World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures Bohumil Doboš New Middle Ages Geopolitics of Post-Westphalian World World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures Series Editors Christopher Chase-Dunn, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA Barry K. Gills, Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Leonid E. Grinin, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia Andrey V. Korotayev, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia This series seeks to promote understanding of large-scale and long-term processes of social change, in particular the many facets and implications of globalization. It critically explores the factors that affect the historical formation and current evolution of social systems, on both the regional and global level. Processes and factors that are examined include economies, technologies, geopolitics, institutions, conflicts, demographic trends, climate change, global culture, social movements, global inequalities, etc. Building on world-systems analysis, the series addresses topics such as globalization from historical and comparative perspectives, trends in global inequalities, core-periphery relations and the rise and fall of hegemonic core states, transnational institutions, and the long-term energy transition. This ambitious interdisciplinary and international series presents cutting-edge research by social scientists who study whole human systems and is relevant for all readers interested in systems approaches to the emerging world society, especially historians, political scientists, economists, sociologists, geographers and anthropologists. All titles in this series are peer-reviewed. More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/15714 Bohumil Doboš New Middle Ages Geopolitics of Post-Westphalian World Bohumil Doboš Institute of Political Studies Charles University Prague 5, Czech Republic ISSN 2522-0985 ISSN 2522-0993 (electronic) World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures ISBN 978-3-030-58680-5 ISBN 978-3-030-58681-2 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58681-2 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Contents 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Conceptual Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.1 Geopolitics and Neomedieval Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.2 Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.2.1 State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.2.2 Unrecognized State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.2.3 Non-State Actor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.2.4 Sovereignty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.2.5 Terra Nullius and Black Spots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.3 Systemic Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.3.1 Medieval System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.3.2 Westphalian System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2.3.3 Globalization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3 New Middle Ages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.1 Hedley Bull and the Birth of Neomedievalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.1.1 Regional Integration of States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.1.2 Disintegration of States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.1.3 Restoration of Private Violence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1.4 Transnational Organizations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 3.1.5 Technological Unification of the World . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.2 Post-Cold War Reincarnation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.2.1 Jörg Friedrichs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.2.2 Philip Cerny . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.2.3 Stephen Kobrin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.2.4 Jan Zielonka . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.2.5 Barry Buzan and Richard Little . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.2.6 Neil Winn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.2.7 John Rapley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.2.8 Phil Williams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.3 End of State System? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.3.1 Crumbling of State System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.3.2 Alternative Actors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 v vi Contents 3.4 Concept of the Three Worlds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.4.1 Durable Disorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 3.4.2 Chaotic Anarchy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.4.3 Westphalian System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.4.4 Relation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4 Analyzing the Global System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 4.1 Regions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 4.2 Research Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 4.2.1 Axis A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.2.2 Axis B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 5 Distribution of the Three Worlds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5.1 Regional Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5.1.1 The EU+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5.1.2 Balkans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 5.1.3 East Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 5.1.4 Russian Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 5.1.5 The Caucasus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 5.1.6 Central Asia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 5.1.7 Chinese Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 5.1.8 East Asia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 5.1.9 Southeast Asia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 5.1.10 Oceania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 5.1.11 Indian Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 5.1.12 AfPak . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 5.1.13 Iran . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.1.14 Turkey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 5.1.15 Larger Mesopotamia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 5.1.16 Gulf Monarchies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 5.1.17 Western Middle East . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 5.1.18 Northern Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 5.1.19 Northwest Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 5.1.20 Horn of Africa+ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 5.1.21 East Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 5.1.22 Central Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 5.1.23 South Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 5.1.24 West Africa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.1.25 North America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 5.1.26 Central America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 5.1.27 The Caribbean . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 5.1.28 Northern South America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 5.1.29 Southern South America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 5.2 Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Contents vii 6 Effects on the International System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 6.1 Adaptation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 6.1.1 Westphalian System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 6.1.2 Durable Disorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 6.1.3 Chaotic Anarchy. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 6.2 Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 6.2.1 Westphalian-Durable Disorder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 6.2.2 Westphalian-Chaotic Anarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 6.2.3 Durable Disorder-Chaotic Anarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 7 Impact on Selected Regions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 7.1 Adaptation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 7.1.1 Al-Shabaab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 7.1.2 People’s Republic of China . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 7.1.3 Facebook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 7.2 Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 7.2.1 EU-Russia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 7.2.2 EU-Sahel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 7.2.3 Turkey-Syria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 8 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151 List of Abbreviations AMISOM African Union Mission in Somalia AQAP Al Qaeda in Arab Peninsula ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations DRC Democratic Republic of Congo EAC East African Community ETA Euskadi Ta Askatasuna EU European Union FARC Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de Colombia FSI Fragile State Index FTA Free Trade Area GDPR General Data Protection Regulation ICU Islamic Court Union IORA Indian Ocean Rim Association IRA Irish Republican Army NAFTA North American Free Trade Agreement NATO North Atlantic Treaty Organization NGO Non-Governmental Organization OBOR One Belt One Road PKK Partiya Karkerên Kurdistanê (Kurdistan Worker’s Party) PRC People’s Republic of China PYD Partiya Yekîtiya Demokrat (United Democratic Party) RAF Red Army Faction SDF Syrian Democratic Forces UK United Kingdom UN United Nations USA United States of America VPN Virtual Private Network YPG Yekîneyên Parastina Gel (People’s Protection Forces) YPJ Yekîneyên Parastina Jin (Women’s Protection Forces) ix Introduction 1 The end of the Cold War introduced significant shifts and changes to the world’s geopolitics (end of bipolarism and establishment of the new-world order), nature of the international system, and domestic political setting of many countries all over the globe. Bipolar competition disappeared, the world became dominated (at least for some time) by a single superpower – the United States (USA) – and many coun- tries fell into the abyss of civil war that was this time not fumed by the competing superpowers. Other states failed due to the end of financing from former superpow- ers and lack of balancing between these behemoths inside the civil conflicts taking place in the third world context. The world became globalized and interconnected via the emerging cyberspace and effects of the new regionalism as in the case of the establishment of the European Union (EU) that spread across most of the European continent or an appearance of the free trade areas (FTAs). New non-state actors that appeared in the new environment (violent non-state actors or nongovernmental organizations) often utilized the caveats in the states’ territoriality and functioning and gained prominence. From these examples, it is clear that the changes in the international structure are systemic and profound. Consequently, a large amount of debates regarding the nature of the post-Cold War world took place. From Fukuyama (1992) to Huntington (1997) to Giddens (1998), many authors attempted to portray the nature of the international system following the fall of bipolarism. This work, however, goes even further and claims that the changes not only disrupted the bipo- lar balance of power but that they challenge the Westphalian system as we know it. It might even seem that the structural limits that empowered the state to become the dominant and mutually reinforcing unit in the international system that established itself since the end of Middle Ages (Spruyt 1994, 180) might shift toward a new equilibrium that might not favor a global dominance of the sovereign state anymore. This development is following the process of power diffusion (Nye Jr. 2011, 113). It is claimed that the world is slowly turning to a new geopolitical setting – the neomedievalism. Nonetheless, as the grand theories mentioned above all failed to grasp the global landscape in totality, this work is not claiming that we can use a © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license 1 to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 B. Doboš, New Middle Ages, World-Systems Evolution and Global Futures, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58681-2_1