics and statistics 21 2.3.2 The corpora - sampling principles 22 2.3.3 The corpora - corpus size 24 2.3.4 Corpus linguistics and variation studies: An integrated approach 25 2.3.5 Corpus linguistics and elicitation tests 26 3. Morphology 29 3.1 Irregular Verbs 29 3.1.1 Burn, learn and dream in New Zealand, British and American English 29 3.1.2 Regularization of irregular past tense forms: A comparison of New Zealand, Australian and British English 31 3.1.3 Prove 33 3.1.4 Gotten 36 3.2 Comparison of adjectives 38 3.2.1 Periphrastic comparison of monosyllabic adjectives 39 3.2.2 Double comparatives 41 .3.3 The s-genitive 42 3.4 Summary 49 4 Syntax 51 viii 4.1 Have 51 4.1.1 Corpus data - occurrences of have 52 4.1.2 Have to with modal meaning 53 4.1.3 Full verb have 55 4.2 Shall and will 58 4.3 Marginal modals 61 4.3.1 Need and dare 61 4.3.2 Ought (to) 65 4.3.3 Used to 68 4.4 Aspect 69 4.4.1 Preterite and perfect 70 4.4.2 The progressive 75 4.5 A note on the get-passive 78 4.6 Collective nouns 80 4.6.1 Regional variation 80 4.6.2 Verbal, pronominal and mixed concord 81 4.6.3 Diachronic change and stylistic variation 81 4.6.4 Corpus data 82 4.7 The mandative subjunctive 89 4.7.1 Comparing NZE with BrE and AmE 92 4.7.2 Mandative constructions in NZE and AusE 96 4.8 For-to-infmitive constructions 98 4.9 Summary 101 5 Lexico-grammar 105 5.1 Different 105 5.2 Protest and appeal 108 5.3 Chance and provide 113 5.4 Farewell 114 5.5 Screen 115 5.6 Look 118 5.7 Summary 121 6. Statistical significance and linguistic relevance 123 6.1 Because 124 6.2 Would 124 6.3 Not 125 6.4 Summary 130 7. Conclusion 133 7.1 Regional variation and diachronic change 133 ix 7.2 Regional and stylistic variation 135 7.3 On the role of frequency as a defining criterion for variety-specific variants 137 7.4 New Zealand English - a separate national standard? 138 7.5 Representativeness of the sample and the validity of results 140 7.6 Results of elicitation tests and findings based on corpus data 141 References 145 Appendix 1 159 Appendix 2 177 Appendix 3 185 Appendix 4 191 Index 209 χ Figures and tables Figures 2.1 NZE and its relation to BrE, AmE and AusE 16 2.2 NZE and a pluricentric model of English: Synchronic perspective 17 2.3 NZE and a pluricentric model of English: Diachronic perspective 18 7.1 Locating NZE in relation to other varieties with respect to ongoing change 135 Tables 2.1 Orthography: per cent vs. percent 20 2.2 Size of the press sections 23 2.3 Per cent vs. percent in a British and an American newspaper 24 3.1 Irregular and regular past tense forms of bur, learn and dream 30 3.2 Preterite vs. past participle: burnt and learnt 30 3.3 Functional analysis of burned and burnt 31 3.4 Irregular and regular past tense forms in NZE, AusE and BrE 32 3.5 Proved vs. proven 34 3.6 Suffixation and periphrastic comparison of monosyllabic adjectives 39 3.7 The s-genitive in LOBpress and FLOBpress: Significance levels 44 3.8 The s-genitive: Corpus evidence 45 4.1 The verb have 52 4.2 Have (got) to 53 4.3 Full verb have in negations and interrogatives 56 4.4 Full verb have in interrogatives and negations in the WCNZE 56 4.5 Shall and will 59 4.6 Dare 62 4.7 Need 63 4.8 Ought (to) 66 4.9 Ought (to) in larger newspaper corpora 66 4.10 Progressive forms: Overall frequencies 75 4.11 Future tense: Progressive vs. simple form 77 4.12 Going to-future 77 4.13 Get-passives 78

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.