Table Of Content

New Combinations in Campylandra (Convallariaceae, Convallarieae) Minoru N. Tamura Botanical Gardens, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, 2000 kisaiehi, Katano-shi, Osaka 576-0004, Japan Liang Songyun (Liang Song-jun) Herbarium, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20 Nanxincum, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, People’s Republic of China Nicholas J. Turland Missouri Botanical Garden, P.0. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A. Abstract. Campylandra Baker was published in Campylandra from Tupistra Ker Gawler on the ba¬ 1875. Subsequently, various authors have either sis of its sessile leaves, presence of staminal fila¬ united it with Tupistra Ker Gawler (sometimes rec¬ ments, and a smaller stigma. On the other hand, ognizing it as a subgenus or section of Tupistra) or Bentham and Hooker (1883) regarded Campylan¬ maintained it as a separate genus. The present au¬ dra as no more than a variant of Tupistra with some¬ thors regard Campylandra as a separate genus on what more developed filaments and a more slender account of its having filaments only proximally (vs. style, and reduced Campylandra to synonymy un¬ almost wholly in Tupistra) adnate to the perianth der Tupistra. Later, Engler (1887, 1897), Clarke tube, anthers as high as or higher (vs. lower) than (1890), Krause (1930), Dandy (1933), Chun (1934), the stigma, a shorter style, and a 3-lobed (vs. pel¬ Hutchinson (1934), Handel-Mazzetti (1936), Hara tate to mushroom-shaped) stigma; this separation is et al. (1978), and Conran and Tamura (1998) all confirmed by molecular phylogenies. In preparation recognized Campylandra as an independent genus. for the accounts of genera in the Convallariaceae They evaluated it with varying circumscriptions, for Flora of China, Volume 24, it is therefore nec¬ but as having, for example, sessile leaves, bracts essary to transfer into Campylandra 12 species longer than the flowers, tepals frilled at the margin, hitherto treated under Tupistra, namely: T. annulata anthers positioned higher than or as high as the H. Li & J. L. Huang, T. chinensis Baker, T. delavayi stigma, presence of filaments and/or a small, tri- Franchet, T. emeiensis Z. Y. Zhu, T. ensifolia F. T. lobed stigma. However, Hooker (1892), Baillon Wang & Tang, T. jimhriata Handel-Mazzetti, T. jin- (1893), Franchet (1896), Wang and Liang (1976, shanensis Z. L. Yang & X. G. Luo. T. liangshanensis 1978), and Huang and Li (1990) all followed Ben¬ Z. Y. Zhu, T. lichuanensis Y. K. Yang, J. K. Wu & tham and Hooker (1883) in regarding Campylandra D. T. Peng, T. longipedunculata F. T. Wang & S. as congeneric with Tupistra. Among them, Franchet Yun Liang, T. verruculosa Q. H. Chen, and T. yun- (1896) and Huang and Li (1990) recognized Cam¬ pylandra at the ranks of section and subgenus, re¬ nanensis F. T. Wang & S. Yun Liang. It is also nec¬ spectively. essary to transfer two species originally described In the forthcoming Flora of China, Volume 24, under a related genus, Rohdea Roth, but later Liang and Tamura (in press) will treat Campylandra transferred to Tupistra: T. tui (F. T. Wang & Tang) and Tupistra as separate genera and stress the mor¬ F. T. Wang & S. Yun Liang (R. tui F. T. Wang & phological differences as follows: Tang) and T. urotepala (Handel-Mazzetti) F. T. Wang Campylandra: filaments proximally adnate to & Tang (R. urotepala Handel-Mazzetti). In addition perianth tube; anthers positioned as high as or to these transfers, Campylandra ensifolia is lecto- higher than stigma; style usually 0-1 mm, rarely to typified. 3.5 mm (C. fimbriata); stigma small, 3-lobed. Tupistra: filaments almost wholly adnate to peri¬ The genus Campylandra was originally de¬ anth tube; anthers positioned lower than stigma; scribed by Baker (1875: 582) with the single spe¬ style 4-12 mm, cylindric; stigma peltate to mush¬ cies C. aurantiaca Baker. Baker distinguished room-shaped, 2-7 mm in diameter, fleshy. Novon 10: 158-160. 2000. Volume 10, Number 2 Tamura et al. 159 2000 New Combinations in Campylandra According to Huang and Li (1990) and Huang Campylandra emeiensis (Z. Y. Zhu) M. N. Tamura, and Hong (1997), Campylandra has unimodal kar¬ S. Yun Liang & Turland, comb. nov. Basionym: yotypes, and ellipsoid or subspherical, monosulcate Tupistra emeiensis Z. Y. Zhu, Acta Bot. Yunnan. pollen grains with reticulate or perforate exine, 4: 271. 1982. TYPE: China. Sichuan: Emei whereas Tupistra has bimodal karyotypes (except in Shan, 1800-2500 m, 1 June 1976, D. Q. Li & T. nutans Wallich ex Lindley: unimodal), and Z. Y. Zhu 29 (holotype, EMA). spherical, inaperturate pollen grains with rugulose, verrucose, or gemmate exine. Thus the separation Campylandra ensifolia (F. T. Wang & Tang) M. of Campylandra and Tupistra is more or less sup¬ N. Tamura, S. Yun Liang & Turland, comb, ported by karyological and pollen morphological nov. Basionym: Tupistra ensifolia F. T. Wang & data, although comprehensive karyological and pol¬ Tang, Bull. Fan Mem. Inst. Biol. 7: 86. 1936. len morphological studies are needed to confirm TYPE: China. Yunnan: “Plant of 6-18 inches. this. The separation of the two genera has also been Flowers brown and green, strongly fragrant. supported by molecular phylogenies based on both Moist shady situations amongst rocks in side trnK (including matK) and rbcL genes (Yamashita valleys on hills to east of Tengyueh, Lat. 25°N., & Tamura, in press). At the present stage, we con¬ alt. 6-7000 ft.,” June 1912 (fl), G. Forrest sider that separation is better than inclusion of 8455 (lectotype here designated, K). Campylandra within Tupistra. However, the de¬ Wang and Tang cited two syntypes: the flowering tailed relationship of species and consequent ge¬ specimen cited above (as “type”) and the following neric circumscription of Campylandra, Gonioscy- specimen (as “fruit type”): China. Yunnan: “Shang- pha Baker, Rohdea, Tricalistra Ridley, and Tupistra pa,” 2000 m, 21 Oct. 1934 (fr), H. T. Tsai 58892 should be reexamined in the future. In the present (PE). The latter specimen was preserved in the her¬ paper, we propose the following 14 new combina¬ barium of the Fan Memorial Institute of Biology, tions in Campylandra for the treatment in Flora of Peiping (Beijing), which has since been transferred China, Volume 24. These species were hitherto to KUN, NAS, and PE. The specimen at Kew has treated under Tupistra, but agree with Campylandra two inflorescences and is here chosen as the lec¬ as defined here. Two of them were originally de¬ totype because flowering material is more useful scribed under a related genus. Rohdea Roth, but diagnostically than fruiting material. were transferred to Tupistra in Wang and Liang (1978). The key to genera, generic descriptions, Campylandra fhnbriata (Handel-Mazzetti) M. N. key to species, and specific descriptions of both Tamura, S. Yun Liang & Turland, comb. nov. Campylandra and Tupistra will be provided in the Basionym: Tupistra fimbriata Handel-Mazzetti, Flora. Anz. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Matb.-Naturwiss. Kl. 59: 253. 1922. TYPE: China. Yunnan: “In plu- Campylandra annulata (H. Li & J. L. Huang) M. viisilva frondosa calide temperata juxta vicum N. Tamura, S. Yun Liang & Turland, comb, Bahan in convalle fluvii Salween, 27°58'[N],” nov. Basionym: Tupistra annulata H. Li & J. ca. 2600 m, 20 June 1916, Handel-Mazzetti L. Huang, Acta Bot. Yunnan., Suppl. 3: 51. 8804 (holotype, W). 1990. TYPE: China. Yunnan: “Cultus in Horto Botanico Kunming. Locus exactus sine cogni- Campylandra jinshanensis (Z. L. Yang & X. G. tus,” D. Y. Xia 49 (holotype, KUN). Luo) M. N. Tamura, S. Yun Liang & Turland, comb. nov. Basionym: Tupistra jinshanensis Z. Campylandra chinensis (Baker) M. N. Tamura, S. L. Yang & X. G. Luo, Acta Bot. Yunnan. 6: Yun Liang & Turland, comb. nov. Basionym: 389. 1984. TYPE: China. Sichuan: cultivated Tupistra chinensis Baker, Hooker’s Icon. PI. 19: in garden of Sichuan School of Chinese Ma¬ t. 1867. 1889. TYPE: China. Hubei: “Patung teria Medica, 450 m, 12 Apr. 1983, X. G. Luo [Badong] district,” Henry 5023 (holotype, K). & Z. L. Yang 483053 (holotype, EMA). Campylandra delavayi (Franchet) M. N. Tamura, Campylandra liangshanensis (Z. Y. Zhu) M. N. S. Yun Liang & Turland, comb. nov. Basionym: Tamura, S. Yun Liang & Turland, comb. nov. Tupistra delavayi Franchet, Bull. Soc. Bot. Basionym: Tupistra liangshanensis Z. Y. Zhu, France 43: 40. 1896. TYPE: China. Yunnan: in Z. Y. Zhu & J. L. Zhang, Acta Phytotax. “dans le bois & Outchay, prfes de Ta kouen,” Sin. 19: 521. 1981. TYPE: China. Sichuan: Delavay s.n. (syntype, P). Hubei: [without lo¬ Puge, 2500 m, 12 Nov. 1978, D. Q. Li & Z. cality], Henry 5231A (syntype, P). Y. Zhu 837 (holotype, EMA). 160 Novon Cainpylandra lichuanensis (Y. k. Yang, J. K. Wu FI. Reipubl. Popularis Sin. 15: 249. 1978. & D. T. Peng) M. N. Tamura, S. Yun Liang & TYPE: China. Yunnan: “Chao-tung,” //. T. Tsai Turland, comb. nov. Basionym: Tupistra lichu- 50880 (holotype, PE). anensis Y. K. Yang, J. K. Wu & D. T. Peng, J. Acknowledgment. We thank Anthony R. Brach Wuhan Bot. Res. 9: 40. 1991. TYPE: China. (MO c/o Harvard) for help in locating literature. Hubei: Lichuan County, “Che-Le, San-jiao, Yi- Zu,” 1100 m, 10 Apr. 1987, D. T. Peng 0631 Literature Cited (holotype, CPU; isotype, LCDH). Baillon, M. H. 1893. Les plantes allides aux Tupistra (suite). Bull. Mens. Soc. Linn. Paris 2: 1113—1117. Cainpylandra longipedunculata (F. T. Wang & Baker, J. G. 1875. Revision of the genera and species of S. Yun Liang) M. N. Tamura, S. Yun Liang & Asparagaceae. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 14: 508—632. Turland, comb. nov. Basionym: Tupistra lon- Bentham, G. & J. I). Hooker. 1883. Genera Plantarum. 3. L. Reeve, Williams & Norgate, London. gipedunculata F. T. Wang & S. Yun Liang, in Chun, W. Y. 1934. Contributions to the flora of kwangtung F. T. Wang & Tang, FI. Reipubl. Popularis Sin. and South-Eastern China (1). Sunyatsenia 1: 209—316. 15: 249. 1978. TYPE: China. Yunnan: “Tsin- Clarke, C. B. 1890. On the plants of kohima and Muney- hung,” C. W. Wang 75985 (holotype, PE). pore. J. Linn. Soc., Bot. 25: 1-155. Conran, J. G. & M. N. Tamura. 1998. Convallariaceae. Pp. 186-198 in: k. kubitzki (editor). The Families and Cainpylandra tui (F. T. Wang & Tang) M. N. Ta¬ Genera of Vascular Plants, 3. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. mura, S. Yun Liang & Turland, comb. nov. Dandy, J. E. 1933. A new liliaceous plant from kwang¬ Basionym: Rohdea tui F. T. Wrang & Tang, Bull. tung. Sunyatsenia 1: 127. Fan Mem. Inst. Biol. 7: 284. 1937. Tupistra tui Engler, A. 1887. Liliaceae—Asparagoideae—Convallarieae. Pp. 81-83 in: A. Engler & k. Prantl (editors). Die na- (F. T. Wang & Tang) F. T. Wang & S. Yun ttirlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2(5). Verlag von Wilhelm Liang, in F. T. Wang & Tang, FI. Reipubl. Po¬ Engelmann. Leipzig. pularis Sin. 15: 14. 1978. TYPE: China. Si¬ -. 1897. Liliaceae. Pp. 71—77 in: A. Engler & k. chuan: “Pao-hsing Hsien [Baoxing Xian], Prantl (editors). Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Nachtrage 1. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. Teng-chih-kou,” 2460 m, 22 June 1933, T. H. Franchet. M. A. 1896. Note sur Quelques Liliac^es de la Tu 4256 (holotype, PE). Chine Occidentale. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 43 : 37—48. The holotype specimen was preserved in the her¬ Handel-Mazzetti, H. 1936. Symbolae Sinicae, 7. Verlag von Julius Springer, Wien. barium of the Fan Memorial Institute of Biology, Hara. 1L. W. T. Steam & L. H. J. Williams. 1978. An Peiping (Beijing), which has since been transferred Enumeration of the Flowering Plants of Nepal, 1. Trust¬ to KUN, NAS, and PE. ees of British Museum (Natural History), London. Hooker, J. I). 1892. Flora of British India. 6. L. Reeve, Cainpylandra urotcpala (Handel-Mazzetti) M. N. London. Tamura, S. Yun Liang & Turland, comb. nov. Huang, J. L. & D. Y. Hong. 1997. Pollen morphology in the subtribe Aspidistriuae (Liliaceae, s.l.). Acta Phyto¬ Basionym: Rohdea urotepala Handel-Mazzetti, tax. Sin. 35: 117—124, pi. 1—5. Anz. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. -& H. Li. 1990. Study on the taxonomic system of 57: 272. 1920. Tupistra urotepala (Handel- the genus Tupistra. Acta Bot. Yunnan., Suppl. 3: 49— Mazzetti) F. T. Wang & Tang, FI. Reipubl. Po¬ 61. pularis Sin. 15: 14. 1978. TYPE: China. Si¬ Hutchinson, J. 1934. The Families of Flowering Plants, 2. Macmillan, London. chuan: “in saltu profundo tergi Soso-liangdse,” krause, k. 1930. Liliaceae. Pp. 227—386 in: A. Engler & ca. 2700 m, 25 Apr. 1914, Handel-Mazzetti k. Prantl (editors), Die natiirlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 1733 (holotype, W). ed. 2, 15a. Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig. Liang, S. Y. & M. N. Tamura. In press. Campylandra Bak¬ er and Tupistra ker Gawler. In Z. Y. Wu & P. H. Raven Cainpylandra verruculosa (Q. H. Chen) M. N. Ta¬ (editors). Flora of China, 24. Science Press. Beijing & mura, S. Yun Liang & Turland, comb. nov. Bas¬ Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis. ionym: Tupistra verruculosa Q. H. Chen, Acta Wang, F. T. & S. Y. Liang. 1976. Tupistra. Pp. 493-497, Phytotax. Sin. 25: 69. 1987. TYPE: China. 927—928 in: Beijing Institute of Botany, Academia Sin- ica (editor), Iconographia Cormophytorum Sinicorum 5. Guizhou: Pingtang, Bairu, 700 m, 13 May 1982, Science Press, Beijing. Q. //. Chen & J. D. Liu 1328 (holotype, HGAS). -&-. 1978. Tupistra ker-Gawl. Pp. 6—16 in F. T. Wang & T. Tang (editors), Flora Reipublicae Po¬ Cainpylandra yunnanensis (F. T. Wang & S. Yun pularis Sinicae, 15. Science Press, Beijing. Yamashita, J. & M. N. Tamura. In press. Molecular phy- Liang) M. N. Tamura, S. Yun Liang & Turland, logeny of the Convallariaceae (Asparagales). In: k. Wil¬ comb. nov. Basionym: Tupistra yunnanensis F. son & D. Morrison (editors). Proceedings of the Mono- T. Wang & S. Yun Liang, in F. T. Wang & Tang, cots II and Grasses III Conference. CSIRO, Sydney.